AUTHOR=Fond Guillaume B. , Yon Dong Keon , Tran Bach , Mallet Jasmina , Urbach Mathieu , Leignier Sylvain , Rey Romain , Misdrahi David , Llorca Pierre-Michel , Schürhoff Franck , Berna Fabrice , Boyer Laurent TITLE=Poverty and inequality in real-world schizophrenia: a national study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1182441 DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2023.1182441 ISSN=2296-2565 ABSTRACT=Background

Schizophrenia has high socioeconomic impact among severe psychiatric disorders.

Aims

To explore clinician-reported and patient-reported inequities between patients under the poverty threshold vs. the others.

Method

916 patients consecutively recruited in 10 national centers received a comprehensive standardized evaluation of illness severity, addictions and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

739 (80.7%) of the patients were classified in the poverty group. This group had poorer objective illness outcomes (lower positive, negative, cognitive, excitement/aggressive and self-neglect symptoms and lifetime history of planned suicide) in multivariate analyses. While they had similar access to treatments and psychotherapy, they had lower access to socially useful activities, couple’s life, housing and parenthood. They had also more disturbed metabolic parameters. On the contrary, the poverty group reported better self-esteem. No significant difference for depression, risky health behavior including addictions and sedentary behavior was found.

Interpretation

The equity in access to care is attributed to the French social system. However, mental and physical health remain poorer in these patients, and they still experience poor access to social roles independently of illness severity and despite healthcare interventions. These patients may have paradoxically better self-esteem due to decreased contact with society and therefore lower stigma exposure (especially at work). Schizophrenia presents itself as a distinct impoverished population concerning health-related outcomes and social integration, warranting focus in public health initiatives and improved treatment, including tailored interventions, collaborative care models, accessible mental health services, housing support, vocational training and employment support, community integration, education and awareness, research and data collection, culturally competent approaches, and long-term support.