Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1397236
This article is part of the Research Topic Toxicity Mechanisms of Environmental Pollutants and Health Risk Assessment View all 9 articles

Insights into uncovered Public Health risks. The case of Asthma attacks among archival workers: a cross-sectional study

Provisionally accepted
Liu Yang Liu Yang 1Chen Xinting Chen Xinting 2Zhang Aie Zhang Aie 3Xu Ruiqi Xu Ruiqi 2Paulo Moreira Paulo Moreira 4,5,6*Dou Mei Dou Mei 2,7
  • 1 Shandong Provincial Chronic Disease Hospital, Qingdao, Human, China, Qingdao, China
  • 2 School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
  • 4 Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, International Healthcare Management Research and Development Centre), Jinan, China
  • 5 Henan Normal University, School of Social Affairs, Henan, China, Xinxiang, China
  • 6 Atlantica Instituto Universitario, Gestao em Saude, Oeiras, Portugal
  • 7 Qingdao University Archives, Qingdao, Human, China, Qingdao, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of asthma attacks among archivists and identify the associated occupational factors in this understudied professional population. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study among 1002 archival workers. A multiple logistic regression was conducted to identify the association between asthma attacks and occupational exposures. The Strobe Protocol was applied. Results: 999 workers were included in the final analysis with the asthma prevalence of 33.3%. Main factors associated with asthma attacks (OR [95% CI]) were the presence of chemically irritating odors (2.152 [1.532-3.024]), mold odors (1.747 [1.148-2.658]), and insects (1.409[1.041-1.907]). A significant synergistic effect was observed between chemical irritants and mold, the odds ratio was 7.098 (95% CI:4.752 -10.603). Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of asthma attacks among archival workers, an under-studied population. Chemical irritants, molds and insects were associated with their asthma attacks. Notably, this study's data analysis has revealed a strong synergy (OR=7.098) between chemical odors and molds in the workplace. While the existing international literature on this specific interaction remains somewhat limited, previous studies have already demonstrated the potential for chemical irritants, such as sulfur dioxide and ozone, to synergistically interact with inhalable allergens, including fungi, molds and dust mites. Consequently, this interaction seems to exacerbate asthma symptoms and perpetuate untreated exposure. Furthermore, in damp and damaged buildings, the presence of microbial components, such as cellular debris or spores released during fungal growth can trigger an inflammatory response, potentially served as a shared pathway for the development of asthma among individuals exposed to these hazardous factors.

    Keywords: Public Health, asthma attacks, Archival workers, Chemical irritants, Molds

    Received: 07 Mar 2024; Accepted: 22 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yang, Xinting, Aie, Ruiqi, Moreira and Mei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Paulo Moreira, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, International Healthcare Management Research and Development Centre), Jinan, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.