AUTHOR=Lynch Heather N. , Lauer Daniel J. , Thompson William J. , Leleck Olivia , Freid Rachel D. , Collins Justin , Chen Kathleen , Ierardi A. Michael , Urban Ania M. , Cappello Michael A. , Boffetta Paolo , Mundt Kenneth A. 

TITLE=Systematic review of the scientific evidence of the pulmonary carcinogenicity of talc

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.989111

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2022.989111

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=<p>We conducted a systematic review to assess the potential pulmonary carcinogenicity of inhaled talc in humans. Our systematic review methods adhere to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and incorporated aspects from the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) and several United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) frameworks for systematic reviews. A comprehensive literature search was conducted. Detailed data abstraction and study quality evaluation, adapting the US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) framework, were central to our analysis. The literature search and selection process identified 23 primary studies that assessed exposure to talc and pulmonary cancer risks in humans (<italic>n</italic> = 19) and animals (<italic>n</italic> = 3). Integrating all streams of evidence according to the IOM framework yielded classifications of suggestive evidence of no association between inhaled talc and lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma at human-relevant exposure levels.</p>