AUTHOR=Wang Guixiang , Zhang Yan , Xie Simiao , Wang Pu , Lei Guanghui , Bian Yueran , Huang Fei , Zhang Jingyuan , Cao Xiaochen , Luo Na , Luo Mingyan , Xiao Qiang 

TITLE=Psychological Typhoon Eye Effect During the COVID-19 Outbreak

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.550051

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2020.550051

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> The COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, Hubei, has brought serious consequences to the lives and mental health of people and has induced psychological stress and affected behavior.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> This study used self-designed questionnaires and SPSS to analyze the psychological and behavioral responses of people in different regions during the COVID-19 pandemic and to check for the presence of “psychological typhoon eye” (PTE) effects. The questionnaires adopted three measurement subscales, namely, the risk cognitive subscale, stress response subscale, and behavioral response subscale, and these were administered online (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.wjx.cn" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">www.wjx.cn</ext-link>) to investigate the psychological and behavioral conduct of respondents from three areas that have been affected by COVID-19 to varying degrees. Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis were conducted to explore the factorial structure of these subscales, and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to explore the structural validity of the questionnaires. The analysis results were used to build a revised 18-item questionnaire which validity was evaluated via ANOVA and LSD.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Results confirm the presence of PTE in the research areas during the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak and highlight some significant differences in the cognition and emotions of the residents in these areas. PTE affected the cognition, emotions, and cognitive and emotional responses of the respondents but did not affect their behavioral responses.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The findings underscore the urgency of providing sustainable mental health care services across different areas during the COVID-19 outbreak. The residents of those areas worst hit by the pandemic, who may not have taken the situation seriously, require emotional guidance the most. Meanwhile, the residents of other areas, who showed the most negative psychological reactions to the pandemic, require a sense of security, a timely “disconnection” from negative information, an accurate cognition of stress, and an acceptance of self-responses.</p>