- 1Department of Smart Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 2Shizong County People's Hospital, Yunnan, China
Background: Health screenings are promoted worldwide as they help detect and prevent overall health issues. Despite expanding coverage, the participation rate among the retired population has not significantly increased. Given the special role of health screenings in promoting health and healthy aging, understanding the behavioral intentions, and influencing factors of retirees’ voluntary participation in health screenings is crucial. This study aims to explore the participation intentions in health screenings among the Chinese retired population by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Self-Efficacy (SE).
Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design to conduct an online questionnaire among 311 retirees in 2023. The questionnaire, tailored for the Chinese retired population, combines the TPB theory and Self-Efficacy theory, including demographic structure, the basic structure of TPB, and SE.
Results: A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach was used to identify factors related to health screening behaviors. Of the respondents, 311 completed the survey (88.9% response rate). The most crucial determinant of health examination behavior was behavioral intention, with a correlation score of (1.524, p < 0.001). Significant correlates of behavioral intention included Subjective Norms (SN) and Self-Efficacy (SE), followed by Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) and Attitude (AT), with correlation scores of (0.401, p < 0.001), (0.339, p < 0.001), (0.082, p < 0.001), and (0.060, p < 0.05), respectively.
Conclusion: This study provides insights for enhancing the willingness and behavior of retirees to participate in health screenings.
1 Introduction
Health screening helps to detect and prevent the overall health of individuals, and maintaining good physical health can improve the quality of life of individuals and enhance psychological and social well-being (1). Health screening refers to the practice of checking disease indicators before symptoms appear. A considerable proportion of health screening in China are offered as packages—often including X-rays, ultrasound, CT, and an extensive array of tumor markers and genetic tests (2). In China, although health screening coverage has expanded over the past decade, most potential beneficiaries remain unscreened and underserved (3, 4). Population aging is the new normal for society in this century (5). With the continuous development of the social economy, retirees’ health and well-being are affected by income, free time, social roles, and life partners of life (6–8). Given the unique role that health screening plays in promoting health and healthy aging, it is crucial to understand the behavioral intentions and factors influencing voluntary participation in health screening among retirees. Previous research has explored the importance of Health screening from different perspectives, including community health centers, urban populations, rural populations, lifestyle interventions (9–12), and disease screening (13–15). Many retirees were not fully aware of the benefits of health screening to themselves and their families. They believed that there was a low risk of acquiring underlying diseases and getting sick, so they did not need to attend health screening. A lack of awareness of health screening was a major reason why people did not participate.
The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) theoretical framework is often used to explain behavioral intentions and has been widely applied to health behavior (16). Its essence is a social cognitive theory of decision-making processes, considered an effective theoretical framework for behavioral guidance. In the context of health behavior, retiree participation in Health screening behavior (PB) is essentially determined by participation intention (PI); among them, PI is influenced by the attitude of whether to participate in health screening (AT), the opinions of people around retiree about health screening (SN), and the individual’s decision to participate in health screening (PBC). The theoretical framework provides a promising avenue for understanding retirement groups’ behavioral intentions and behaviors in Health screening. A large number of studies (17–19) proved that TPB can successfully predict health behaviors and found that TPB can effectively predict different types of Health screening behavior (20, 21). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the psychological factors related to health screening intentions among Chinese retirees and to understand retirees’ participation intentions and motivations, which could help improve the examination rate. We hypothesized the applicability of TPB in explaining the role of Chinese retirees participating in health screening.
Along with the TPB model, many studies have combined SE for discussion; SE is another important decision-making factor that predicts health behavior (22–24). Researchers have found that self-efficacy positively impacts one’s intention to engage in activities and effectively increases the likelihood of that behavior. It is a strong health predictor as it affects patients’ certainty about their ability to perform recommended behaviors to improve their health. These findings have been demonstrated in various area studies relating to health behavior (25–27). The contributions of this study are as follows.
Previous research mainly focused on health screening in the clinical field or big data screening in public health. This study predicts the participation intention of current health screening and the influencing factors of participation behavior from the perspective of personal psychology and behavior. Then, this study adds SE to the TPB theoretical framework and verifies the feasibility of the TPB extended model in the health screening behavior of retired people. Finally, this study demonstrates the inherent mechanism between the four prediction dimensions. Through the analysis of 311 valid questionnaires, it explores the influencing mechanism of retirees’ willingness to participate in physical examinations, aiming to help decision-makers formulate relevant policies and regulations and provide Practitioners provide reliable project design guidance. And more clearly identify participants’ participation intentions and participation status from a practical perspective.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 examines the literature on the TPB and SE and explains the theoretical background. Additionally, we propose several hypotheses. In sections 3 and 4, we describe our data and present the descriptive statistics. Section 5 analyzes the research results and the limitations and suggestions. Finally, Section 6 provides a conclusion highlighting future research implications.
2 Literature review
2.1 Theory of planned behavior
The theoretical framework of this study was adapted from the TPB. They propose that an individual’s intention to engage in a specific behavior is the strongest predictor of that behavior (16). The relationships between these factors (AT, SN, and PBC) in the TPB model all have been supported when applied to different health behaviors. Such as McEachan’s review of the literature discussing health-related behaviors surveyed 206 papers using the TPB theory, and the authors concluded that TPB was a good predictor of health behaviors (28). Moreover, the TPB has also been used as a theoretical framework for designing health behavior interventions, including promoting physical activity (29) or protect oral health (30). They expand the explanatory power of TPB.
In addition, based on the TPB model, most studies of participation in Health screening intention or behavior focus on cancer screening for men or women. For example, one study found women’s promotion of cervical cancer screening rates (31), Sun’s studies in rural women’s willingness to participate in breast cancer (32), and Sieverding’s research men—participation in prostate cancer screening (33). The authors found that TPB use and Health screening in retirees have not been studied. Therefore, this research aims to explore the feasibility of using the TPB theory to investigate the participation of retired individuals in Health screening in China.
2.1.1 Attitude toward the participate intention
Attitude (AT) reflects an individual’s evaluation of performing health screening, seen as either positive or negative (34, 35). This concept suggests that attitudes toward specific health behaviors, such as cancer screenings, significantly influence participation, 2023; Sun et al. (31, 32). Research in retired populations indicates that attitudes can predict engagement in activities like sports (36) and influence intentions to seek mental health help (37). A study on older adults with hearing loss highlighted that those positive attitudes toward their condition encouraged health-seeking behaviors (38). Thus, AT is thought to involve intentions to undergo health screenings, associated concerns or emotions, and the belief in the health benefits of health screenings.
