AUTHOR=Xu Tingting , Jiang Yan , Guo Xiuyan , Campbell Julie A. , Ahmad Hasnat , Xia Qing , Lai Xiaozhen , Yan Di , Ma Liangkun , Fang Hai , Palmer Andrew J. TITLE=Maternal choices and preferences for screening strategies of gestational diabetes mellitus: A exploratory study using discrete choice experiment JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health VOLUME=10 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.864482 DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2022.864482 ISSN=2296-2565 ABSTRACT=Aims

This study aimed to investigate maternal preferences for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening options in rural China to identify an optimal GDM screening strategy.

Methods

Pregnant women at 24–28 gestational weeks were recruited from Shandong province, China. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit pregnant women's preferences for GDM screening strategy defined by five attributes: number of blood draws, out-of-pocket costs, screening waiting-time, number of hospital visits, and positive diagnosis rate. A mixed logistic model was employed to quantify maternal preferences, and to estimate the relative importance of included attributes in determining pregnant women's preferences for two routinely applied screening strategies (“one-step”: 75 g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] and “two-step”: 50 g glucose challenge-test plus 75 g OGTT). Preference heterogeneity was also investigated.

Results

N = 287 participants completed the DCE survey. All five predefined attributes were associated with pregnant women's preferences. Diagnostic rate was the most influential attribute (17.5 vs. 8.0%, OR: 2.89; 95%CI: 2.10 to 3.96). When changes of the attributes of “two-step” to “one-step” strategies, women's uptake probability from full “two-step” to “one-step” significantly increased with 71.3% (95%CI: 52.2 to 90.1%), but no significant difference with the first step of “two-step” (−31.0%, 95%CI: −70.2 to 8.1%).

Conclusion

Chinese pregnant women preferred the “one-step” screening strategy to the full “two-step” strategy, but were indifferent between “one-step” and the first step of “two-step” strategies.