Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Occupational Health and Safety
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1388996
This article is part of the Research Topic The Interaction between the Organizational Health Culture and Workers' Healthy Behaviors View all articles

Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behaviorusing the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021

Provisionally accepted
Jana Soeder Jana Soeder 1*Anke Wagner Anke Wagner 1Anna T. Neunhöffer Anna T. Neunhöffer 1Peter Martus Peter Martus 2Falko Papenfuss Falko Papenfuss 3Andrea Wittich Andrea Wittich 4Juliane Schwille-Kiuntke Juliane Schwille-Kiuntke 1Esther Rind Esther Rind 1Monika A. Rieger Monika A. Rieger 1
  • 1 Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
  • 2 Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 3 Robert Bosch (Germany), Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 4 Independent researcher, Tübingen, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: During the communicable coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, organizational infection control measures (oICM) were introduced in the workplace. The employees’ positive attitudes and active participation are relevant for full effectiveness regarding disease prevention. Therefore, we explore changes in employees’ attitudes toward oICM at work from Aug-Oct 2020 (T0) over January 2021 (T1) to Oct-Nov 2021 (T2). We further investigate the role an organization can play in supporting health-related preventive behavior. Methods: We considered repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal panel survey data from 5,554 employees of a global supplier of technology and services in Germany. 16 items constitute the attitude scores toward oICM (5-point Likert scale). Via mixed-effect model, aspects associated with employees’ attitudes toward oICM were explored. Via ‘extreme-group’-approach, we compared the 20% of participants with the largest changes into less favorable to the 20% with the largest changes into more favorable attitudes toward oICM over time. Results: The overall positive attitudes toward work-related oICM were more favorable at T1 (mean±SD: 4.2±0.6, median (IQR): 4.3 (0.8), n=2515) compared to T0 (4.1±0.6, 4.1 (0.8), n=2417) but less favorable at T2 (3.9±0.7, 4.0 (0.9), n=2062). Among others, feeling well-informed about possible work-related risks of infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), perceived psychosocial demands through work environment aspects, and perceived management’s commitment to safety and health were associated with long-term positive attitudes toward oICM. Individuals developing more favorable attitudes toward oICM reported feeling well-informed about possible work-related SARS-CoV-2-infection risks and improved COVID-19-specific resilience over time. Individuals developing less favorable attitudes toward oICM reported decreased perceptions of COVID-19-associated risks. Conclusion: oICM in the workplace were perceived appropriate even after COVID-19 vaccines were widely available and although the perceived affective risks about SARS-CoV-2 decreased. Taken together, our findings highlight how organizations can support employees in adopting health-related preventive behavior. Among others, we found that feeling well-informed about possible work-related health risks was positively associated with long-term favorable attitudes toward work-related oICM. We expect that the results contribute to the development of interventions to prepare and adapt to future global public health concerns.

    Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Occupational safety and health, Workplace, working condition, Health Promotion, Health culture, Attitude

    Received: 20 Feb 2024; Accepted: 02 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Soeder, Wagner, Neunhöffer, Martus, Papenfuss, Wittich, Schwille-Kiuntke, Rind and Rieger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Jana Soeder, Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.