Sylk Sotto-Santiago
Inginia Genao
Meshell Johnson- 1School of Medicine, Indiana University Bloomington, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- 2College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, United States
- 3San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System and School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Breaking barriers to diversify the physician workforce
In recent years, we have seen increased attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion in academic medicine in the U.S. In fact, higher education institutions have increasingly implemented formal diversity initiatives over the past 50 years to support students from historically and racially underrepresented groups (1). In the 1960s, student demands for institutional accountability set the path forward for multicultural/diversity offices along with leaders charged with providing student support. In the 1980s and 1990s, institutions were motivated by the foundations of multicultural education inspiring curricular change to counter educational and social injustice (1, 2). Closer attention also resulted in an examination of the experiences of students of color in higher education, summarized by hostile and unwelcoming environments (3). The result was a rise in diversity leaders hired to create and lead the institutional diversity plan and strategic direction (1, 4).
Unfortunately, academic medicine has a long history of racism, discrimination, and ethical atrocities that were committed in the name of medicine. The Flexner Report (1910), a commentary on medical education that promoted segregation and severely limited the ability of Black physicians to train, had a lasting impact in medical education, considerably damaging historically Black medical schools and serving as a prime example of systemic racism (5). The changing demographics of the U.S. and the vast health inequities and disparities among racial groups continued to be highly visible. The number of historically and underrepresented providers across all of medicine remained dismal. In 2003, the Sullivan Commission on Diversity in the Healthcare Workforce provided recommendations to address the lack of diversity in the health professions and ways to promote systemic change (6). The Missing Persons: Minorities in the Health Professions report emphasized that diversifying the health professions had focused on recruitment and retention of students of color, but that diversity must be considered more broadly, inclusive of faculty and staff, and observed in the areas of education, clinical and research activities, and public missions of institutions (7). The report also characterized the importance of medical school leadership and faculty in ensuring that an institution's policies align with its mission, and that they reform medical education by overseeing the recruitment, retention, and promotion of students and faculty of color (6). Medical education reform has included the adoption of cultural competency as a means to improve the quality of care that clinicians deliver to minoritized patient populations. In the late 1990s, cultural humility also offered a way to encourage self-reflection, lifelong learning, and a check of power imbalances to develop meaningful communication and mutually respectful relationships with patients. More recently, medical education reform is now focusing on antiracism, health equity, and other concepts that highlight structural and social determinants or drivers of health (7). Sadly, the underrepresentation of students and faculty of color has not changed significantly since the institution of the 2009 Liaison Committee of Medical Education diversity accreditation guidelines (8–11). Yet, scholars have continued to report a misalignment between the values professed by medical institutions and population health outcomes. In addition, there is a perceived disconnect between what drives institutions and the mission of social responsibility in academic medicine (12, 13).
Progress is relative. The AAMC's 2015 report: Altering the Course: Black Males in Medicine, noted the number of Black men enrolled in medical school actually decreased between 1978 and 2014. In 1978, 1,410 Black males applied to medical school, and in 2014, just 1,337 applied (14). As this data continue to be monitored, the percentage of Black men in medical schools has increased only slightly (15). In 2019, only 5.3% of graduates from U.S. medical schools identified as Hispanic/Latinx or of Spanish origin, but the number of Black, Hispanic, and women applicants and enrollees increased at U.S. medical schools in 2022 (16, 17). We continue to work toward elevating the voices of historically and underrepresented groups in higher education and frankly, facing what some may consider an attack to these efforts in recent years, such as the pending cases before the U. S. Supreme Court: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, seeking to prohibit the limited consideration of an applicant's racial or ethnic background in the higher education admissions process (18, 19).
The importance of this Research Topic: Breaking Barriers to Diversify the Physician Workforce cannot be understated. It is known that the physician and healthcare workforce does not reflect the patient population we serve. Efforts exist to diversify the physician workforce, especially in relationship to racially and historically underrepresented groups, along with socio-economic diversity. However, in addition to these efforts and scholarship, there needs to be better guidance on strategies and best practices for retaining physicians of color, as well as caring for racially minoritized populations.
We sought articles that included historical perspectives on forms of racism, discrimination, and the systems that support them still today. We are proud to present eigh articles and 29 authors who are doing the critical work needed. With their unique contributions they offered a look at key practices for search committees, DEI committee structure within graduate medical education, and admissions. Scholars were able to present a professional development program that incorporated best practices to promote diversity at each stage of the search process (Jacobs et al.). Moreover, scholars provided insight into the establishment of DEI committees that have implications for support of institutional recruitment efforts and inclusive environments (Kara et al.). In addition, Joy demonstrated the value of intersectionality and how harnessing the power of holistic reviews can mitigate bias throughout the admissions process. Walker and Williams continue to highlight the importance of mentoring as a meaningful contribution toward the diversification of the physician workforce through equity-focused mentoring models.
Additional articles pay close attention to underrepresented groups in medicine. Corsino et al. looked at Hispanic, Latinx, and/or Spanish origin experiences and acknowledged the required multifaceted approach to their success while highlighting the ongoing challenges that limit students from pursuing and completing medical school. Salinas et al. challenged us to look at first generation/low income experience of those navigating academic medicine. We need to center the work that we are doing advancing DEI on the lived experiences of the populations that we are intending to serve. Sharp et al. explicitly state that the lack of intention behind addressing the “needs of Black women can be viewed as complicity in the oppressive structures that serve to subjugate them”.
Lastly, we agree with Esparza et al. The authors highlight a key aspect of this special issue. Medicine has a long history of its own. Without intentional looks at the medical education system, we risk perpetuating exclusion, racism, discrimination, and harm, revealing environments that are “near impossible to enter and incredibly traumatic for those with multiple marginalized identities. Until we approach DEI in academic medicine with the rigor, intentionality, and investment needed to evaluate and influence an exceedingly complex and adaptable ecosystem of oppression, meaningful change will continue to elude us”.
Despite the challenges we face, through this special issue, we have provided literature, practices, and perspectives that impact the diversification of the physician workforce. As we continue to aim for diversity, inclusion, and belonging, there are innovative ways to move forward in each of these areas with research and practice in our fields.
Author contributions
IG and MJ contributed to the direction and writing and edits of all versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and contributed to this editorial.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Patton LD, Sánchez B, Mac J, Stewart D. An Inconvenient truth about “progress”: an analysis of the promises and perils of research on campus diversity initiatives. Rev Higher Educ. (2019) 42:173–98. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2019.0049
3. Harper SR, Hurtado S. Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. New Dir Stud. (2007) 2007:7–24. doi: 10.1002/ss.254
5. Laws T. How should we respond to racist legacies in health professions education originating in the flexner report?. AMA J Ethics. (2021) 23:E271–E275 doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.271
6. Sullivan Commission's Report on Health Professions Diversity. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. (2004) Available online at: http://www.jointcenter.org/healthpolicy/docs/SullivanExecutiveSummary.pdf (accessed June 5, 2009).
7. Sotto-Santiago S, Poll-Hunter N, Trice T, Lum LB, Golden S, Howell S, et al. A framework for developing antiracist medical educators and practitioner-scholars. Acad Med. (2022) 97:41–7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004385
8. Nivet MA. Minorities in academic medicine: review of the literature. J Vascular Surg. (2010) 51:S53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.064
9. Lett E, Murdock HM, Orji WU, Aysola J, Sebro R. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open. (2019) 2:e1910490. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490
10. Kohn LT. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Roles of Academic Health Centers in the 21st Century. Academic Health Centers: Leading Change in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. (2004).
11. Boatright DH, Samuels EA, Cramer L, Cross J, Desai M, Latimore D, et al. Association between the liaison committee on medical education's diversity standards and changes in percentage of medical student sex, race, and ethnicity. JAMA. (2018) 320:2267–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13705
12. Awasthi S, Beardmore J, Clark J, Hadrige P, Madani H, Marusic M, et al. The future of academic medicine: five scenarios to 2025. Milbank Memorial Fund. (2005). Available online at: https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/files/documents/0507FiveFutures/0507FiveFutures.html (accessed February 24, 2021).
13. Sotto-Santiago S, Sharp S, Mac J, Messmore N, Haywood A, Tyson M, Yi V. Reclaiming the mission of academic medicine: An examination of institutional responses to (anti) racism. AEM Educ Trai. (2021) 5: S33-S43. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10668
14. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2015). Altering the Course: Black Males in Medicine. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
15. Poll-Hunter NI, Brown Z, Smith A, Starks SM, Gregory-Bass R, Robinson D, et al. Increasing the Representation of Black Men in Medicine by Addressing Systems Factors. Academic Med. (2023) 98:304–12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005070
16. Soto-Greene ML, Sanchez J, Churrango J, Salas-Lopez D. Latino faculty development in US medical schools: A Hispanic center of excellence perspective. J Hispanic Higher Educ. (2005) 4:366–76. doi: 10.1177/1538192705279596
17. Soto-Greene M, Culbreath K, Guzman DE, Sánchez JP, Romero-Leggott V. Diversity and inclusion in the academic medicine workforce: encouraging medical students and residents to consider academic careers MedEdPORTAL. (2018) 14:10689. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10689
Keywords: diversity and inclusion, equity, physician workforce diversity, Black and Hispanic/Latino, racial climate
Citation: Sotto-Santiago S, Genao I and Johnson M (2023) Editorial: Breaking barriers to diversify the physician workforce. Front. Public Health 11:1190382. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1190382
Received: 20 March 2023; Accepted: 18 April 2023;
Published: 16 May 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Cheryl Healton, School of Global Public Health, New York University, United States
Copyright © 2023 Sotto-Santiago, Genao and Johnson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sylk Sotto-Santiago, c3NvdHRvJiN4MDAwNDA7aXUuZWR1