Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373591

Variations in health literacy and influential factors affecting the categories of social support among rural patients with diabetes mellitus

Provisionally accepted
Xin Zhang Xin Zhang 1Yan-Ping Zhang Yan-Ping Zhang 2Lin Zeng Lin Zeng 1Xiang Li Xiang Li 3Jia-Xia Han Jia-Xia Han 2Gui-Fen Fu Gui-Fen Fu 4*Chao-Qun Bai Chao-Qun Bai 2Xiao-Xue Lei Xiao-Xue Lei 2
  • 1 Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangx, China
  • 2 Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences and the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
  • 3 People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Region, China
  • 4 Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Museum, Nanning, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the inherent classification of social support among individuals residing in rural areas of China. Additionally, we aim to examine the attributes and variations in health literacy scores among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) within diverse social support categories. Design: Cross-sectional study Methods: Employing the multi-stage stratified sampling technique, we enrolled 2,178 patients diagnosed with DM residing in the rural regions of Guangxi Province. We utilized the General Information Questionnaire, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Instrument. Results: The rural patients with DM were categorized into four distinct groups based on the types and levels of their underlying social support. These groups included a low-level social support utilization group (43%), a low-level objective social support group (17%), a moderate-level social support group (20%), and a high-level social support and high-level utilization group (20%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, disease duration, and blood sugar control level (p < 0.05). Furthermore, health literacy scores and scores across various dimensions for rural patients with DM demonstrated variability in accordance with latent profiles of social support, with statistically significant differences observed (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was identified between the level of social support and all dimensions of health literacy among rural patients with DM (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The social support available to individuals with DM in rural settings can be categorized into four distinct types, and its manifestation is influenced by demographic factors. The health literacy of rural patients with DM is intricately linked to the extent of social support they receive. For enhanced outcomes, interventions targeted at enhancing health literacy and quality of life among rural patients with DM should be tailored to address the heterogeneity observed in latent profiles of social support.

    Keywords: Health Literacy, Latent profile analysis (LPA), social support, Diabetes mellitus (DM), Rural areas of China

    Received: 20 Jan 2024; Accepted: 14 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Zhang, Zeng, Li, Han, Fu, Bai and Lei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Gui-Fen Fu, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Museum, Nanning, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.