Influence of Professional Identity on the E-Learning Adaptability Among Chinese Nursing Students During COVID-19

Background: The traditional face-to-face education methods have been altered to E-learning due to the outbreak, and the E-learning adaptability of nursing students will directly affect the effectiveness of online education. The professional identity of nursing students refers to the positive perception, evaluation, and emotional experience of the nursing profession and identity to be undertaken, which may affect the E-learning adaptability of nursing students during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to explore the impact of professional identity on the E-learning adaptability of the Chinese nursing students during COVID-19.

Methods: This study was conducted in three medical schools in Yunnan Province, China from August to October 2020. Data collection consisted of three sections: participants' characteristics, learning adaptability, and professional identity.

Results: A total of 585 nursing students had a moderate level of E-learning adaptability. There was a positive correlation between E-learning adaptability and professional identity (r = 0.316~0.505, p < 0.001). In addition, the professional identity was associated with predictors of the E-learning adaptability among nursing students (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: There was a moderate level of E-learning adaptability among the Chinese nursing students during the COVID-19 crisis. Enhancing the professional identity is critical in improving the E-learning adaptability among nursing students.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread widely throughout China and the world, which brings lots of challenges to the educational work in institutions of higher learning (1, 2). The traditional educational methods are altered to E-learning because the conventional face-to-face education is considered as an opportunity for the virus to spread. E-learning has been adopted in most colleges and universities to ensure learning from the beginning of the outbreak. In 2020, the Ministry of Education issued a new regulation that colleges and universities should take full advantage of E-learning platforms to ensure teaching progress and quality (3). Since then, E-learning has been widely applied as a vital part of the learning pattern.

E-learning, also known as online education, refers to the use of the Internet, computers, smartphones, and other electronic resources to acquire and disseminate knowledge, such as network education, digital learning, interactive learning, and computer-assisted teaching (4, 5). Compared with the traditional classroom teaching pattern, the network teaching platform breaks the limitation of time and space. However, students need the spirit of independence, initiative, and consciousness in the progress of E-learning. E-learning adaptability directly affects the effectiveness of online education (6). E-learning adaptability is the capacity to adjust behaviors, thoughts, and feelings in response to the variable, uncertain, and unexpected situations and circumstances in the process of online learning. It realizes the changed process of balance between the individual and the learning environment (7). Adaptability is an essential academic and personal development capacity among students (8). The better the E-learning adaptability of students, the better the learning effect (9). Conversely, learning maladjustment may adversely affect their learning efficiency and the occupation prospects for development (10, 11). Nowadays, many universities have recognized the importance of E-learning as a core element of their learning system. E-learning adaptability of students belongs to the middle level of the whole. More than half of students showed low learning autonomy and satisfaction in web-based learning in China (12, 13).

The professional identity of nursing students refers to the positive perception, evaluation, and emotional experience of the nursing profession and identity to be undertaken. It determined the career choice of nursing students and the stability of the nursing team to some extent. The formation of professional identity was a dynamic process for a nurse. It started at the professional education stage and then developed, fluctuated, and accompanied the entire career. The role of nursing students was a crucial period for the formation of professional identity. Nursing students with a stronger professional identity were more likely to remain in their work posts and improve the quality of care in the long run (14–16). However, there is no relevant research on whether the professional identity of nursing students will directly affect their learning adaptability.

So, in this study, we aim to (1) assess the situation of E-learning adaptability and professional identity of Chinese nursing students during the COVID-19; (2) identify the association between E-learning adaptability and professional identity; and (3) determine the influential factors of the E-learning adaptability among the Chinese nursing students.

Materials and Methods

Study Design

This study was a cross-sectional study on nursing students enrolled in three medical schools in Yunnan province using the STROBE guideline for cross-sectional studies. All theoretical courses through online learning of this semester during the epidemic prevention and control from March to July 2020. E-learning methods include the live, record, or sometimes both. It involves the online platform of Rain classroom, Tencent Meeting, and Zoom app. It is essential for implementing online education with computers, virtual reality devices, mobile phones, and personal digital assistants. Institution of higher education has conducted training on the use of the online teaching platform and online collective preparation of instruction to teaching staff. Teachers adjust the curriculum plan in time according to the characteristics of online teaching. The teaching and research section conducts a rational examination and evaluation system for E-learning courses.

