Mogeda El Sayed El Keshky1*
Enas ObaidAllah Sarour2- 1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- 2Human Sciences and Design, Family Sciences Dept., King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Background: Researchers and practitioners are concerned with the impact of work-family conflict on the well-being of workers, including those in the health care sector, and previous research suggested that nurses were experiencing a range of negative outcomes.
Aim: To investigate the potentially mediating role of self-compassion and moderating role of gratitude in the relationships between work-family conflict and both life satisfaction and happiness among Saudi nurses.
Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 368 nurses (men age = 35.18, SD = 6.67, 70.65% of females). Nurses were recruited via social media using convenience sampling techniques. They completed the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Subjective Happiness Scale, the Gratitude Questionnaire–6, the Self-Compassion Scale, and the Work-Family Conflict Scale, as well as a set of demographic questions. The data were analyzed using PROCESS MACRO model 4 and 8, and the reporting followed STROBE checklist.
Results: As expected, the study found a negative relationship between work-family conflict and both life satisfaction and happiness. These relationships were mediated by self-compassion. For the relationships between work-family conflict and life satisfaction and happiness, and between family-work conflict and happiness, this mediation was moderated by gratitude.
Conclusion: This study built on positive psychology and demonstrated that the positive personality traits of self-compassion and gratitude can engender enhanced life satisfaction and happiness among Saudi nurses.
1 Introduction
Researchers and workplace organizations have been concerned with the interference between work and family roles for quite some time. It is challenging for workers to achieve a balance between work and family responsibilities (1), which may produce work-family conflict. It has been well-established by prior research that work-family conflict is a threat to the well-being of workers. Many studies have reported direct and indirect negative relationships of work-family conflict with life satisfaction (2–4) (5–8). Prior research has reported additional negative effects of work-family conflict on workers, including burnout (9), physical health problems (10) (11), and psychological issues (12) (13; 11).
Nurses deal with more and greater challenges than many other workers, such as long periods of shift work, heavy workload, and a great deal of pressure (14–16), which may make them more prone to work-family conflict. In studies among nurses, Burke and Greenglass (17), (18), and (19) all reported that work-family conflict was associated with negative well-being effects. Different negative experiences have been reported in Saudi nurses in previous research. Turnover in Saudi nurses were estimated at a rate of 20%, which is higher than other countries such as England (20). In a region of Saudi Arabia, it was reported that nurses had decreased job satisfaction, and a 40% rate of turnover was reported in the study (21). Another study found that Saudi nurses had moderate levels of quality of life (22). It is therefore important to investigate factors that can mitigate this distress among nurses.
Recent research suggests that positive psychology constructs may protect nurses from this distress. A meta-analysis on positive psychology interventions among nurses concluded that mindfulness interventions reduced anxiety among nurses (23). Among healthcare workers, it was reported that mindfulness positively impacted on job satisfaction (24). Another quasi-experimental study reported that nursing students benefited from an empathy intervention program during internship (25). Further, positive psychology constructs, such as hope, resilience, and optimism were found to protect nurses from distress (26). People with high levels of self-compassion used emotion regulation strategies better (27). Self-compassionate people are open to experiences of pain and distress and approach them with self-kindness (28). Further, self-compassion makes people aware of their negative experiences, and they get to acknowledge that other people have these experiences too (29). This means that when self-compassionate individuals experience work-family conflicts, they deal with the situation by being compassionate to themselves, which enhances resilience and well-being.
According to the Socioecological Theory (30), the intersection between individual and contextual variables exerts an influence on behavioral and prosocial outcomes of people. As such, when work-family conflicts impact on the well-being of people through self-compassion, individual variables such as gratitude may be playing a role as well. Grateful individuals have higher odds of experiencing frequent and intense emotions and positive perspectives of their environment, which helps achieve better well-being (31).
Given the links between work-family conflict and negative individual and organizational outcomes, researchers have been concerned with policies, interventions, and practices that can improve workers’ well-being (7, 32, 33). Many of these interventions and programs target the organizational level (34), and interventions for individuals have received comparatively little attention. If indeed workplace organizations do not invest in programs that improve employees’ individual well-being, it is important for workers themselves to find ways to improve their sense of well-being. Positive psychology asserts that there are personal psychological traits and resources that can buffer individuals from negative or stressful circumstances and promote enhanced well-being, and gratitude and self-compassion occupy a central role in these discussions (29, 35). This notion can be applied to reducing work-family conflict (36).
Although previous research has established a negative relationship between work-family conflict and the well-being of workers (7, 37, 38), potential mediating and moderating mechanisms are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to construct a moderated mediation model according to Hayes (39) in order to test the mediation role of self-compassion and the moderating role of gratitude in the relationship between work-family conflict and happiness and life satisfaction among nurses in Saudi Arabia.
2 Literature review
2.1 Work-family conflict, life satisfaction, and happiness
As women increasingly enter the labor market while maintaining family and household responsibilities, the incidence of work-family conflict may increase for female workers (40) and indeed for both male and female workers when partners both work and share responsibility for family care-giving (41). In Saudi Arabia, the Brookings Institution estimated an increase of 20 to 33% of women entering the workplace in 2021 (42). Balancing family life and work life has, therefore, been increasingly challenging in Saudi Arabia. This is especially true for nurses whose jobs entail psychological and physical demands associated with heavy workloads, attention to multiple patients, and the need to display positive emotions regardless of their mood (43).
The notion of work-family conflict originates in role theory (44) and the role strain hypothesis (45). Conflict can exist in both directions, work responsibilities interfering with family life (that is, work-family conflict, or WFC) and family responsibilities interfering with work life (family-work conflict, or FWC) (46). Among nurses, it was revealed that work-family conflict acted as a path through which toxic leadership impacted on distress of the nurses (47). To capture a fuller understanding of the interference between work and family responsibilities, researchers have suggested examining both WFC and FWC (33, 48).
