Suicidality among older Australian adults

Background: Vulnerability to suicidality is a concern among older adults, particularly as this proportion of the population is growing. Determining what factors contribute to suicidality will help to create a framework for understanding and assessing suicidal risk among older adults and developing effective treatments. This study examined suicidality among older Australian adults.

Methods: This study forms part of a larger study to trial a survey to collect cross-sectional data on the mental and physical health of older Australian adults across time. One hundred and fourteen Australian residents aged 65 years and over completed an anonymous survey online or by returning a paper-and-pencil version of the survey by post. The survey took approximately 25 min to complete and comprised of (1) sociodemographic questions (e.g., age, gender, education), (2) validated questionnaires measuring depression, general anxiety, psychological distress, insomnia, substance dependence, problem gambling, and stress, and (3) mental and physical health and wellbeing items (e.g., religiosity, assistance with daily tasks, and mental health service usage in the last 12-months). The dependent variable, suicidality, was measured by asking participants whether they had ever seriously thought about committing suicide.

Results: Associations with suicidality were analyzed using Chi-squares and independent samples t-tests. The results found suicidality to be significantly associated with lower levels of satisfaction with the frequency of seeing and/or communicating with friends, and inadequate levels of community engagement.

Conclusion: The results of this survey reinforce the importance of social connectedness as a central and significant protective factor against suicidality among older adults.

Introduction

The Australian population is aging rapidly. In 20 years (2000–2020) the proportion of people aged 65 years and over increased by 3.9%, from 12.4 to 16.3% (1). In 2020, suicide was the 10th leading cause of death for men and 22nd leading cause of death for women (2). The highest age-specific suicide rate was recorded for men aged 85 years and older (36.2 deaths per 100,000 persons). Comparatively for women, the age-specific suicide rate for those aged 85 years and over was 6.2 per 100,000 persons.

A systematic literature review (3) identified that suicidal behavior among older adults aged 65 years and over was associated with functional disability and a variety of conditions (e.g., malignant diseases, neurological disorders, pain, liver disease, arthritis). The review included 59 quantitative studies across four continents. A further six qualitative studies from three continents unpacked the results of the quantitative studies finding common themes of illness, disability, pain, feelings of being a burden, lack of dignity, independence and sense of usefulness, and lack of pleasure with living to be common themes precipitating suicidal thoughts, attempts and completed suicides. Furthermore, mental health conditions (i.e., dementia, depression, anxiety) have been positively correlated with the prevalence of suicide among older adults (4). In addition, there is also a tendency for health professionals not to routinely assess for mental health conditions amongst older adults and this can result in the under-identification and under-reporting of actual rates (5), potentially increasing the risk of suicide.

Suicidality among older adults has also been associated with a range of other mental health issues, such as insomnia (6), substance abuse (7), and gambling (8), Determining what factors contribute to suicidality will help to create a framework for understanding and assessing suicidal risk among older adults, and ultimately developing and administering effective treatments.

The aim of this study was to conduct a survey of older Australian adults (aged 65 years and over) to examine suicidality across sociodemographic variables, depression, anxiety, psychological distress, insomnia, substance dependence, problem gambling, stress, and mental health and physical well-being items.

Methods

Procedure and participants

This paper reports on data collected as part of a larger study to trial a survey to collect cross-sectional data on the mental and physical health of older Australian adults across multiple timepoints. Recruitment for this study was conducted nationally, with all Australian residents aged 65 years and older eligible to take part by completing an anonymous survey online or returning a paper-and-pencil version of the survey by post. Following ethics approval, the study was advertised via social and printed media, flyers on community notice boards, and in aged care residential facilities. The survey took approximately 25 min to complete. A total of 168 older adults consented to take part in the study, six participants were ineligible as they resided outside of Australia and were removed from the sample for analysis. A further 48 participants failed to complete an essential question for analysis (whether they had ever seriously thought about committing suicide) and were subsequently also removed from analysis. This left a total sample size of 114. Participant characteristics of this sample are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

Measures

The survey included sociodemographic items, validated measures, and items relating to the mental and physical health and well-being of the participants.

