Editorial on the Research Topic
Fast transit, crew health, and performance on extended duration space missions
NASA is currently planning a human flight to Mars, which will require approximately a forty-million-mile journey, which is over 150 times longer than the distance between the Earth and Moon. This journey will involve prolonged transit outside of the Earth's magnetosphere, where intense radiation levels threaten the crew's performance, health, and survival. Advanced forms of nuclear rocketry are under development now to transit this distance as rapidly as feasible, and thereby minimize the total radiation dose to the crew.
The protection of the crew's health and performance requires a fully interdisciplinary scientific and engineering approach. New biomedical developments may make the crews less susceptible to space radiation, and other environmental threats. Advanced crew monitoring and shielding may provide additional protection strategies and countermeasures. Current nuclear thermal rockets can minimize this Earth–Mars transit time to roughly 1 month in each direction, and future fission-fragment nuclear rocket propulsion may reduce this time to < 1 week, but this will require new accomplishments in advanced materials and nuclear technology. It is essential that these missions be conducted during periods of minimal particle radiation from the Sun. Space weather and solar flare activity may be currently forecast out to 45 days from the present. We seek to explore and identify biotechnology that protects human health, new shielding, monitoring, and counter-measure technologies, new methods that refine and extend space weather forecasting, and especially new propulsion technologies that greatly reduce the transit time to Mars and beyond.
Original research articles published in this Research Topic publication begin to address some of the most complex interdisciplinary challenges to preserving crew health on long missions to be conducted outside of the Earth's magnetosphere, such as from the Earth to Mars. Topics include adaptive, mission-centric medical standards, metagenomic anomaly detection, genomic age-associated risks to crew health, and application of advanced analytics to ensure crew health maintenance. The most effective strategy for long-duration human crew missions is to go exceptionally fast, to minimize the crew's exposure to the radiation environment. Currently NASA and DOE are carefully considering two different types of nuclear rocketry for such missions, one that utilizes thermal expansion of a liquid hydrogen accelerant, and the other that utilizes thermionic conversion of the reactor's heat flux directly to electricity that is subsequently used for ion rocket acceleration. In this Research Topic, we introduce a much more advanced manifestation of a fission fragment rocket that can only be used outside of the Earth's atmosphere, but that provides far greater performance and assurance of reduced radiation exposure than the nuclear rockets that are currently under consideration for the human mission to Mars.
Author contributions
AS: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: crew health, crew safety, radiation mitigation, extended duration space mission, nuclear rocket
Citation: Sobel AL (2024) Editorial: Fast transit, crew health, and performance on extended duration space missions. Front. Public Health 11:1318619. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1318619
Received: 11 October 2023; Accepted: 31 October 2023;
Published: 20 February 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Volker Hessel, University of Adelaide, Australia
Copyright © 2024 Sobel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annette Louise Sobel, bigbitbucket@mac.com