Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Public Health, 16 November 2022
Sec. Environmental Health and Exposome

Esophagus cancer and essential trace elements

\nXin YangXin Yang1Zhe TangZhe Tang2Jing LiJing Li1Jizong Jiang
Jizong Jiang1*
  • 1Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Numerous epidemiological and laboratory studies on essential trace elements have reported protective associations in developing various cancer types, including esophagus cancer (EC). However, the results are not always consistent. Some essential trace elements could play a vital role in preventing esophagus cancer. Some showed no association with esophageal cancer risk, while others harmed individuals. This article reviews the association between the intake or supplementation of essential trace elements (especially zinc, copper, iron, and selenium) and the risk of esophageal cancer. Generally, zinc intake may decrease the risk of esophageal cancer (EC), especially in high esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) prevalence regions. The association between copper supplementation and EC remains uncertain. Total iron consumption is thought to be associated with lower EC risk, while heme iron intake may be associated with higher EC risk. Selenium intake showed a protective effect against EC, especially for those individuals with a low baseline selenium level. This review also prospects the research direction of the association between EC and essential trace elements.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide (1) and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in China (2). The 5-year survival rate for EC remains one of the lowest in all cancer types, with a 5-year survival of 20% in the United States (1) and 40.1% in China (3). More than 90% of EC patients in China are diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (3, 4), the world's most common type of EC. In Western nations, alcohol drinking and smoking are the primary risk factors for ESCC (5), whereas, in so-called “esophageal cancer belts” such as South Africa, France, Iran, and China, these behaviors are less prevalent (6). Environmental and dietary factors have also been reported to affect ESCC, and essential trace elements may be dose-dependent on the risk of ESCC. Essential trace elements of the human body account for roughly 0.00001% to 0.01% of the total body weight, including Fe, Zn, Cu, Mo, F, V, Ni, Co, Se, Cr, I, and Mn. They play a significant role in maintaining normal biological function, acting as active centers of enzymes or tracing bioactive substances. Numerous studies have attempted to illustrate the meaning of balancing essential trace elements in EC protection or treatment. Yet, the findings of these studies are not always the same. Here, we focus on the connection of esophagus cancer with essential trace elements, especially zinc, copper, iron, and selenium.

Zinc

Zinc is one of the most abundant trace elements found in almost all organs and tissues of the body. It plays a critical role in stabilizing the structures of many proteins, especially those participating in DNA synthesis and RNA transcription, thus regulating cell growth, development, and differentiation, maintaining an immune response, and mediating oxidative stress and apoptosis (79). Among all the biological functions, it should be highlighted that zinc could inhibit chronic or acute oxidative stress, which is one of the mechanisms of cancer development. Zinc deficiency impairs the antioxidant activity and renders the organism more susceptible to injury induced by various oxidative stressors (10). Therefore, an adequate level of zinc is important for individuals. Some laboratory studies have established an association between zinc deficiency and cancer (1116). Zinc homeostasis could influence T-cell activation as well as the polarization of T helper (Th) cells into their different subpopulations [Th1, Th2, Th17, regulatory T cells (Treg)], thus regulating cancer immune microenviroment (15). Choi et al. found that zinc could inhibit cell proliferation of EC cells through Orai1-mediated intracellular Ca2+ oscillations and revealed a possible molecular basis for zinc-induced cancer prevention and the Orai1-SOCE signaling pathway in cancer cells (16). Several studies have already shown the relationship between dietary zinc deficiency and ESCC (17, 18). ESCC in Linxian is a high-incidence area in China. A study from Linxian showed that the zinc concentration in biopsy samples was negatively correlated with the venture of EC development, exhibiting strong proof for the connection of dietary zinc deficiency with the higher risk of EC in humans (17).