2.1.2 Subjective norm toward the participation intention
Subjective norms (SN), reflecting perceived social pressure, significantly influence health behavior intentions. Studies indicate SN’s strong impact on specific health actions, with norms categorized into descriptive (observing others’ actions) and injunctive (beliefs about what significant others think one should do) (39–41). Yap found that higher perceived social pressure increases the intention to participate in health screenings (42). Similarly, recommendations significantly affect decisions like HPV vaccination among young women (43) and seeking cancer help among retired men (44). Chang’s study highlighted the media’s role in shaping behaviors like hearing aid use among the older adult (45). In our study, retirees’ health checkup decisions were influenced by significant others, with family, friends, and authority figures playing crucial roles in their choices. Online information also impacts their perceptions and decisions regarding health screenings.
2.1.3 Perceived behavioral control toward the participation intention
Perceived behavioral control (PBC) reflects an individual’s belief in their capability and control over actions, influencing the ease of performing behaviors (34). Recognized as a critical health asset, PBC correlates with health behavior intentions and actions (46, 47). Studies show PBC linked to behaviors like responsible drinking (48) and parental actions to prevent children’s myopia (49). In type 2 diabetes management, PBC significantly influences treatment participation, with patients more willing to undergo injections believing in better disease control (20, p. 2). Others highlighted PBC’s role in mitigating aging-related declines (50) and in promoting physical activity among older adults (32, 51). This study posits that retirees’ PBC affects their decision and ability to engage in health screenings.
2.1.4 Participation intention and behavior in health checks
Understanding the role of intention in participating in health behaviors is critical, as it directly affects participation in health Screening. Intention has been proven to be a direct determinant of behavioral orientation in the mental health management of the older adult (52), diabetic patient care (53, 54), and oral health (55). Literature on CCS health screenings indicates intentions can account for behavioral differences (56). However, intentions do not always result in actions, as seen in a study on older adults with osteoarthritis in Portugal, where intention had little effect on physical activity (57). The participation intention we discuss in this study is the degree of readiness to perform health screening behaviors, which can include positive and negative attitudes and is influenced by the advice of significant others.
2.2 Self-efficacy toward the participation intention
Self-efficacy, reflecting confidence in managing health outcomes and perceived health competence, strongly predicts health behaviors (58, 59). It is linked to behaviors that improve older adult health (60, 61)and influences life satisfaction (62), community health activity engagement (63), and health management (64, 65). Schwarzer highlighted that action self-efficacy predicts preventive health actions in the older adult (66). Retirement impacts seniors’ health behaviors, with high self-efficacy post-retirement enhancing health actions, such as increased smoking cessation rates among retirees (67, 68). Leisure self-efficacy also improves retired individuals’ quality of life (69). Despite these findings, the causal link between self-efficacy and behavior requires further exploration (70). This study examines self-efficacy as a predictor of retirees’ engagement in preventive health measures, specifically in health screening participation, including planning and adherence to health screening activities.
2.3 Development of hypotheses
This research examines the influence of retirees’ internal determinants on decision-making and participation in health screening activities. We put forward two research questions:
RQ1: What specific reasons influence retirees’ voluntary participation in Health screening?
RQ2: To what extent do these factors influence the likelihood of retirees voluntarily engaging in health screening behaviors?
These two research questions aim to identify factors contributing to voluntary participation in health screening among retired individuals. Additionally, they seek to determine how these factors impact retirees’ intentions to participate in Health screening voluntarily. These research questions are essential as they assist practitioners or policymakers in better serving retired individuals and addressing the challenges associated with the aging population.
Based on the TBP model and prior studies, the following hypothesis was proposed:
H1: The AT of retirees toward health screening positively correlates with their willingness to participate in Health screening.
H2: The SN of retirees regarding health screening positively correlates with their willingness to participate in Health screening.
H3: Retirees' PBC to participate in health screening and intention to participate are positively related.
H4: Retirees' SE to participate in health screening and intention to participate are positively related.
H5: Retirees' PI in Health screening and the PB of the retirees are positively correlated.
Based on the above hypotheses, we could add new variables (SE) to the TPB model on a reasonable basis. The research examines survey data on the retired population’s intentions to participate in Health screening and will relate influencing factors. Combined with the existing literature, the research hypotheses and the model adopted in this study were developed based on TPB, shown in Figure 1.
3 Methods
3.1 Instrument
To test the above hypothesis (Figure 1), this study used multi-item scales to measure each variable, which provides better stability and minimizes measurement error. These well-established scales have been rigorously tested in numerous studies and have shown good reliability and validity. The measurement items of this study were evaluated and refined based on the previous research scale to ensure the validity and reliability of the content and to be more suitable for retirees’ health screening behavior.
The TPB Measures include TPB structure and SE factor (Items are displayed in Table 1). The TPB structure is adapted from the TPB scale (71), and has been used in four previous research studies, Shumeli (72), Xin (31), and Dilekler (73), and Babazadeh (39): AT (Q6-Q9) refers to retirees’ positive or negative emotional feedback on participating in health screening behavior, SN (Q10-Q13) refers to retirees are more likely to be influenced by other influential people when participating in health screening. PBC (Q14-Q17) refers to how retirees can decide how easy it is to participate in health screening. PI (Q22-Q25) refers to the direct motivation of retirees to participate in health screening. PB (Q26-Q29) refers to retirees’ actual behavior of participating in health screening. In addition to the TPB construct, the questionnaire also included SE (Q18-Q21) as antecedents, which was adapted from the Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (75), Stout (74) and Dolatabadi (25), referring to the degree to which retirees feel confident in their ability to manage their health effectively. The measurement items consist of a total of 24 items, and the constructs are measured using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (representing “strongly agree”) to 5 (defining “strongly disagree”). Likert scales assume that attitudes can be assessed, and that the degree of attitude lies on a linear continuum between strongly agree and strongly disagree. All items used in the questionnaire were translated into Chinese.
To ensure the questionnaire’s content validity, we consulted a panel of experts, including three senior medical professionals specializing in health screening, two university lecturers with expertise in English, and two health educators. Their feedback was instrumental in finalizing the survey questionnaire.
