Can information infrastructure development improve the health care environment? Evidence from China

Existing studies ignore the importance of information infrastructure development in improving regional health care environment. This paper adopts a spatial difference-in-difference (DID) model to assess the impact of information infrastructure development on urban health care environment based on a quasi-natural experiment of the “Broadband China” city pilots (BCCP). A balanced panel of 259 cities from 2010 to 2019 is selected for empirical analysis in this paper. Our findings show that the implementation of BCCP resulted in a 4.1 and 2.9% improvement in local medical workforce and medical infrastructure. In addition, there is significant spatial spillover effects of the implementation of BCCP, with 7.2 and 12.5% improvement in medical workforce and medical infrastructure in the surrounding areas. Our findings also suggest that information infrastructure development enhances the health care environment by driving industrial upgrading and education levels. Further analysis shows that BCCP has the strongest improvement on medical workforce in the eastern region and non-ordinary prefecture-level cities. For medical infrastructure, BCCP has stronger improvement in central region, western region, and non-ordinary prefecture-level cities. Finally, the paper conducts a series of robustness tests to ensure the reliability of the analysis results, including parallel trend tests, placebo tests, and re-estimation with different methods. Policies to improve the health care environment through information infrastructure development are proposed.

Introduction

With the emergence of environmental pollution and food problems, people are paying more attention to their own health. Improving the health care environment is considered an important means of ensuring public health (1). A large number of scholars have paid attention to how to improve regional health care environment. Swift (2) pointed out that the level of regional economic development is an important factor affecting the health care environment. Population size and structure are also thought to significantly impact the health care environment (3). In addition, some scholars proposed that foreign investment, government intervention and financial development are all essential for the improvement of health care environment (4–8). However, the marginal benefits of these factors are diminishing and there is an urgent need to find new driving factors to further enhance the health care environment.

The development of information communication technology such as big data, cloud computing and 5G provides new opportunities for the improvement of the health care environment (9–11). These technology applications are extremely dependent on government support for information infrastructure (12). On the one hand, the development of information infrastructure has stimulated the application of information technology in the medical field (13). This has greatly enhanced medical cooperation between different regions and can effectively improve the health care environment in developing regions. On the other hand, the development of information infrastructure can promote industrial upgrading and provide talents and technologies for medical institutions, thus improving health care environment (14). This means that information infrastructure development has a significant impact on the health care environment. Especially in the current context of rapid development of information technology, ignoring the impact of information infrastructure construction on the healthcare environment is not conducive to maintaining public health. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the effects and mechanisms of information infrastructure development on the health care environment and propose the recommendations to improve the health care environment.

To develop information infrastructure, China launched a “Broadband China” city pilots (BCCP) policy in 2014. The implementation of BCCP is dedicated to improving the speed and accessibility of broadband, which can effectively improve the level of information technology in the area where it is located. From 2014 to 2016, 116 city pilots have been approved (15). Based on the above quasi-natural experiment, this paper adopts a spatial difference-in-difference (DID) model to assess the impact of information infrastructure development on the health care environment. In addition, this paper further explores the mechanisms by which information infrastructure development enhances the health care environment from the perspectives of industrial upgrading and the education level. Finally, this paper conducts heterogeneity analysis and robustness test.

The contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in the following three points. First, this paper correlates information infrastructure with the health care environment. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies that analyze the impact of information infrastructure development on the health care environment at the city level. Information infrastructure development greatly enhances the digital health care technology and information health care talent clustering in the region. Neglecting the development of information infrastructure is not conducive to effective improvement of the health care environment. Second, this paper assesses the impact of information infrastructure development on the health care environment through a quasi-natural experiment of BCCP. This policy has a strong exogeneity, which can reduce the interference of endogeneity on the evaluation results to a certain extent. Finally, this paper considers spatial factor to the traditional DID model. There is a clear spatial correlation in China's health care environment, i.e., the improvement of the health care environment in large cities has a spillover effect on the surrounding areas (16). Ignoring such spatial correlation may lead to biased estimates. The results estimated by the spatial DID model reduce the interference of spatial factors and can more reliably assess the impact of political information infrastructure development on the health care environment.