Zinc consumption was significantly associated with a lower risk of EC and gastric cancer in Asia but not in the United States or Europe (19). The results of a meta-analysis also indicated that increasing zinc supplementation by 5 mg/day was associated with a 15% decrease in EC risk (20). It was reported that the mechanisms between zinc deficiency and the development of EC lie in that zinc deficiency could result in the upregulation of multiple genes related to DNA damage, oxidative stress, immune response, cell proliferation, and apoptosis, thus inducing the development of EC (18). Animal studies showed that ESCC cells proliferated more rapidly in mice fed zinc-deficient diets via inducing overexpression of COX-2, P38, PCNA, and NF-κB (18). ESCC can also be promoted by zinc deficiency through inflammatory gene expression (21, 22) and oncogenic microRNA expression, including upregulation of oncogenic miR-31 and other miRNAs (21, 23). Deeper molecular mechanisms induced by nutrient bioavailability or dietary interventions have recently been studied using integrative genomics methods (24). Fong et al. (25) demonstrated that zinc intake reduced COX-2 mRNA by 80%, an enzyme involved in inflammation, thus bringing prevention or therapeutic possibilities of zinc supplementation for EC. A recent study found that zinc supplementation could protect Barrett's epithelia from transforming into esophageal cancer cells (26), further revealing zinc supplementation's protective effects. The role of zinc in EC diseases is not fully answered and needs further investigation. It seems that zinc intake may decrease EC risk, especially in high ESCC prevalence regions.

Copper

Copper is an essential trace element that the body requires and is vital in many biological functions, including maintaining DNA integrity, synthesizing essential metabolites, transporting oxygen to the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and involving redox reactions as an active site metabolic cofactor. Emerging laboratory studies showed that copper could act as a dynamic signaling metal and metalloallosteric regulator, participating in cell growth and proliferation, autophagy, and antioxidant defense, thus regulating cancer development, as tumor growth and metastasis have a high requirement for this metal nutrient (27). Such properties make the dual copper effect beneficial and toxic to the cells. An intake of 900 μg per day is recommended for this essential trace element, while a level of 10 mg per day is the maximum permissible (28). Excess copper may promote radical damage and decrease the activity of proteins or enzymes, thus causing cellular injury via over-activated oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, inflammation, and DNA damage, finally helping in the angiogenesis of tumors (29). It remains controversial whether copper intake contributes to EC prevention, despite many studies focusing on the relationship between copper intake and the disease. Chen et al. (30) claimed that copper intake was negatively correlated with EC mortality in Shanxi, China, via estimating average copper intake in 21 Chinese communes, where EC mortality rates were much higher than average (30). Similarly, according to Sohrabi et al. (31) the copper levels were obviously lowered in EC tissues compared to non-cancerous tissues (31). Recently, Zhuang et al. (32) even explored the therapeutic effect of copper nanoparticles in EC treatment via their antioxidant activities (32). However, in the Kashmir valley, an area at high risk for EC in India, as reported by Mir et al. (33) plasma levels of copper in patients with EC were significantly higher than in controls, indicating an imbalance in plasma levels of copper may be responsible for the development of the disease (33). Copper supplementation and ESCC risk were evaluated by Hashemian et al. (34) and a nonlinear association was found between copper intake and ESCC risk, but the supplementation trend related to ESCC was not evident (34). In addition, a meta-analysis found that copper supplementation at 1 mg/day did not reduce the risk of EC (20). Altogether, the relationship between copper and EC remains uncertain. Copper supplementation recommendations still require additional research.

Iron

Iron is an important component of heme, iron-sulfur proteins, and enzymes and participates in many biological processes, including oxygen transport, ferroptosis, immune response, cellular energy metabolism, and many other enzymatic reactions. Physiological processes have evolved for iron acquisition to meet metabolic needs while avoiding the toxicity of free radicals generated from iron. Iron excess and iron deficiency are related to pathological states (35). Recent studies have focused on ferroptosis, a newly discovered iron-dependent mode of cell death that plays an important role in the biological behavior of cancer cells. Zhu et al. (36) and Qiao et al. (37) found that ferroptosis-related noncoding RNAs correlate with the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and therapeutic sensitivity of ESCC, indicating new therapeutic approaches for noncoding RNAs targeting ferroptosis in ESCC (36, 37). The role of iron in EC development has been under investigation. However, the results are still conflicting regarding the association of iron levels with the risk of EC. Sohrabi et al. (31) evaluated the iron concentrations between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues in EC. The results showed that the iron level in cancerous tissues was higher. However, no significant differences were revealed in EC (31). Several basic research indicated that the excess levels of iron enhanced EC (3840), and the mechanisms possibly were related to the over-expression of iron import proteins, DNA damage, ferroptosis, and oxidative stress (41, 42).