3.2 Data collection
To meet the requirements of our study design, considering that we have 29 variables and following the principle that each variable requires at least 10 samples, we needed a minimum of 290 participants. To test the research hypotheses, we collected data from retired people in Shizong County, Yunnan Province. All data were collected between May and July 2023. An online questionnaire was generated on the platform with a unique web link. We used a screening question: “Have you reached retirement age or are preparing to retire? Are you willing to participate in this survey?” to exclude participants who do not meet the age standards and are unwilling to participate in the study to ensure that participants in the questionnaire meet China’s retirement age Conditions include early retirement (45 years for women and 50 years for men) and mandatory retirement (50 years for women and 60 years for men) (76). Through these procedures, a total of 350 questionnaires were distributed. After excluding invalid questionnaires with basically the same answers, logical errors, or response times of less than 15 s, 311 valid responses were obtained, and the overall effective questionnaire response rate was 88.9%. This study complied with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Shizong County, Yunnan Province.
3.3 Ethical considerations
This study complied with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Shizong County, Yunnan Province, ethics code/number: YNSZ-IRB-020-20230524.
3.4 Sample characteristics
As shown in Table 2, in the demographic analysis, the age group of 50–64 years had the highest number of participants in Health Screening, accounting for 47.91% of the total. The age group of 65–74 years accounted for 36.66%. Regarding gender distribution, females accounted for 45.02%, while males accounted for 54.98%. Regarding education, 45.98% had a high school education or below, 33.44% had a vocational education, 13.50% had a bachelor’s degree, and 7.07% had a graduate degree or above. Regarding the participants’ occupations before retirement, the highest proportion was observed among employees of state-owned enterprises and public institutions, accounting for 52.41%. Regarding monthly income distribution, 45.34% had incomes between 2001 and 5,000 yuan, while 42.77% had revenues ≤2000 yuan.
3.5 Data analysis methods
This research employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the conceptual framework. We used SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 26.0 to analyze the main factors influencing retirees’ participation in health examinations. Firstly, frequency analysis was conducted to determine the participants’ general characteristics. Secondly, confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the AMOS 26.0 software to validate the dimensions and validity of the variable factor structure.
4 Results
4.1 Measurement tool assessment
4.1.1 Results of the reliability and validity test
This section uses confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the agreement between the five factors and the theoretical model. Total reliability (CR) and average variance extraction (AVE) evaluated the indicators’ convergent and discriminant validity. AVE values >0.5 and CR values >0.7 are generally recommended (77). In this research, Cronbach’s alpha values of all variables are above 0.7, indicating good internal consistency reliability. All variables’ composite reliability (CR) values exceeded 0.7, indicating sufficient convergent validity (78). In addition, the AVE values of the six factors involved in this research (AT et al.) were all greater than 0.5, indicating that the scale data have excellent discriminant validity (Table 3). The results show that the scale has good reliability and validity.
4.1.2 Results of the reliability and validity test
Table 4 shows the results of the discriminant validity test. The square root values of the AVEs for all facets were higher than the inter-facet correlations, demonstrating sufficient discriminant power.
4.2 Assessment of the structural model and the hypotheses
4.2.1 Model fitting
In the first step of hypothesis testing, the structural model was evaluated. Our model shows a good fit for the data. The structural equation fit of the model was (χ2 = 871.9, df = 2,449, p = 0.00, CMIN/df = 3.502, NFI = 0.739, CFI = 0.797 IFI = 0.799, and RMSEA = 0.090). All fit index values were acceptable according to the established fit criteria (79).
4.2.2 Hypothesis testing and path size significance
This study calculated the path coefficient and p value through bootstrapping with a sample of 311 subjects. As shown in Table 4; Figure 2, all hypotheses are supported at a significant level of p < 0.05 or p < 0.001.
In this research, 311 retirees were surveyed, and the path coefficient and p value were calculated. As shown in Table 5; Figure 2, the intention-oriented hypothesis of participating in the health examination shows that the relationship between AT and PI is statistically significant when p < 0.05, showing a positive effect (0.060), which supports hypothesis H1. Secondly, the relationship between the three psychological factors (SN et al.) and the intention to participate in the behavior is statistically significant when p < 0.001, SN and SE have a significant effect on the PI had a significant positive effect (0.401 and 0.339). PBC had a positive correlation (0.082) with PI, supporting hypotheses H2, H3, and H4, respectively. Finally, PI has a significant positive correlation (1.524) to PB, so hypothesis H5 holds.
5 Discussion
This study investigated the relationship between retirees’ intention to participate in health screening and actual participation by extending the TPB and incorporating SE. Research shows that the behavior of retirees to participate in health screening depends on their intentions and is directly affected by SN and SE. SN and SE significantly affect retirees’ participation behavior, with participation intention as a mediator. PBC and AT have weak effects on retirees’ intention to participate. All hypotheses in the model were supported, confirming that TPB is an acceptable theoretical basis for this study. This finding is consistent with previous TPB-based studies conducted in the United States (80), China (81, 82), and Europe (57).
This chapter discusses the theoretical and practical implications of our study in detail. Finally, we will also address the limitations of our study and provide recommendations for future research in this area.
5.1 Predictive factors
5.1.1 Predictive factors of intention for health screening
The results indicate that SN, SE, PBC, and AT positively impact retirees’ intention to participate in health Screening.
The results found that SN is the most critical predictor of retirees’ behavioral intention to participate in health check-ups, and it has the highest correlation with PI. This result echoes previous research that SN can well predict intentions in health behaviors (28) from the three aspects of social support, family support, and collectivism (31, 41, 54). It was also found that the external environment positively impacts SN (83), that is, the widespread use of social software and the accessibility of health information in the Internet environment. Social support in social networks is a significant health resource. High levels of social support are associated with better health behaviors and a greater intent to participate in health screening. This is further emphasized by the recent Chollou study (84).
This study confirms the feasibility of incorporating Self-Efficacy (SE) into the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), aligning with the views of Fishbein and Cappella that SE can better explain individual behavior within TPB (85). For instance, (86) found that blood donors with higher SE are more positively influenced by their participation experience. Similarly, Oikarinen noted in their study on the dietary habits of obese individuals that those with lower SE face more challenges in weight control (26), highlighting the importance of SE in self-care behaviors (87). In summary, within the TPB framework, researchers explain that individuals with higher perceived social acceptance and stronger SE are more likely to engage in certain behaviors in reality (88), a viewpoint our research also supports. Furthermore, we found a positive link between Social Norms (SN) and SE, where an increase in SN is accompanied by a rise in SE, similar to our findings, anothers also showed thereby positively affecting the intention to participate in health behaviors (89). In health behavior promotion, the external environment’s impact on SE could either facilitate or hinder self-care behaviors (90).