The reminder of this study is organized as follows: Section Research hypothesis provides the research hypothesis of this study, Section Policy background of information infrastructure development of “Broadband China” provides the policy background of information infrastructure development of “Broadband China,” Section Methods and data provides methods and data, Section Results the results, and Section Conclusion and recommendations provides the conclusions and recommendations.

Research hypothesis

It has been widely recognized in the literature that information infrastructure development has a significant enhancing effect on economic development in terms of productivity enhancement (17–19). However, the impact of information infrastructure development on the health care environment has not been emphasized. This paper argues that information infrastructure development affects the healthcare environment through the following two main channels.

First, the development of information infrastructure has greatly contributed to the upgrading of the industry and provided more advanced collaboration models for health care organizations (20). The mobility of medical technology and personnel is the most important factor limiting the improvement of the health care environment (21, 22). The development of information communication technology represented by 5G and cloud computing can effectively link medical institutions in developed and developing regions, thus enhancing the medical and health care environment in developing regions (16, 23, 24). In addition, the industrial upgrading driven by the development of information infrastructure has also gathered more medical professionals for cities, which is conducive to improving the local health care environment (25).

Second, the development of information infrastructure lowers the barriers to education, and the level of education of residents is improved. On the one hand, this will lead to residents paying more attention to their own health, thus enhancing government investment in health care, and improving the health care environment (26). On the other hand, the improvement of education level will also help to cultivate medical professionals and improve the medical system, which will lead to the improvement of the medical and health care environment (27). Thus, this paper proposes the following hypothesis:

H1: Information infrastructure development can improve the health care environment, and its main mechanism is to promote industrial upgrading and education level.

Since the construction of information infrastructure is not divided by administrative divisions, neighboring cities are able to share part of the information infrastructure (28). Information infrastructure development not only affects the local health care environment, but also has an impact on the surrounding areas. On the one hand, the information infrastructure construction improves the information level of local medical institutions, and the neighboring areas will learn and imitate the introduction of advanced technology to improve their own health care environment (29). On the other hand, the information technology and medical professionals gathered by the local information infrastructure construction also provide a reservoir of human resources for the surrounding areas (30). This will lead to the introduction of more medical talents in the surrounding areas, thus improving the medical and health care environment. Therefore, this paper proposes the following hypothesis:

H2: Information infrastructure development not only enhances the local health care environment, but also has positive spillover effects on neighboring areas.

Policy background of information infrastructure development of “Broadband China”

The development of big data, cloud computing and 5G technologies has further enhanced the transmission and use of information and has had a significant socio-economic impact (28, 31). However, the development and application of these technologies are extremely dependent on the construction of information infrastructure, such as the laying of communication base stations and fiber optic cables (15). Chinese government implemented the policy of “Broadband China” city pilots (BCCP) in August 2013. This policy is dedicated to accelerating the construction of network bandwidth in pilot cities and improving the speed and accessibility of broadband in pilot cities. The first batch of 41 cities with comprehensive expert assessment was implemented in 2014, the second batch of 38 cities in 2015, and the third batch of 37 cities in 2016, the spatial distribution of each city is shown in Figure 1. The main way of the policy implementation is to expand the access coverage to build the network with broadband and promote industrial optimization and upgrading and economic transformation with more diversified network applications. Undoubtedly, the implementation of BCCP has greatly promoted the development of information infrastructure in the pilot cities.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Spatial distribution of the implementation of BCCP.

Methods and data

Data

The period of the sample in this paper is from 2010 to 2019, covering the first 4 years and the last 5 years of BCCP implementation. Data were obtained from the China City Statistics Database (CCSD) in the China Research Data Service (CNRDS) platform (https://www.cnrds.com/Home/Index#/FinanceDatabase/DB/CCSD) and the China City Statistics Yearbook (2011–2020). Since the spatial DID model requires the data structure to be a balanced panel, this paper excludes the sample of cities that have missing values in any year. The balanced panel dataset contains 259 cities per year, with a total of 2,590 samples.

