Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Public Health, 07 March 2024
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Chinese parents’ intention to vaccinate their 0–5-year-old children with the EV-71 vaccine against hand, foot, and mouth disease and willingness-to-pay

Lu Cheng&#x;Lu Cheng1Sumei Zhong&#x;Sumei Zhong2Xiaonan Xu&#x;Xiaonan Xu1Junrong LiJunrong Li2Fangqin XieFangqin Xie2Yulan LinYulan Lin1Dongjuan Zhang
Dongjuan Zhang2*
  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
  • 2Vaccine Clinical Trial Center, Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Background: This study aimed to determine the intention and willingness-to-pay (WTP) of Chinese parents/guardians to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine. Knowledge levels about hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) and the EV-71 vaccine were also investigated.

Methods: A cross-sectional, self-administered online survey was conducted between November 2022 and March 2023. A stratified multi-stage random sampling method was used to recruit parents/guardians of children aged 0–5 years in southeastern China.

Results: A total of 3,626 complete responses were received. The mean knowledge score of HFMD was 9.99 (±4.23) out of a total of 14 points. The majority of the participants reported a somewhat willing intent (58.8%), followed by an extremely willing intent (28.9%). Participants who did not consider the EV-71 vaccine expensive (OR = 2.94, 95%CI 2.45–3.53) perceived that the EV-71 vaccine is effective (OR = 2.73, 95%CI 1.52–4.90), and a high knowledge level of HFMD (OR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.57–2.29) had the highest significant odds of having an extremely willing intent to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of WTP for the EV-71 vaccine was CNY¥200/USD$28 (IQR CNY¥100-400/USD$14-56). The highest marginal WTP for the vaccine was mainly influenced by the perceived high cost of the vaccine. Those participants who did not consider the EV-71 vaccine expensive had more than 10 times higher odds of vaccinating their children (OR = 10.86, 95%CI 8.49–13.88). Perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers were also significant influencing factors in the highest marginal WTP.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of improving health promotion and reducing the barriers to EV-71 vaccination. Therefore, it is important to improve health promotion and reduce the barriers to EV-71 vaccination.

1 Introduction

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a global enteroviral infection that mainly affects children aged 0–5 years. The main clinical manifestations are fever, vesicular rashes on the hands, feet, and buttocks, and ulcers in the oral mucosa. Usually, HFMD is self-limiting, but a small proportion of children may experience severe complications such as meningitis, encephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis, and neurorespiratory syndrome (13).

HFMD can be caused by a variety of enteroviruses, among which enterovirus 71 (EV-71) is the leading pathogen and could cause severe illness and death (46). Between 1970 and 2000, a large number of outbreaks of HFMD associated with EV-71 occurred in the Asia-Pacific region (7). The severe neurological symptoms of HFMD caused by EV-71 have made HFMD a serious public health problem for children in Asia–Pacific countries, with China being one of the most severely affected countries (8, 9). During 2008 and 2017, a total of 13.8 million cases of HFMD were reported in China, including 3,300 deaths, resulting in a fatality rate of approximately 0.2 per 1,000 deaths (10). EV-71-associated HFMD placed a significant burden on infected children, their families, and society, and the highest mortality rate of EV-71-associated HFMD also occurred in China (1.8%) (11, 12). Unfortunately, there are no specific therapeutic drugs for HFMD, and the use of vaccines is the most effective measure to prevent this disease (13). China’s self-developed inactivated EV-71 vaccine has been marketed since its first approval in December 2015 (14). However, the vaccination rate remains low across China (15, 16). During 2016 and 2019, the coverage rates for doses 1 and 2 were 24.7 and 19.4%, respectively, in Guangzhou City (16). Similarly, the whole-course vaccination rates of two doses of the EV-71 vaccine in Fujian Province were 4.2 and 8.5% in 2017 and 2018, respectively (17). Parental acceptance of the EV-71 vaccination is crucial to enable public health systems to reach the recommended threshold and achieve herd immunity, thereby halting the virus spread.

Parental decision-making for the vaccination of their children is complex and impacted by many factors, depending on parents’ perspectives. The health belief model (HBM) explains and predicts health behaviors by focusing on the attitudes and beliefs of individuals (18). This model includes concepts such as perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The HBM has been extensively used to study vaccination beliefs and behaviors to identify parental behavioral intentions toward childhood vaccination (19, 20). HBM constructs have been recognized as an important predictor of influenza vaccine uptake in many previous influenza vaccination studies (21, 22), including a study on Chinese parents’ decisions to vaccinate their children against seasonal influenza (23).