This study also discusses the role of SE in TPB, which is consistent with the conclusion of many researchers that SE better explains individual behavior in TPB (85). For example, in studies on voluntary blood donation behavior, experienced blood donors with higher SE were more susceptible to the influence of their participation behavior (86). In a study of poor eating habits in obese individuals, those with lower SE were less able to control their weight, making successful weight loss more challenging (26). Overall, within the framework of the TPB, the researchers explained that individuals with higher perceived social acceptance and more robust SE are more likely to perform certain behaviors in reality (88), and our research supports this view. In addition, SN and SE influence each other. When SN increases, SE will also increase. SE can increase an individual’s subjective commitment to perform a specific health behavior and fulfill others’ expectations, thus positively affecting the intention to participate (89).
In addition, there is a positive correlation between PBC and PI. However, the strength of this relationship is weaker compared to SN and SE, which is consistent with previous studies in the literature (91, 92). Our findings support this notion. When SE and PBC coexist, SE can serve as a better measure (93). In 2020, Ajzen proposed after further research on TPB that both refer to people’s belief in their ability to perform a given behavior. However, operationally, PBC and SE are often assessed different ways (94). This also confirms previous research results.
Interestingly, a significant difference found in this study compared to previous studies is that AT’s impact is smaller than other influencing factors. Our survey on AT is consistent with a small number of prior investigations (31, 54). There may be several reasons for this result. First, the retired group has a low level of education and limited knowledge of health examinations, resulting in distrust and disparity in health. This is consistent with the research of Zheng (95) and Guo (96). When patients have a low disease background, health information avoidance will make people face the disease or take preventive measures. Based on these factors, individuals may exhibit avoidance attitudes (AT) toward health examinations, which does not positively affect their willingness to participate (PI). Secondly, another possible reason for this result may be the existence of a neutral attitude (97, 98). Recent research (99) confirms that an apathetic attitude is negatively related to behavior. In this study, retirees showed no apparent positive or negative attitudes toward health screenings, defined as neutral attitudes. Another possible explanation for speculation is that attitudes toward current health research differ due to different target types (health protection and health risks) (40). Attitudes show great predictive power when directed toward high-reward health behaviors—health-risk behaviors, such as smoking or alcohol abuse. Therefore, the impact of AT on PI is relatively small in this case. Since this study is an empirical study, local retirees may be neutral in their attitudes toward whether to participate in health screening, and there may be other unmeasured antecedent variables that impact AT results. The measurement of AT and its role in health screening PI warrants further study.
5.1.2 Predictive factors of health screening behavior
In this research, we also determined the influence coefficient of PI-PB, the final link of TPB, which further confirmed that TPB is suitable for studying voluntary behavior and its applicability in health behavior. Accumulated evidence shows that intention is the most crucial factor in the theory of planned behavior. Best predictor. PI effectively promotes the generation of PB in health behaviors, which is consistent with previous findings in the intention-behavior relationship that reasonable intentions may provide better behavior prediction (100–102). This provides strong evidence for the decisive impact of PI on PB. In our study, the effects of AT, SN, PBC, and SE on participation intention were all valid, and the impact of PI on retiree health checkup PB was not inconsistent with previous studies. This provides strong evidence for the decisive impact of PI on PB. Retirees have a strong willingness to participate in health screening. In previous studies (67), people were restricted from participating in various health examinations, which may be why people are not enthusiastic about participating in health examinations. Because of intention-behavior congruence, this also means that people are less likely to engage in healthy behaviors when intentions are not strong.
This study aims to identify the factors that motivate Chinese retirees to participate in health screenings and how they influence their participation intentions by incorporating Self-Efficacy (SE) into the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). A distinctive aspect of this research is the addition of new variables to overcome the TPB model’s limitations in explanatory power. This approach coincides with Ranjbaran’s study, where SE not only enhances the TPB’s explanatory power for health participation behavior but also provides a unique perspective for discussions on health promotion and public health (103). Enhanced the explanatory power of the model in health participation behavior. This study focuses on exploring the individual participation behavioral intentions of retired people through the perspective of TPB. This unique perspective contributes to discussing health promotion, public health, and active aging. Third, to the best of the researchers’ knowledge, this study is one of the few empirical studies on retiree health screening behavior and intention to participate. The results of SEM show that all hypotheses in the extended TPB model are significantly supported, and the final data are consistent with the theoretical predictions. This makes this study significant and further proves TPB’s predictive utility. Judging from the results of this study, it is valuable for us to extend the TPB model, which will validate its effectiveness in health promotion research. To explore the effective expansion of the TPB expansion model in health participation behavior in public health and healthcare.
5.2 Implications
5.2.1 Theoretical implications
This study provides theoretical and practical research. The theoretical contributions derived from this study are, first, an in-depth exploration of the particularities of the retired group, considering that their life situations, personal needs, and experiences are significantly different from those of other age groups. Therefore, their socio-psychological factors, including AT, SN, PBC, and SE also show different characteristics. Notably, unlike previous research, we found that PBC did not predict behavioral intentions among retired people as strongly as expected. We also observed differences in people’s AT for health checks in different social backgrounds. SN of retired groups and SE of new entrants are significant predictors. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of these factors is crucial to improving the intention of retired people to participate in health checks. Secondly, the study introduced self-efficacy and incorporated it into the TPB model, which can better adapt to the needs of this retired group. The results suggest that targeting participation intentions among retired people may require particular emphasis on subjective norms and self-efficacy rather than just changing attitudes. This theoretical expansion helps to understand better the decision-making process and behavioral intentions of retired people and provides more comprehensive evidence for health promotion and intervention. Finally, by integrating social psychology (SE) and decision-making theory (TPB), we provide a broader perspective on understanding the decision-making process for health behaviors. This integration fills the theoretical gap between the two and helps better meet retired groups’ needs in health behavior intervention. By focusing on this specific group, we help fill the knowledge gap about the health behaviors of retired people. Therefore, it is significant to study the relationship between participation intentions and participation behaviors in retired people. With these in mind, we recommend incorporating research samples into health management studies of older adults to understand better and address their needs.