Empirical model

Baseline model

This paper adopts BCCP as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate the impact of digital infrastructure development on the health care environment. In addition, considering the existence of spatial spillover effects on the healthcare environment, this paper further adds spatial factors to the traditional DID model and uses spatial DID to assess the impact of BCCP implementation on the health care environment. The estimation results of spatial lag model (SLM), spatial error model (SEM) and spatial Durbin model (SDM) are also reported in this paper. Among them, the SLM incorporates the spatial lag term of the dependent variable in the model (32, 33). The SLM-based spatial DID model is constructed as follows:

$\begin{array}{l}HC{E}_{it}=\alpha +\delta {{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}HC{E}_{it}+\beta {BCCP}_{it}+\lambda {Control}_{it}\\ +{\epsilon }_{it},{\epsilon }_{it}~N(0,{\sigma }^{2}I)& (1)\end{array}$

where HCE_it denotes health care environment of city i in year t, BCCP_it denotes implementation of the “Broadband China” city pilots, $\delta \sum _{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}HC{E}_{it}$ denotes the spatial lag of c health care environment, Con_it denotes the control variables. The SEM incorporates the spatial lag term of the error term into the model (34), and the spatial DID model based on SEM is constructed as follows:

$\begin{array}{ll}HC{E}_{it}=\alpha +\beta {BCCP}_{it}+\lambda {Control}_{it}+{\epsilon }_{it}& (2)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{ll}{\epsilon }_{it}=\delta W_{it}\epsilon +\mu ,\mu ~N(0,{\sigma }^{2}I)& (3)\end{array}$

where HCE_it denotes health care environment, BCCP_it denotes implementation of the “Broadband China” city pilots, Con_it denotes the control variables, δ denotes the estimated coefficient of the spatial auto-correlation error term; μ denotes the error term. The SDM incorporates the spatial lagged terms of both the independent and dependent variables into the model (35, 36), and the spatial DID model based on SDM is constructed as follows:

$\begin{array}{l}HC{E}_{it}=\alpha +\delta {{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}HC{E}_{it}+\beta {BCCP}_{it}+\\ +\xi {{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}BCC{P}_{it}+\lambda Co{n}_{it}& (4)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{ll}+\tau {{\displaystyle \sum }}_{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}Co{n}_{it}+{\epsilon }_{it},{\epsilon }_{it}~N(0,{\sigma }^{2}I)& (5)\end{array}$

where HCE_it denotes health care environment, BCCP_it denotes the implementation of the “Broadband China” city pilots, Con_it denotes the control variables, $\sum _{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}HC{E}_{it}$ denotes the spatial lag term of health care environment, $\sum _{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}Co{n}_{it}$ is the spatial lag term of control variables; $\sum _{j=1}^n{W}_{ij}BCC{P}_{it}$ is the spatial lag term of implementation of the BCCP.

Mediating effect model

To explore the mechanism of the influence of information infrastructure development on the health care environment, the following mediating effect model is constructed in this paper:

$\begin{array}{ll}HC{E}_{it}=\alpha +\beta {BCCP}_{it}+\lambda {Control}_{it}+{\epsilon }_{it}& (6)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{ll}{M}_{it}=\alpha +\beta {BCCP}_{it}+{\epsilon }_{it}& (7)\end{array}$

$\begin{array}{ll}HC{E}_{it}=\alpha +\beta {BCCP}_{it}+\gamma M_{it}+\lambda {Control}_{it}+{\epsilon }_{it}& (8)\end{array}$

where M_it denotes the mediating variable, including industrial upgrading and education level. Industrial upgrading is measured by the ratio of the added value of the tertiary industry to GDP and education level is measured by the number of university students per 10,000 people. If the coefficients of BCCP in Equation (6) and M in Equation (7) pass the significance test, it indicates that information infrastructure development affects health care environment through promoting industrial upgrading and education level.

Variables

The dependent variable in this paper is the health care environment. In this paper, medical workforce and medical infrastructure are selected as the proxy variables for the health care environment (6). Where medical workforce is measured by the total number of doctors and medical infrastructure is measured by the number of hospital beds (6).

The independent variable the implementation of BCCP. BCCP is an incremental reform with three cohorts of cities implementing BCCP from 2014 to 2016. This study uses the implementation of BCCP as the independent variable to assess the impact of information infrastructure development on the healthcare environment. The value of BCCP is 1 if the i-th city implemented BCCP in year t and 0 if no BCCP was implemented.

In this paper, a series of factors that determine the urban health care environment are also selected as control variables, including economic development (lnrgdp), total population (lnpop), foreign investment (lnfdi), government intervention (gov), financial development (fin), industry structure (is) and education level (edu) (4–8). The definitions and descriptive statistics of each variable are shown in detail in Tables 1, 2. It should be noted that this paper measures urban education level through average years of education per capita (37). The specific algorithm is:

$\begin{array}{ll}ed{u}_{it}=6pri{m}_{it}+9mi{d}_{it}+12hi{g}_{it}+16un{i}_{it}& (9)\end{array}$

where prim_it, mid_it, hig_it and uni_it denote the proportion of residents with education level above elementary school, junior high school, high school and junior college in year t of city i.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Variable definition.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Descriptive statistics.

Results

Spatial autocorrelation test

To analyze the spatial correlation of health care environment at the city level in China, this paper reports the spatial distribution of medical workforce and medical infrastructure through Figure 2. The spatial distribution in Figure 2 shows that medical workforce and medical infrastructure have relatively similar characteristics, i.e., the health care environment in the regional capital cities is stronger than that in the surrounding cities and shows a decreasing trend with distance. Meanwhile, the medical health environment in coastal areas and northern China is stronger than that in inland areas and southwest China. To further investigate the statistical significance of the spatial correlation of health care environment, this paper calculates the Moran's I index of medical workforce and medical infrastructure from 2010 to 2019.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. The spatial distribution of health care environment. The plots in the first row denote the spatial distribution of medical workforce (lnmw) in 2010 and 2019. The plots in the second row denote the spatial distribution of medical infrastructure (lnmi) in 2010 and 2019.

The Moran's I Index scatterplot provides a visual representation of the spatial correlation of urban healthcare environments. Figures 3, 4 shows the Moran scatter plots for the healthcare environment in 2010 and 2019. In these plots, the horizontal axis represents the standardized healthcare environment, and the vertical axis represents the spatial lagged values. According to the scatter plots, the coefficient of the main fit line is significantly higher than zero, indicating a spatially positive correlation between healthcare environments. The specific results of the Moran index of healthcare environment are given in Table 3. During 2010–2019, the Moran's I index is significantly positive at the 1% level with index values between 0 and 1, which indicates a strong spatial correlation of city-level health care environment in China. Therefore, the spatial factor should be considered in the estimation of the impact of information infrastructure development on health care environment.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Moran scatterplot of health care environment in 2010. The left graph denotes the Moran scatterplot of medical workforce (lnmw) and the right graph denotes the Moran scatterplot of medical infrastructure (lnmi).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Moran scatterplot of health care environment in 2019. The left graph denotes the Moran scatterplot of medical workforce (lnmw) and the right graph denotes the Moran scatterplot of medical infrastructure (lnmi).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Calculation of Moran's I index of health care environment.

Impact of information infrastructure development and health care environment

Table 4 reports the baseline regression results of the impact of information infrastructure development on health care environment. For comparison and to ensure the robustness of the results, we report all the results of the fixed effects model, the SLM model, the SEM model, and the SDM model. For each model, we report results with both medical workforce (lnmw) and medical infrastructure (lnmi) as dependent variables.

TABLE 4

Table 4. Impact of information infrastructure development and health care environment.

According to the results, BCCP implementation has a significant positive contribution to the health care environment. The coefficients calculated by the four models for BCCP on medical workforce (lnmw) are 0.075 (p < 0.01), 0.037 (p < 0.01), 0.036 (p < 0.01), and 0.039 (p < 0.01), respectively. The coefficients for BCCP on medical infrastructure (lnmi) are 0.048 (p < 0.01), 0.015 (p < 0.01), 0.014 (p < 0.01), and 0.023 (p < 0.01). Since SDM takes into account both spatial lag effect and spatial error effect, its assessment of BCCP impact is more reliable. Therefore, the implementation of BCCP leads to a final improvement of 3.9 and 2.3% in medical workforce and medical infrastructure after excluding the spatial factor interference.

The estimation results of the SDM model suggest that the BCCP policy has an important enhancing effect on the health care environment. Since the cities of BCCP are distributed across the country and the health care environment is spatially relevant, it is necessary to discuss the spatial spillover effects. Table 5 further reports the spatial spillover effects of BCCP on the health care environment. Specifically, the direct effects, indirect effects, and total effects of BCCP implementation on medical workforce (lnmw) are 4.1, 7.2, and 11.3%, which all passed the 1% significance test. The direct effects, indirect effects, and total effects of BCCP implementation on medical infrastructure (lnmi) are 2.9, 12.5, and 15.4%, which also passed the 1% significance test. The results of the above analysis show that information infrastructure development not only leads to significant improvements in the local healthcare environment, but also generates stronger positive spillover effects. The implementation of BBCP leads to an overall improvement effect of 11.3 and 15.4% for medical workforce and medical infrastructure nationwide. This shows that there is a need for the government to further promote the development of information infrastructure, mainly 5G, cloud computing and big data centers.

TABLE 5

Table 5. Direct effect, indirect effect, and total effect of SDM in Table 4.

Parallel trend test

Figure 5 reports the results of the parallel trend test. The regression coefficients mostly failed the 5% level significance test before the implementation of the BCCP. This indicates that there was no significant difference of the health care environment between the control groups and treated groups before the BCCP was implemented. The parallel trend hypothesis was satisfied. In addition, the regression coefficients showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing after the implementation of the BCCP. This indicates that the effect is strongest in the first 3 years of information infrastructure development. Over time, the impact of BCCP on the health care environment begins to decline. This implies that in the short term, BCCP can lead to an improvement in the health care environment, but the effect will gradually diminish. The government should ensure the short-term performance of the policy while increasing the long-term effectiveness of information infrastructure development on the effect of healthcare environment improvement.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Results of Parallel Trend Test. The dependent variable in the left panel is medical workforce (lnmw) and the dependent variable in the right panel is medical infrastructure (lnmi). The X-axis denotes the window period for BCCP implementation. The Y axis represents the regression coefficient of BCCP. The year before BCCP is implemented as the base period.

Analysis of the mechanisms by which information infrastructure development affects the health care environment

To test the mechanism of the effect of information infrastructure development affecting the health care environment in hypothesis 1, the mediating effect model is constructed in section Mediating effect model. Table 6 reports the regression results for this model.

TABLE 6

Table 6. Mechanisms of information infrastructure affects the health care environment.

According to the regression results in columns (1) and (4), the regression coefficients of BCCP are 0.085 (p < 0.01) and 0.251 (p < 0.01), which means that the development of information infrastructure significantly promotes the industrial upgrading and the level of education in the city where it is located. Subsequently, the regression results in columns (2) and (3), the regression coefficients of iu are 0.612 (p < 0.01) and 0.315 (p > 0.1), respectively. This indicates that information infrastructure development enhances the healthcare environment by promoting industrial upgrading. The regression coefficients for edu in columns (5) and (6) are 0.085 (p < 0.05) and 0.047 (p < 0.05), respectively. This indicates that information infrastructure development enhances the health care environment by promoting the level of access to education.

Heterogeneity analysis

Table 7 reports the results of the heterogeneity analysis of the implementation of BCCP on the health care environment. From the regional perspective, this paper analyzes the impact differences between the central and western regions relative to the eastern region. The results show that the enhancement of BCCP on medical workforce (lnmw) is mainly concentrated in the eastern region, but the enhancement of medical infrastructure (lnmi) is mainly concentrated in the central region and the western region.

TABLE 7

Table 7. Heterogeneity analysis.

Specifically, the effect of BCCP on the improvement of medical workforce in the eastern region is 4.5%, and there is no significant difference between the improvement effect of the eastern region on the central region and the western region. Compared to the eastern region, the effect of BCCP on medical infrastructure is 2.8 and 4% higher in the central and western region. In addition, this paper further analyzes the impact of BCCP on cities with different administrative ranks. In this paper, provincial capital cities, sub-provincial cities and municipalities are defined as non-ordinary prefecture-level cities, and other cities are ordinary prefecture-level cities. The results show that BCCP enhances the health care environment significantly less in ordinary prefecture-level cities than in non-ordinary prefecture-level cities. Specifically, the BCCP has a 4.2 and 4.8% higher lift effect on medical workforce and medical infrastructure for non-average prefectures than for average prefectures.

Robustness test

Placebo test

Since the BCCP policy may also affect the health care environment in non-pilot cities, this would lead to unreliable estimates. This study adopts Monte Carlo simulation to conduct a placebo test according to the study of La Ferrara et al. (38). First, this study randomly selected samples from the control group multiple times as the treatment group. Then, this study performs DID regression analysis to estimate the parameters. The results are reliable if the estimated parameters are normally distributed with a mean value of 0. The estimated coefficient distributions and kernel density curves after 500 random samples are given in Figure 6. As expected from the placebo test, the estimated coefficients show a normal distribution with a mean around 0. This suggests that the change in the health care environment of the truly treated group stems from the implementation of BCCP policy.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Results of placebo test. The dependent variable in the left graph is medical workforce (lnmw) and the dependent variable in the right graph is medical infrastructure (lnmi). Treatment groups were randomly drawn 500 times in the control group by Monte Carlo simulation and DID regression was performed. Plot the obtained regression coefficients as a distribution graph. This figure reports the results of health care environment of non-pilot cities as a dependent variable, presenting a normal distribution with an average value of 0.

Re-estimation using PSM-DID

To enhance the robustness of the study, this paper uses both PSM methods for posterior matching regression. This paper used two conventional matching methods, namely 1:1 nearest neighbor matching and kernel density matching.

The regression results after matching using these two methods are reported in Table 8. The regression results include both estimates with medical workforce and medical infrastructure as dependent variables. The results show that the implementation of BCCP significantly improves the urban health care environment using either nearest neighbor matching or kernel density matching. This is consistent with the results of previous studies using spatial panels, i.e., the results of this paper are robust.

TABLE 8

Table 8. Re-estimation using PSM-DID.

Conclusion and recommendations

Conclusion

This paper adopts a spatial DID model to assess the impact of information infrastructure development on the health care environment based on a quasi-natural experiment of BCCP. First, the spatial distribution map of the health care environment and the results of the Moran's I index measure indicate that there is a significant spatial correlation between medical workforce and medical infrastructure. The health care environment in north region and coastal areas is higher than that in the central and western regions in China.

Second, the estimation results of the spatial DID indicated that the implementation of BCCP improved medical workforce and medical infrastructure by 4.1 and 2.9%, respectively. In addition, BCCP implementation improved medical workforce and medical infrastructure by 7.2 and 12.5% in the surrounding areas. The total effects of BCCP implementation on medical workforce and medical infrastructure improvement are 11.3 and 15.4%. The results suggest that information infrastructure development not only significantly improves the local health care environment, but also has positive spatial spillover effects.

Third, the results of the mechanism analysis suggest that information infrastructure development enhances the health care environment by promoting industrial upgrading and education level. This paper also analyzes the heterogeneity of cities in different regions and administrative levels. The results show that BCCP has a higher impact on the eastern region and non-ordinary prefecture-level cities of medical workforce. Meanwhile, the impact of BCCP is higher for medical infrastructure in central and western regions with non-ordinary prefecture-level cities.

Finally, this paper also performs a series of robustness tests to ensure the reliability of the analysis results. Parallel trend test showed that there was no significant difference in health care environment between the treated groups and control groups before the implementation of BCCP, while the health care environment of the treated group is significantly higher than that of the control group after the implementation of BCCP. In addition, placebo tests, and re-estimates based on PSM-DID all yielded more consistent conclusions. Thus, the assessment of spatial DID was relatively reliable.

Recommendations

Based on the conclusions, this paper puts forward the following three recommendations.

First, it is necessary to continuously promote the development of information infrastructure. Digitization and information technology are important tools to improve the regional health care environment. Especially for developing regions, their ability to absorb excellent medical resources is more limited. The development of information technology can enhance the health care environment of such regions through inter-regional medical cooperation. The results of this paper show that information infrastructure development not only enhances the local healthcare environment, but also has a spillover effect on the surrounding areas. This implies that there is no strong competition among cities, and that cooperation and sharing can maximize the regional healthcare environment. The government can develop a larger-scale information infrastructure development program from a regional perspective. For other developing countries, information infrastructure development policies like that of China could be developed. IT development driven by initial government investment, thus improving the healthcare environment in the country.

Second, the government should encourage the combination of information technology industry and traditional medical industry. Cutting-edge information technology and data analysis techniques can greatly enhance the efficiency of medical personnel and reduce their errors of judgment. At the same time, the government should also encourage healthcare professionals to learn about information technology to further enhance the healthcare environment. For both developed and developing countries, governments should encourage the integration of IT with the healthcare industry through channels such as subsidies from the Ministry of Finance or innovation support. Information technology development can effectively bridge the medical gap between regions and improve the medical and health care environment.

Finally, part of governments should enhance the improvement of health care environment by the means of financial subsidies for information infrastructure development. The findings of this paper suggest that the impact of information infrastructure development on western regions and ordinary prefecture-level cities is more limited. To address this phenomenon, local governments should increase their initial investment and build healthcare platforms through financial subsidies. Meanwhile, governments should make full use of the industrial upgrading and education level improvement effects brought by the information infrastructure development to improve the medical and health care environment at a later stage.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: The data are obtained from the China City Statistics Database (CCSD) in the China Research Data Service (CNRDS) platform (https://www.cnrds.com/Home/Index#/FinanceDatabase/DB/CCSD).

Author contributions

CT: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, and writing—original draft. CZ: writing—review and editing and software. CY: funding acquisition, supervision, validation, and project administration. YT and YZ: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 19CGL008).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, Cheng KK, Maeseneer JD, Meng Q, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet. (2017) 390:2584–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Swift R. The relationship between health and GDP in OECD countries in the very long run. Health Econ. (2011) 20:306–22. doi: 10.1002/hec.1590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Holecki T, Rogalska A, Sobczyk K, Wozniak-Holecka J, Romaniuk P. Global elderly migrations and their impact on health care systems. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lan T, Chen T, Hu Y, Yang Y, Pan J. Governmental investments in hospital infrastructure among regions and its efficiency in China: an assessment of building construction. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:719839. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.719839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Medhekar A. Public-private partnerships for inclusive development: role of private corporate sector in provision of healthcare services. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. (2014) 157:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Song C-X, Qiao C-X, Luo J. Does high-speed rail opening affect the health care environment?–evidence From China. Front Public Health. (2021) 9:708527. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.708527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chung W. Characteristics associated with financial or non-financial barriers to healthcare in a universal health insurance system: a longitudinal analysis of korea health panel survey data. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:828318. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.828318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Barlow J, Roehrich JK, Wright S. De facto privatization or a renewed role for the EU? Paying for Europe's healthcare infrastructure in a recession. J R Soc Med. (2010) 103:51–5. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090296

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Dolley S. Big data's role in precision public health. Front Public Health. (2018) 6:68. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kaur-Gill S, Dutta MJ, Bashir MB. A community-based heart health intervention: culture-centered study of low-income malays and heart health practices. Front Commun. (2020) 5:16. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.00016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Huryk LA. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J Nurs Manag. (2010) 18:606–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01084.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rudenko L, Goryachikh S, Bykova O, Livanova R, Lapteva S. Mechanism Providing Information Infrastructure Support of Sustainable Development of Small Business in the Region. Atlantis Press (2020). p. 249–52. doi: 10.2991/aer.k.200202.050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ebenso B, Okusanya B, Okunade K, Akeju D, Ajepe A, Akaba GO, et al. What are the contextual enablers and impacts of using digital technology to extend maternal and child health services to rural areas? Findings of a qualitative study from Nigeria. Front Glob Women's Health. (2021) 2:670494. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.670494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li F, Frederick S, Gereffi G. E-Commerce and industrial upgrading in the Chinese apparel value chain. J Contemp Asia. (2019) 49:24–53. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2018.1481220