As established earlier, WFC has been shown to be a critical factor impacting life satisfaction. Tang et al. (38) reported its negative impact on workers’ happiness, as well. FWC has also been negatively associated with life satisfaction (37) and happiness (49). Studies have highlighted the negative impacts of work-family conflict on nurses’ well-being in particular: WFC has been positively associated with nurses’ turnover intentions (50), job stress (51), and anxiety and depression (52). A negative relationship was also found among nurses between work-family conflict and both life satisfaction (53–55) and job satisfaction (56). Accordingly, the first hypothesis of this study is as follows:
Hypothesis 1: WFC and FWC will be negatively associated with life satisfaction and happiness.
2.2 The mediating role of self-compassion
The aforementioned research notwithstanding, there have been studies that found no relationship between work-family conflict and life satisfaction (57, 58), which suggests that there may be other pathways through which WFC impacts life satisfaction. Indeed, Taşdelen-Karçkay and Bakalım (54) found a mediating effect of work-life balance in this relationship. This relationship was also reported to be mediated by emotional exhaustion (60) and coping strategies (61). Others have also reported a mediation role of emotional exhaustion in the relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction, a construct that is related to life satisfaction among workers (62). However, there have been no studies that investigated the mediation role of self-compassion.
Self-compassion is a positive personality trait that involves treating oneself with a sense of care and kindness rather than self-criticism, especially in the face of adversity and failures (29, 63). Neff (64) adds that self-compassion includes cultivating a sense of connectedness with others rather than of isolation, and a mindful practice of not overly self-identifying with one’s painful thoughts and feelings (64). Self-compassion has been found to benefit individuals’ well-being (65). Self-compassion is linked to adaptive functioning, especially in times of loss, failure, and stress (66). (67) reported that self-compassion is correlated with positive mental health outcomes, such as less depression and anxiety and greater life satisfaction. Neff and Faso (68) reported a positive relationship between self-compassion and well-being in parents of children with autism. And (69) found a negative relationship between self-compassion and work-family interference.
It has been argued that self-compassion protects people when a negative situation is beyond their control or even when they are responsible for the negative circumstances (66); thus, nurses who are self-compassionate may be less affected by work-family conflict regardless of the situation. In previous research specifically with nurses, it was reported that self-compassion was positively associated with job satisfaction and negatively related to burnout (70). Further, self-compassion was an important predictor of relationship satisfaction and conflict resolution (71) and family functioning (72) among nurses. The study’s second set of hypotheses is as follows:
Hypothesis 2a: Self-compassion will negatively mediate the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 2b: Self-compassion will negatively mediate the relationship between WFC and happiness.
Hypothesis 2c: Self-compassion will negatively mediate the relationship between FWC and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 2d: Self-compassion will negatively mediate the relationship between FWC and happiness.
2.3 The moderating role of gratitude
Gratitude is the emotion or state of being thankful. In one sense, it can be defined as the emotion that people feel when they receive something that they perceive as valuable, altruistic, or even costly (73), and more broadly can be defined as an attitude or disposition by which one notices and appreciates positive experiences and achievements (74, 75). The broaden-and-build theory (76) posits that positive emotions, including gratitude, help individuals’ build enduring personal physical, intellectual, and psychological resources. It has been postulated that people with high levels of gratitude experience more frequently and intensely positive emotions and use positive coping mechanisms, which enhance their mental well-being (31, 75, 77). Others have claimed that gratitude leads people to interpret other people’s behaviors in a positive way, perceive other people as supportive and available, which benefits both parties (74, 75, 78). Randolph (79) posited that expressing gratitude is essential for nurses to cope with the challenges of work and to enhance family relationships. Prior research has reported that gratitude increased happiness (80), resilience, job satisfaction, and a healthy work environment among nurses (81). Further, gratitude was claimed as beneficial at workplace. In a sample of 411 employees, Mahipalan and Garg (82) reported that gratitude moderated the relationship between workplace bullying and psychological capital of employees. A study involving 112 female employees in India found that gratitude was linked to family enrichment (83), and to spiritual well-being and distress (84). In a sample of healthcare employees in India, Garg et al. (85) concluded that gratitude moderated the relationship between workplace toxicity and turnover intentions. Gratitude was also related to vitality with a mediation of resilience (86). Gratitude was also reported as a moderator in the relationship between teasing and depression (87). Among nurses, gratitude was reported to mitigate the negative impacts of FWC on work engagement (88). Parallelly, it was claimed in previous research that the relationship between self-compassion and happiness was moderated by gratitude (89). Therefore, it is possible that the mediation effect of self-compassion may be different at different levels of gratitude. Accordingly, the third set of hypotheses for our study was as follows:
Hypothesis 3a: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between WFC and self-compassion.
Hypothesis 3b: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 3c: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between WFC and happiness.
Hypothesis 3d: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between FWC and self-compassion.
Hypothesis 3e: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between FWC and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 3f: Gratitude will moderate the relationship between FWC and happiness.
3 Method
3.1 Sample and procedure
Nurses were recruited via social media using convenience sampling techniques. The design of this study is cross-sectional. The questionnaire was sent to respondents via email, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter. Nurses were approached through their hospitals whose managers provided their emails; nurses were then asked to send the link of the questionnaire to other nurses they knew via different media platforms. The data were collected from December 10, 2022 to January 28, 2023 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A total number of 425 participants returned the completed survey, but only 368 surveys without missing data were used in the study. The mean age of the surveyed nurses was 35.18 with a standard deviation of 6.67. 70.65% were female, 28.2% were single, 65% were married, 5.7% divorced, and 1.1% widowed. About 34.2% had a diploma degree, 8.7% had a diploma after university degree, 52.7% had a university degree, 3.8% had a master’s degree, and 0.6% possessed a doctorate. Around 83.4% were working in the government sector, 3.6% in a semi-government sector, and 13% were working in the private sector. Around 90.2% were full-time workers, 2.7% part-time, and 7.1% were working irregular hours. About 5.2% had less than 1 year of experience, 5.7% had 1 to 3 years of experience, 16.3% 3 to 6 years, 16% between 6 and 9 years, 21.2% between 9 and 12 years, 13% between 12 and 15 years, and 22.6% had more than 15 years of experience. Around 8.7% had monthly income of less than 5,000 RS (Saudi Riyal), 31.2% had income between 5,000 and 9,000 SR, 31.5% between 9,000 and 13,000 SR, 17.4% between 13,000 and 17,000 SR, 5.4% between 17,000 and 21,000, 4% between 21,000 and 25,000, and 1.6% had monthly income greater than 25,000 SR. Finally, 62% were Saudi citizens, 22.8% were residents from non-Arab countries, and 15.2% were residents from other Arab countries.