5.2.2 Practical implications
Practically, research on retirees’ health checkup willingness provides valuable suggestions for improving the follow-up health checkup service process. First, our findings highlight the importance of subjective norms and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy is vital among people aged 25–65, and personal perceptions are highest during this period. In contrast, after age 65, self-efficacy will weaken with subjective perception, and mental and physical health will decline, damaging personal autonomy. However, family support and social support will significantly improve this situation. Healthy psychological and social factors determine the health outcomes of retired people, and social support has profound health benefits for them. As a social and psychological pressure, retirement has a huge impact on retired people. This can improve SE through strategies such as planning a series of health screening.
On the other hand, both interpersonal influence and external influence have a positive impact on subjective norms. Among them, social networks (i.e., social support) under the Internet are the best embodiment of external power. In China, most retirees always stay on their mobile devices, and their daily lives must be separated from the mobile Internet. Social software allows people to communicate more frequently, quickly, and effectively and is more susceptible to their influence. The Internet’s rapid development has reduced the lag in obtaining external information. They can promptly obtain information that is difficult to distinguish between true and false, feedback from mass media, recommendations from merchants, and even advertisements based on geographical location, which make them more susceptible to external influence. Health service operators can comprehensively promote the benefits of health examinations and the importance of health through the Internet and can also apply them to improve lifestyles after health examinations. For example, subjective norms can be reinforced through regular reminders from family, friends, doctors, or health management software, as well as relevant news notifications from government policies and media agencies. These measures will help improve customer satisfaction with health examination services, improve the quality of health examination services, and help formulate relevant policies and plans for health checks services. Since 2018, Chinese physical examination institutions have been increasing year by year and launching physical examination packages for different types of groups. A complete health examination service process can improve customers’ overall health examination experience and willingness to conduct regular health checks.
5.2.3 Policy implications
Finally, this study provides some policy implications. This study discusses factors that significantly influence the participation experience of the retired population. It is worth pointing out that regular health checks have always been a healthy lifestyle recommended by the government, especially for controlling blood pressure and blood sugar, which is crucial for preventing most chronic diseases. The government encourages retired people to use these resources to actively participate in health check-ups by providing free health checks opportunities and publishing and disseminating relevant information. In recent years, innovative medical care and healthy aging have become increasingly popular in China, and more and more hospitals and medical institutions have continued to upgrade and improve the quality of medical services. Policies such as smart medical care and healthy aging are continuously optimized and upgraded in this process. Future policymakers can refer to these related influencing factors when discussing future policies or regulations on intelligent healthcare and healthy aging. In addition, as healthy aging and smart healthcare continue to develop, and more and more institutions invest in them, health examination policies will face many challenges, such as addressing ethical issues, privacy concerns, and individual rights issues when formulating examination activities. Our study takes a first step toward addressing these challenges by identifying specific influencing factors that may contribute to these problems. These influencing factors provide us with valuable entry points to address these challenges.
5.3 Limitations and future directions
This research identified three limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Firstly, due to the limitation of sample size, our research can only represent some retired individuals, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, our model may not include other potential influencing factors, such as the quality of health examination services and economic factors. Including these factors could yield different results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing retired individuals’ intention to participate in health examinations. Lastly, this research is based on a cross-sectional survey with a single dataset, which limits the ability to establish causal relationships. The research did not consider the time frame (e.g., “in the past,” “before retirement,” or “soon to retire”) for investigating the mindset changes before and after retirement. It would be valuable for future research to explore longitudinal changes in the attitudes of retired individuals toward health examinations if the survey data allow for such analysis.
6 Conclusion
This study delves into the relationship between retirees’ intentions to participate in health screenings and their actual behavior by extending the TPB and incorporating SE. The findings reveal a significant positive impact of SN and SE on retirees’ intentions to participate in health screenings while also confirming the mediating role of intention between AT, SN, PBC, and SE. These results are consistent with previous TPB-based studies both domestically and internationally, further emphasizing the importance of considering SE in health behavior research. It further proves the predictive utility of TPB and its extended model in health promotion research, offering a new perspective on understanding retirees’ health screening behaviors, especially in assessing how social support and personal beliefs influence health behavior intentions. Additionally, by including SE as a component of the TPB model, this study enhances the model’s explanatory power in explaining health participation behavior, providing a unique perspective for discussions on health promotion, public health, and active aging and laying a theoretical foundation for future health promotion strategies.
On a practical level, this study offers valuable insights for health screening service companies and policymakers. It highlights the need to pay special attention to enhancing retirees’ sense of social norms and SE when designing health screening services and related policies to promote their active participation. Moreover, the study’s findings support the idea that future policies should focus more on retirees’ health screening experiences to increase their willingness and frequency of participation in health screenings.
Despite its theoretical and practical contributions, this study has limitations, such as sample representativeness and consideration of potential influencing factors. Therefore, future research needs to explore other factors that may influence retirees’ health screening behaviors further and how different interventions can effectively increase their willingness to participate.
This study underscores the importance of understanding and enhancing social norms and SE in promoting retirees’ participation in health screenings. By designing interventions targeting these factors, we can more effectively promote health management among retirees, thereby improving public health standards and the quality of life for the older adult.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
This study complied with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Shizong County, Yunnan Province, ethics code/number: YNSZ-IRB-020-20230524.
Author contributions
JX: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. YP: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. QL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the participants of this study for their time and willingness to share their experiences and feelings.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. World Health Organization (2022). “A short guide to cancer screening: increase effectiveness, maximize benefits and minimize harm.”