In China, the EV-71 vaccine is a class II vaccine and requires out-of-pocket payments. Therefore, determining parents’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the EV-71 vaccine is critical for future pricing and for increasing vaccination rates and coverage. In monetary terms, WTP refers to the maximum amount that an individual would be willing to sacrifice to obtain the benefits of a program, service, or health technology (24). In vaccination decisions, the decision to vaccinate depends on the WTP of an individual for a vaccination to obtain increased health benefits (25). HBM constructs have also been used to explain WTP for influenza vaccination (26).

More evidence about parental acceptance and the WTP for the EV-71 vaccine is essential to promote the implementation of the vaccination program in China and also to provide insights into future pricing considerations, demand forecasts, and the implementation of the national EV-71 immunization program. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine Chinese parental intention to vaccinate their children aged 0–5 years with the EV-71 vaccine against HFMD. The HBM was used as the framework to predict parental intention to vaccinate their children and the highest marginal WTP.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study participants and study design

We commenced a cross-sectional, web-based anonymous survey between November 2022 and March 2023 in Fujian Province. Study participants were parents or guardians (e.g., grandparents) of children aged 0–5 years who have not received the EV-71 vaccine. Participants need to be long-term residents of Fujian Province, i.e., they should have lived in the study area for at least 6 months in the 12 months before the survey.

A stratified multi-stage random sampling method was adopted to select study regions. First, urban and rural areas in all 10 cities (36 urban areas and 53 rural areas) of Fujian Province were ranked by population size. Systematic sampling was then used to select 20 urban regions and 16 rural regions. Second, one vaccination center (community health center) was selected using the systematic sampling method from each selected region as the study center. Third, each study center recruited at least 100 parents/guardians of children aged 0–5 years to complete the online survey. One medical staff from each selected vaccination center was recruited and trained in a standard manner to recruit study participants and provide an explanation of the questionnaire. The participants were informed that their participation was voluntary and that consent was implied through their completion of the questionnaire.

2.2 Instruments

The survey consisted of questions that assessed (1) demographic background, health status, and history of HFMD; (2) knowledge about HFMD and the EV-71 vaccine; (3) information source of the EV-71 vaccine; (4) perception of HFMD and EV-71 vaccination based on HBM; and (5) intention and WTP for the EV-71 vaccine. In cases where a family has more than one child aged 0–5 years, participants were requested to provide data based on the second child.

2.2.1 Demographics, health status, and history of HFMD

Personal details, including age, gender, place of birth, workplace, census register place, highest education level, number of children aged 0–5 years, occupation, and average monthly household income, were collected. The participants were also asked whether their children had a history of HFMD and to rate their overall health status.

2.2.2 Knowledge about HFMD and the EV-71 vaccine

The participants’ knowledge was assessed using a series of questions regarding signs and symptoms of HFMD infection, transmission, susceptible population, viruses, and the EV-71 vaccine (a 14-item scale). The response options were “true,” “false,” or “do not know.” A correct response was given a score of one, and an incorrect response or “do not know” response was scored zero. The possible total knowledge score ranged from 0 to 14, with higher scores representing higher levels of knowledge. The reliability of HFMD knowledge items was evaluated by assessing the internal consistency of the items representing the knowledge score. The 14 knowledge items had a reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of 0.915.

2.2.3 Information source for the EV-71 vaccine

Participants were asked to provide their information regarding the EV-71 vaccine from the following options: medical institutions, family/friends, social media, TV/radio/newspapers/magazines, Internet, school, community health promotion, and children’s feedback.

2.2.4 Perception of HFMD and EV-71 vaccination

HBM-derived items were used to measure the participants’ perceptions of HFMD and the EV-71 vaccination (27, 28). The questions probed perceived susceptibility to HFMD (two items), perceived severity of HFMD (two items), perceived benefits of an EV-71 vaccine (two items), perceived barriers to getting a vaccination against HFMD (four items), and cues to action (two items). All the response options were either ‘Yes’ or ‘No.’