3.2 Measures
Study participants completed questionnaires which included a set of demographic questions as well as the Satisfaction with Life Scale (90), the Subjective Happiness Scale (91), the Gratitude Questionnaire–6 (GQ-6) (74), the Self-Compassion Scale (92), and the Work-Family Conflict Scale (93).
3.2.1 The satisfaction with life scale
This is a five-item measure for self-evaluations of overall satisfaction with one’s life. This scale is measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) for each item (90). Thus, total scores range from 5 to 35. In this study, the scale exhibited a good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.85).
3.2.2 The subjective happiness scale
This measure consisted of four-item measure scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Each item presents the respondent with a sentence fragment and two polar characterizations that complete the sentence. Respondents select a number from 1 to 7 to indicate the extent to which the characterizations describe themselves.
Total scores for the Subjective Happiness Scale range from 4 to 28 (91). In this study, the scale had adequate internal consistency reliability (α = 0.65).
3.2.3 The gratitude questionnaire–6
This is a six-item scale that measures respondents’ self-evaluations of gratitude. Each item of the scale is scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Thus, total scores range from 6 to 42. Items 3and 6 are reversely scored (74). This scale exhibited good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.73).
3.2.4 The self-compassion scale
This scale consisted of 12-item instrument designed to measure how compassionate people are with themselves and is score on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always) for each item. Total scores range from 12 to 60 (92). This scale exhibited an acceptable internal consistency reliability (α = 0.74).
3.2.5 The work-family conflict scale
This is a short instrument comprised of two related subscales with five items each: the work-to-family conflict subscale (WFC) and the family-to-work conflict subscale (FWC). Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging between 1 (very strongly disagree) and 7 (very strongly agree). The total scores for each subscale range between 5 and 35 (93). The scale exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability with (α = 0.82 for WFC and α = 0.79 for FWC).
3.3 Statistical analysis
All the data analyses were conducted using the RStudio software (94). For much of the analysis, an add-on software package called Process, developed by Hayes (39), was used. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations between the study variables were gathered first. Secondly, a mediation analysis was conducted using Model 4 of the Process software, and a moderated mediation analysis was performed using Process Model 8. We used 95% confidence intervals with 10,000 bootstrap samples. 95% confidence intervals that do not contain zero indicate statistically significant conditional indirect effects. The Process software also allows centering of variables that are part of the product terms, to set conditional effects for different levels of the moderator variables (mean-1SD, mean, and mean + 1SD), and to bootstrap results against violations of normality and homoscedasticity assumptions. It has been established by previous studies that age and gender were significantly associated with life satisfaction and happiness (95–97); therefore, we included these variables as covariates.
3.4 Ethics
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committees on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Approval for conducting this study was obtained from the ethics committee of Institutional Review Board of King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah in Saudi Arabia (No 343-253-1443). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
4 Results
4.1 Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations
The results of the descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlations are summarized in Table 1. The mean scores of participants on the scales were as follows: 24.15 for life satisfaction (SD = 6.48, range = 5–35), 31.7 for gratitude (SD = 5.75, range = 5–42), 20.09 for WFC (SD = 5.62, range = 5–35), 14.71 for FWC (SD = 7.14, range = 5–35), 41.73 for self-compassion (SD = 7.02, range = 12–60), and 19.31 for happiness (SD = 4.10, range = 4–28). As expected, life satisfaction was positively correlated with gratitude, self-compassion, and happiness, and negatively correlated with WFC and FWC. Happiness was positively correlated with life satisfaction, gratitude and self-compassion, and negatively correlated with WFC, and slightly with FWC. Finally, gratitude and self-compassion were positively correlated.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations between study variables.
4.2 Testing for the mediation model
To answer Hypothesis 1, that is, WFC and FWC will be negatively associated with life satisfaction and happiness, we used the mediation analysis module of the Process software package with gender and age as covariates. The results show that WFC was negatively associated with life satisfaction (β = −0.15, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.21 to −0.09]) and with happiness (β = −0.07, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.12 to −0.03]) in the absence of a mediator. FWC was similarly negatively related to life satisfaction (β = −0.16, p < 0.01, 95% CI [−0.22 to −0.11]) and happiness (β = −0.03, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.11 to −0.03]) in the absence of a mediator. Therefore, Hypothesis 1 was supported.
When the mediator was included, WFC was negatively associated with life satisfaction (β = −0.15, p < 0.01, 95% CI [−0.29 to −0.06]), but not with happiness. Similarly, FWC was negatively associated with life satisfaction (β = −0.17, p < 0.01, 95% CI [−0.25 to −0.07]) but not with happiness. Self-compassion was related to life satisfaction (β = 0.29, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.17 to 0.35]), happiness (β = 0.29, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.23 to 0.34]), WFC (β = −0.30, p < 0.001, 95% CI [−0.50 to −0.26]), and FWC (β = −0.31, p < 0.001, 95% CI [−0.40 to −0.21]). As shown in Table 2, these relationships were established in the presence of covariates.
