Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Public Health, 22 November 2023
Sec. Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Prevention

Modeling preferential attraction to infected hosts in vector-borne diseases

  • School of Interdisciplinary Informatics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States

Vector-borne infectious diseases cause more than 700,000 deaths a year and represent an increasing threat to public health worldwide. Strategies to mitigate the spread of vector-borne diseases can benefit from a thorough understanding of all mechanisms that contribute to viral propagation in human. A recent study showed that Aedes mosquitoes (the vectors for dengue and Zika virus, among others) are preferentially attracted to infected hosts. In order to determine the impact of this factor on viral spread, we built a dedicated agent-based model and parameterized it on dengue fever. We then performed a systematic study of how mosquitoes' preferential attraction for infected hosts affects viral load and persistence of the infection. Our results indicate that even small values of preferential attraction have a dramatic effect on the number of infected individuals and the persistence of the infection in the population. Taken together, our results suggests that interventions aimed at decreasing the preferential attraction of vectors for infected hosts can reduce viral transmission and thus can have public health implications.

1 Introduction

Vector borne diseases like dengue, malaria, and yellow fever are infections transmitted by the bite of blood-feeding arthropods such as mosquitoes and ticks. In 2019, 56,879 million cases of dengue were reported, with 36,055 deaths attributable to dengue globally (1). With the increasing global burden of dengue and other vector-borne diseases, it is critical to determine all the factors that influence the overall transmission of the virus. In this study, we developed a computational model to understand how the viral transmission can be influenced by vector attraction for infected hosts.

A recent study by Zhang et al. (2) showed that dengue and Zika infected mice were more attractive to the Aedes mosquitoes than uninfected mice. The study showed that dengue and Zika infections in mice lead to increased release of acetophenone, a mosquito attractant, due to altered skin microbiota (2). Interestingly, preference toward infected humans has also been observed in malaria, where mosquitoes are more attracted to humans in transmissible stage than to uninfected and infected individuals in non-transmissible stages (3). Anopheles mosquitoes are known malaria vectors and have been shown to respond to skin volatile compounds emitted by skin-associated bacteria in the hosts (4). In addition to skin microbiome, body odor and underlying health conditions can influence the mosquitoes' attraction to humans (5). Administering vitamin A to the host was able to reduce acetophenone release due to decreased abundance of Bacillus spp. in the skin microbiome, leading to decreased mosquito attraction (2). However, composition of the human skin microbiota is influenced by many factors including skin site, sex, age, and use of cosmetics (6). More studies are needed to study the efficacy of vitamin A in reducing the mosquito attraction in dengue-infected individuals.

While the study by Zhang et al. (2) focused on understanding the biochemical mechanisms that make infected hosts more attractive to mosquitoes, the impact of such mechanisms on virus transmission has not yet been fully elucidated. More specifically, how viral load and persistence of viral infection in the population can be impacted by changes in mosquitoes' attraction to infected hosts is still poorly understood. Knowing whether preferential attraction to infected hosts has a major effect on viral propagation in a population can have important implications for public health initiatives aimed at reducing the burden of vector borne diseases.

In order to study the effect on viral propagation when vectors are preferentially attracted to infected hosts, we built a simple SIR (7) agent-based model (ABM) with mosquitoes and human hosts as agents, and introduced a bias parameter that controls preferential attraction of mosquitoes to infected hosts. We designed computational experiments to systematically investigate the effect of the bias and other key parameters in the model on viral propagation and total viral load.

Agent-based models have been widely applied in biomedical sciences, with areas of focus ranging from immune system responses to viral infections (8, 9), tumor development and response to different therapies including immunotherapy (10, 11), and viral transmission during pandemics (12). ABMs are comprised of individual agents, with well-defined behavior and rules of interactions, and are an orthogonal approach to equation-based mathematical modeling (13). In both types of approaches, choosing a correct set of parameters is key to successfully model the phenomenon of interest (14), (15), (16), (17). In this study, we specifically parameterized the model using data from the literature on dengue virus. However, the model can be easily adapted to simulate other vector borne diseases like malaria or Zika. Using this dengue infection model, we show that preferential attraction to infected hosts plays a key role in sustained infections. Without any preference for infected hosts (i.e., with the bias parameter set to 0), the viral load is minimal and the infection dies out quickly in the population. Taken together, these results suggest that interventions designed to interfere with mosquito preference for infected hosts could be effective for controlling vector-borne diseases.

