AUTHOR=Zhang Yue-Yang , Chen Bing-Xue , Chen Zhuang , Wan Qin TITLE=Correlation study of renal function indices with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy in T2DM patients with normal renal function JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1302615 DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2023.1302615 ISSN=2296-2565 ABSTRACT=Background

The anticipation of diabetes-related complications remains a challenge for numerous T2DM patients, as there is presently no effective method for early prediction of these complications. This study aims to investigate the association between renal function-related indicators and the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who currently have normal renal function.

Methods

Patients with T2DM who met the criteria were selected from the MMC database and divided into diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) groups, with a total of 859 and 487 patients included, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA), urine albumin(ALB), albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and diabetic peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between these indicators and peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy in diabetes.

Results

In a total of 221 patients diagnosed with DPN, we found positive correlation between the prevalence of DPN and eGFR (18.2, 23.3, 35.7%, p < 0.05). Specifically, as BUN (T1: references; T2:OR:0.598, 95%CI: 0.403, 0.886; T3:OR:1.017, 95%CI: 0.702, 1.473; p < 0.05) and eGFR (T1: references; T2:OR:1.294, 95%CI: 0.857, 1.953; T3:OR:2.142, 95%CI: 1.425, 3.222; p < 0.05) increased, the odds ratio of DPN also increased. Conversely, with an increase in Cr(T1: references; T2:OR:0.86, 95%CI: 0.56, 1.33; T3:OR:0.57, 95%CI: 0.36, 0.91; p < 0.05), the odds ratio of DPN decreased. Furthermore, when considering sensitivity and specificity, eGFR exhibited a sensitivity of 65.2% and specificity of 54.4%, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.568–0.656.

Conclusion

In this experimental sample, we found a clear positive correlation between eGFR and DPN prevalence.