The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394118
This article is part of the Research Topic World Health Day 2024: Frontiers in Public Health presents: "My Health, My Right" View all 6 articles
One Health Index Applied to countries of South American
Provisionally accepted- 1 Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil
- 2 Prefeitura Municipal de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
- 3 Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
The One Health concept has proposed an integrated and unified approach, aiming health balance and enhancement by recognizing the interdependence of human, animal, and environmental health.The COVID-19 pandemic has pushed global One Health initiatives and policy improvement toward preventive measures for future pandemics, particularly of zoonotic origin. Such scenario may be particularly relevant for South America, considered highly vulnerable due to natural biodiversity superposed to socioeconomical and environmental issues, demanding effective methods and indicators for proper One Health strategies and goals, aligned to macroregional contexts. Accordingly, the present study has aimed to assess the One Health Index (OHI) in South American countries, along with potential interactions with socioeconomical indicators. Results obtained by Clustering Analysis and Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) have revealed a positive association between OHI and Human Development Index (HDI), but not with Gross Domestic Product (GDP).Although South American countries with political stability, robust investment in health and progressist policies have shown a higher OHI, better environmental health was not associated to better human and animal health. In addition, although the Amazon biome (which overlaps 9/12 South American countries) had a positive impact to environmental health, such contribution contrasted to rudimentary local human health systems and may highlight the complexity of One Health within the South American context. Lack of stronger indicators for animal health was also considered an important weaking point for a true OHI assessment. Nonetheless, countries with more developed livestock have presented better animal health, which may not reflect an overall animal health indicator, as companion and wildlife animal health indicators were not available. Although lower (within-country) scale analysis such as states and metropolitan areas may better shape internal differences, the study herein has clearly shown One Health inequalities and challenges among South American countries. As important, forests and other natural areas of developing (particularly Amazon Forest) countries should receive incentives for sustainable economic growth, preventing the sacrifice of environmental health in benefit of human and livestock animal health.
Keywords: health indicators, Socioeconomical factors, Ecosystemic services, Livestock, Political stability
Received: 01 Mar 2024; Accepted: 26 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Sibim, Chiba De Castro, Kmetiuk and Biondo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Alexander W. Biondo, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.