Sociodemographic information collected included age, gender, highest level of education completed, gross income per annum, country of residence and birth, living setting, relationship status, and whether the participant had been sexually active in the last 12 months.

Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 [PHQ-9; (9)]. The PHQ-9 is a nine-item depression subscale of the Patient Health Questionnaire (10). The questionnaire is based on the diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fourth edition (11). Questions are based on symptoms experienced in the previous 2 weeks, with questions answered on a four-point scale from 0 = “Not at all” to 3 = “Nearly every day” and then summed to obtain a score from 0–27.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 [GAD-7; (12)]. The GAD-7 is a seven-item screening tool for GAD. Questions are based on symptoms experienced in the previous two weeks with items answered on a four-point scale from 0 = “Not at all” to 3 = “Nearly every day”. Items are summed to obtain a score from 0–21.

Kessler 6 [K6; (13)]. The K6, an abridged version of the K10, is a six-item screening tool to provide a general measure of psychological distress. Questions ask about depressive- and anxiety-related symptomology during the previous 30 days. For the Australian version of the K6, symptoms are rated on a five-point scale from 1 = “None of the time” to 5 = “All of time” with scores summed to obtain a score from 6–30.

Insomnia Severity Index [ISI; (14)]. The ISI is a seven-item measure assessing the nature, severity, and impact of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. Questions are based on sleep-related behaviors across the prior 2 weeks. Each question is answered on a five-point Likert scale from 0 = “None” to 4 = “Very severe” for the first three questions, (1) difficulty falling asleep, (2) difficulty staying awake, and (3) problems waking up too early; 0 = “Very satisfied” to 4 = “Very dissatisfied” for (4) satisfaction with current sleep pattern; 0 = “Not noticeable” to 4 = “Very much noticeable” for (5) noticeability of sleep problem to others; 0 = “Not worried” to 4 = “Very much worried” for (6) degree of worry/distress about current sleep problem; and 0 = “Not interfering” to 4 = “Very much interfering” for (7) extent that sleep problem interferes with daily functioning. Responses to the seven-items are summed to obtain a total score from 0–28, with scores interpreted as: 0–7 = No clinically significant insomnia, 8–14 = Subthreshold insomnia, 15–21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity), and 22–28 = Clinical insomnia (severe).

CAGE Adapted to Include Drugs [CAGE-AID; (15)]. The CAGE-AID is a four-item tool adapted from the CAGE to screen for alcohol and other drug problems. Each question is given a “yes” or “no” response, with one or more “yes” responses considered an indication of possible substance use or abuse.

Problem Gambling Severity Index [PGSI; (16)]. The PGSI is a nine-item measure of common signs for risk of problem gambling. Questions are based on the prior 12 months and answered on a four-point scale from 0 = “Never” to 3 = “Almost always”, with scores summed to obtain a total score from 0–27. The total score is interpreted as: 0 = Non-problem gambler, 1–2 = Low-risk gambler, 3–7 = Moderate-risk gambler, and 8 or above = Problem gambler.

The Social Readjustment Rating Scale [SRRS; (17)]. The SRRS measures the amount of stress experienced over the prior 12 months and the risk of future illness. Participants are presented with a list of major stressful life events and asked to state whether they experienced that event within the last 12 months. Each event has been designated a score of up to 100 points, for example, death of a spouse or child = 100 points, marriage = 50 points, and children leaving home = 29 points. The scores for endorsed items are summed to obtain a total score where 0–150 = a low susceptibility to stress-induced health breakdown, 150–300 = a 50% (moderate) chance of health breakdown in the next 2 years, and 300 or more = an 80% (high) chance of health breakdown in the next 2 years.