Furthermore, it was found that total iron intake and heme iron intake were different from the risk of EC. Total iron supplementation was significantly inversely correlated with the risk of EC, especially among the Asian population and ESCC subgroup. A dose-response analysis indicated that each 5 mg/day increase in total iron supplementation was related to a 15% reduction in EC risk. However, heme iron intake was positively related to the risk of EC, especially in the United States. Each 1 mg/day increase in heme iron supplementation increased the risk of EC by 21% (20).

Similarly, a large European cohort study found that higher intakes of processed meat and heme iron may be related to an increased risk of developing EC, especially esophageal adenocarcinoma (43). Cross et al. (42) also found that heme iron supplementation may be associated with a risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). They observed a positive association between red meat intake and ESCC but no association with adenocarcinoma (42). Overall, total iron intake may be related to reduced EC risk, while heme iron intake may be related to increased EC risk. More evidence is required to clarify the relationship between imbalanced iron levels (iron deficiency or overload) and the risk of EC.

Selenium

Selenium is a naturally occurring element to which humans are mostly exposed through food intake, air, drinking water, and dietary supplements. A moderate amount of selenium is vital for maintaining biological functions, but a slightly higher amount of selenium may have potential toxicity. Basic research showed an anti-tumor effect of selenium, including inhibiting cancer cell proliferation (44), preventing tumor formation in cell populations already exposed to carcinogens (45), reducing carcinogen-induced DNA mutations, and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (46).

Numerous studies have shown selenium to be related to the risk of EC. It was reported that selenium could slow down the development of ESCC by decreasing the expression of Ki-67, inducing apoptosis, and lowering inflammation and oxidative DNA damage, thus exerting an important chemopreventive effect on ESCC by reducing high-grade dysplasia to low-grade dysplasia (47, 48). Zhang et al. (49) found that β-catenin/TCF pathway played a vital role in selenium induced-growth inhibition and apoptosis in ESCC cells (49). Liu et al. (50) also revealed that methylseleninic acid acted as a chemopreventive agent via the regulation of KLF4/miR-200a/Keap1/Nrf2 axis in ESCC cells (50). Several studies measured serum selenium levels between patients with EC and controls. Steevens et al. detected selenium levels in toenails. They found that selenium concentrations were inversely related to the risk of ESCC, while an inverse association was only found in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in women and non-smokers (51). Mark et al. (52) found a significant inverse relationship between serum selenium concentrations and the incidence of EC (52).

Further, they also observed significant inverse associations between the baseline concentration of serum selenium and death from ESCC (53), indicating that selenium intake may help reduce the incidence of EC and death from EC. A randomized controlled trial showed evidence that selenium played a preventive role in subjects with preexisting esophageal squamous dysplasia, which was reported as the precursor lesion of ESCC (54). In a follow-up of the Linxian General Population Nutrition Intervention Trial, selenium intake with vitamin E and β-carotene helped reduce the risk of EC, and the beneficial effects on mortality from EC were still evident up to 10 years after the cessation of supplementation and were consistently greater in younger patients (55). However, some meta-analyses showed different results regarding the relationship between selenium exposure and the risk of EC. Cai et al. (56) showed that high selenium exposure might decrease the risk of EC (56), while Hong et al. (57) observed that a higher selenium concentration was not significantly related to a decreased risk of EC (57). The Golestan Cohort Study also mentioned that the association between dietary selenium supplementation and the risk of ESCC was nonlinear but probably U-shaped, which suggests that the risk of ESCC may increase with excessive selenium intakes (34). Generally, for those individuals with a low baseline selenium level, selenium intake could have a protective effect against EC; for general populations, the effect of daily supplementation of selenium remains unclear.

