AUTHOR=Ju Xu , Yimaer Wumitijiang , Du Zhicheng , Wang Xinran , Cai Huanle , Chen Shirui , Zhang Yuqin , Wu Gonghua , Wu Wenjing , Lin Xiao , Wang Ying , Jiang Jie , Hu Weihua , Zhang Wangjian , Hao Yuantao TITLE=The impact of monthly air pollution exposure and its interaction with individual factors: Insight from a large cohort study of comprehensive hospitalizations in Guangzhou area JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137196 DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137196 ISSN=2296-2565 ABSTRACT=Background

Although the association between short-term air pollution exposure and certain hospitalizations has been well documented, evidence on the effect of longer-term (e. g., monthly) air pollution on a comprehensive set of outcomes is still limited.

Method

A total of 68,416 people in South China were enrolled and followed up during 2019–2020. Monthly air pollution level was estimated using a validated ordinary Kriging method and assigned to individuals. Time-dependent Cox models were developed to estimate the relationship between monthly PM10 and O3 exposures and the all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations after adjusting for confounders. The interaction between air pollution and individual factors was also investigated.

Results

Overall, each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 concentration was associated with a 3.1% (95%CI: 1.3%−4.9%) increment in the risk of all-cause hospitalization. The estimate was even greater following O3 exposure (6.8%, 5.5%−8.2%). Furthermore, each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 was associated with a 2.3%-9.1% elevation in all the cause-specific hospitalizations except for those related to respiratory and digestive diseases. The same increment in O3 was relevant to a 4.7%−22.8% elevation in the risk except for respiratory diseases. Additionally, the older individuals tended to be more vulnerable to PM10 exposure (Pinteraction: 0.002), while the alcohol abused and those with an abnormal BMI were more vulnerable to the impact of O3 (Pinteraction: 0.052 and 0.011). However, the heavy smokers were less vulnerable to O3 exposure (Pinteraction: 0.032).

Conclusion

We provide comprehensive evidence on the hospitalization hazard of monthly PM10 and O3 exposure and their interaction with individual factors.