Table 2. Mediation effects of work-family conflict on life satisfaction and happiness.
To test the mediation model, we used the bootstrap method and the results are summarized in Table 3. The indirect effect of self-compassion was −0.10 (95% CI = −0.13 to −0.04) on the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction, −0.08 (95% CI = −0.14 to −0.04) on the relationship between FWC and life satisfaction, −0.15 (95% CI = −0.21 to −0.09) on the relationship between WFC and happiness, and − 0.16 (95% CI = −0.22 to −0.10) on the relationship between FWC and happiness. None of these confidence intervals contained the value zero, which indicates that the indirect effects were statistically significant. Therefore, our hypotheses that self-compassion will mediate these relationships (Hypotheses 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d) were supported.
Table 3. Bootstrapping indirect effect and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mediation model.
4.3 Testing for the moderated mediation model
To check the gratitude as moderator hypotheses (3a through 3f), we used the moderated mediation analysis module of the Process software package with gender and age as covariates. WFC was negatively associated with self-compassion (β = −0.28, p < 0.001), and the interaction with gratitude was statistically significant (β = −0.03, p < 0.001). Thus, Hypothesis 3a was supported. WFC was also negatively associated with life satisfaction (β = −0.13, p < 0.05), but the interaction with gratitude was not statistically significant. Thus, Hypothesis 3b was not supported. On the other hand, WFC was not related to happiness and the interaction with gratitude was also not statistically significant. Therefore, Hypothesis 3c was also not supported. FWC was negatively related to self-compassion (β = −0.21, p < 0.001) and the interaction with gratitude was not statistically significant. Therefore, Hypothesis 3d was not supported. FWC was negatively related to life satisfaction (β = −0.12, p < 0.01) and the interaction with gratitude was not statistically significant. Therefore, Hypothesis 3e was also not supported. Lastly, FWC was negatively associated with happiness (β = −0.06, p < 0.01) and the interaction with gratitude was statistically significant as well (β = −0.009, p < 0.01). Thus, Hypothesis 3 was supported (Table 4).
Table 4. Moderated mediation effect of work-family conflict on life satisfaction and happiness.
The indirect effects of self-compassion at different levels of gratitude are summarized in Table 5. The indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction was not statistically significant for participants with low levels of gratitude (βind = −0.009, 95% CI = −0.002 to 0.0007), but was statistically significant for participants with medium levels of gratitude (βind = −0.02, 95% CI = −0.06 to −0.001) and with higher levels of gratitude (βind = −0.05, 95% CI = −0.011 to −0.003), which indicates that the indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction was stronger for those with higher levels of gratitude. Similarly, the indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between WFC and happiness was not statistically significant for participants with low levels of gratitude (βind = −0.01, 95% CI = −0.04 to 0.01), but was statistically significant for participants with medium levels of gratitude (βind = −0.05, 95% CI = −0.08 to −0.03) and higher levels of gratitude (βind = −0.10, 95% CI = −0.015 to −0.06). Thus, the indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between WFC and happiness was also stronger for those with higher levels of gratitude.
Table 5. Conditional indirect effects of work-family conflict on life satisfaction and happiness for different levels of gratitude.
The indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between FWC and life satisfaction was not statistically significant for participants with low levels of gratitude (βind = −0.01, 95% CI = −0.03 to 0.0008), medium levels of gratitude (βind = −0.02, 95% CI = −0.04 to 0.0006) or higher levels of gratitude (βind = −0.02, 95% CI = −0.06 to 0.0007). The indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between FWC and happiness was statistically significant for participants with low levels of gratitude (βind = −0.03, 95% CI = −0.06 to −0.003), medium levels of gratitude (βind = −0.04, 95% CI = −0.07 to −0.02) and higher levels of gratitude (βind = −0.06, 95% CI = −0.09 to −0.03). Thus, the indirect effect of self-compassion on the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction was beneficial for all levels of gratitude. These conditions are plotted in Figures 1, 2.
Figure 1. Conceptual Research Model.
Figure 2. Relationship between FWC and self-compassion for 3 gratitude conditions.
5 Discussion
This study demonstrated moderating and mediating mechanisms impacting the association between work-family conflict and happiness and life satisfaction among a sample of Saudi nurses. The main findings indicated a statistically significant negative relationship of WFC and FWC with both life satisfaction and happiness. The results also showed that self-compassion negatively mediated the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction, between WFC and happiness, between FWC and life satisfaction, and between FWC and happiness. The results also indicated that gratitude moderated the mediation of self-compassion in the relationship between WFC and life satisfaction, between WFC and happiness, and between FWC and happiness. These results yield theoretical and practical implications for the well-being of workers in general and nurses in particular.
The negative relationships found between work-family conflict and both life satisfaction and happiness corroborate prior research enumerated earlier in this paper. However, some studies reported no statistically significant association between work-family conflict and life satisfaction (57, 58). This inconsistency in findings may suggest cultural differences or other mechanisms underlying or impacting these relationships. This study found that these relationships were negatively mediated by self-compassion, such that the impacts of WFC and FWC on life satisfaction and happiness were mitigated through self-compassion. (59) reported that self-compassion diminishes the emotional exhaustion dimension of work burnout, and a longitudinal study by Schabram and Heng (98) found that self-compassion was a remedy for work-related emotional exhaustion. Others have reported that self-compassion enables people to enhance their emotional resilience (99), which enhances well-being. Self-compassion incorporates evaluations of unpleasant situations with a sense of tolerance and understanding, which may explain why self-compassionate individuals are able to find happiness and satisfaction in their lives (100). Accordingly, nurses who experience WFC and FWC may nonetheless be happier and satisfied with their lives if they are self-compassionate.