2 Methods

In this section, we describe the agent-based model that we developed using the NetLogo language (18), and discuss the computational experiments and analyses performed with the model.

2.1 NetLogo model

1. Agents and their properties: The two agents in the model are mosquitoes and humans. Human agents have three states, viz. uninfected, infected, and recovered. Similarly, mosquitoes have three states, viz. uninfected, incubation, and carrier.

2. Agents' behavior: At every tick (time step), mosquitoes, and humans move. Human agents can move in any direction randomly, while the direction of mosquitoes depend on the attractiveness and bias parameter values. Attractiveness can be defined as the probability that a mosquito will move toward the closest human. Bias can be defined as the probability that a mosquito will move toward the closest infected human, given that the mosquito is attracted to human. In short, the attractiveness represents mosquitoes' attraction to human agents, whereas bias represents preferential attraction to infected individuals.

3. Environment: World of 33 by 33 patches with toroidal topology.

4. Interactions:

Mosquitoes: When an uninfected mosquito is in the same location as an infected host, the mosquito is inoculated with the virus and its state changes to incubation stage. Average incubation time is set to 7 days based on published data on dengue transmission (19). At the end of the incubation time, the state of the mosquito will change to carrier state, and the mosquito can now infect an uninfected human. The mosquito remains in carrier state for its lifetime, which is set to 21 days (see Table 1). After its lifetime (determined by average carrier time), the mosquito reverts to the uninfected state, simulating the replacement of a mosquito with a newly born one.

Humans: Once a human agent is infected by the bite of a carrier mosquito, its state changes to infected stage and remains sick for a period of time. Average sick time is set to 5 days (see Table 1). After the sick time is over, the individual can no longer transmit the virus to another mosquito and cannot get re-infected for a period of time. Based on multiple studies, the average time before the individual can be re-infected is set to 30 days (see Table 1).

5. Model assumptions: The model assumes constant human and mosquito populations throughout the simulation, i.e., the death rate equals the birth rate.

6. Output variables: At every time point, viral load is measured as the sum of the counts of infected humans and mosquitoes in incubation and in carrier stage.

7. Stopping criterion: If all humans and mosquitoes are clear of infection, the simulation stops. In cases when the infection continue to persist in the population, the simulation has a hard stop at 2,000 ticks.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Typical model parameter values with sources of information on dengue specific parameters.

2.1.1 Model parameters

There are three types of parameters in the NetLogo interface (see Supplementary Figure 1): (1) Initial population sizes of mosquito and human and percentage of infected mosquito; (2) dengue infection specific parameters such as average sick time, carrier time, incubation time, and recovery time; and (3) human attractiveness and preference (bias) for the infected host. The sick time, recovery time, incubation time, and carrier time are modeled with random normal distributions, with average times as specified in Table 1 and standard deviation set to one fourth of the average, to allow some variability in the infection and transmission parameters, which is often the case in real scenarios.

2.2 Grid search for attractiveness and bias

To study the impact of attractiveness to human hosts and bias of mosquitoes for infected individuals, we performed a systematic grid search for attractiveness and bias parameter values in the range from 0 to 1.0, with 0.1 as step size. Low values of attractiveness indicate mosquitoes having little to no preference to move toward human hosts. Similarly, low values of bias correspond to little to no preference for infected individuals.

2.3 Sensitivity analysis

Parameters that were taken from the literature were kept constant for all simulation runs. For instance, average sick time, average carrier time, recovery time and average incubation time were set to 5, 21, 30, and 7 days, respectively (Table 1). In order to determine the sensitivity of the model to changes in parameter values, we performed simulations with a range of parameter values for percentage infected at start and mosquito population. The human population was set to 100, as larger values resulted in an overcrowded environment, in which mosquitoes can always find a host, irrespective of bias, and attractiveness.

3 Results

Simulation experiments based on systematic grid search for human attractiveness and bias were carried out. The simulation results included simulation time and viral load at the end of each simulation. For every pair of human attractiveness and bias values, we plotted average viral load and average simulation run length (Figures 1A, B and Supplementary Figures 49). Additionally, the trend in viral transmission is shown by plotting viral load over time (see Figures 1CF).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Results from simulation experiments plotting (A) Average viral load vs. human attractiveness and bias (B) Average simulation time vs. human attractiveness and bias (C–F) Average viral load over each step for varying human attractiveness and bias = 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9, respectively. The height of 3-D bars in (A, B) represents the average viral load.

When there is no preference of the mosquitoes for infected hosts (bias = 0), the viral load in the population either died off quickly or remained at a low level (Figures 1A, B), even when human attractiveness was set to high. This trend was consistent even when the percentage of infected individual was high (e.g., 30%) at the beginning of the simulation (Supplementary Figures 4, 5). When the population of mosquitoes was doubled to 100, similar trends were observed with little to no bias for infected hosts (see Supplementary Figures 6, 7). However, even with small bias values for infected hosts (bias = 0.3), the infection persisted for a much longer period (Figure 1D). These results suggests that the preferential bias for infected hosts has a substantial effect on the ability of the virus to propagate in the population.

The results were consistent for a wide range of parameters for percentage infected at start and number of mosquitoes, as shown by the high correlation between runs (Supplementary Figures 2, 3). In a crowded environment (i.e., with a large number of mosquitoes and humans), we observed persistent infections even with little or no bias for infected hosts. This can be explained by the high probability that mosquitoes will find a host (Supplementary Figures 8, 9).

Generally, an increase in bias and attractiveness resulted in higher viral propagation in the population (Figures 1D, E). However, for extreme values of attractiveness to human and bias (when attractiveness = 1 and bias = 0.9) toward infected individuals, we observed a sudden decrease of viral load (Figure 1F). One explanation for this behavior is that the mosquitoes end up biting the same infected individuals again and again, with a decreased probability for the infection to spread to more individuals.

4 Discussion

Here, we presented an agent-based model that simulates the propagation of a vector-borne viral infection in a population, systematically studying the impact of vector's attractiveness to human and its bias for infected hosts. Our results indicate that without bias for infected hosts, vector-borne diseases can die off relatively quickly. Conversely, infections tend to persist for longer periods of time and viral propagation increases substantially even with a moderate bias for infected individuals. However, very high values of bias and attractiveness lead to reduced viral propagation, as a result of the vectors biting the same infected individuals multiple times.

Our agent-based model does not aim to realistically simulate all the complexities underlying the spread of vector-borne diseases. Rather, it aims to provide an interpretable evolutionary explanation for the preferential attraction of mosquitoes for infected hosts, described in Zhang et al. (2). Further, the results of our simulations clearly suggest that intervention strategies that can decrease or eliminate the vector bias for infected hosts might be very effective in reducing the spread of vector-borne diseases.

5 Model availability

The source code for our NetLogo model is available on GitHub at the following URL: https://github.com/ishworthapa/biasInfectionModel. The model can be run in the NetLogo modeling environment, freely available at: https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. A snapshot of our NetLogo model interface is shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

IT: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. DG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Austin Seamann from the lab for introducing the study by Zhang et al. that served as the springboard for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1276029/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Yang X, Quam MB, Zhang T, Sang S. Global burden for dengue and the evolving pattern in the past 30 years. J Travel Med. (2021) 28:taab146. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab146

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zhang H, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Peng Y, Peng W, Tong L, et al. A volatile from the skin microbiota of flavivirus-infected hosts promotes mosquito attractiveness. Cell. (2022) 185:2510–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lacroix R, Mukabana WR, Gouagna LC, Koella JC. Malaria infection increases attractiveness of humans to mosquitoes. PLoS Biol. (2005) 3:e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Busula AO, Takken W, de Boer JG, Mukabana WR, Verhulst NO. Variation in host preferences of malaria mosquitoes is mediated by skin bacterial volatiles. Med Vet Entomol. (2017) 31:320–6. doi: 10.1111/mve.12242

