- 1Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institutes of Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- 3Biophysics Department, Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
New frontiers in radiobiology
The field of radiation oncology and by extension the study of radiobiology is undergoing a renaissance driven by novel synergistic treatments with chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents, novel uses of our existing technology such as in very high dose rate irradiation (FLASH), and by expanding use of particle radiotherapy for new clinical indications. In this Research Topic, jointly featured in Frontiers in Public Health and Frontiers in Oncology, we are pleased to feature nine articles that probe these novel discoveries and methodologies.
The articles highlighted here span the gamut of radiobiology. Efforts to better understand the fundamental biophysical mechanisms of charged particle radiotherapy were heavily featured. Li presented a novel analysis of the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) dataset, based on 1,118 in vitro cell survival datasets, to present a novel model including LET and fluence of different ion species. This resulted in a model predictive of survival fraction for all ion beams, which unlike previous models is independent of reference photon irradiation and universal across all ion and cell species. Frame et al. visualized broken or intact individual DNA molecules using atomic force microscopy in order to demonstrate the increased rate of DNA breakage within the Bragg peak of a monoenergetic 110 MeV proton beam compared to the entrance plateau region. Collectively, their work on a plasmid model system reinforces the notion that a universal RBE of 1.1 for proton radiotherapy does not accurately fit the observed effects, and the role of LET in driving enhanced DNA DSB production despite delivery of the same physical dose.
The exploration continues within radiotherapeutic techniques that are less commonly used in practice today and go beyond traditional external beam radiotherapy. Wang et al. review modern boron neutron capture radiotherapy, well-delineating current status and challenges as this modality gains a modern resurgence. One of the stumbling blocks remains the targeting ability of boron delivery agents, which is directly linked to the induction of surrounding normal tissue damage. Guerra Liberal et al. extend the Topic's focus to targeted radionuclide therapy, where alpha-particle emitters are rapidly gaining momentum for the treatment of radioresistant tumors. The alpha-particle emitter, Radium-223 (223Ra), has been tied to improved survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis and is administered in clinical practice in the form of 223Ra dichloride (223RaCl2). The authors explore the biological mechanism of its action, by comparing it to different radiation qualities such as conventional X-ray and external alpha irradiation in a range of clinically absorbed doses of 0.05–2 Gy in a panel of prostate cancer and bone cell lines. Their results uncover a delayed DNA repair between both 223Ra and alpha-particle modalities with similar kinetics. Collectively, they identify that the greater cell-type dependent RBE of 223Ra appears associated with increased levels of residual DNA damage and cell death by mitotic catastrophe. Nishri et al. explore diffusing alpha-emitter radiotherapy (DaRT) using radium-224 (224Ra)-loaded seeds in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) or the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab (BEV) in in vitro U87 cultured cells as well as in a glioblastoma xenograph mouse model. The results presented in this extensive preclinical study confirm that the combinational treatment with TMZ and DaRT nearly doubled cytotoxicity. This was confirmed by colony survival studies wherein the addition of TMZ reduced the surviving fraction by 40–50% compared to monotherapy. In animal studies, the combination DaRT and TMZ delayed tumor development greater than monotherapy alone, with further increased tumor control noted with BEV administration. We hope this sees successful translation to clinical trials and adds a novel therapeutic strategy to improve the survival of glioblastoma patients.
Clark et al. are seeking to understand the effects of radiotherapy on tumor-microenvironmental interactions in driving resistance transformation, by identifying extracellular vesicles produced by breast cancer cells following treatment. These vesicles promote cancer stem-like cell expansion, radioresistance and enhanced pro-tumor activity of fibroblasts via IL-6 production. Furthermore, they identify a potential therapeutic target as well as, in the vesicles, a potential traceable biomarker. Park et al. aim to illustrate the radioprotective potential of a bacterial exopolysaccharide isolated from D. radiodurans BRD125 in their work. The compound offered free-radical scavenging effects, resulting in reduced irradiation-induced apoptosis particularly within the bone-marrow and spleen of X-ray irradiated mice, combined with enhanced expression of hematopoiesis-related cytokines such as GM-CSF, G-GSF, M-CSF, and SCF, leading to enhanced hematopoietic stem cell protection and regeneration.
Certainly not least, interest in biomarker development featured prominently in our topic. The topic was interwoven in the above featured papers, as well as in the form of P53 status in Mireştean et al.s' review of the Warburg effect, where they evaluate the potential to leverage targeted “anti-Warburg” therapies to improve the radiosensitivity of head and neck cancer. Separately, Kocsis et al. aimed to evaluate a biomarker for radiosensitivity and decrease of pulmonary function, looking at chromosomal aberrations of in vitro irradiated blood of non-small cell lung cancer patients before the start of therapy and compare it to the aberrations in the blood of patients at several time points (ranging from 3 to 24 months) after stereotactic radiotherapy. The authors find a connection between these aberrations in the in vitro irradiated blood samples before the start of radiotherapy and subsequent decrease in pulmonary function tests following radiotherapy.
Radiobiology is constantly evolving, and novel treatment methodologies—as well as better understanding of our current clinical offerings—are creating new frontiers within the field. This requires an interdisciplinary approach integrating multiple scientific and clinical disciplines. This section aims to bring together a broad evaluation and overview of the current frontiers in radiobiology.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: radiobiology, particle, biomarker, radioisotope, LET
Citation: Ebner DK, Shimokawa T, Tinganelli W and Vandevoorde C (2023) Editorial: New frontiers in radiobiology. Front. Public Health 11:1181656. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1181656
Received: 07 March 2023; Accepted: 09 March 2023;
Published: 27 March 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Dariusz Leszczynski, University of Helsinki, Finland
Copyright © 2023 Ebner, Shimokawa, Tinganelli and Vandevoorde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniel K. Ebner, ZWJuZXIuZGFuaWVsJiN4MDAwNDA7bWF5by5lZHU=; Takashi Shimokawa, c2hpbW9rYXdhLnRha2FzaGkmI3gwMDA0MDtxc3QuZ28uanA=; Walter Tinganelli, dy50aW5nYW5lbGxpJiN4MDAwNDA7Z3NpLmRl; Charlot Vandevoorde, Yy52YW5kZXZvb3JkZSYjeDAwMDQwO2dzaS5kZQ==