Participants were asked to answer a series of questions related to their mental health and physical well-being. Questions included: (a) whether they had ever seriously thought about dying by suicide (yes/no); (b) whether they had ever been a smoker (yes/no); (c) how religious they are (1 = not at all religious to 11 = extremely religious); how satisfied they were with the frequency of seeing and communicating with (d) family and (e) friends (1 = No nearly enough to 11 = Very satisfied with how often); (f) their satisfaction with level of community engagement (1 = Not at all, to 5 = Very much); overall satisfaction with (g) physical health, (h) mental health, and (i) quality of life (1 = Excellent to 5 = poor); whether they had experienced symptomatology relating to (j) social phobia, (k) specific phobia, (l) post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), (m) obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), (n) panic disorder (1 = yes, 2 = sometimes, 3 = not now, but used too, 4 = no, never have); (o) whether they needed assistance with daily tasks because of physical illness or disability (1 = yes, 2 = sometimes, 3 = no); whether they (p) had ever experienced a direct blow to the head, and (q) were physically hit/smacked as a child (1 = no, never, 2 = yes, but only brief exposure, 3 = yes, prolonged exposure); (r) whether they had experienced any physical conditions from a provided list (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, osteoporosis); and (s) whether they had accessed any services from a provided list (i.e., psychologist, pharmacist, telephone service) in the past 12 months for a mental health condition.

Results

All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS (v.28). The dependent variable was suicidality, specifically, whether the participant had seriously considered suicide at any point in their lifetime. Suicidality was examined against socio-demographics, validated measures, and mental and physical health and well-being items using Chi-squares and independent samples t-tests, corresponding to categorical and continuous/interval variables respectively. The p-value was set conservatively at 0.01 due to the number of analyses conducted. The results are presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Suicidality by sociodemographic, validated measures, and mental and physical health and well-being items.

The results indicate that two variables were significant at the 0.01 level with suicidality associated with lower levels of satisfaction with the frequency of seeing and/or communicating with friends, and suicidality more than three times higher among participants who reported inadequate levels of community engagement compared to those who reported adequate levels of engagement.

Discussion

This study explored what variables were associated with suicidality among older Australian adults. Suicidality was examined across a series of sociodemographic variables, validated questionnaires, and mental and physical health and well-being items. Suicidality was found to be significantly associated with a dissatisfaction with the frequency of seeing and/or communicating with friends, and inadequate levels of community engagement.

The two variables highlight the importance of social connection where suicidality is concerned, the impact of which is emphasized within the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (18). This theory posits that suicide will only occur if an individual has both the desire to die by suicide and the ability to do so. The desire to die is comprised of two psychological states, a low sense of belonginess or social isolation, and a perceived burdensomeness. In contrast, strong social support may have a protective effect against stressors in later life that increase one's vulnerability to suicidal risk factors [e.g., (19, 20)].

It could be argued that dissatisfaction with the frequency of seeing and/or communicating with family should similarly be significant. However, the nature of an obligatory relationship with family members and voluntary relationship with friends may have a differential effect on one's mental health and well-being. For example, Huxhold and Miche (21) found social activities with friends may become more important as one ages and creates a buffer against the negative effects of aging. Furthermore, Gallant and Spitze (22) found that in comparison to family members, social networks had more positive than negative influences over the management of chronic illness among older adults, such as disease management, decision-making about chronic illness, and psychosocial coping. Consequently, family members may play a more moderate role in suicidal risk among older adults than that of friends.

It was surprising that there were no further significant associations with suicidality. However, the results for the questionnaires measuring depression, general anxiety, psychological distress, insomnia, and stress suggest this was a relatively healthy cohort of older Australian adults. Although suicidality among our sample was above the worldwide range, 19.3 vs. 2.6–17%; (23). The results of the study may therefore not provide a good reflection of the general populace of older adults. Indeed, in comparison to Australian population data, our sample is comprised of a greater proportion of females [62.3 vs. 53%; (24)], a higher proportion of individuals living in cared accommodation (12.3 vs. 5.2%) and is more highly educated [43.9 vs. 12% had completed a bachelor's degree or higher, (24, 25)]. Consequently, the data should be viewed with caution. The results of the study are also limited by the small sample size and the likely impact this had on the statistical power of the analyses to detect significant results. The sample size also limited the capacity to conduct more sophisticated analyses to examine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. Furthermore, given the target sample, we may have been better served administering the Geriatric Depression Scale (26) over the PHQ9 to measure depression. Nonetheless, the results underscore the importance of social connection as a potential protective factor against suicidality among older Australian adults.