Other essential trace elements

In a cohort study, calcium (Ca) was reported to be related to a decreased risk of ESCC in men in the United States (58). Similarly, Hashemian et al. (34) observed a significant linear inverse association between calcium supplementation and the risk of ESCC (34). The possible molecular mechanisms may lie in the fact that calcium could inhibit the proliferation and invasion of cancer cells and promote apoptosis (59). The relationship between magnesium (Mg) in drinking water and the risk of EC was also reported. The result showed a significant trend toward decreasing EC risk with increasing magnesium concentration in drinking water (60). It was also reported that compared with healthy tissues, the levels of chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), aluminum (Al), tin (Sn), and lead (Pb) were higher in cancerous tissues. However, no significant differences were revealed in EC (31). There are only limited studies focused on the relationship between the aforementioned essential trace elements and the risk of EC. Cr was reported to increase the risk of various cancer infections under environmental and occupational exposures (61) via ROS production, DNA damage, angiogenesis, and other molecular process (62, 63); however, its association with EC remains unclear. Mn has been widely studied in neurodegenerative diseases, and it mainly participates in biological roles in the form of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) by neutralizing the radical superoxide. A few studies have reported that MnSOD may play a role in EC protection (64, 65). In a mouse model, high levels of MnSOD expression promoted ESCC cell growth, whereas moderate MnSOD expression suppressed tumor cell growth (64), indicating the dual effects of MnSOD on ESCC cell proliferation. No evidence showed a clear relationship between Al, Sn, Pb, and EC. Further study may reveal the underlying association.

Discussion

It was found that EC had a close relationship with environmental and dietary factors, in which essential trace elements played significant roles. Studies on the association between essential trace elements and EC were critical and have provided potential direction for the prevention of EC. In this review, we analyzed the studies of some main essential trace elements in EC. Zinc, iron, and selenium supplementation seem to be related to a reduced risk of EC, while copper showed an equivocal effect on the prevention of EC. Despite ample evidence and general consistency in the relationship between essential trace elements and EC, the public or health professionals often view the effect of essential trace elements with skepticism. One explanation could be that the physiologic systems affected by essential trace elements are so complicated that the effects of supplementing with only one or two elements are not effective enough or even sometimes harmful. Essential trace elements belong to the whole diet pattern. Many studies focused on only one essential trace element, which could not reflect the reality that diet as a whole is more important than the sum of its parts (66). In-depth studies on essential trace elements are required. Genome, epigenome, transcriptome, metabolome, proteome, and microbiome have long been used in cancer studies, which significantly improve our understanding of the mechanisms of cancer development or new therapy application of cancers. With the development of such technologies, a molecular biological approach that integrates data of “omics,” including metagenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, genetics, and other molecular technology, is expected to help us enhance our understanding of the association between essential trace elements and risk of EC incidence or development (66) (Figure 1). Moreover, a clearer connection between essential trace elements and the molecular alteration and variation of patients is gradually becoming identifiable and quantifiable, thereby renewing the old general view associating specific phenotypical changes with the differential intake of essential trace elements (67). Further research is needed and is expected to clarify how essential trace elements act in the development of EC and whether essential trace element supplementation could protect against EC.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. An overview of how integrated omics technologies could be applied to study the relationship between essential trace elements and EC.

Author contributions

XY carried out the primary literature search, drafted, and revised the manuscript. JL and ZT contributed to drafting and revising of the manuscript. JJ and JL helped modify the manuscript. ZT and JJ carried out the literature analysis and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. (2022) 72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jiang D, Zhang L, Liu W, Ding Y, Yin J, Ren R, et al. Trends in cancer mortality in China from 2004 to 2018: A nationwide longitudinal study. Cancer Commun. (2021) 41:1024–36. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hou H, Meng Z, Zhao X, Ding G, Sun M, Wang W, et al. Survival of esophageal cancer in China: a pooled analysis on hospital-based studies from 2000 to 2018. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:548. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhang X, Peng L, Luo Y, Zhang S, Pu Y, Chen Y, et al. Dissecting esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma ecosystem by single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:5291. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25539-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bravi F, Edefonti V, Randi G, Garavello W, La Vecchia C, Ferraroni M, et al. Dietary patterns and the risk of esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. (2012) 23:765–70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Jessri M, Rashidkhani B, Hajizadeh B, Jessri M, Gotay C. Macronutrients, vitamins and minerals intake and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case-control study in Iran. Nutr J. (2011) 10:137. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chasapis CT, Loutsidou AC, Spiliopoulou CA, Stefanidou ME. Zinc and human health: an update. Arch Toxicol. (2012) 86:521–34. doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0775-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Saper RB, Rash R. Zinc: an essential micronutrient. Am Fam Physician. (2009) 79:768–72.

Google Scholar

9. Schwartz MK. Role of trace elements in cancer. Cancer Res. (1975) 35:3481–7.

Google Scholar

10. Jarosz M, Olbert M, Wyszogrodzka G, Mlyniec K, Librowski T. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of zinc. Zinc Dep NF-kappaB Signal Inflammopharmacol. (2017) 25:11–24. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0309-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Federico A, Iodice P, Federico P, Del Rio A, Mellone MC, Catalano G. Effects of selenium and zinc supplementation on nutritional status in patients with cancer of digestive tract. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2001) 55:293–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Prasad AS, Beck FW, Doerr TD, Shamsa FH, Penny HS, Marks SC, et al. Nutritional and zinc status of head and neck cancer patients: an interpretive review. J Am Coll Nutr. (1998) 17:409–18. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1998.10718787

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Zowczak M, Iskra M, Torlinski L, Cofta S. Analysis of serum copper and zinc concentrations in cancer patients. Biol Trace Elem Res. (2001) 82:1–8. doi: 10.1385/BTER:82:1-3:001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Prasad AS, Beck FW, Snell DC, Kucuk O. Zinc in cancer prevention. Nutr Cancer. (2009) 61:879–87. doi: 10.1080/01635580903285122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Maywald M, Rink L. Zinc homeostasis and immunosenescence. J Trace Elem Med Biol. (2015) 29:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2014.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Choi S, Cui C, Luo Y, Kim SH, Ko JK, Huo X, et al. Selective inhibitory effects of zinc on cell proliferation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through Orai1. FASEB J. (2018) 32:404–16. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700227RRR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Abnet CC, Lai B, Qiao YL, Vogt S, Luo XM, Taylor PR, et al. Zinc concentration in esophageal biopsy specimens measured by x-ray fluorescence and esophageal cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2005) 97:301–6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji042

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chen Y, Liu FX, Liu H. Effects of dietary zinc deficiency on esophageal squamous cell proliferation and the mechanisms involved. World J Gastrointest Oncol. (2021) 13:1755–65. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i11.1755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Li P, Xu J, Shi Y, Ye Y, Chen K, Yang J, et al. Association between zinc intake and risk of digestive tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. (2014) 33:415–20. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ma J, Li Q, Fang X, Chen L, Qiang Y, Wang J, et al. Increased total iron and zinc intake and lower heme iron intake reduce the risk of esophageal cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis. Nutr Res. (2018) 59:16–28. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2018.07.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Fong LY, Farber JL, Croce CM. Zinc intake, microRNA dysregulation, and esophageal cancer. Aging. (2016) 8:1161–2. doi: 10.18632/aging.100978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Taccioli C, Chen H, Jiang Y, Liu XP, Huang K, Smalley KJ, et al. Dietary zinc deficiency fuels esophageal cancer development by inducing a distinct inflammatory signature. Oncogene. (2012) 31:4550–8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Liu CM, Liang D, Jin J, Li DJ, Zhang YC, Gao ZY, et al. Research progress on the relationship between zinc deficiency, related microRNAs, and esophageal carcinoma. Thorac Cancer. (2017) 8:549–57. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12493

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kussmann M, Raymond F, Affolter M. OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J Biotechnol. (2006) 124:758–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.02.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fong LY, Zhang L, Jiang Y, Farber JL. Dietary zinc modulation of COX-2 expression and lingual and esophageal carcinogenesis in rats. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2005) 97:40–50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Valenzano MC, Rybakovsky E, Chen V, Leroy K, Lander J, Richardson E, et al. Zinc Gluconate induces potentially cancer chemopreventive activity in barrett's esophagus: a phase 1 pilot study. Dig Dis Sci. (2021) 66:1195–211. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06319-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ge EJ, Bush AI, Casini A, Cobine PA, Cross JR, DeNicola GM, et al. Connecting copper and cancer: from transition metal signalling to metalloplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. (2022) 22:102–13. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00417-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Trumbo P, Yates AA, Schlicker S, Poos M. Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. J Am Diet Assoc. (2001) 101:294–301.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Nasulewicz A, Mazur A, Opolski A. Role of copper in tumour angiogenesis–clinical implications. J Trace Elem Med Biol. (2004) 18:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2004.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chen F, Cole P, Mi Z, Xing L. Dietary trace elements and esophageal cancer mortality in Shanxi, China. Epidemiology. (1992) 3:402–6. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199209000-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Sohrabi M, Nikkhah M, Sohrabi M, Farimani AR, Shahi MM, Ziaie H, et al. Evaluating tissue levels of the eight trace elements and heavy metals among esophagus and gastric cancer patients: a comparison between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues. J Trace Elem Med Biol. (2021) 68:126761. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2021.126761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Zhuang X, Kang Y, Zhao L, Guo S. Design and synthesis of copper nanoparticles for the treatment of human esophageal cancer: introducing a novel chemotherapeutic supplement. J Exp Nanosci. (2022) 17:274–84. doi: 10.1080/17458080.2022.2065264

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mir MM, Dar NA, Salam I, Malik MA, Lone MM, Yatoo GN, et al. Studies on association between copper excess, zinc deficiency and TP53 mutations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from Kashmir valley, India-a high risk area. Int J Health Sci. (2007) 1:35–42.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Hashemian M, Poustchi H, Abnet CC, Boffetta P, Dawsey SM, Brennan PJ, et al. Dietary intake of minerals and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the golestan cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. (2015) 102:102–8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.107847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lal A. Iron in health and disease: an update. Indian J Pediatr. (2020) 87:58–65. doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-03054-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhu J, Zhao Y, Wu G, Zhang X, Chen Q, Yang B, et al. Ferroptosis-related lncRNA signature correlates with the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and therapeutic sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2022) 2022:7465880. doi: 10.1155/2022/7465880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Qiao G, Zhang W, Dong K. Regulation of ferroptosis by noncoding RNAs: a novel promise treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem. (2022) 477:2193–202. doi: 10.1007/s11010-022-04441-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Chen X, Yang G, Ding WY, Bondoc F, Curtis SK, Yang CS. An esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis model for esophageal adenocarcinogenesis in rats and enhancement by iron overload. Carcinogenesis. (1999) 20:1801–8. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.9.1801

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Nishitani S, Noma K, Ohara T, Tomono Y, Watanabe S, Tazawa H, et al. Iron depletion-induced downregulation of N-cadherin expression inhibits invasive malignant phenotypes in human esophageal cancer. Int J Oncol. (2016) 49:1351–9. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3640

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Shishido Y, Amisaki M, Matsumi Y, Yakura H, Nakayama Y, Miyauchi W, et al. Antitumor effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid through ferroptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. (2021) 28:3996–4006. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09334-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chan KT, Choi MY, Lai KK, Tan W, Tung LN, Lam HY, et al. Overexpression of transferrin receptor CD71 and its tumorigenic properties in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. (2014) 31:1296–304. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.2981

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Cross AJ, Freedman ND, Ren J, Ward MH, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, et al. Meat consumption and risk of esophageal and gastric cancer in a large prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. (2011) 106:432–42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Jakszyn P, Luján-Barroso L, Agudo A. Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Molina E, Sánchez MJ, et al. Meat and heme iron intake and esophageal adenocarcinoma in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition study. Int J Cancer. (2013) 133:2744–50. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Bertram JS, Kolonel LN, Meyskens FL. Rationale and strategies for chemoprevention of cancer in humans. Cancer Res. (1987) 47:3012–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II Mechanisms Cancer Causes Control. (1991) 2:427–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00054304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Rayman MP. Selenium and human health. Lancet. (2012) 379:1256–68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61452-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ahsan A, Liu Z, Su R, Liu C, Liao X, Su M. Potential chemotherapeutic effect of selenium for improved canceration of esophageal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:5509. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Liu T, Sun Y, Yang S, Liang X. Inhibitory effect of selenium on esophagus cancer cells and the related mechanism. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). (2020) 66:456–61. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.66.456