Participants

Participants were nursing students enrolled in three medical schools in Yunnan Province. Students who met the following criteria were included in this study: (1) currently studying in the school of nursing; (2) participated in E-learning from March to July 2020; (3) participants had no cognitive impairment or obvious language barriers and provided their informed consent to participate in this study. International students were excluded. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were stated in the content of the invitation to participate link.

Measurement

The questionnaire consisted of three sections: sociodemographic characteristics, learning adaptability, and professional identity.

The sociodemographic characteristics form was designed based on previous studies and the opinion of two nursing specialists, such as age, gender, educational level, residence, household incomes per capita (CNY), duration of classes in a week, preferred teaching method, and network environment.

E-learning adaptability was measured for the undergraduates' learning adaptability questionnaire (ULAQ),and compiled and validated in China by Xu (17). The questionnaire consists of 55 items and two dimensions of learning motivation and learning behavior. Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (exactly right), such as “1” is poor, “2” is middle and lower, “3” is middle, “4” is middle and upper, and “5” is excellent. Total and two dimensions scores were calculated by taking the average across all items within each dimension. The higher the score, the better the learning adaptability of nursing students. This questionnaire has good reliability and validity. The internal consistency coefficient of total scores and two dimensions were 0.891, 0.789, and 0.864. The correlation coefficient between total scores and two dimensions was 0.783 and 0.893. ULAQ was used to assess the learning adaptability among college students in previous studies (18, 19).

Professional identity was measured using the Professional Identity Questionnaire for Nurse Students (PIQNS), developed and validated by Chinese scholars (20). The questionnaire consists of 17 items, with five dimensions respectively: professional self-image (six items), the benefit of retention and risk of turnover (four items), social comparison and self-reflection (three items),independence of career choice (two items), and social modeling (two items). Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (exactly right). Total and each dimension scores were calculated by taking the average across all items within each dimension; a higher score indicated a higher level of professional identity. The Cronbach's alpha and the split-half reliability of PIQNS were 0.827 and 0.842, respectively.

Statistical Collection

As a result of the pandemic outbreak, we conducted a web-based online survey to reduce face-to-face interactions. Therefore, data were collected through a professional online questionnaire platform. After they signed written informed consent, a text message containing the URL of the online survey was sent to all the students. At the start of the online study, we validated our participants by asking them about their major and college. Participant information was electronically encoded for data storage, and the computer of researcher was password-protected to prevent unauthorized access. The system would remind respondents of missing responses before submission, and only full completed questionnaires were allowed to submit. A total of 600 questionnaires were received in this online survey, and 15 invalid questionnaires with incorrect information were excluded. The remaining 585 valid questionnaires were valid, with an effective rate of 97.5%.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were expressed as means ± SD. We used Kolmogorov–Smirnov to assess the normality of the distribution of continuous variables. Descriptive statistics were used for the participant characteristics of E-learning adaptability and professional identity among nursing students. Independent samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA tests were conducted to further analyze the ULAQ scores by sociodemographic variable. Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between total dimensions and each dimension of professional identity and E-learning adaptability. The magnitudes of correlations are classified as follows: ≤ 0.25 very low; 0.26 ≤ r ≤ 0.49 low; 0.50 ≤ r ≤ 0.69 moderate; 0.70 ≤ r ≤ 0.89 high; and 0.90 ≤ r <1 very high. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influential factors of E-learning adaptability. All tests were two-tailed, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of Participants

A total of 585 nursing students were included in this study, and the average score for age was 20.17 ± 1.38. Participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. Most respondents in this study were women (89.91%) and undergraduate students (52.48%). Approximately 77.09% of respondents live in rural areas, and 63.93% reported a poor network environment. Household incomes per capita (CNY) of respondents mainly were around 1,000–3,000 yuan (57.78%). The duration of classes in a week of most respondents was 15–25 h (38.63%), followed by more than 25 h (33.85%), and <15 h (27.52%). About 70.77% of respondents preferred live as their teaching method in E-learning.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 585).

Descriptions of E-Learning Adaptability Among Nursing Students

Data shown in Table 2 clearly illustrated the E-learning adaptability among nursing students. Gender (p = 0.146) and household incomes per capita (CNY) (p = 0.159) were no statistical significance with E-learning adaptability. ULAQ score was significantly associated with the educational level of respondents (p < 0.001), residence (p < 0.001), duration of classes in a week (p < 0.001), preferred teaching method (p < 0.001), and network environment (p < 0.001). The highest ULAQ scores were from undergraduate (3.65 ± 0.47), living in urban areas (3.81 ± 0.67), 15–25 h courses per week (3.68 ± 0.41), combination teaching methods (3.76 ± 0.60), and stable network environment (3.58 ± 0.55) among the Chinese nursing students. Post-hoc analyses (Appendix Table 1) result from the comparison showed that 15–25 h courses per week scored better than <15 h (p < 0.001) and more than 25 h (p < 0.001), and <15 h scored better than more than 25 h (p = 0.007). A combination of both scored better than record (p = 0.001) and live (p = 0.002). Compared with the record (3.34 ± 0.57), live (3.40 ± 0.46) had higher ULAQ scores, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.499).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Undergraduates' Learning Adaptability Questionnaire (ULAQ) scores among nursing students with different sociodemographic characteristic (N = 585).

Correlation Analysis Between E-Learning Adaptability and Professional Identity of Nursing Students

Appendix Table 2 represents the dimensions and total scores of E-learning adaptability and professional identity for nursing students. The average score of E-learning adaptability was 3.41 ± 0.51, including two dimensions of learning motivation (3.34 ± 0.56) and learning behavior (3.42 ± 0.52). The average score of professional identity was 61.60 ± 10.06, it had five dimensions according to the ranking of total scores as follow: (1) professional self-image (22.5 ± 4.03), (2) benefits of retention and risk of turnover (13.54 ± 2.88), (3) social comparison and self-reflection (11.28 ± 2.15), (4) independence of career choice (6.39 ± 1.51), and social modeling (7.85 ± 1.60). There was a positive correlation between total dimensions and each dimension of professional identity and E-learning adaptability (r = 0.316~ 0.505, p < 0.001), which is shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3

Table 3. The correlation between the E-learning adaptability and professional identity dimensions (r).

Factors Influencing the E-Learning Adaptability of Nursing Students

Multiple linear regression analysis is shown in Table 4. The E-learning adaptability was a dependent variable. The independent variables included the educational level, residence, duration of classes, preferred teaching method, network environment, and professional identity. These were significant predictive factors on the E-learning adaptability of nursing students (F = 85.327, p < 0.001).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis for E-learning adaptability of nursing students (N = 585).

Discussion

E-Learning Adaptability of Nursing Among the Chinese Nursing Students During COVID-19

With the transformation of teaching methods during the epidemic, the adaptability of online learning of college students has received extensive attention and research. In this study, the E-learning adaptability of nursing students was at a medium level, based on the total average ULAQ score (3.41 ± 0.51). Similar results were observed with Saudi Arabia (21) and Egypt (22) studies, which indicated that about half of the students showed a positive attitude toward E-learning and had some barriers. The effectiveness of e-learning programs in developing countries scores lower than in developed countries among medical students (23). Developed countries may have built and adapted the technological infrastructure for the transition of face-to-face to digital education. In contrast, developing countries are not fully prepared for the shift. The integration of information and communication technology in teaching and learning is still early in the education systems (24). Arthur-Nyarko (25), DePaul (26), and other researchers also reported that unstable network connections and the lack of computers in homes in rural areas are important factors affecting the progress and quality of online learning. The results are in keeping with our findings that nursing students who live in rural areas and have unreliable network connections have lower ULQA scores. At the same time, undergraduate, 15–25 h courses per week and combination of live and record among nursing students have better E-learning adaptability. There were no significant differences in gender and household incomes per capita. Almaiah (27), Singh (28) reported similar results. However, some suggest that affluent family is an essential factor of E-learning feasibility for nursing students, and women showed a more positive response toward E-learning than men in previous studies (29). Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate further and analyze the influential factors of the E-learning adaptability among nursing students. Based on the analysis results, strategies to improve the E-learning adaptability of students will be formulated.

E-Learning Adaptability and Professional Identity

There was a positive correlation between E-learning adaptability and professional identity, and the higher the professional identity, the higher the E-learning adaptability. In the regression model, professional identity is an essential predictor of E-learning adaptability among the Chinese nursing students during COVID-19. Existing research showed that professional identity and learning burnout were negatively correlated (30). More than 60% of Chinese college students are often unclear about their future career goals and lack active academic participation (31, 32). Students often face difficulties due to the lack of a good learning attitude, such as the lack of self-control and indiscipline when self-isolated at home (33). Therefore, by helping the formation of professional identity in nursing students, learning adaptability will possibly be more developed in them. Professional identity is considered to construct and deconstruct through nursing education continuously (34, 35). It is suggested that colleges and universities pay attention to career guidance of nursing students, improve the online career planning curriculum, and guide nursing students to set up the correct values of career choice in the teaching management process. Additionally, teachers should help students to set up the learning goals of professional courses and complete online learning courses in a planned way. On the other hand, it strengthens the cultivation of professional identity among nursing students. Through guiding students to understand the value of nursing work in the learning process, stimulating nursing students demands for academic knowledge, and thus significantly promote the E-learning adaptability of nursing students.

Factors Affecting the E-Learning Adaptability

Previous studies have shown similar findings that the higher the educational level, the higher the E-learning adaptability of nursing students. Lu (36) shows that the higher the educational level, the better the online learning self-efficacy and deep learning level. Undergraduate and junior college nursing students have different self-learning abilities, and different coping styles in solving significant learning problems might be one of the reasons causing the difference in E-learning adaptability. Similarly, Zhao (37) reported that postgraduates have better overall online learning adaptability than undergraduates due to stronger independent innovation thinking and more precise knowledge needs. Another study found that the learning burnout of junior college students is higher than undergraduate students (35). Therefore, it is necessary to fully evaluate the current situation of the problems and needs encountered by different educational background groups in the progress of online learning and to apply online tests intellectually to teach students according to their aptitude.

We observed that the residence and network environment were essential predictors of E-learning adaptability. Compared with living in the city, limited internet access, such as an unstable network environment and a lack of computers in homes in rural areas, affected the E-learning progress. Students from cities have better availability of Wi-Fi routers and dedicated rooms at home and better proficiency in computer and internet usage than those in towns and villages, which determines the feasibility of e-learning (38). Previous research found that inadequate access to technology, studying materials, and computers can leave students marginalized and anxious, affecting online learning (39). At the same time, students are more satisfied with the teaching method of combination of live and record, which reduces the problem of poor network connection to a certain extent and helps students to after-school review (40). It is recommended that improving the Information and Communication Technology infrastructure is warranted in the long run. Meanwhile, using and developing the offline curriculum resources is essential in enhancing E-learning adaptability. Colleges and universities should assess the difficulties in E-learning from rural nursing students so that alternate study plans and strategies can be worked out in advance.

It was of great interest to discover that duration of classes can be used as one of the significant predictors in E-learning adaptability. Similar findings to those in a previous study found that most of the students prefer the duration of each class to be capped at a maximum of 45 min, which could be attributed to the maximum attention span, a student can have (41). Previous studies have shown that health issues are more common in those students who have to attend classes for >4 h a day and have long courses. It may result from prolonged exposure to digital gadgets, which is associated with various ailments, such as digital eye strain and cervical spondylosis (42). Therefore, it is crucial that colleges and universities set aside guidelines for online teachings, such as the number of classes per day, length, and break between classes. Time-to-effort optimization and inclusion of practices, such as adopting creative and blended learning will make E-learning more effective.

Limitations

This study used only quantitative measures rather than a mixed-methods approach. In addition, this study used only self-reported measure tools rather than e-learning proficiency within the concept of successful adaptation, such as learning outcomes. Further exploration adding objective evaluation indicators and using qualitative methods could have acquainted more comprehensive situations to learning about E-learning adaptability among nursing students.