Going forward, as part of the larger project intended to create a database of cross-sectional data on the mental and physical health and well-being of older Australian adults, we will seek to collaborate with experts in population health, geriatrics, and biostatistics. We will aim to develop a framework protocol to incorporate how best to refine the survey, identify potential short- and longer-term research questions, analyze the data, recruit a larger more representative sample, and report the findings.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the unidentified raw data supporting the conclusions of this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and following Federation University HREC ethical approval to do so. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to BK, Yi5rbGVpbiYjeDAwMDQwO2ZlZGVyYXRpb24uZWR1LmF1.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Federation University Human Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent for participation was obtained for this study in accordance with the National Legislation and the Institutional Requirements.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

To the older adults who participated in this survey and Sue Lauder for her administrative assistance in posting out questionnaires.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Twenty Years of Population Change. (2020). Available online at: https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/twenty-years-population-change#:~:text=Proportion%20of%20population%20aged%2065%20years%20%26%20overandtext=In%20the%20year%20ending%2030%20June%202020%2C%20the%20population%20aged,in%20all%20states%20and%20territories (accessed July 1, 2022).

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of Death, Australia. (2020). Available online at: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/causes-death-australia/latest-release?msclkid=dab46db0c6b011ec9726f06a4b3d13c3#intentional-self-harm-deaths-suicide-in-australia (accessed July 1, 2022).

3. Fässberg MM, Cheung G, Canetto SS, Erlangsen A, Lapierre S, Lindner R, et al. A systematic review of physical illness, functional disability, and suicidal behaviour among older adults. Aging Mental Health. (2016) 20:166–94. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1083945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kułak-Bejda A, Bejda G. Mental disorders, cognitive impairment and the risk of suicide in older adults. Front Psychiatry. (2021) 12:695286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization. Mental Health of Older Adults. (2017). Available online at: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-adults (accessed July 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

6. Nadorff MR, Fiske A, Sperry JA, Petts R. Insomnia symptoms, nightmares, and suicidal ideation in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2013) 68:145–52. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bartels SJ, Blow FC, Van Citters AD. Dual diagnosis among older adults: co-occurring substance abuse and psychiatric illness. J Dual Diagn. (2006) 2:9–30. doi: 10.1300/J374v02n03_03

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Levens S, Dyer AM, Zubritsky C, Knott K. Gambling among older, primary-care patients: An important public health concern. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2005) 13:69–76. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200501000-00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. (2001) 16:606–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2010) 32:345–59. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (2000).

Google Scholar

12. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. (2006) 166:1092–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2003) 60:184–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Morin CM. Insomnia: Psychological Assessment and Management. New York: Guilford Press. (1993).

Google Scholar

15. Brown RL. Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wis Med J. (1995) 94:135–40.

Google Scholar

16. Ferris J,. The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. (2001). Available online at: https://www.greo.ca/Modules/EvidenceCentre/files/Ferris%20et%20al(2001)The_Canadian_Problem_Gambling_Index.pdf (accessed July 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

17. Holmes TH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. (1967) 11:213–8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(67)90010-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Joiner T. Why People Die by Suicide. London: Harvard University Press. (2007).

Google Scholar

19. Krause N. Stress, social support, and negative interaction in later life. Res Aging. (1991) 13:333–63. doi: 10.1177/0164027591133004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rowe JL, Conwell Y, Schulberg HC. Social support and suicidal ideation in older adults using home healthcare services. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2006) 14:758–66. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000218324.78202.25

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Huxhold O, Miche M. Benefits of having friends in older ages: differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2014) 69:366–75. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gallant MP, Spitze GD. Help or hindrance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Res Aging. (2007) 29:375–409. doi: 10.1177/0164027507303169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Corna LM, Cairney J. Suicide ideation in older adults: relationship to mental health problems and service use. Gerontologist. (2010) 50:785–97. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Older Australians. (2021). Available online at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australians (accessed December 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

25. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, Ageing and Carers: Summary of Findings−2015 (cat. No. 4430). (2015). Available online at: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4430,~0ma.in+features202015 (accessed December 1, 2022).

Google Scholar

26. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey MB, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. (1983) 17:37–49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar