AUTHOR=Ndebele Paul , Krisko Perrin , Bari Imran , Paichadze Nino , Hyder Adnan A. 

TITLE=Evaluating industry attempts to influence public health: Applying an ethical framework in understanding commercial determinants of health

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.976898

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2022.976898

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Objectives</title><p>This paper explores industry influence on public health using a specific case study and applies an established ethical framework based on eleven principles to explore Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH). It demonstrates an application of these principles to evaluate the ethical integrity of industry strategies and practices and their impacts on public health.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Using eleven a priori, deductive, ethical principles as codes, this paper conducted an in-depth analysis of 19 e-mail chains and accompanying documents made publicly available through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) from U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) sent between Coca-Cola representatives, lobbyists, academics, and the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), founded by former Coca-Cola executives.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The three principles violated most frequently amongst the documents were consumer sovereignty (<italic>n</italic> = 22), evidence-informed actions (<italic>n</italic> = 21), and transparency (<italic>n</italic> = 20). Similarly, codes that featured most regularly across documents were transparency (13 out of 19 documents), consumer sovereignty (13 out of 19 documents), evidence-informed actions (9 out of 19 documents), and social justice and equity (9 out of 19 documents). All eleven principles were applied at least four times throughout the documents; however, responsiveness (<italic>z</italic> = 12), moral responsibility (<italic>z</italic> = 16), and holism (<italic>z</italic> = 30) were the least relevant to the data set.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This case study of Coca-Cola demonstrates the usefulness of this ethics framework in reviewing actions of corporate actors in the promotion of products that are harmful to human health. It shows that the industry at times has low ethical integrity in their various strategies and practices to promote their products despite the negative impacts of these products on public health.</p></sec>