Jing Tian
Jian ChenEditorial on the Research Topic
Public health promotion and medical education reform, volume II
During the COVID-19 pandemic, all the involved countries have to face the tough challenges from overloaded public health system, and thus have been taking various measures to strengthen the system (1, 2). Indeed, since the onset of COVID-19, the public healthcare system has underwent profound changes in so many ways such as: education, medical research, public health infrastructure, health policy and management (3, 4).
One of the thorniest issues that all countries have to solve is the shortage of frontline healthcare workers, which is even more worsen in local and rural places where the density of healthcare workers always decreases with deprivation (5). Consequently, the frontline medical workers endured extra duty hours, workload burden and health risks during the novel coronavirus crisis (6). This, coupled with the direct engagement with coronavirus infected patients, led the physicians to experience significant stress, producing noticeable psychological alterations (7). Guraya et al. evaluated the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the frontline physician's psychological health, which was represented in five themes: mental health, individual challenges, decision-making, patient care and support services. Among them, the mental health ranked the foremost challenge to physicians. When the physician's personal and professional lives were highly affected during the COVID-19 pandemic, emotional distress has been witnessed in most of clinical physicians, thereby worsening their psychological condition and preventing them from serving in the patients' best interest (8). Meanwhile, there is plenty of evidence that the priorities for medical care have changed dramatically. Physicians were more likely to consider age, cognitive status, and the prognosis for survival in making decision (9). In addition, there are indications of a paradigm change in the pattern of patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. That is, accompanied with focus on minimizing infection spread, a patient's care was often delayed and compromised, along with poor patient-doctor communication. On the other hand, the institutional interventions were not adequate to support doctors' crumbling wellbeing. Together, during the pandemic and even in the post-pandemic of COVID-19, the deteriorating mental health of frontline doctors should be paid adequate attention and supported effectively.
In spite of the corresponding increase in the overall density of doctors, the insufficient quantity and quality still failed to support health care demand, particularly in local and rural places, leading to relatively lagged construction of healthcare system (10). The National Development and Reform Commission of China launched the rural-oriented tuition-waived medical education (RTME) program in March 2010 (11). In the recent decade, over 57,000 rural-oriented tuition-waived medical students (RTMSs) were enrolled and received financial aid from government (12). In turn, these students were committed to work in rural medical institutions for at least 3 years after graduation. However, the policy implementation did not achieve expected goals. Zhang et al. reported that less than half of students had strong willing to fulfill the commitments, while the rest may not continue working in rural medical institutions after 3 year-rural service. This would greatly impede the development of China's rural medical system, which makes it unable to mount a quick and effective response to the threat of a pandemic such as COVID-19. Further analysis indicated that the honesty-credit, specialty identity and career identity could significantly predict RTMSs' willingness to fulfill the contract early. Therefore, in order to ensure the sustainability and success of RTME program, students should be encouraged to choose their majors voluntarily, and career identity education should be introduced in the curriculum. Last but not least, with full support from the state and the government, the improved working conditions of rural health workers may encourage RTMSs to stay in rural communities.
As we know, the COVID-19 lockdown pushed the switch from offline to online teaching (13, 14). Then, an important question that remains to be approached is whether this switch would influence education outcomes. Ettl et al. evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of an online Moodle course in teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It was demonstrated that e-learning method enabled students to gain objective and subjective knowledge, and the interactive learning videos were well-received by students as helpful to their learning. Actually, there is increasing evidence that e-learning may be a reliable alternative, and the online learning has been growing to play an increasingly important role in higher education (15, 16).
Noteworthy, the outbreak of global acute infectious disease such as SARS, H1N1 and COVID-19 has raised high concerns in emergency management and emergency response (17). However, the lack of public health knowledge could be observed in most clinicians (18). Yu et al. reported that, due to the separation of clinical and preventive education systems in current undergraduate medical education, the clinical medicine graduates were not well versed in public health emergency (PHE) practices, while the preventive graduates were lack of medical rescue knowledge and practical capabilities. It was suggested that a complete integrated PHE curriculum should be added to the school's teaching plans regardless of majors.
At the same time, COVID-19 revealed the urgent need to bridge the prominent gap between new knowledge and evidence-based practices. Today's reality is that healthcare professionals are required to possess competency in designing, implementing, and diffusing evidence-based healthcare solutions (19). Since 2015, the Indiana University has begun to offer a Professional Certificate Program as a graduate course, and succeeded in training well-rounded members in innovation and implementation science (20). Mehta et al. stated that the program has built an integrated network of Agile Change Conductors who are competent in developing effective teams, implementing and diffusing evidence-based care within the healthcare delivery system.
In summary, the COVID-19 pandemic has widely impacted public health, specifically focusing on education and training of the healthcare workforce. Learning from the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic will be an effective strategy to contain the spread of future global crises. Undoubtedly, the medical and public health systems would be developed best after combating COVID-19.
Author contributions
JC: Writing—review and editing. JT: Writing—original draft.
Funding
This work was supported by Guangxi Higher Education Teaching Reform Projects (No. 2022JGZ153).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the authors and reviewers for their excellent contributions and insightful comments to this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Hadj Hassine I. Covid-19 vaccines and variants of concern: A review. Rev Med Virol. (2022) 32:e2313. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2313
2. Umakanthan S, Sahu P, Ranade AV, Bukelo MM, Rao JS, Abrahao-Machado LF, et al. Origin, transmission, diagnosis and management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Postgrad Med J. (2020) 96:753–8. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138234
3. Naciri A, Radid M, Kharbach A, Chemsi G. E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. (2021) 18:27. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27
4. Sharma A, Ahmad Farouk I, Lal SK. COVID-19: A review on the novel coronavirus disease evolution, transmission, detection, control and prevention. Viruses. (2021) 13:202. doi: 10.3390/v13020202
5. Underwood A. COVID-19: A rural US emergency department perspective. Prehosp Disaster Med. (2021) 36:4–5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20001417
6. Mosheva M, Hertz-Palmor N, Dorman Ilan S, Matalon N, Pessach IM, Afek A, et al. Anxiety, pandemic-related stress and resilience among physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Depress Anxiety. (2020) 37:965–71. doi: 10.1002/da.23085
7. Rao H, Mancini D, Tong A, Khan H, Santacruz Gutierrez B, Mundo W, et al. Frontline interdisciplinary clinician perspectives on caring for patients with COVID-19: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e048712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048712
8. Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. (2020) 368:m1211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1211
9. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3:e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976
10. Wu Y, Zhang Q, Huang Y, Qiu S. Seeking medical services among rural empty-nest elderly in China: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. (2022) 22:202. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02911-0
11. Wang L, Yang Y, Zhu J, Xie H, Jiang C, Zhang C, et al. Professional identity and mental health of rural-oriented tuition-waived medical students in Anhui Province, China. BMC Med Educ. (2019) 19:199. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1603-1
12. Shen Y, Huang X, Li H, Chen E, Kong Y, Yu J, et al. Early outcomes of a rural-oriented physician education programme against rural physician shortages in Guangxi province: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e049274. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049274
13. Launer J. Teaching and facilitating groups online: adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. Postgrad Med J. (2021) 97:543–4. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140619
14. Su B, Zhang T, Yan L, Huang C, Cheng X, Cai C, et al. Online medical teaching in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: Tools, modalities, and challenges. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:797694. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.797694
15. Jaoua F, Almurad HM, Elshaer IA, Mohamed ES. E-learning success model in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in higher educational institutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:2865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052865
16. Kabir H, Hasan MK, Mitra DK. E-learning readiness and perceived stress among the university students of Bangladesh during COVID-19: a countrywide cross-sectional study. Ann Med. (2021) 53:2305–14. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2009908
17. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu YJ, Mao YP, Ye RX, Wang QZ, et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. (2020) 9:29. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00646-x
18. Wang J, Wang Z. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis of China's Prevention and Control Strategy for the COVID-19 epidemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:2235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072235
19. Azar J, Adams N, Boustani M. The Indiana University Center for healthcare innovation and implementation science: Bridging healthcare research and delivery to build a learning healthcare system. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. (2015) 109:138–43. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.03.006
Keywords: public health, medical education reform, public health education, trends and challenges, local/regional medical schools
Citation: Tian J and Chen J (2023) Editorial: Public health promotion and medical education reform, volume II. Front. Public Health 11:1267528. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1267528
Received: 26 July 2023; Accepted: 07 August 2023;
Published: 15 August 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Christiane Stock, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Germany
Copyright © 2023 Tian and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jian Chen, Y2hlbmppYW4mI3gwMDA0MDtnbG1jLmVkdS5jbg==