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Martinez J, Showering A, Oke C, Jones RT, Logan JG. Differential attraction in mosquito-human interactions and implications for disease control. Philos Trans R Soc B. (2021) 376:20190811. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Egert M, Simmering R. The microbiota of the human skin. In: Schwiertz A, editor. Microbiota of the Human Body: Implications in Health and Disease. Cham: Springer (2016). p. 61–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A. (1927) 115:700–21. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Castiglione F, Ghersi D, Celada F. Computer modeling of clonal dominance: memory-anti-naive and its curbing by attrition. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1513. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Castiglione F, Celada F. Immune System Modelling and Simulation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2015). doi: 10.1201/b18274

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Jenner AL, Kelly W, Dallaston M, Araujo R, Parfitt I, Steinitz D, et al. Examining the efficacy of localised gemcitabine therapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer using a hybrid agent-based model. PLoS Comput Biol. (2023) 19:e1010104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gong C, Milberg O, Wang B, Vicini P, Narwal R, Roskos L, et al. A computational multiscale agent-based model for simulating spatio-temporal tumour immune response to PD1 and PDL1 inhibition. J R Soc Interface. (2017) 14:20170320. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hoertel N, Blachier M, Blanco C, Olfson M, Massetti M, Rico MS, et al. A stochastic agent-based model of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France. Nat Med. (2020) 26:1417–21. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1001-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Macal CM, North MJ. Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE (2005). p. 14. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lillacci G, Khammash M. Parameter estimation and model selection in computational biology. PLoS Comput Biol. (2010) 6:e1000696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000696

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. MacLeod M, Nersessian NJ. Modeling complexity: cognitive constraints and computational model-building in integrative systems biology. Hist Philos Life Sci. (2018) 40:1–28. doi: 10.1007/s40656-017-0183-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bentout S, Chekroun A, Kuniya T. Parameter estimation and prediction for coronavirus disease outbreak 2019 (COVID-19) in Algeria. AIMS Publ Health. (2020) 7:306. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bentout S, Tridane A, Djilali S, Touaoula TM. Age-structured modeling of COVID-19 epidemic in the USA, UAE and Algeria. Alex Eng J. (2021) 60:401–11. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.08.053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. NetLogo. Available online at: http://ccl northwestern edu/netlogo/

Google Scholar

19. Kularatne SA. Dengue fever. BMJ. (2015) 351:h4661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4661

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, van Vinh Chau N, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:1423–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1110265

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Goindin D, Delannay C, Ramdini C, Gustave J, Fouque F. Parity and longevity of Aedes aegypti according to temperatures in controlled conditions and consequences on dengue transmission risks. PloS ONE. (2015) 10:e0135489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135489

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Nishiura H. Duration of short-lived cross-protective immunity against a clinical attack of dengue: a preliminary estimate (WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia). Dengue Bull. (2008) 32:55–66.

Google Scholar

23. Snow GE, Haaland B, Ooi EE, Gubler DJ. Research on dengue during World War II revisited. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2014) 91:1203. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0132

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: agent-based modeling, preferential attraction, vector borne disease, computational modeling, viral propagation model

Citation: Thapa I and Ghersi D (2023) Modeling preferential attraction to infected hosts in vector-borne diseases. Front. Public Health 11:1276029. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1276029

Received: 11 August 2023; Accepted: 31 October 2023;
Published: 22 November 2023.

Edited by:

Nuno Sepulveda, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

Reviewed by:

Soufiane Bentout, Centre Universitaire Ain Temouchent, Algeria
Jorge F. Mendez-Galván, Federico Gómez Children's Hospital, Mexico

Copyright © 2023 Thapa and Ghersi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dario Ghersi, dghersi@unomaha.edu

ORCID: Ishwor Thapa orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-1631
Dario Ghersi orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-0843

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.