We found that this mediation of self-compassion varied with differing levels of gratitude. The results suggest that self-compassion strongly mitigated the negative impacts of work-family conflict on well-being for nurses with high levels of gratitude. The explanation may be the fact that people who are grateful take better care of themselves, are more compassionate and kind, are more resilient in times of adversity, and have healthier sleep (79). According to the broaden-and-build theory (101), when individuals experience positive emotions such as gratitude, they build cognitive and emotional resources needed to deal with any circumstance. Fredrickson and Joiner (102) claimed these positive resources help individuals to develop and grow, and lead to effective responses to new circumstances, including work and family situations and conditions. The efforts of this study speak, therefore, to the call of Nicklin et al. (36) to consider gratitude among the positive resources that can facilitate healthy work-family balance.
This study joins previous theories, the role theory (44) and the role strain theory (45) and postulates that conflicting roles at work and at family create strain for employees, and yet joins again the broaden-and-build theory (76) and socioecological theory (30) to posit that gratitude and self-compassion create lasting physical and psychological resources that can mitigate the strain and facilitate employees’ well-being.
5.1 Implications of the study
This study has theoretical and practical implications. For theoretical implications, this study contributed to the literature by establishing evidence of the role of self-compassion and gratitude in protecting nurses from work-family conflicts among a Saudi sample. These findings have practical implications for organizations in general and hospitals in particular. For hospital HR, it is important to plan programs to enhance self-compassion and gratitude of the nurses. These positive psychology interventions have proved their effectiveness, and it is crucial that Saudi hospitals plan effective interventions to promote nurses’ well-being, which would increase their performance. Gratitude and self-compassion are trainable and can therefore be practiced and enhanced, and they present affordable targets for interventions to enhance the well-being of workers in general and nurses in particular. Therefore, managers should consider bringing into the workplace positive psychological interventions focusing on growing gratitude and self-compassion. Further, workers themselves should learn about these positive interventions and attempt to integrate them into their psychological, work, and family lives.
5.2 Limitations
Despite the contributions of this study, there are limitations that should be mentioned. First, the design was cross-sectional. Longitudinal designs are recommended for future research. Second, the study used convenience sampling and may have yielded sampling and selection bias, which hampers generalizability of findings; random sampling is recommended for future research. Third, the proportion of females was relatively high in the sample and it is advised that a more proportionate sample be tested. Fourth, the Subjective Happiness Scale has a relatively low Cronbach’s alpha and results should be interpreted bearing this in mind. Fifth, the data collection was made via online platforms, we cannot know in which conditions the respondents were when the completed the questionnaire. Further, the recruiting process via social media is beyond any control of who has participated and what the respondents are representing. Future research should use also other means of data collection to facilitate data cross-validation. Sixth, this study relied on subjective data, future research should include also objective measures.
6 Conclusion
Work-family conflict remains an important concern for the well-being of workers and for the performance organizations that employ them. Previous research has established different pathways through which these relationships operate. This study built on positive psychology and investigated the underlying mediating role of self-compassion and moderating role of gratitude in the relationships between work-family conflict and life satisfaction and happiness among Saudi nurses. The results showed a mediation role of self-compassion on the impact of work-family conflict on the well-being of nurses. Moreover, this mediation was moderated by gratitude. Gratitude and self-compassion are positive constructs that are able to bring positive benefits to the lives of nurses and workers in general. These findings suggest that interventions and programs targeted at enhancing the well-being of nurses should include these positive psychology constructs, self-compassion and gratitude. Nurses are also advised to seek to grow self-compassion and gratitude within themselves, since they are trainable and teachable and can be self-administered. The current healthcare system seems to be built on the exploitation of HCPs, following the premise that they will find their own ways to optimize their resilience and endurance. However, without changes in the organizational structure, this demand for self-optimization is self-limiting and will easily result in “organized” burnout.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Approval for conducting this study was obtained from the ethics committee of Institutional Review Board of King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah in Saudi Arabia (No 343-253-1443). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Author contributions
ME: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ES: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research work was funded by the Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. (IFPIP: 343-253-1443).
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge technical and financial support provided by the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, DSR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Rupert, PA, Stevanovic, P, Tuminello Hartman, ER, Bryant, FB, and Miller, A. Predicting work-family conflict and life satisfaction among professional psychologists. Prof Psychol Res Pract. (2012) 43:341–8. doi: 10.1037/a0026675
2. Adams, GA, King, LA, and King, DW. Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. (1996) 81:411–20. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.411
3. Lu, L, Gilmour, R, Kao, SF, and Huang, MT. A cross‐cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: the Taiwanese vs British. Career Dev Int. (2006) 11:9–27. doi: 10.1108/13620430610642354
4. Qiu, L, and Fan, J. Family boundary characteristics, work-family conflict and life satisfaction: A moderated mediation model. Intl J Psychol. (2015) 50:336–44. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12107
5. Bedeian, AG, Burke, BG, and Moffett, RG. Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. J Manag. (1988) 14:475–91. doi: 10.1177/014920638801400310
6. Boles, JS. Influences of work-family conflict on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and quitting intentions among business owners: the case of family-operated businesses. Fam Bus Rev. (1996) 9:61–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00061.x
7. Kossek, EE, and Ozeki, C. Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: a review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. J Appl Psychol. (1998) 83:139–49. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.139
8. Zhao, XR, Qu, H, and Ghiselli, R. Examining the relationship of work-family conflict to job and life satisfaction: a case of hotel sales managers. Int J Hosp Manag. (2011) 30:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.04.010
9. Rupert, PA, Stevanovic, P, and Hunley, HA. Work-family conflict and burnout among practicing psychologists. Prof Psychol Res Pract. (2009) 40:54–61. doi: 10.1037/a0012538
10. Allen, TD, and Armstrong, J. Further examination of the link between work-family conflict and physical health: the role of health-related behaviors. Am Behav Sci. (2006) 49:1204–21. doi: 10.1177/0002764206286386
11. Panatik, SAB, Badri, SKZ, Rajab, A, Abdul, HR, and Shaha, IM. The impact of work family conflict on psychological well-being among school teachers in Malaysia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. (2011) 29:1500–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.390
12. Winefield, HR, Boyd, C, and Winefield, AH. Work-family conflict and well-being in university employees. J Psychol: Interdiscipl and Appl. (2014) 148:683–97. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.822343
13. Obidoa, C, Reeves, D, Warren, N, Reisine, S, and Cherniack, M. Depression and Work Family Conflict Among Corrections Officers. J Occup Envirl Med. (2011) 53:1294–301.
14. Leineweber, C, Chungkham, HS, Westerlund, H, Tishelman, C, and Lindqvist, R. Hospital organizational factors influence work-family conflict in registered nurses: multilevel modeling of a nation-wide cross-sectional survey in Sweden. Int J Nurs Stud. (2014) 51:744–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.010
15. Teo, STT, Pick, D, Newton, CJ, Yeung, ME, and Chang, E. Organisational change stressors and nursing job satisfaction: the mediating effect of coping strategies. J Nurs Manag. (2013) 21:878–87. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12120
16. Van Bogaert, P, Clarke, S, Roelant, E, Meulemans, H, and Van de Heyning, P. Impacts of unit-level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse-reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach. J Clin Nurs. (2010) 19:1664–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03128.x
17. Burke, RJ, and Greenglass, ER. Work-family conflict, spouse support, and nursing staff well-being during organizational restructuring. J Occup Health Psychol. (1999) 4:327–36. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.4.4.327
18. Yildirim, D, and Aycan, Z. Nurses’ work demands and work-family conflict: A questionnaire survey. Intl J Nursg Stud. (2008) 45:1366–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.10.010
19. Yu, J, Song, H, Shi, H, and Wang, K. Association between work–family conflict and overall well-being among Chinese nurse leaders. J Nurs Manag. (2020) 28:1498–503. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13084
20. Alluhidan, M, Tashkandi, N, Alblowi, F, Omer, T, Alghaith, T, Alghodaier, H, et al. Challenges and policy opportunities in nursing in Saudi Arabia. Hum Resour Health. (2020) 18:98–10. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00535-2
21. Almalki, MJ, Fitzgerald, G, and Clark, M. The relationship between quality of work life and turnover intention of primary health care nurses in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Serv Res. (2012) 12:314. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-314
22. Alharbi, MF, Alahmadi, BA, Alali, M, and Alsaedi, S. Quality of nursing work life among hospital nurses in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag. (2019) 27:1722–30. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12863
23. Liu, H, Kong, L, Sun, Q, and Ma, X. The effects of mindfulness-based interventions on nurses’ anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis. Nurs Open. (2022) 10:3622–34. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1610
24. Ramaci, T, Rapisarda, V, Bellini, D, Mucci, N, De Giorgio, A, and Barattucci, M. Mindfulness as a protective factor for dissatisfaction in HCWS: the moderating role of mindful attention between climate stress and job satisfaction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:1–16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113818
25. Ding, X, Wang, L, Sun, J, Li, DY, Zheng, BY, He, SW, et al. Effectiveness of empathy clinical education for children’s nursing students: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. (2020) 85:104260. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104260
26. Zhou, H, Peng, J, Wang, D, Kou, L, Chen, F, Ye, M, et al. Mediating effect of coping styles on the association between psychological capital and psychological distress among Chinese nurses: a cross-sectional study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. (2017) 24:114–22. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12350
27. Finlay-Jones, AL, Rees, CS, and Kane, RT. Self-compassion, emotion regulation and stress among australian psychologists: testing an emotion regulation model of self-compassion using structural equation modeling. PLoS One. (2015) 10:1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133481
28. Kavaklı, M, Ak, M, Uğuz, F, and Türkmen, OO. The mediating role of self-compassion in the relationship between perceived COVID-19 threat and death anxiety. Turkish J Clin Psychiatry. (2020) 23:15–23. doi: 10.5505/kpd.2020.59862
29. Neff, K. Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self Identity. (2003) 2:85–101. doi: 10.1080/15298860309032
30. Bronfenbrenner, U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1979).
31. Jans-beken, L, Jacobs, N, Janssens, M, Peeters, S, Lechner, L, Lataster, J, et al. Gratitude and health: an updated review gratitude and health: an updated review. J Posit Psychol. (2019) 15:743–82. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1651888
32. Eby, LT, Casper, WJ, Lockwood, A, Bordeaux, C, and Brinley, A. Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J Vocat Behav. (2005) 66:124–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.003
33. Frone, MR, Russell, M, and Cooper, ML. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: testing a model of the work-family Interface. J Appl Psychol. (1992) 77:65–78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65
34. Hammer, LB, Demsky, CA, Kossek, EE, and Bray, JW. Work–family intervention research In: TD Allen and LT Eby, editors. The oxford handbook of work and family. New York: Oxford University Press (2015). 8–9.
35. Fredrickson, B. Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds In: RA Emmons and ME McCullough, editors. The psychology of gratitude. New York: Oxford University Press (2004). 145–66.
36. Nicklin, JM, Meachon, EJ, and Mcnall, LA. Balancing work, school, and personal life among graduate students: a positive psychology approach. Appl Res Qual Life. (2018) 14:1265–86. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9650-z
37. Mesmer-Magnus, JR, and Viswesvaran, C. Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: a meta-analytic examination. J Vocat Behav. (2005) 67:215–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.004
38. Tang, AD, Chang, ML, Wang, TH, and Lai, CH. How to create genuine happiness for flight attendants: effects of internal marketing and work-family interface. J Air Transp Manag. (2020) 87:101860. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101860
39. Hayes, AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press (2013).
40. Jackson, MA, Tal, AI, and Sullivan, AR. Hidden biases in counseling women: balancing work and family concerns In: M Kopala and MA Keitel, editors. Handbook of counseling women : Thousand Oaks, Sage (2016). 152–72.
41. Greenhaus, JH, and Friedman, SD. Work and family—allies or enemies? What happens when business professionals confront life choices. New York: Oxford University Press (2000).
42. Ng, A. Saudi Arabia sees a spike in women joining the workforce, Brookings study shows CNBC (2021) Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/29/saudi-arabia-sees-a-spike-in-women-joining-the-workforce-study-says.html.
43. Orgambídez-Ramos, A, and de Almeida, H. Work engagement, social support, and job satisfaction in Portuguese nursing staff: a winning combination. Appl Nurs Res. (2017) 36:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.05.012
44. Merton, RK. The role-set: problems in sociological theory. Br J Sociol. (1957) 8:106–20. doi: 10.2307/587363
46. Greenhaus, JH, and Beutell, NJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manag Rev. (1985) 10:76–88. doi: 10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
47. Labrague, LJ. Linking toxic leadership with work satisfaction and psychological distress in emergency nurses: the mediating role of work-family conflict. J Emerg Nurs. (2023) S0099-1767(23)00312-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.11.008
48. Byron, K. A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents. J Vocat Behav. (2005) 67:169–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009
49. Gu, M, Tan, CM, Ho, YS, and Liu, L. Work-family conflict and happiness: the moderating role of national culture. Evid Based HRM. (2022) 10:293–311. doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-01-2021-0001
50. Yildiz, B, Yildiz, H, and Ayaz Arda, O. Relationship between work-family conflict and turnover intention in nurses: a meta-analytic review. J Adv Nurs. (2021) 77:3317–30. doi: 10.1111/jan.14846
51. Labrague, LJ, Ballad, CA, and Fronda, DC. Predictors and outcomes of work-family conflict among nurses. Int Nurs Rev. (2021) 68:349–57. doi: 10.1111/inr.12642
52. Zurlo, MC, Vallone, F, and Smith, AP. Work-family conflict and psychophysical health conditions of nurses: gender differences and moderating variables. Jpn J Nurs Sci. (2020) 17:1–12. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12324
53. Gull, N, Song, Z, Shi, R, Asghar, M, Rafique, MA, and Liu, Y. Paternalistic leadership, Polychronicity, and life satisfaction of nurses: the role of work-family conflict and family-work conflict in public sector hospitals. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:1–32. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648332
54. Taşdelen-Karçkay, A, and Bakalım, O. The mediating effect of work–life balance on the relationship between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. Aust J Career Dev. (2017) 26:3–13. doi: 10.1177/1038416216682954
55. Zhang, Y, Rasheed, MI, and Luqman, A. Work-family conflict and turnover intentions among Chinese nurses: the combined role of job and life satisfaction and perceived supervisor support. Pers Rev. (2020) 49:1140–56. doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2019-0017
56. AlAzzam, M, AbuAlRub, RF, and Nazzal, AH. The relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction among hospital nurses. Nurs Forum. (2017) 52:278–88. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12199
57. Cooke, RA, and Rousseau, DM. Stress and strain from family roles and work-role expectations. J Appl Psychol. (1984) 69:252–60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.252
58. Karatepe, OM, and Baddar, L. An empirical study of the selected consequences of frontline employees’ work-family conflict and family-work conflict. Tour Manag. (2006) 27:1017–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.024
59. Maslach, C, and Jackson, SE. Burnout in organizational settings. App Soc Psychol Annual. (1984) 5:133–53.
60. Anasori, E, Kucukergin, KG, Soliman, M, Tulucu, F, and Altinay, L. How can the subjective well-being of nurses be predicted? Understanding the mediating effect of psychological distress, psychological resilience and emotional exhaustion. J Serv Theory Pract. (2022) 32:762–80. doi: 10.1108/JSTP-01-2022-0008
61. Aziz, NNA, Yazid, ZNA, Tarmuji, NH, Samsudin, MA, and Majid, AA. The influence of work-family conflict and family-work conflict on well-being: the mediating role of coping strategies. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. (2018) 8:259–75. doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i4/4012
62. Dodanwala, TC, and Shrestha, P. Work-family conflict and job satisfaction among construction professionals: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Horiz. (2021) 29:62–75. doi: 10.1108/OTH-11-2020-0042
63. Brach, T. Radical acceptance: embracing your life with the heart of a Buddha In Bantam (2003) Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=s3h&AN=9970995&lang=es&site=ehost-live&custid=s6088100.
64. Neff, KD. Development and validation of a self-compassion scale. Self Identity. (2003) 2:223–50. doi: 10.1080/15298860390209035
65. Allen, AB, Goldwasser, ER, and Leary, M. Self and identity self-compassion and well-being among older adults. Self Identity. (2017) 11:428–53. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2011.595082
66. Leary, MR, Tate, EB, Adams, CE, Allen, AB, and Hancock, J. Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: the implications of treating oneself kindly. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2007) 92:887–904. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887
67. Neff, KD, Rude, SS, and Kirkpatrick, L. An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. J R Pers. (2007) 41:908–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.002
68. Neff, KD, and Faso, DJ. Self-compassion and well-being in parents of children with autism. Mindfulness. (2015) 6:938–47. doi: 10.1007/s12671-014-0359-2
69. Iqbal, MN, and Bashir, U. Self-compassion and work-family interference across family system among women school teachers: A cross-sectional study. J Educ Humanities Res. (2021) 12:40–6.
70. Vaillancourt, ES, and Wasylkiw, L. The intermediary role of burnout in the relationship between self-compassion and job satisfaction among nurses. Can J Nurs Res. (2020) 52:246–54. doi: 10.1177/0844562119846274
71. Kaya, F, Uluman, OT, Sukut, O, and Balik, CHA. The predictive effect of self-compassion on relationship satisfaction and conflict resolution styles in romantic relationships in nursing students. Nurs Forum. (2022) 57:608–14. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12717
72. Hajian, F, Sadeghi, N, and Moghimian, M. The effectiveness of self-compassion training on nurses’ family performance management. Daneshvar Med Basic Clin Res J. (2020) 28:50–61. doi: 10.22070/DANESHMED.2020.3055
73. Wood, AM, Maltby, J, Stewart, N, and Joseph, S. Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personal Individ Differ. (2008) 44:621–32. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.028
74. Mccullough, ME, Emmons, RA, and Tsang, J. The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2002) 82:112–27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112
75. Wood, AM, Maltby, J, Stewart, N, Linley, PA, and Joseph, S. A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude. Emotion. (2008) 8:281–90. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.281
76. Fredrickson, BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. (2001) 56:218–2226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
77. You, S, Lee, J, and Lee, Y. Relationships between gratitude, social support, and prosocial and problem behaviors. Curr Psychol. (2020) 41:2646–53. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00775-4
78. McCullough, ME, Emmons, RA, Kilpatrick, SD, and Larson, DB. Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychol Bull. (2001) 127:249–66. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249
79. Randolph, SA. The power of gratitude. Workplace Health Saf. (2017) 65:144. doi: 10.1177/2165079917697217
80. Lee, MR. The effect of anger and gratitude on the happiness of nursing students. J Health Inform Stat. (2020) 45:173–80. doi: 10.21032/jhis.2020.45.2.173
81. Conley, P, Ohnoutka, D, and Enriquez, M. Perception of gratitude among new nurse graduates: a mixed-methods study. Nurs Manag. (2022) 53:36–42. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000834584.88792.6c
82. Mahipalan, M, and Garg, N. Does workplace toxicity undermine psychological capital (PsyCap) of the employees? Exploring the moderating role of gratitude. Int J Organ Anal. (2023). doi: 10.1108/IJOA-12-2022-3543 [ahead of print].
83. Garg, N. Gratitude and work-family enrichment among Indian female workforce: exploring the mediating role of psychological capital. Int J Work Organ Emot. (2022) 13:1–17. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2022.121971
84. Garg, N. Validation of the transpersonal gratitude scale (TGS) and the relationship between transpersonal gratitude, spiritual well-being and distress in India. J Relig Health. (2023) 62:3604–21. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01811-w
85. Garg, N, Mahipalan, M, and Sharma, N. Does workplace toxicity influence turnover intentions among Indian healthcare employees? Investigating the moderating role of gratitude. J Health Organ Manag. (2023) 37:250–72. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2022-0233
86. Garg, N, Kumari, S, and Punia, BK. Interrelation between gratitude and vitality among students: exploring mediating role of resilience. Psychol Stud. (2022) 67:200–7. doi: 10.1007/s12646-022-00654-x
87. Bansal, S, Garg, N, and Singh, J. Weight-based teasing and depressive symptoms among Indian college students: exploring the moderating effect of gratitude. Kybernetes. (2023). doi: 10.1108/K-10-2022-1486 [ahead of print].
88. Zhan, X, Yang, W, Guo, Y, and Luo, W. Can patient gratitude compensate for depletion from family-to-work conflict in nurses? An experience sampling study. Pers Rev. (2023) 52:2153–71. doi: 10.1108/PR-12-2020-0891
89. Beni, S, Dos, LA, and Latipun, L. Correlation self-compassion and happiness among university students in Timor-Leste: gratitude as moderation variable. Int J Psychol Stud. (2019) 11:1. doi: 10.5539/ijps.v11n2p1
90. Diener, E, Emmons, RA, Larsen, RJ, and Griffin, S. Satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. (1985) 49:71–5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
91. Lyubomirsky, S, and Lepper, H. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indic Res. (1999) 46:137–55. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041
92. Raes, F, Pommier, E, Neff, KD, and Van Gucht, D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2011) 18:250–5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702
93. Haslam, D, Filus, A, Morawska, A, Sanders, MR, and Fletcher, R. The work-family conflict scale (WAFCS): development and initial validation of a self-report measure of work-family conflict for use with parents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. (2014) 46:346–57. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0476-0
94. Rstudio Team, Rs . (2022). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/.
95. Della Giusta, M, Jewell, SL, and Kambhampati, US. Gender and life satisfaction in the UK. Fem Econ. (2011) 17:1–34. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2011.582028
96. Fugl-Meyer, AR, Melin, R, and Fugl-Meyer, KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med. (2002) 34:239–46. doi: 10.1080/165019702760279242
97. Tiefenbach, T, and Kohlbacher, F. Happiness and life satisfaction in Japan by gender and age. Tokyo: In German Institute for Japanese Studies (2014).
98. Schabram, K, and Heng, YT. How other- and self-compassion reduce burnout through resource replenishment. Acad Manag J. (2022) 65:453–78. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2019.0493
99. Neff, KD, and Dahm, KA. Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation In: BD Ostafin, MD Robinson, and BP Meier, editors. Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation. New York: Springer (2015). 121–37.
100. Booker, JA, and Dunsmore, JC. Testing direct and indirect ties of self-compassion with subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud. (2018) 20:1563–85. doi: 10.1007/s10902-018-0011-2
101. Fredrickson, BL. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. (2004) 359:1367–77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
Keywords: family-work conflict, gratitude, happiness, nurses, life satisfaction, self-compassion, work-family conflict
Citation: El Keshky MES and Sarour EO (2024) The relationships between work-family conflict and life satisfaction and happiness among nurses: a moderated mediation model of gratitude and self-compassion. Front. Public Health. 12:1340074. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340074
Edited by:
Arndt Büssing, Witten/Herdecke University, GermanyReviewed by:
Lei Lu, Peking University, ChinaBojan Obrenovic, Zagreb School of Economics and Management, Croatia
Naval Garg, Delhi Technological University, India
Copyright © 2024 El Keshky and Sarour. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mogeda El Sayed El Keshky, ZHJtb2dlZGFAZ21haWwuY29t