Conclusion

Our study identified that the E-learning adaptability of nursing students during the COVID-19 was at a moderate level. Professional identity played a significant role in the E-learning adaptability of nursing students. Educational level, residence, duration of classes, preferred teaching method, and network environment were significant predictors of the E-learning adaptability of nursing students. The conclusions of this study can provide a reference, which will improve the E-learning adaptability of nursing students and reduce the negative impact.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Research Ethics Committee in Kunming Medical University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

HW and MY contributed to the conception and design of the study. HW undertook the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Both authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Teaching Research and Reform Program of Kunming Medical University (2020-JY-Y-094).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID-19 and medical education. Lancet Infect Dis. (2020) 20:777–78. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30226-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. (2020) 323:2131–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. The Ministry of Education (2020). Available online at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202001/t20200127_416672.html (accessed January 27, 2020).

Google Scholar

4. Aljawarneh SA. Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. J Comput High Educ. (2020) 32:57–73. doi: 10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lara JA, Aljawarneh S, Pamplona S. Special issue on the current trends in E-learning Assessment. J Comput High Educ. (2020) 32:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12528-019-09235-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang JY, Zhang J, Xue HP. Application of information and communication technology in nurse training in Chinese hospitals: a literature review. J Nurs Sci. (2018) 16:106–08. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.16.106

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Niu LF. Investigation and research on the learning adaptability of college students. Journal of Teachers College of Qingdao University. (2011) 2:65–72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4133.2011.02.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Martin AJ, Nejad HG, Colmar S, Liem GAD. Adaptability: conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and uncertainty. Aust J Guid Couns. (2012) 22:58–81. doi: 10.1017/jgc.2012.8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Holliman A, Waldeck D, Jay B, Murphy S, Atkinson E. Collie, J, et al. Adaptability and social support: examining links with psychological wellbeing among UK students and non-students. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:636520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Song N. Study on adjustment disorders of high school students and relevant countermeasures. Chin Med J Peoples Health. (2015) 27:5–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2015.15.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Longobardi C, Prino LE, Marengo D, Settanni M. Student-teacher relationships as a protective factor for school adjustment during the transition from middle to high school. Front Psychol. (2016) 7:1988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chen G, Huang HX, Meng DH. Sampling survey and analysis of online class learning situation of college students in 5 universities in Nanjing during COVID 19 pandemic. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2020) 9:1095–97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2020.09.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Dong Y. Research on the adaptability of college students' online learning and educational countermeasures. Jiaoyu Jiaoxue Luntan. (2020) 40:107–10. Available online at: http://kns-cnki-net.sjlib.cn/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=JYJU202040056&DbName=CJFQ2020

Google Scholar

14. Hensel D, Laux M. Longitudinal study of stress, self-care, and professional identity among nursing students. Nurse Educ. (2014) 5:227–31. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Wu C, Palmer MH, Sha K. Professional identity and its influencing factors of first-year post-associate degree baccalaureate nursing students: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. (2020) 84:104–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kelly J, Watson R, Watson J, Needham M, Driscoll LO. Studying the old masters of nursing: a critical student experience for developing nursing identity. Nurse Educ Pract. (2017) 26:121–25. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Xu XJ. Learning adaptability of undergraduates: research on structure, development characteristics and influencing factors (dissertation/master's thesis). Southwest University, Chongqing, China (2004).

Google Scholar

18. Yu XY, Lin KK, Sun YM. Correlation between learning adaptability and mental health in vocational nursing first-year students in Beijing. Chin J Modern Nurs. (2013) 26:3165–72. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2013.26.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhang YZ. The study on learning adaptability of medical college students and its influential factors in Guangdong Province (dissertation/master's thesis). Shantou University, Shantou, China (2007).

Google Scholar

20. Hao Y.F. Study the effect of the self-educational project on professional identity and self-efficacy in nurse students—shanghai (dissertation/master' s thesis). The Second Military Medical University, The Second Military Medical University (2011).

Google Scholar

21. Shawaqfeh MS, Al Bekairy AM, Al-Azayzih A, Alkatheri AA, Qandil AM, Obaidat AA, et al. Pharmacy students perceptions of their distance online learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. J Med Educ Curric Dev. (2020) 7:1–9. doi: 10.1177/2382120520963039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zalat MM, Hamed MS, Bolbol SA. The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PLoS ONE. (2021) 3:e0248758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Adarkwah MA. “I'm not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). (2020) VN:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Antwi S, Bansah AK, Franklin T. The information technology challenges in teaching senior high school geography in Ghana. Issues Trends Educ Technol. (2018) 1:16–37. doi: 10.2458/azu_itet_v6i1_antwi

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Arthur-Nyarko E, Kariuki MG. Learner access to resources for eLearning and preference for eLearning delivery mode in distance education programmes in Ghana. Int J Educ Technol. (2019) 6:1–8. Available online at: https://educationaltechnology.net/ijet/index.php/ijet/article/view/151

Google Scholar

26. DePaul K,. Data From: Can Online Learning Mitigate Rural Schools' Biggest Challenges? (2020). Available online at: https://www.gettingsmart.com/2020/02/15/can-online-learning-mitigate-rural-schools-biggest-challenges/

Google Scholar

27. Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). (2020) VN:1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Singh HK, Joshi A, Malepati RN, Najeeb S, Balakrishna P, Pannerselvam NK. et al. A survey of E-learning methods in nursing and medical education during COVID-19 pandemic in India. Nurse Educ Today. (2021) 99:104796. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104796

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Anwar A, Mansoor H, Faisal D, Khan HS. E-Learning amid the COVID-19 lockdown: standpoint of medical and dental undergraduates. Pak J Med Sci. (2021) 1:217–22. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.3124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Sun AL, Gao JZ, Xiong LP, Dong YY. Correlation between professional identity and learning burnout among associate nursing students during clinical practice. Chin J Nurs Educ. (2016) 4:309–12. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2016.04.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Bao W. Bridging the gap between research and practice: identifying high-impact educational practices for Chinese undergraduate education. Peking Univ Educ Rev. (2019) 1:105–29. doi: 10.12088/pku1671-9468.201903006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bao W, Zhang X. The multi-dimensional structure and influence mechanism of student academic involvement in China. Fudan Educ Forum. (2012) 6:20–8. Available online at: http://kns-cnki-net.sjlib.cn/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=GWZX201206008&DbName=CJFQ2012

Google Scholar

33. Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: a case study of Peking University. Hum Behav Emerg Tech. (2020) 2:113–15. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Guo Y, Yang L, Ji H, Zhao Q. Caring characters and professional identity among graduate nursing students in China-a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. (2018) 65:150–55. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Aagaard K, Sørensen EE, Rasmussen BS, Laursen BS. Identifying nurse anesthetists' professional identity. J Peri Anesth Nurs. (2017) 6:619–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.08.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Lu ML, Huang XY, Dong YH. Research on the relationship between E-learning self-efficacy and deep learning among nurses. J Nurses Train. (2018) 21:2006–15. doi: 10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2018.21.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zhao ML, Chen Q, Fang JW. Research on online learning adaptability of postgraduates. J Hubei Norm Univ. (2020) 4:60–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3149.2020.04.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wu L, Zhang RL, Chen CL. The construction and application of the teaching model of nursing trainees based on the network information platform. J Clin Nurs Pract. (2019) 12:180–82. Available online at: http://kns-cnki-net.sjlib.cn/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=HBSF202004009&DbName=CJFQ2020

Google Scholar

39. Hoque MN, Hannan A, Imran S, Alam MA, Matubber B, Saha SM. Anxiety and its determinants among undergraduate students during e-learning in bangladesh amid Covid-19. J Affect Disord Rep. (2021) 6:100241. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100241

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Bhardwaj A, Nagandla K, Swe KMM, Abas ABL. Academic staff perspectives towards adoption of e-learning at melaka manipal medical college: has e-learning redefined our teaching model? Kath-mandu Univ Med J. (2015) 1:12–8. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v13i1.13746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Leal-Costa C, Moral-García JE, Ruzafa-Martínez M. Experiences of nursing students during the abrupt change from face-to-face to e-learning education during the first month of confinement due to COVID-19 in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 15:5519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Rafi AM, Varghese PR, Kuttichira P. The pedagogical shift during COVID 19 pandemic: online medical education, barriers and perceptions in Central Kerala. J Med Educ Curric Dev. (2020) 7:1–4. doi: 10.1177/2382120520951795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Appendix

APPENDIX TABLE 1

Appendix Table 1. Multiple comparisons of the one-way ANOVA for E-learning adaptability of nursing students (N = 585).

APPENDIX TABLE 2

Appendix Table 2. Dimensions and total scores of E-learning adaptability and professional identity (N = 585).