2.2.5 Intention to receive an EV-71 vaccine and willingness-to-pay (WTP)

The intention to accept an EV-71 vaccine was measured using a one-item question (“Do you want to vaccinate your child with EV-71 vaccine?”) on a 4-point scale (“extremely unwilling,” “somewhat unwilling,” “somewhat willing,” and “extremely willing”). WTP was measured using a one-item question (“What is the maximum amount you are willing to pay for the EV-71 vaccine?”) on a 9-point scale (CNY¥ 100/USD$ 14 to CNY¥ 900/USD$ 126, at a currency ratio of 7:1). The price range options were based on the approximate minimum–maximum price range of currently available vaccines in China.

2.3 Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated for each region using the equation: n = Z2 P(1-P)/d2 (29), in which the prevalence rate was 70% (P) based on the vaccine acceptance rate reported in the previous literature (30, 31). The significance level was set at 0.05, and the allowable error was 0.03 (d). The minimal sample size required for this study was 896.

2.4 Statistical analysis

We conducted both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, including all factors showing significance (p < 0.05). Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and p-values were calculated for each independent variable. The model fit of the multivariable logistic regression analysis was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (32). The majority of respondents were willing to pay between CNY¥100 and CNY¥400 for the EV-71 vaccine, and a lower proportion reported a WTP of CNY¥ 500 and above. Hence, the WTP was divided into three price ranges (CNY¥ 100/200, CNY¥ 300/400, and CNY¥ 500 and above). A multivariable multinomial logistic regression was employed to model factors associated with marginal WTP for the EV-71 vaccine for three price ranges, with CNY¥ 100/200, the lowest coded category, as the reference group. Similarly, only significant factors in the univariate analyses (p < 0.05) were selected for the multinomial logistic regression analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Demographics

A total of 3,626 complete responses were received (Table 1). The age range of participants was 16–76 years, with a mean age of 33.55 years (standard deviation, SD ± 7.73). The majority of participants were aged 30 to 40 years (58.8%), were mothers (70.7%), were from Fujian households (92.7%), were working in urban areas (61.7%), and had a family monthly income of < CNY¥8,000 (69.1%). Most of the families have only one child (80.4%), with almost equal proportions of boys (56.7%) and girls (43.3%). Only 8.7% of children have had HFMD before.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants (n = 3,626).

3.2 Knowledge about HFMD and the EV-71 vaccine

The mean of the total knowledge score was 9.99 (SD ± 4.23) out of a possible score of 14. The median was 11 (interquartile range, IQR, 8–14). The knowledge scores were categorized as a score of 0–11 or 12–14 based on the median split; as such, a total of 1,765 (48.7%) participants were categorized as having a score of 12–14 and 1,861 (51.3%) participants had a score of 0–11. The majority (92.2%) of participants had heard of HFMD, but only 52.5% of them were aware of the EV-71 disease and 67.5% were aware of the EV-71 vaccine (data not shown). Figure 1 shows that the major information source was a medical institution (58.7%), followed by family/friends (32.5%), social media (30.6%), TV/radio/newspapers/magazine (29.2%), Internet (29.0%), school (21.3%), community health promotion (17.2%), and children’s feedback (4.7%).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. EV-71 vaccination information sources (N = 2,448).

3.3 Health beliefs

The participants had high perceptions of susceptibility. Nearly half of the participants agreed that their children had a high risk of getting HFMD (45.4%), and the majority were worried about the likelihood of their children getting HFMD (82.7%). The participants also had high perceptions of the severity of HFMD; 50.8% agreed that a child could became very sick if infected with HFMD, and 89.9% agreed that HFMD infection could affect a child’s schooling. High perceptions of the benefits of the EV-71 vaccination were reported. The majority (91.4%) of the participants perceived the benefit of the EV-71 vaccination in preventing HFMD. Under the perceived barriers construct, concerns about the side effects, affordability, and safety were reported by 54.7, 54.1, and 53.0%, respectively. Receiving information from medical staff (74.2%) was the major construct of cues to action.

