The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358834
Is India on a path to reduce tobacco industry influence in tobacco control? findings from the global tobacco industry interference index for 2019-2023
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, Haryana, India
- 2 University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- 3 Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
- 4 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, Haryana, India
- 5 Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
- 6 Panjab University, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
The tobacco industry (TI), driven by profit motives, consistently conceals health risks through deceptive strategies, notably in countries like India. These tactics create vulnerabilities hindering effective tobacco control measures and enabling the TI to exploit legal gaps.Understanding these TI strategies is essential for policy makers to take appropriate preventive and corrective measures in order to limit Tobacco Industry Interference (TII) in policy making.The study aims at understanding the trend of TII in India between 2019-2023. The secondary data from Global Tobacco Industry Interference report, consisting of seven major domains of TII index viz. policy participation, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities, industry benefits, unnecessary interaction, transparency, conflict of interest, and preventive measures, was retrieved. A composite score was obtained after adding scores of different domains, for each year. The study's findings demonstrated an initial improvement in India's implementation of WHO FCTC article 5.3, as evidenced by a decreasing score between 2019 and 2021.However, this trend halted in 2023, with data showing a slight increase in the score. When compared with other Asian countries, India show marginal improvement in score than Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Thailand and south Korea. Some of the countries in the region including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Brunei, China and Vietnam experienced a decline in TII. There has been rise in CSR activities, forms of un-necessary interactions of TII with policy makers and participation in policy development; however, improvements are observed in providing benefits to tobacco industry, conflict of interest, and preventive measures. In order to fortify the regulatory framework, it is imperative to create awareness among stakeholders on conflict of interest, denormalize Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives by the tobacco industry, provision of a watchdog for TII in the country and 'whole of government' approach in implementation of FCTC Article 5.3.
Keywords: Tobacco Industry, WHO FCTC Article 5.3, Global Tobacco Industry Interference, India, policy
Received: 20 Dec 2023; Accepted: 26 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Goel, Walia, Bhojani, Bhatnagar and Chopra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sonu Goel, Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, Haryana, India
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.