2. Gong, W, and Cheng, KK. Challenges in screening and general health checks in China. Lancet Public Health. (2022) 7:e989–90. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00207-9
3. Xia, C, Basu, P, Kramer, BS, Li, H, Chunfeng, Q, Xue Qin, Y, et al. Cancer screening in China: a steep road from evidence to implementation. Lancet Public Health. (2023) 8:e996–e1005. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00186-X
4. Yip, W, Hongqiao, F, Jian, W, Liu, J, Pan, J, Duo, X, et al. Universal health coverage in China part 1: Progress and gaps. Lancet Public Health. (2023) 8:e1025–34. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00254-2
5. Lu, J, and Liu, Q. Four decades of studies on population aging in China. China Popul Dev Stud. (2019) 3:24–36. doi: 10.1007/s42379-019-00027-4
6. Infurna, FJ, Gerstorf, D, and Lachman, ME. Midlife in the 2020s: opportunities and challenges. Am Psychol. (2020) 75:470–85. doi: 10.1037/amp0000591
7. La, R, Crystal, J, Haslam, C, and Steffens, NK. A meta-analysis of retirement adjustment predictors. J Vocat Behav. (2022) 136:103723. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103723
8. Wang, M, and Shi, J. Psychological research on retirement. Annu Rev Psychol. (2014) 65:209–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115131
9. Amorim, SM, Freitas, LH, and França, P. Retirement well-being: a systematic review of the literature. Temas Em Psicol. (2019) 27:155–72. doi: 10.9788/TP2019.1-12
10. Bender, AM, Jørgensen, T, and Pisinger, C. Do high participation rates improve effects of population-based general health checks? Prev Med. (2017) 100:269–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.008
11. Du, B, and Yuexuan, M. The relationship between health changes and community health screening participation among older people. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:870157. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870157
12. Du, M, Li, P, Tang, L, Min, X, Chen, X, and Long, H. Cognition, attitude, practice toward health checkup and associated factors among urban residents in Southwest China, Sichuan Province, 2022: a community-based study. J Public Health. (2023):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10389-023-01883-8
13. Bender, AM, Jørgensen, T, and Pisinger, C. Is self-selection the Main driver of positive interpretations of general health checks? The Inter99 randomized trial. Prev Med. (2015) 81:42–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.004
14. Kim, S, Choi, S, Kim, J, Park, S, Kim, Y, Park, O, et al. Trends in health behaviors over 20 years: findings from the 1998-2018 Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey. Epidemiol Health. (2021) 43:e2021026. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021026
15. Krogsbøll, LT, Jørgensen, KJ, Larsen, CG, and Gøtzsche, PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMJ. (2012) 345:e7191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7191
16. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. (1991) 50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
17. Aschwanden, D, Strickhouser, JE, Sesker, AA, Lee, JH, Luchetti, M, Terracciano, A, et al. Preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: associations with perceived behavioral control, attitudes, and subjective norm. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:662835. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.662835
18. Cheng, OY, Yam, CLY, Cheung, NS, Lee, PLP, Ngai, MC, and Lin, CY. Extended theory of planned behavior on eating and physical activity. Am J Health Behav. (2019) 43:569–81. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.43.3.11
19. Lareyre, O, Gourlan, M, Stoebner-Delbarre, A, and Cousson-Gélie, F. Characteristics and impact of theory of planned behavior interventions on smoking behavior: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Med. (2021) 143:106327. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106327
20. Hsu, S-H, Tang, KP, Lin, CH, Chen, PC, and Wang, LH. Applying the theory of planned behavior to investigate type 2 diabetes patients’ intention to receive injection therapy. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1066633. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1066633
21. Malcolm, ON, Nelson, A, Modeste, NN, and Gavaza, P. Factors influencing implementation of personalized prevention plans among annual wellness visit patients using the theory of planned behavior: a quantitative study. Res Soc Adm Pharm. (2021) 17:1636–44. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.01.002
22. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. (1977) 84:191–215.
23. Jalilian, F, Mirzaei-Alavijeh, M, Ahmadpanah, M, Mostafaei, S, Kargar, M, Pirouzeh, R, et al. Extension of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to predict patterns of marijuana use among young Iranian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:1981. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061981
24. Tolma, EL, Reininger, BM, Evans, A, and Ureda, J. Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Educ Behav. (2006) 33:233–51. doi: 10.1177/1090198105277393
25. Dolatabadi, S, Bohlouli, B, and Amin, M. Associations between perceived self-efficacy and Oral health Behaviours in adolescents. Int J Dent Hyg. (2022) 20:593–600. doi: 10.1111/idh.12610
26. Oikarinen, N, Jokelainen, T, Heikkilä, L, Nurkkala, M, Hukkanen, J, Salonurmi, T, et al. Low eating self-efficacy is associated with unfavorable eating behavior tendencies among individuals with overweight and obesity. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:7730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34513-0
27. Papadakos, J, Barnsley, J, Berta, W, Rowlands, G, Samoil, D, and Howell, D. The association of self-efficacy and health literacy to chemotherapy self-management behaviors and health service utilization. Support Care Cancer. (2022) 30:603–13. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06466-5
28. McEachan, RR, Charlotte, MC, Taylor, NJ, and Lawton, RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related Behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. (2011) 5:97–144. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.521684
29. Esposito, G, van Bavel, R, Baranowski, T, and Duch-Brown, N. Applying the model of goal-directed behavior, including descriptive norms, to physical activity intentions: a contribution to improving the theory of planned behavior. Psychol Rep. (2016) 119:5–26. doi: 10.1177/0033294116649576
30. Karimi-Shahanjarini, A, Makvandi, Z, Faradmal, J, Bashirian, S, and Hazavehei, MM. An examination of the past behaviour-intention relationship in the case of brushing Children’s teeth. Oral Health Prev Dent. (2016) 14:509–17. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a37136
31. Xin, T, Jiang, Y, Li, C, Ding, X, Zhu, Z, and Chen, X. Using planned behavior theory to understand cervical Cancer screening intentions in Chinese women. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1063694. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1063694
32. Sun, Y, Yuan, J, Liu, W, Qin, B, Zhiqing, H, Li, J, et al. Predicting rural Women’s breast Cancer screening intention in China: a PLS-SEM approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:858788. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.858788
33. Sieverding, M, Matterne, U, and Ciccarello, L. What role do social norms play in the context of men’s cancer screening intention and behavior? Application of an extended theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol. (2010) 29:72–81. doi: 10.1037/a0016941
34. Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior In: J Kuhl and J Beckmann, editors. Action Control. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg (1985). 11–39.
35. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. (2011) 26:1113–27. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
36. Horne, M, Emsley, R, Woodham, A, Wearden, A, and Skelton, DA. Associations of intention to undertake physical activity among community dwelling British south Asian adults aged 60 years and over: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. (2018) 162:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.05.005
37. Adams, C, Gringart, E, Strobel, N, and Masterman, P. Help-seeking for mental health problems among older adults with chronic disease: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Aust J Psychol. (2021) 73:426–37. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2021.1952850
38. Ramos, MD. Exploring the relationship between planned behavior and self-determination theory on health-seeking behavior among older adults with hearing impairment. Geriatr Nurs. (2023) 52:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.05.001
39. Babazadeh, T, Ranjbaran, S, Kouzekanani, K, Nerbin, SA, Heizomi, H, and Ramazani, ME. Determinants of waste separation behavior Tabriz, Iran: an application of the theory of planned behavior at health center. Front Environ Sci. (2023) 11:985095. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.985095
40. Hagger, MS, and Hamilton, K. Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. (2023) 35:198–254. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2023.2225897
41. Morren, M, and Grinstein, A. The cross-cultural challenges of integrating personal norms into the theory of planned behavior: a Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) approach. J Environ Psychol. (2021) 75:101593. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101593
42. Yap, S-F, Lim, WM, Gaur, SS, and Lim, PY. A framework for preventive health marketing. J Strateg Mark. (2023) 31:894–917. doi: 10.1080/0965254X.2021.2013933
43. Kasting, ML, Christy, SM, Stout, ME, Zimet, GD, and Mosher, CE. Attitudinal correlates of HPV vaccination in college women. Clin Nurs Res. (2022) 31:826–35. doi: 10.1177/10547738211045227
44. Fish, JA, Prichard, I, Ettridge, K, Grunfeld, EA, and Wilson, C. Predicting Men’s intentions to seek help for Cancer symptoms: a comparison of the theory of planned behaviour and the health belief model. Aust J Psychol. (2022) 74:1–10. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2022.2039042
45. Chang, V, Wang, Y, and Wills, G. Research investigations on the use or non-use of hearing aids in the smart cities. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. (2020) 153:119231. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.002
46. Hong, JH, Lachman, ME, Charles, ST, Chen, Y, Wilson, CL, Nakamura, JS, et al. The positive influence of sense of control on physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health in older adults: an outcome-wide approach. Prev Med. (2021) 149:106612. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106612
47. McCarrick, D, Prestwich, A, and O’Connor, DB (2022). “Perseverative cognition and health Behaviours: exploring the role of intentions and perceived Behavioural control.” Psychol Health 1–17. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2130921 (Epub ahead of print).
48. Cooke, R, Dahdah, M, Norman, P, and French, DP. How well does the theory of planned behaviour predict alcohol consumption? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. (2016) 10:148–67. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.947547
49. Jiang, N, Chen, J, Cao, H, Liu, Y, Zhang, Y, Wang, Q, et al. Parents’ intentions toward preschool Children’s myopia preventive behaviors: combining the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:1036929. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036929
50. Lachman, ME. Perceived control over aging-related declines: adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. (2006) 15:282–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00453.x
51. Liu, J, Liu, L, and Pei, M. Analysis of older People’s walking behavioral intention with the extended theory of planned behavior. J Transp Health. (2022) 26:101462. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2022.101462
52. Lei, M, Deeprasert, J, Li, RYM, and Wijitjamree, N. Predicting Chinese older adults’ intention to live in nursing homes using an integrated model of the basic psychological needs theory and the theory of planned behavior. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:947946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.947946
53. Gao, M, Chen, P, Sun, X, Feng, X, and Fisher, EB. Integrating the extended theory of planned behavior with the stages of change to predict exercise among Chinese people with type 2 diabetes. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:772564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772564
54. Pan, L, Zhang, X, Wang, S, Zhao, N, Zhao, R, Ding, B, et al. Determinants associated with self-management behavior among type 2 diabetes patients in China: a structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Int J Clin Health Psychol. (2023) 23:100332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100332
55. Rajeh, MT. Modeling the theory of planned behavior to predict adults’ intentions to improve oral health behaviors. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:1391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13796-4
56. Amin, M, Elyasi, M, Bohlouli, B, and ElSalhy, M. Application of the theory of planned behavior to predict dental attendance and caries experience among children of newcomers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2019) 16:3661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193661
57. Duarte, N, Hughes, SL, and Paúl, C. Theory of planned behavior in predicting physical activity among Portuguese older adults with osteoarthritis. Act Adapt Aging. (2022) 46:60–72. doi: 10.1080/01924788.2021.1916717
58. Smith, MS, Wallston, KA, and Smith, CA. The development and validation of the perceived health competence scale. Health Educ Res. (1995) 10:51–64. doi: 10.1093/her/10.1.51
59. Tang, MY, Smith, DM, Sharry, JM, Hann, M, and French, DP. Behavior change techniques associated with changes in Postintervention and maintained changes in self-efficacy for physical activity: a systematic review with Meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med. (2019) 53:801–15. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay090
60. French, DP, Olander, EK, Chisholm, A, and Sharry, JM. Which behaviour change techniques are Most effective at increasing older adults’ self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med. (2014) 48:225–34. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9593-z
61. Xie, X, Jiao, D, He, J, Liu, Y, and Li, Z. Perceived health competence and health education experience predict health promotion behaviors among rural older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2022) 22:1679. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14080-1
62. Toledano-González, A, Labajos-Manzanares, T, and Romero-Ayuso, D. Well-being, self-efficacy and Independence in older adults: a randomized trial of occupational therapy. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2019) 83:277–84. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.05.002
63. Chen, HH, and Hsieh, PL. Applying the Pender’s health promotion model to identify the factors related to older adults’ participation in community-based health promotion activities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:9985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199985
64. Chen, J, Tian, Y, Yin, M, Lin, W, Tuersun, Y, Li, L, et al. Relationship between self-efficacy and adherence to self-management and medication among patients with chronic diseases in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. (2023) 164:111105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111105
65. Kim, AS, Jang, MH, Park, KH, and Min, JY. Effects of self-efficacy, depression, and anger on health-promoting behaviors of Korean elderly women with hypertension. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:6296. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176296
66. Schwarzer, R, and Renner, B. Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy. Health Psychol. (2000) 19:487–95. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.487
67. Huang, N-C, Kuo, P-H, Hsu, W-C, and Hu, SC. Retirement planning and types of healthy lifestyle after retirement: a Nationwide survey in Taiwan. Health Promot Int. (2023) 38:daad044. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad044
68. Ma, H, Li, X, Zhang, M, Liu, H, Jin, Q, Qiao, K, et al. Relationships among smoking abstinence self-efficacy, trait coping style and nicotine dependence of smokers in Beijing. Tob Induc Dis. (2020) 18:72. doi: 10.18332/tid/125401
69. Lee, C, Payne, LL, and Berdychevsky, L. The roles of leisure attitudes and self-efficacy on attitudes toward retirement among retirees: a sense of coherence theory approach. Leis Sci. (2020) 42:152–69. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2018.1448025
70. French, DP. The role of self-efficacy in changing health-related behaviour: cause, effect or spurious association? Br J Health Psychol. (2013) 18:237–43. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12038
72. Shmueli, L. Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior model. BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10816-7
73. Dilekler, İ, Doğulu, C, and Bozo, Ö. A test of theory of planned behavior in type II diabetes adherence: the leading role of perceived behavioral control. Curr Psychol. (2021) 40:3546–55. doi: 10.1007/s12144-019-00309-7
74. Stout, ME, Christy, SM, Winger, JG, Vadaparampil, ST, and Mosher, CE. Self-efficacy and HPV vaccine attitudes mediate the relationship between social norms and intentions to receive the HPV vaccine among college students. J Community Health. (2020) 45:1187–95. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00837-5
75. Zhang, JX, and Schwarzer, R. Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: a Chinese adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. Psychologia. (1995) 38:174–81.
76. Zhang, Y, Salm, M, and van Soest, A. The effect of retirement on healthcare utilization: evidence from China. J Health Econ. (2018) 62:165–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.09.009
77. Hair, J. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edn. Pearson: Faculty and Research Publications (2009).
78. Carlson, KD, and Herdman, AO. Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organ Res Methods. (2012) 15:17–32. doi: 10.1177/1094428110392383
79. Zhonglin, W, Kit-Tai, H, and Marsh, HW. Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test. Acta Psychol Sin. (2004) 36:186.
80. Jones, SMW, Sherman, KJ, Bermet, Z, Palazzo, LG, and Lewis, CC. Theory of planned behavior and mindfulness intentions in chronic low back pain. Mindfulness. (2022) 13:3145–52. doi: 10.1007/s12671-022-02022-2
81. Horne, J, Madill, J, and Gilliland, J. Incorporating the ‘theory of planned behavior’ into personalized healthcare behavior change research: a call to action. Pers Med. (2017) 14:521–9. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0038
82. Hu, Z, Sun, Y, Ma, Y, Chen, K, Lv, L, Wang, L, et al. Examining primary care physicians’ intention to perform cervical Cancer screening services using a theory of planned behavior: a structural equation modeling approach. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:893673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893673
83. Zhao, B, Kim, JE, Moon, J, and Nam, EW. Social engagement and subjective health among older adults in South Korea: evidence from the Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006–2018). SSM Popul Health. (2023) 21:101341. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101341
84. Chollou, KM, Shirzadi, S, Pourrazavi, S, Babazadeh, T, and Ranjbaran, S. The role of perceived social support on quality of life in people with cardiovascular diseases. Ethiop J Health Sci. (2022) 32:1019–26. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v32i5.17
85. Fishbein, M, and Cappella, JN. The role of theory in developing effective health communications. J Commun. (2006) 56:S1–S17. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00280.x
86. Bednall, TC, Bove, LL, Cheetham, A, and Murray, AL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions. Soc Sci Med. (2013) 96:86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.022
87. Ranjbaran, S, Shojaeizadeh, D, Dehdari, T, Yaseri, M, and Shakibazadeh, E. Determinants of medication adherence among Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: an application of health action process approach. Heliyon. (2020a) 6:e04442. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04442
88. Elyasi, M, Hollis, L, Major, PW, Baker, SR, and Maryam, A. Modeling the theory of planned behaviour to predict adherence to preventive dental visits in preschool children. PLoS One. (2020) 15:e0227233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227233
89. He, X, Shek, DTL, Wenbin, D, Pan, Y, and Ma, Y. The relationship between social participation and subjective well-being among older people in the Chinese culture context: the mediating effect of reciprocity beliefs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:16367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316367
90. Ranjbaran, S, Shojaeizadeh, D, Dehdari, T, Yaseri, M, and Shakibazadeh, E. The effectiveness of an intervention designed based on health action process approach on diet and medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetol Metab Syndr. (2022) 14:3. doi: 10.1186/s13098-021-00773-x
91. Gavaza, P, Brown, CM, Lawson, KA, Rascati, KL, Wilson, JP, and Steinhardt, M. Examination of pharmacists’ intention to report serious adverse drug events (ADEs) to the FDA using the theory of planned behavior. Res Soc Adm Pharm. (2011) 7:369–82. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.09.001
92. Walker, A, Watson, M, Grimshaw, J, and Bond, C. Applying the theory of planned behaviour to pharmacists’ beliefs and intentions about the treatment of vaginal candidiasis with non-prescription medicines. Fam Pract. (2004) 21:670–6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh615
93. Armitage, CJ, and Conner, M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. (2001) 40:471–99. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939
94. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. (2020) 2:314–24. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.195
95. Zhengbiao, HAN, Mingfeng, Z, and Hang, YUE. Rural residents’ health information avoidance behavior in lower risk disease context. J Libr Info Sci Agri. (2021) 33:4–15. doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.21-0393
96. Guo, C, Si, L, and Sun, Y. Research on the process and influencing factors of online diabetes information users’ avoidance behavior: a qualitative study. Behav Sci. (2023) 13:267. doi: 10.3390/bs13030267
97. Ali, K, Li, C, Zain-ul-abdin, K, and Muqtadir, SA. The effects of emotions, individual attitudes towards vaccination, and social endorsements on perceived fake news credibility and sharing motivations. Comput Hum Behav. (2022) 134:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107307
98. Edwards, JD, and Ostrom, TM. Cognitive structure of neutral attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol. (1971) 7:36–47. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90053-9
99. Bechler, CJ, Tormala, ZL, and Rucker, DD. The attitude–behavior relationship revisited. Psychol Sci. (2021) 32:1285–97. doi: 10.1177/0956797621995206
100. Babazadeh, T, Lotfi, Y, and Ranjbaran, S. Predictors of self-care behaviors and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Public Health. (2023) 10:1031655. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031655
101. Conner, M, and Norman, P. Understanding the intention-behavior gap: the role of intention strength. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:923464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464
102. Sheeran, P, and Conner, M. Degree of reasoned action predicts increased intentional control and reduced habitual control over health behaviors. Soc Sci Med. (2019) 228:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.015
Keywords: health screening, the theory of planned behavior, self-efficacy, participate behavior, retirement
Citation: Xu J, Pan Y and Li Q (2024) Influencing factors of health screening among retirees: an extended TPB approach. Front. Public Health. 12:1320920. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1320920
Edited by:
Petra Heidler, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, AustriaReviewed by:
Soheila Ranjbaran, Sarab Faculty of Medical Sciences, IranDavid Paige Gilkey, Montana Technological University, United States
Copyright © 2024 Xu, Pan and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Younghwan Pan, cGV0ZXJwYW5Aa29va21pbi5hYy5rcg==