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Zhang W, Yan S, Liu M, Zhang G, Yang S, He S, et al. Beta-Catenin/TCF pathway plays a vital role in selenium induced-growth inhibition and apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells. Cancer Lett. (2010) 296:113–22. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Liu M, Hu C, Xu Q, Chen L, Ma K, Xu N, et al. Methylseleninic acid activates Keap1/Nrf2 pathway via up-regulating miR-200a in human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Biosci Rep. (2015) 35:5. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Steevens J, Van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA, Schouten LJ. Selenium status and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes: the Netherlands cohort study. Gastroenterology. (2010) 138:1704–13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Mark SD, Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Wu YP, Katki H, Gunter EW, et al. Prospective study of serum selenium levels and incident esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2000) 92:1753–63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.21.1753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Wei WQ, Abnet CC, Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Dong ZW, Sun XD, et al. Prospective study of serum selenium concentrations and esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, heart disease, stroke, and total death. Am J Clin Nutr. (2004) 79:80–5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.1.80

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Limburg PJ, Wei W, Ahnen DJ, Qiao Y, Hawk ET, Wang G, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, esophageal squamous cell cancer chemoprevention trial of selenomethionine and celecoxib. Gastroenterology. (2005) 129:863–73. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Kamangar F, Fan JH, Abnet CC, Sun XD, et al. Total and cancer mortality after supplementation with vitamins and minerals: follow-up of the linxian general population nutrition intervention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2009) 101:507–18. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Cai X, Wang C, Yu W, Fan W, Wang S, Shen N, et al. Selenium exposure and cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:19213. doi: 10.1038/srep19213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Hong B, Huang L, Mao N, Xiong T, Li C, Hu L, et al. Association between selenium levels and oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Biosci Rep. (2016) 36:4. doi: 10.1042/BSR20160131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Park Y, Leitzmann MF, Subar AF, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A. Dairy food, calcium, and risk of cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Arch Intern Med. (2009) 169:391–401. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Lipkin M. Application of intermediate biomarkers to studies of cancer prevention in the gastrointestinal tract: introduction and perspective. Am J Clin Nutr. (1991) 54:188S−92S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.1.188S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Yang CY, Chiu HF, Tsai SS, Wu TN, Chang CC. Magnesium and calcium in drinking water and the risk of death from esophageal cancer. Magnes Res. (2002) 15:215–22.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

61. Proctor DM, Suh M, Mittal L, Hirsch S, Valdes Salgado R, Bartlett C, et al. Inhalation cancer risk assessment of hexavalent chromium based on updated mortality for Painesville chromate production workers. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. (2016) 26:224–31. doi: 10.1038/jes.2015.77

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Chen QY, Murphy A, Sun H, Costa M. Molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. (2019) 377:114636. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ge X, He J, Wang L, Zhao L, Wang Y, Wu G, et al. Epigenetic alterations of CXCL5 in Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis. Sci Total Environ. (2022) 838:155713. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155713

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Sun G, Wang Y, Hu W, Li C. Effects of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) expression on regulation of esophageal cancer cell growth and apoptosis in vitro and in nude mice. Tumour Biol. (2013) 34:1409–19. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0622-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Schiffman SC Li Y, Martin RC. The association of manganese superoxide dismutase expression in Barrett's esophageal progression with MnTBAP and curcumin oil therapy. J Surg Res. (2012) 176:535–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.11.1013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Murphy R. An integrative approach to assessing diet-cancer relationships. Metabolites. (2020) 10:123. doi: 10.3390/metabo10040123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Irimie AI, Braicu C, Pasca S, Magdo L, Gulei D, Cojocneanu R, et al. Role of key micronutrients from nutrigenetic and nutrigenomic perspectives in cancer prevention. Medicina. (2019) 55:6. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: esophagus cancer, essential trace elements, minerals, zinc, copper, iron, selenium

Citation: Yang X, Tang Z, Li J and Jiang J (2022) Esophagus cancer and essential trace elements. Front. Public Health 10:1038153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038153

Received: 06 September 2022; Accepted: 19 October 2022;
Published: 16 November 2022.

Edited by:

Chunguang Yang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Jing Han, Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Eduard Yakubov, Paracelsus Medical Private University, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Yang, Tang, Li and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jizong Jiang, c29sb21vbi5oaWxsLmppYW5nJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.