AUTHOR=Fung Sai-fu , Kong Chris Yiu Wah , Liu Yi-man , Huang Qian , Xiong Zike , Jiang Zhiquan , Zhu Fangfang , Chen Zhenting , Sun Kun , Zhao Huiqin , Yu Ping 

TITLE=Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item WHO Well-Being Index

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.872436

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2022.872436

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Aims</title><p>This article evaluates the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 5-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in mainland China.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Two cross-sectional studies with 1,414 participants from a university in China were conducted. The Chinese version of the WHO-5 was assessed to determine its internal consistency, concurrent validity, factorial validity, and construct validity.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The results indicate that the WHO-5 is unidimensional and has good internal consistency, with Cronbach's <italic>a</italic> = 0.85 and 0.81 in Study 1 (<italic>n</italic> = 903) and Study 2 (<italic>n</italic> = 511), respectively. The findings also demonstrate that the WHO-5 has good concurrent validity with other well-established measures of wellbeing, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and mental wellbeing. The results of confirmatory factor analysis also suggest that the scale has a good model fit.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This study provides empirical data demonstrating that the Chinese version of the WHO-5 has good psychometric properties. The scale can be a useful measure in epistemological studies and clinical research related to wellbeing in Chinese populations.</p></sec>