3.4 EV-71 vaccination intent

Figure 2 shows the proportion of responses with the intention to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine. A total of 3,178 (87.7%) participants responded “Yes” with the intention to vaccinate their children with EV-71 vaccine, while only 448 (12.4%) responded “No.” In a more specific breakdown, the majority responded somewhat willing (58.8%), followed by extremely willing (28.9%). Only 2.8% responded as extremely unwilling, and 9.6% reported as somewhat unwilling. The third and fourth columns of Table 2 show the responses of extremely willing against the other options (somewhat willing/somewhat unwilling/extremely unwilling) to the intention to vaccinate by demographics and health belief constructs. By demographics, multivariable analyses revealed that being self-employed (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.11–2.14), average annual household income ≥CNY¥16,000 (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.07–2.44), and having a child aged less than 3 years (OR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.33–2.03) were strong significant factors in having a definite intention to vaccinate their children against HFMD. Those with university and above education level (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07–1.61) and high knowledge score (OR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.57–2.29) were also significant associated with a definite intention to get their child vaccinated with the EV-71 vaccine.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. EV-71 vaccination intent (N = 3,626).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate and multivariable analyses of factors associated with willingness to receive the EV-71 vaccine (N = 3,626).

Most of the constructs in the HBM were significantly associated with having a definite intention to vaccinate a child with the EV-71 vaccine in the multivariable analysis. Disagreeing on the high cost of the vaccine (OR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.45–3.53) under the perceived barriers construct was the strongest predictor for a definite intention. Having a definite intention for EV-71 vaccination was significantly strongly correlated with the perception that EV-71 vaccination is effective in preventing HFMD under the perceived benefit construct (OR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.52–4.90) and worry about a child getting HFMD (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.34–2.370). While the cue to action was a significant construct, participants who reported receiving a recommendation from medical staff (OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.40–2.24) were associated with having a more definite intention to vaccinate.

3.5 Willingness-to-pay (WTP)

Figure 3 shows that most of the participants were willing to pay an amount of either CNY¥100 [USD$14] (34.9%) or CNY¥ 200 [USD$ 28] (26.2%) for an EV-71 vaccine. The median WTP for the EV-71 vaccine was CNY¥ 200/USD$ 28 (IQR CNY¥ 100-400/USD$ 14-56). Table 3 shows the results of the univariable and multivariable regression analyses for the marginal WTP an amount of CNY¥ 100/200 [USD$ 14/28], CNY¥ 300/400 [USD$ 42/56], and CNY¥ 500 [USD$ 70] by demographics and HBM constructs. The results of the multinomial logistic regression revealed that participants with households registered in other provinces had a higher WTP an amount of CNY¥ 300/400 [USD$ 42/56] and CNY¥ 500 [USD$ 70] over CNY¥ 100/200 [USD$ 14/28]. The participants with an annual household income level of ≥CNY¥ 16,000 had the highest WTP for an amount of CNY ¥500 [USD$72] over CNY¥ 100/200 [USD$14/28] (OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 2.02–5.15). Other demographic factors positively associated with WTP an amount of CNY¥ 500 [USD$ 72] over CNY¥ 100/200[USD$ 14/28] were higher education level (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.76), only having one child aged 0–5 years in the family (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.12–1.88) and having a child aged less than 3 years (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.29–2.31).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Willingness-to-pay for the EV-71 vaccination (N = 3,626).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Multinomial logic regression of factors associated with marginal willingness-to-pay (WTP) for EV-71 vaccine (N = 3,626).

For HBM constructs, a higher marginal WTP was significantly associated with the perception of susceptibility, benefits, and barriers. A disagreement that the EV-71 vaccine is expensive was the strongest facilitator that was associated with higher WTP for an amount of CNY¥ 300/400 [USD$ 42/56] (OR = 2.58, 95%CI: 2.11–3.17) and CNY¥ 500 [USD$ 70] (OR = 10.86, 95%CI: 8.49–13.88) over CNY¥ 100/200 [USD$ 14/28]. Concern about a child getting HFMD under the construct of perceived susceptibility was another factor significantly associated with a higher WTP for an amount of CNY¥ 300/400 [USD$ 42/56] (OR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.03–1.81) and CNY¥ 500 [US$ 70] (OR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.33–2.49). Participants who considered the EV-71 vaccine to be effective in preventing HFMD had a higher chance to pay for CNY¥ 500 [US$ 70] and above (OR = 2.09, 95%CI: 1.16–3.76) over CNY¥ 100/200 [US$ 14/28].

4 Discussion

Parental perspectives and beliefs about vaccines are important factors in predicting a child’s immunization status. The current study explored the knowledge level of HFMD and the EV-71 vaccine, as well as their intent and WTP to vaccinate their children aged 0–5 years with the EV-71 vaccine, among parents/guardians in southeastern China.

The majority (87.7%) of participants were intent to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine, which is higher than the observed vaccination rates of 4.2 and 8.5% in Fujian Province in 2017 and 2018, respectively (17). Among those who were not willing to vaccinate their children, concern about vaccine safety was the major reason. In 2016, an illegal vaccine case was reported in China. Vaccines were sold in many provinces and cities without precise cold chain storage and transportation, including a variety of class II vaccines for children. Such news has widely caused parental concerns about the safety of vaccines used for their children (23, 33). The results of our study also showed that concern about the safety of the EV-71 vaccine was significantly correlated with parental intent to vaccinate their children, which is in line with the findings reported by Li et al. (31). Furthermore, the perception that the EV-71 vaccine can effectively prevent HFMD and worry about children suffering from HFMD are the most critical factors affecting the intention to vaccinate. The results of our study have proved that healthcare organizations are the most important source of information on the EV-71 vaccine (58.7%), and recommendations from healthcare professionals can significantly increase parental intention to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine (OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.46–2.32). These findings are consistent with other research on vaccine acceptability (34, 35). In addition, willingness to vaccinate was higher among those with high knowledge scores of HFMD (OR = 1.90, 95%CI: 1.57–2.29) in our current study. Therefore, health education programs in healthcare institutions such as community health centers, where medical staff could provide easy-to-understand education to parents, may be necessary to increase the uptake rate of the EV-71 vaccine. Meanwhile, the government could organize national campaigns to spread the message that “vaccines are good,” which could also help to eliminate vaccine hesitancy among the public.

The results of this study showed that parents with higher education levels had a higher acceptance rate of the EV-71 vaccine. Education increases knowledge and awareness of vaccine benefits; people with a high education level were more likely to receive information about the EV-71 infection and the HFMD vaccine from different sources (36). However, some studies agree that high levels of education are positively correlated with vaccine hesitancy (37, 38). Other studies found no statistically significant differences between high and low levels of education (39). Many vaccine-preventable diseases have almost been eradicated in countries with high economic development and educational levels, which might decrease the perceived threat of communicable diseases among the public and increase vaccine skepticism (40). On the other hand, the number of reported cases and deaths related to HFMD ranked first among the category C infectious diseases in China, causing serious economic and social burdens (41). HFMD is still an important threat to public health in China and many other developing countries. In fact, previous studies have shown that the majority of the EV-71 vaccine-associated adverse events reported either in China or globally were mild or self-limiting and that the EV-71 vaccine has been proven to have good safety (16, 42). Therefore, healthcare professionals could emphasize the safety aspect of the EV-71 vaccine to parents to correct parental misconceptions, which might be valuable to enhance their confidence in vaccinating their children.

The affordability of the vaccine is also an important factor influencing parents’ willingness to vaccinate their children with the EV-71 vaccine. In the current study, approximately 80% of respondents were willing to pay CNY¥ 100–400 [USD$14–56], and only 20% of them were willing to pay CNY¥ 500 [USD$70] and above. The estimated mean WTP for the EV-71 vaccine was CNY¥ 268 [USD$ 38], which is lower than that in Malaysia [USD$ 87.47] (43). However, it is worth mentioning that, as approximately 70% of our study participants had household income lower than CNY¥ 8000 [USD$ 1143], a vaccine cost of CNY¥ 268 [USD$ 38] could be their whole-day family income and, therefore, could still be too expensive for those families with low household income. In China, the EV-71 vaccine is a class II vaccine that must be purchased by parents at their own expense. The cost is approximately CNY¥ 500 [US$ 70] for a child to complete two doses of vaccination, which is higher than the price that most parents/guardians in this study were willing to pay. The current high cost of EV-71 vaccine appears to be a significant barrier for parents to vaccinate their children, suggesting that children in China can be widely vaccinated with the EV-71 vaccine when the price stands at USD$ 25 or less (44). Within the price range of current routine vaccines paid by the Chinese government, a national EV-71 vaccination program would be cost-saving or highly cost-effective in reducing the EV-71 vaccine-related morbidity, mortality, and use of health services among children younger than 5 years in China (45). Policymakers may consider the EV-71 vaccination as part of a routine childhood immunization schedule.

Several study limitations should be noted. First, this study was a cross-sectional study, and causality could not be determined. Second, the questionnaire in this study was self-administered, and respondents may have chosen options that were socially expected but deviated from their true beliefs. Third, parents’ intent to vaccinate their children (87.7%) was higher than the actual vaccination rates of 4.2 and 8.5% that were observed in Fujian Province in 2017 and 2018, respectively. This gap may be related to parents’ participation in this study, influencing their understanding of EV-71 disease and its vaccine. Fourth, the generalization of study results may be limited as our current study only recruited participants from one province in southeastern China. Further study with a nationwide study design could be valuable. The strengths of this study are also worth mentioning. First, we used stratified and systematic sampling methods to recruit study participants, which helped to ensure the representativeness of study participants. Second, the questionnaire has shown a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.915). Third, standard training was provided to all medical staff who were recruited to conduct data collection.

5 Conclusion

Health promotion is warranted to promote the EV-71 vaccination; among parents/guardians who expressed the intention to vaccinate their children, two-thirds expressed probable intention. The HBM can be used to develop strategies for enhancing EV-71 vaccine uptake and WTP. Most importantly, the findings revealed that interventions targeting perceived barriers, i.e., the efficacy and affordability of the EV-71 vaccine, are most crucial. Concerns regarding the side effects or safety of vaccines were also significant predictors of EV-71 vaccination intent, implying that the government will put effort into enhancing public trust. The WTP was positively related to socioeconomic factors, which should guide policy recommendations for the future national EV-71 improvisation program in China. Further follow-up studies need to be conducted to determine parents’ actual vaccination rate of the EV-71 vaccine for their children.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

LC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FX: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Bridging Clinical Trial Project of Recombinant Hepatitis E Vaccine (Escherichia coli) with Mercury Removal Process Change (No.PRO-HE-011) and Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project (No. 2020CXA019).

Acknowledgments

The researcher would like to thank all the participants involved in this study. We also gratefully acknowledge the support from all the local Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 20 urban regions and 16 rural regions in Fujian. The Fujian Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention is the first corresponding institution.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Zhu, P, Ji, W, Li, D, Li, Z, Chen, Y, Dai, B, et al. Current status of hand-foot-and-mouth disease. J Biomed Sci. (2023) 30:15. doi: 10.1186/s12929-023-00908-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Aswathyraj, S, Arunkumar, G, Alidjinou, EK, and Hober, D. Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD): emerging epidemiology and the need for a vaccine strategy. Med Microbiol Immunol. (2016) 205:397–407. doi: 10.1007/s00430-016-0465-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yi, Z, Pei, S, Suo, W, Wang, X, Huang, Z, Yi, A, et al. Epidemiological characteristics, routine laboratory diagnosis, clinical signs and risk factors for hand, −foot -and -mouth disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0267716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Cox, JA, Hiscox, JA, Solomon, T, Ooi, MH, and Ng, LFP. Immunopathogenesis and virus-host interactions of enterovirus 71 in patients with hand, foot and mouth disease. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:2249. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02249

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Li, P, Huang, Y, Zhu, D, Yang, S, and Hu, D. Risk factors for severe hand-foot-mouth disease in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:716039. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.716039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. He, X, Zhang, M, Zhao, C, Zheng, P, Zhang, X, and Xu, J. From monovalent to multivalent vaccines, the exploration for potential preventive strategies against hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Virol Sin. (2021) 36:167–75. doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00294-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Koh, WM, Bogich, T, Siegel, K, Jin, J, Chong, EY, Tan, CY, et al. The epidemiology of hand, foot and mouth disease in Asia: a systematic review and analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. (2016) 35:e285–300. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001242

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Gonzalez, G, Carr, MJ, Kobayashi, M, Hanaoka, N, and Fujimoto, T. Enterovirus-associated hand-foot and mouth disease and neurological complications in Japan and the rest of the world. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:5201. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205201

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Yi, EJ, Shin, YJ, Kim, JH, Kim, TG, and Chang, SY. Enterovirus 71 infection and vaccines. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. (2017) 6:4–14. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2017.6.1.4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dong, Y, Wang, L, Burgner, DP, Miller, JE, Song, Y, Ren, X, et al. Infectious diseases in children and adolescents in China: analysis of national surveillance data from 2008 to 2017. BMJ. (2020) 369:m1043. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhao, Y, Jin, H, Zhang, X, and Wang, B. Case-fatality of hand, foot and mouth disease associated with EV71: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect. (2015) 143:3094–102. doi: 10.1017/S095026881500028X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Gan, Z, Jin, H, Li, J, Yao, X, Zhou, Y, Zhang, X, et al. Disease burden of enterovirus 71 in rural Central China: a community-based survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2015) 11:2400–5. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1059980

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yang, B, Liu, F, Liao, Q, Wu, P, Chang, Z, Huang, J, et al. Epidemiology of hand, foot and mouth disease in China, 2008 to 2015 prior to the introduction of EV-A71 vaccine. Euro Surveill. (2017) 22:16-00824. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.50.16-00824

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Mao, Q, Wang, Y, Bian, L, Xu, M, and Liang, Z. EV71 vaccine, a new tool to control outbreaks of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). Expert Rev Vaccines. (2016) 15:599–606. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1138862

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ye, L, Chen, J, Fang, T, Ma, R, Wang, J, Pan, X, et al. Vaccination coverage estimates and utilization patterns of inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine post vaccine introduction in Ningbo, China. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:1118. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11198-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Li, Z, Qin, Z, Tan, H, Zhang, C, Xu, J, Chen, J, et al. Analysis of the coverage of inactivated enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine and adverse events following immunization with the EV71 vaccine among children from 2016 to 2019 in Guangzhou. Expert Rev Vaccines. (2021) 20:907–18. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1933451

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pan, W, Zhao, Z, and Chen, J. Birth cohort analysis on inoculation rate of enterovirus 71 vaccine among children at ages of 0 ~ 5 years in Fujian Province, China from 2017 to 2018. Chin J Biol. (2020) 33:293–6.

Google Scholar

18. McWhirter, JE, and Hoffman-Goetz, L. Application of the health belief model to U.S. magazine text and image coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning (2000-2012). J Health Commun. (2016) 21:424–38. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1095819

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Reindl, D, and Catma, S. A pre-vaccine analysis using the health belief model to explain parents' willingness to vaccinate (WTV) their children in the United States: implications for vaccination programs. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. (2022) 22:753–61. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2045957

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Radisic, G, Chapman, J, Flight, I, and Wilson, C. Factors associated with parents' attitudes to the HPV vaccination of their adolescent sons: a systematic review. Prev Med. (2017) 95:26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Zambri, F, Quattrini, A, Perilli, I, Spila Alegiani, S, Marchetti, F, Colaceci, S, et al. Health belief model efficacy in explaining and predicting intention or uptake influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. (2022) 58:285–92. doi: 10.4415/ANN_22_04_09

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. He, L, Liao, Q, Huang, Y, Feng, S, and Zhuang, X. Parents’ perception and their decision on their children's vaccination against seasonal influenza in Guangzhou. Chin Med J. (2015) 128:327–41. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.150099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Yang, R, Penders, B, and Horstman, K. Addressing vaccine hesitancy in China: a scoping review of Chinese scholarship. Vaccines. (2019) 8:2. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8010002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. He, S, and Anderson, ET. Conceptualizing and measuring pathways for how object attachment affects willingness to pay (WTP). Curr Opin Psychol. (2021) 39:121–4. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ess, SM, and Szucs, TD. Economic evaluation of immunization strategies. Clin Infect Dis. (2002) 35:294–7. doi: 10.1086/341419

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Iwashita, Y, and Takemura, S. Factors associated with willingness to undergo vaccination against haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib). Jpn J Public Health. (2010) 57:381–9. doi: 10.11236/jph.57.5_381

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Becker, ME. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. (1974) 2:324–5. doi: 10.1177/109019817400200401

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Champion, VL, and Skinner, CS. The health belief model In: K Glanz, BK Rimer, and K Viswanath, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (2008). 45–65.

Google Scholar

29. Hajian-Tilaki, K. Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies. Caspian J Intern Med. (2011) 2:289–98.24551434.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Wang, Y, Meng, F, Li, J, Li, G, Hu, J, Cao, J, et al. Willingness of parents to vaccinate their 6-60-month-old children with EV71 vaccines: a cross-sectional study in rural areas of northern Jiangsu Province. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2020) 16:1579–85. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1737465

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Qi, L, Su, K, Xia, Y, Tang, W, Shen, T, and Li, Q. Enterovirus 71 vaccine acceptance among parents of children < 5 years old and their knowledge of hand, foot and mouth disease, Chongqing, China, 2017. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0225569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225569

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hosmer, DW Jr, Lemeshow, S, and Sturdivant, RX. Applied logistic regression. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons (2013).

Google Scholar

33. Cao, L, Zheng, J, Cao, L, Cui, J, and Xiao, Q. Evaluation of the impact of Shandong illegal vaccine sales incident on immunizations in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2018) 14:1672–8. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1473697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Di Giuseppe, G, Pelullo, CP, Volgare, AS, Napolitano, F, and Pavia, M. Parents’ willingness to vaccinate their children with COVID-19 vaccine: results of a survey in Italy. J Adolesc Health. (2022) 70:550–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Schnaith, AM, Evans, EM, Vogt, C, Tinsay, AM, Schmidt, TE, Tessier, KM, et al. An innovative medical school curriculum to address human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine. (2018) 36:3830–5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Matta, P, El Mouallem, R, Akel, M, Hallit, S, and Fadous Khalife, MC. Parents’ knowledge, attitude and practice towards children's vaccination in Lebanon: role of the parent-physician communication. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:1439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09526-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Bocquier, A, Fressard, L, Cortaredona, S, Zaytseva, A, Ward, J, Gautier, A, et al. Social differentiation of vaccine hesitancy among French parents and the mediating role of trust and commitment to health: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Vaccine. (2018) 36:7666–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Tang, S, Liu, X, Jia, Y, Chen, H, Zheng, P, Fu, H, et al. Education level modifies parental hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccinations for their children. Vaccine. (2023) 41:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.060

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kirbiš, A. The impact of socioeconomic status, perceived threat and healthism on vaccine hesitancy. Sustain For. (2023) 15:6107. doi: 10.3390/su15076107

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Healy, CM. Commentary on “parental vaccine-hesitancy: understanding the problem and searching for a resolution”. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2014) 10:2597–9. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.970074

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Overview of the national epidemic of statutory infectious diseases in 2021. (2022). Available at: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s3578/202204/4fd88a291d914abf8f7a91f6333567e1.shtml (Accessed November 10, 2023).

Google Scholar

42. Nguyen, TT, Chiu, CH, Lin, CY, Chiu, NC, Chen, PY, Le, TTV, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an inactivated, adjuvanted enterovirus 71 vaccine in infants and children: a multiregion, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. (2022) 399:1708–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00313-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Rajamoorthy, Y, Taib, NM, Harapan, H, Wagner, AL, and Munusamy, S. Application of the double bounded dichotomous choice model to the estimation of parent’s willingness to pay for the hand foot mouth disease vaccination: a survey in Selangor, Malaysia. PLoS One. (2023) 18:e0286924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286924

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Lee, BY, Wateska, AR, Bailey, RR, Tai, JH, Bacon, KM, and Smith, KJ. Forecasting the economic value of an enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine. Vaccine. (2010) 28:7731–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wang, W, Song, J, Wang, J, Li, Y, Deng, H, Li, M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a national enterovirus 71 vaccination program in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2017) 11:e0005899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: HFMD, EV-71 vaccine, willingness-to-pay, children, China

Citation: Cheng L, Zhong S, Xu X, Li J, Xie F, Lin Y and Zhang D (2024) Chinese parents’ intention to vaccinate their 0–5-year-old children with the EV-71 vaccine against hand, foot, and mouth disease and willingness-to-pay. Front. Public Health. 12:1336687. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1336687

Received: 11 November 2023; Accepted: 31 January 2024;
Published: 07 March 2024.

Edited by:

Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, University of Parma, Italy

Reviewed by:

Charles J. Vukotich Jr., University of Pittsburgh, United States
Harpaljit Kaur, Taylor’s University, Malaysia

Copyright © 2024 Cheng, Zhong, Xu, Li, Xie, Lin and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dongjuan Zhang, dongj8888@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.