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xue Y, Tang C, Wu H, Liu J, Hao Y. The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: does digital economy development matter? Energy Policy. (2022) 165:112997. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112997

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Potrafke N, Roesel F. The urban–rural gap in healthcare infrastructure: does government ideology matter? Reg Stud. (2020) 54:340–351. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1623390

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Toader E, Firtescu BN, Roman A, Anton SG. Impact of information and communication technology infrastructure on economic growth: an empirical assessment for the EU countries. Sustainability. (2018) 10:3750. doi: 10.3390/su10103750

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pradhan RP, Mallik G, Bagchi TP. Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: a causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Manag Rev. (2018) 30:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wang B, Liu Y, Parker SK. How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Annals. (2020) 14:695–725. doi: 10.5465/annals.2018.0127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Tan L, Yu K, Bashir AK, Cheng X, Ming F, Zhao L, et al. Toward real-time and efficient cardiovascular monitoring for COVID-19 patients by 5G-enabled wearable medical devices: a deep learning approach. Neural Comput Appl. (2021) 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00521-021-06219-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hanzl M. Urban forms and green infrastructure – the implications for public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities Health. (2021) 5:S232–6. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1791441

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mosadeghrad AM. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. Int J Health Policy Manag. (2014) 3:77–89. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.65

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Dash S, Shakyawar SK, Sharma M, Kaushik S. Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. J Big Data. (2019) 6:54. doi: 10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. (2012) 36:241–277. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Attaran M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: challenges and opportunities. Int J Healthc Manag. (2022) 15:70–83. doi: 10.1080/20479700.2020.1843887

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wickersham A, Epstein S, Sugg HVR, Stewart R, Ford T, Downs J. The association between depression and later educational attainment in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e031595. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031595

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rydland HT, Fjær EL, Eikemo TA, Huijts T, Bambra C, Wendt C, et al. Educational inequalities in mortality amenable to healthcare. A comparison of European healthcare systems. PLoS ONE. (2020) 15:e0234135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Dong F, Li Y, Qin C, Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhao X, et al. Information infrastructure and greenhouse gas emission performance in urban China: a difference-in-differences analysis. J Environ Manag. (2022) 316:115252. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Krzeczewski B, Krzeczewska O, Pluskota A, Pastusiak R. Does the agglomeration effect occur in the hospital sector? The impact of agglomeration economies on the financial performance of hospitals—an evidence from Poland. Int J Health Plann Manag. (2019) 34:553–71. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ghafoor N, Fayyaz S, Nisa M-U-, Akbar MR. An empirical investigation of socio-economic impacts of agglomeration economies in major cities of Punjab, Pakistan. Cogent Econ Finance. (2021) 9:1975915. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2021.1975915

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang J, Wang W, Ran Q, Irfan M, Ren S, Yang X, et al. Analysis of the mechanism of the impact of internet development on green economic growth: evidence from 269 prefecture cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. (2022) 29:9990–10004. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16381-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Lam C, Souza PCL. Estimation and selection of spatial weight matrix in a spatial lag model. J Bus Econ Stat. (2020) 38:693–710. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2019.1569526

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Su Y, Li Z, Yang C. Spatial interaction spillover effects between digital financial technology and urban ecological efficiency in China: an empirical study based on spatial simultaneous equations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:8535. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Leung Y, Yan J. A locational error model for spatial features. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. (1998) 12:607–620. doi: 10.1080/136588198241699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Mur J, Angulo A. The spatial durbin model and the common factor tests. Spatial Econ Anal. (2006) 1:207–26. doi: 10.1080/17421770601009841

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Tientao A, Legros D, Pichery MC. Technology spillover and TFP growth: a spatial Durbin model. Int Econ. (2016) 145:21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco.2015.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Jia S, Qiu Y, Yang C. Sustainable development goals, financial inclusion, and grain security efficiency. Agronomy. (2021) 11:2542. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11122542

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. La Ferrara E, Chong A, Duryea S. Soap operas and fertility: evidence from Brazil. Am Econ J. (2012) 4:1–31. doi: 10.1257/app.4.4.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar