Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Public Health, 17 September 2020
Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion
This article is part of the Research Topic Social Value for Health: Understanding, Framing and Capturing the Wider Psycho-Social Outcomes Of Health Interventions and Programmes View all 18 articles

Preferences of Physical Education Profiles Among Polish Adolescents

  • 1Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Institute of Physical Education, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
  • 2Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland

The purpose of this study was to examine the association of the preferred profiles of physical education (PE) classes with gender and school level among Polish adolescents. In the cross-sectional survey study, 1,340 Polish students (including 50% of girls) attending middle and high schools, aged between 13 and 19 years, participated. The participants selected one of four preferred profiles of PE classes. The majority (n = 845, 63%) of students participated in PE for “fun–pleasure–entertainment,” whereas only one third of students (n = 419, 31%) preferred “exercise–sweat–fitness” as a profile of PE classes. The preference for “fun–pleasure–entertainment” decreased about 41% for boys and 31% for high school students. A preference for “exercise–sweat–fitness” increased about 56% for men and 31% for high school students. Teachers should comply with students' preferences related to PE profiles, organizing PE classes in more fun-related forms for girls and in more exercise-related forms for boys. The proportions of these two preferred profiles of PE classes should turn across adolescence, increasing exercise-related forms and decreasing those fun-related ones.

Introduction

Physical education (PE) underwent a deep transformation with the transition from a traditional sports skill orientation to a broader emphasis on health-related fitness and lifelong physical activity (PA) (1). Given the growing concerns over the PA levels of many young people and the possible health consequences, it is not surprising that the PE concept is not limited to “curriculum orientations” and teachers' educational goals, but it includes the view of students and the broader sociocultural context (2, 3). Previous studies have suggested that issues connected with the objectives of PE were well-established in theory (49). However, in rapidly transforming modern societies, the educational system is also undergoing significant changes; thus, there is a strong need to replicate previous research and monitor developments in this area. In light of the above, the present study is an attempt to focus on the preferences in PE classes among adolescents.

Most of the published data from different countries reported that PA decreases with an increase of age in youth (10, 11). For instance, the longitudinal prospective 10-year study by Kimm et al. (12) showed that between the ages 9–10 and 16–17 years, median habitual leisure time PA declined by 100% in African American girls (n = 1,213) and 64% in white girls (n = 1,166). In another longitudinal study by Telama and Yang (13), a decline in PA between the ages of 9 and 27 was shown in Finland, and a remarkable decline in PA level was observed after the age of 12. In a review study by Hallal et al. (14), it was found that inactivity rises with age and is increased in high-income countries. Caspersen et al. (15) also showed that PA of moderate to vigorous intensity declined consistently from age 12 in the United States, with one of the most dramatic declines appearing to occur between 13 and 18 years of age.

Youth PA behavior is influenced by biological, psychosocial, and environmental factors. Gender is identified among them as a significant correlate of PA. The vast majority of studies have consistently indicated that boys are more active than girls (11, 13, 14, 16, 17). Gender differences in various types of PA patterns (e.g., low, moderate, and vigorous) were also noticed. Some researchers point out that boys participate more in vigorous activities, while girls prefer moderate-to-low activities. Interestingly, with increasing age, boys prefer moderate- or low-activity patterns, while girls continue to participate in moderate-to-low activities (10).

One of the reasons for this gender difference may be that regular participation in sports and exercises is heavily influenced by observation of others who model these behaviors and by social reinforcement. The main emphasis is being put on parental role modeling, rules around sedentary and active pursuits, and parental support for PA (18), as well as the strong pressure from the media concerning female aesthetic models (19). On the other hand, it is often said that the school reproduces male culture and values, thus instilling a series of gender stereotypes among students, and that there are fewer opportunities for girls to participate in sports or regular exercise in some countries (20, 21).

Participating in organized PA at school and in the community is associated with greater physical effort and reduced sedentary time among both boys and girls (22). Unfortunately, PE that is currently taught in Polish schools increasingly fails to engage young people and, thus, fails to prepare them to become active creators and consumers of the varied forms of PA available outside of school. Recent research into the PA of youth in Poland has shown that only 74% of the students participated in all or almost all PE classes in the school year, while 11% took part in half or fewer of the total classes. The students' participation decreased as they got older, and the participation level was lower among the girls than the boys. Approximately 70% of the students were exempted from PE classes on written parental request, while 43% were excused on their own request. A doctor's certificate was obtained by 33% of the students, usually for a period shorter than 1 month, and 4.5% were exempted longer than 3 months. To sum up, for over 20–40% of the students, the number of PE classes in which they participated was significantly lower than the number planned by the legislator (23). Similar data were obtained in a nationwide survey carried out in the school years 2009–2010 and 2011–2012, in which, on average, the abstentions exceeded 15, 23, and 30% of students for specific levels of education (primary, middle, and high schools), respectively (24).

Low PA and PE classes' participation may largely be a function of a lack of motivation to exercise among inactive children and adolescents. Thus, teachers should aim, among other objectives, to boost adolescents' motives for the maintenance of participation in PA. Among the reasons driving adolescents to perform and to maintain physical or sportive activities, intrinsic motivation plays an important role. Intrinsic motivation refers to participation in an activity for inherent satisfaction and represents the most autonomous form of motivation (25, 26). It positively predicts the importance of students' engagement in PE, and this finally and positively predicts the intention of the student to continue doing PA (2729). It is in accordance with the thesis that human behavior is undermined by the fulfillment of needs, self-actualization, and full realization of one's own potential, hence leading to the satisfaction with tasks at hand (30, 31).

Crum (32) distinguishes four profiles of PE classes: (1) fun–pleasure–entertainment; (2) exercise–sweat–fitness; (3) control–order–discipline; and (4) relevant learning concerning movement and sport. The PE profiles were originally intended to diagnose the quality of PE teacher education (PETE). In the current study, these PE profiles were used to examine students' preferences to be provided with an answer to the important question of which of the profiles is the strongest trigger of PE attendance and the main source of their motivation.

Although the conception and curriculum of PE should include an individual context from the students' perspective, little research was focused on the opinion of adolescent students about the preferences for the profiles of PE classes. This study examines the associations of the preferred profile of PE classes with gender and school level of students attending middle and high schools.

Methods

Participants

In this cross-sectional survey study, a sample of 1,340 adolescent students attending public schools in the Silesian region in the south of Poland participated. The study sample included 667 middle school students (50% of the total sample) and 673 high school students (50%), aged between 13 and 19 years. There were 675 girls (50%) and 665 boys (50%) among the participants. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the sample.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the sample.

Measure

The survey asked a single question: “Which version of physical education presented below is closest to the one you would like to pursue at your school?” The students answered by selecting one of four preferred profiles of PE classes, developed by Crum (32): (1) PE as fun, pleasure, and entertainment; (2) PE as exercise, sweat, and fitness; (3) PE as control, order, and discipline; and (4) PE as relevant learning concerning movement and sport. The answers were coded 0 = No choice and 1 = Choice. Further, three close questions were added at the end of the survey, regarding such demographic variables as gender (female or male), type of school (middle or high), and grade (first, second, or third). The students answered each question by selecting one of the options.

Procedure

The cross-sectional survey study was conducted between September 2010 and January 2011 in three voivodeships around the Silesia region (Poland): Lower Silesia, Upper Silesia, and Opole Voivodeship. The paper-and-pencil survey was administered during school time with the consent of the teachers. The research was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Opole Medical Chamber (no. 151/2007) and conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Prior to the study, written informed consent was obtained from parents of students below 16 years of age. The students were informed that the research is anonymous and voluntary and that they could withdraw from the examination at any time, without giving a reason. Data collection consisted initially of 1,355 surveys. However, 10 surveys were excluded from further analysis because of more than 10% of missing data, and five individuals refused participation in the survey. The response rate was 99%.

Statistical Analysis

A series of Pearson's χ2 independence tests were performed separately to examine the relationship of the preferred PE profile with gender and school level. The null hypothesis is that the values included in rows and columns in the contingency table are equal. The alternative hypothesis (when p < 0.05) indicates an association between the variables. Further, binary logistic regression was conducted to discover predictors of the preferred PE profiles among such independent variables as gender (female and male) and school level (middle and high). In the univariate model of regression, gender, and school level were tested separately. Conversely, in the multivariate model, both gender and school levels were considered simultaneously as predictors. The Wald test was used to test the null hypothesis that a set of parameters is equal to zero. All statistical analyses were performed using STATISTICA 13.1 software.

Results

Preferences of the profiles of PE classes are shown in Table 2. Among the four profiles of PE classes, the majority of students have chosen the first (n = 845, 63%) and second (n = 419, 31%). The two other profiles of PE classes were not too common among students since only 3% (n = 40) has selected the fourth and 2.7% (n = 36) preferred the third. Table 2 contains the results of Pearson's χ2-test for the association between gender and school level of students and their preferences for the profiles of PE classes. Preference for the first profile of PE classes prevailed among girls, whereas boys more often chose the second profile of PE classes, as is shown in Figures 1A,B, respectively. Similar tendencies were found between students of distinct levels of schools. Students of middle school more often selected the first profile of PE classes, whereas more students of high schools have chosen the second profile, as is shown in Figures 1C,D, respectively. More boys (when compared to girls) and high school students (in comparison to middle school students) have selected the third profile of PE classes. There was neither a significant association between the fourth profile of PE classes and gender nor with school level. The interaction effect is shown in Figure 1.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Contingency table and results of Pearson's χ2-test for the association between the four profiles of physical education, gender, and school level.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Interaction plots (A) between the first profile of PE classes (fun–pleasure–entertainment) and gender (female marked as a circle and male marked as a triangle); (B) between the second profile of PE classes (exercise–sweat–fitness) and gender (female marked as a circle and male marked as a triangle); (C) between the first profile of PE classes (fun–pleasure–entertainment) and school level (middle marked as a square and high marked as a cross); and (D) between the second profile of PE classes (exercise–sweat–fitness) and school level (middle marked as a square and high marked as a cross).

Results of the logistic regression analyses predicting preference for the profiles of PE classes among students are shown in Table 3. Preference for the first profile of PE classes may be predicted among female and middle school students, whereas preference for the second and third profiles may be predicted among male and high school students.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Results of the logistic regression analysis predicting preferences for the profiles of PE classes among students (N = 1,340).

Discussion

The findings indicate that students' preferences for the profiles of PE classes are mainly related to the first (63%) and second (31%) profiles. It means that the basic, desirable forms of the activities during PE lessons are fun, leisure, entertainment, and intention to develop their physical fitness and locomotor skills. This is in line with previous research showing that positive emotions (happiness and joy) are significantly more highly evaluated than other emotions (negative and ambiguous) throughout PE sessions and that intrinsically motivated people do PA for pleasure, fun, or other self-determined reasons (25, 26, 33).

The results suggested that the preferable profile for girls and younger students from middle school was that of fun, pleasure, and entertainment, while boys and older adolescents from high school were predominantly in favor of exercise, sweat, and fitness. Previous research on gender differences in the context of PE activity support these results, as boys' more intensive PA and preferences toward vigorous activities contrasted with girls' predilection for moderate-to-low activities and lower level of activity in general (10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17). The data also showed that the preferable profile of PE classes changes with age from the first to the second profile. Adolescence is a transitional developmental period between childhood and adulthood that is characterized by more biological, psychological, and social role changes than any other stage of life except infancy (3436). Given the magnitude of such changes, it is not surprising that there are also significant changes in the preferred forms of physical activity and the motives and values underlying engagement in PE classes. Given the magnitude of such changes (37), it is not surprising that there are also significant changes in the preferred forms of physical activity and the motives and values underlying engagement in PE classes.

Logistic regression analysis showed that the preference for the first profile of PE classes was predicted by female gender and middle school level, whereas prediction of the occurrence of the second and third profiles concerned male gender and high school students. In other words, girls and younger students most frequently tended to choose fun, pleasure, and entertainment, whereas the group of boys and older youth preferred exercise, sweat, and fitness, as well as control, order, and discipline. A nationwide survey carried out in Polish schools showed that 14% of students expressed lack of willingness to participate in PE lessons. Consequently, from primary school to higher education, the proportion of the reluctance to attendance tended to increase: from 6% between the fourth and sixth grades of primary school, through 14% in middle school level, to 19% in high school. As one of the main reasons for the avoidance of PE classes, respondents mentioned an unattractive method of conducting classes by the teachers (31% of the total number of students) (24).

Limitation of the Study

Despite the importance of the results of the present study, the findings must be viewed within the context of its limitations and interpreted with caution. One important limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the study, which does not allow any causal relationship of the preferred profiles of PE classes with gender and school level among adolescents. Further longitudinal research is needed to replicate the present findings. The research was performed almost a decade ago. Likely, the current and future replication of the study could have different results. The changes in PE preferences and culture may be related to generational changes. Moreover, there are other correlatives such as biological, psychosocial, and environmental factors that can affect students' preferences. Therefore, future studies need to investigate more factors related to the PE preferences. Finally, given that this research is based only on students' self-report survey, future research could combine self-report measured with a more objective qualitative method (e.g., observation).

Conclusions

Particular Polish schools and teachers have some autonomy in developing the curriculum of physical education. Teachers' preference for selected sports disciplines may significantly affect the content of school PE. It seems necessary to also take into account students' preferences in PE practice. Students expect that PE classes will be fun and focused on recreation and entertainment. This choice dominates in both middle and high schools. Students expect physical education classes to be implemented as fun, recreation, and entertainment. This choice dominates in both types of schools. The PE curriculum close to the students' expectations may have a positive impact on the attitude toward PE participation by increasing the perceived attractiveness of PE and in engaging in physical activity and triggering greater creativity.

It appears that better understanding of students' preferences is one of the means to decrease the level of reluctance in attendance in PE classes as well as to boost the effectiveness of realizing the most important PE objectives. Organizing PE classes in more fun-related forms for girls and in more exercise-related forms for boys and using the knowledge about the changing proportions of two preferred profiles of PE classes over age in practice by increasing the exercise-related forms and decreasing the fun-related ones could provide useful guidance for teachers.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Bioethical Commission of the Opole Medical Chamber, 45-054 Opole, Poland. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin. Written informed consent from the participants of this study over the age of 16 was not required according to national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

CK, BZ-W, and AR contributed to the study conception and design, data collection and interpretation, and manuscript preparation and review. AR contributed to the statistical analysis and visualizing and writing the results. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Edginton CR, Chin M, Bronikowski M. Health and physical education: a new global statement of consensus (from a Polish perspective). Biomed Hum Kinet. (2011) 3:44–8. doi: 10.2478/v10101-011-0010-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Crum B. Competing orientations for P.E. curriculum development: the trend towards a consensus in the Netherlands and an international comparison. In: Williams T, Almond L, Sparkes A, editors. Sport and Physical Activity. Moving Towards Excellence. London: Spon (1992). p. 85–93.

Google Scholar

3. Naul R. Concepts of physical education in Europe. In: Hardman K, editor. Physical Education: Deconstruction and Reconstruction - Issues and Directions. Schorndorf: Hofmann (2003). p. 1–14.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

4. Bronikowski M. Hierarchia celów operacyjnych wychowania fizycznego w ocenie nauczycieli wychowania fizycznego [Hierarchy of goals of physical education as assessed by physical education teachers]. Zeszyty Naukowe AWF w Poznaniu. (2005) 54:195–7. Available online at: https://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/publication/55790/edition/71930/content

5. Bukowiec M. Postulowane, Załozone i Rzeczywiste Funkcje Wychowania Fizycznego w Przygotowaniu do Uczestnictwa w Kulturze Fizycznej [Proposed, Established and Actual Functions of Physical Education, Helping in Culture Involvement]. Kraków: AWF (1990).

6. Demel M. Szkice krytyczne o kulturze Fizycznej [Critical Sketches About Physical Culture]. Warszawa: Sport i Turystyka (1973).

7. Frołowicz T. Edukacyjne Intencje Nauczycieli Wychowania Fizycznego. Miedzy Deklaracjami a Działaniami [Educational Intentions of PE Teachers. Between Declarations and Actions]. Gdańsk: AWF (2002).

8. Kuśnierz C. Hierarchia Celów Wychowania Fizycznego w Opiniach Nauczycieli i Uczniów Południowo-Zachodniej Polski [Hierarchy of Goals Of Physical Education Students Based on the Opinions of Teachers and Students From South-Western Poland]. Opole: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Opolskiej (2015).

9. Kuśnierz C, Pośpiech D, Rogowska A. Hierarchy of physical education goals as an expression of educational priorities among Polish teachers. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. (2015) 17:592–600. doi: 10.5007/1980-0037.2015v17n5p592

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Slymen DJ, McKenzie TJ. A longitudinal study of children's enjoyment of physical education. Pediatr Exerc Sci. (2003) 15:170–8. doi: 10.1123/pes.15.2.170

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kin-Isler A, Asci FH, Altintas A, Guven-Karaban B. Physical activity levels and patterns of 11-14 year-old Turkish adolescents. Adolescence. (2009) 44:1005–15.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Inchley JC, Currie DB, Todd JM, Akhtar PC, Currie CE. Persistent socio-demographic differences in physical activity among Scottish schoolchildren 1990-2002. Eur J Pub Health. (2005) 15:386–8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Kriska AM, Barton BA, Kronsberg SS, Daniels SR, et al. Decline in physical activity in black girls and white girls during adolescence. N Engl J Med. (2002) 347:709–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003277

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Telama R, Yang X. Decline of physical activity from youth to young adulthood in Finland. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2000) 32:1617–22. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. (2012) 380:247–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Caspersen CJ, Pereira M, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2000) 32:1601–9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009000-00013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Joens-Matre RR. A Social Ecological Analysis of Physical Activity Promotion for Overweight and Normal Weight Youth. doctoral thesis. Ames, IA: Iowa State University (2006)

Google Scholar

18. Schaben J, Welk GW, Joens-Matre RR, Hensley L. The predictive utility of the children's physical activity correlates scale across multiple grade levels. J Phys Act Health. (2006) 3:59–69. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.1.59

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Crawford D, Cleland V, Timperio A, Salmon J, Andrianopoulos N, Roberts R, et al. The longitudinal influence of home and neighbourhood environments on children's body mass index and physical activity over 5 years: the CLAN study. Int J Obes. (2010) 34:1177–87. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.57

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Amado-Alonso D, Mendo-Lázaro S, León-del-Barco B, Mirabel-Alviz M, Iglesias-Gallego D. Multidimensional self-concept in elementary education: Sport practice and gender. Sustainability. (2018) 10:2805. doi: 10.3390/su10082805

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hardman K, Murphy C, Routen AC, Tones S. World-Wide Survey of School Physical Education: Final Report. Paris: UNESCO (2014).

Google Scholar

22. Valdivia-Moral P, Molero D, Díaz-Suarez A, Cofre C, Zagalaz-Sánchez ML. Coeducational methodology used by physical education teachers and students' perception of it. Sustainability. (2018) 10:2312. doi: 10.3390/su10072312

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Jago R, Macdonald-Wallis C, Solomon-Moore E, Thompson JL, Lawlor DA, Sebire SJ. Associations between participation in organised physical activity in the school or community outside school hours and neighbourhood play with child physical activity and sedentary time: a cross-sectional analysis of primary school-aged children from the UK. BMJ Open. (2017) 7:e017588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017588

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Woynarowska B, Mazur J, Oblacińska A. Uczestnictwo uczniów w lekcjach wychowania fizycznego w szkołach w Polsce [Participation of students in physical education lessons in schools in Poland]. Hygeia Public Health. (2015) 50:183–90. Available online at: http://www.h-ph.pl/pdf/hyg-2015/hyg-2015-1-183.pdf

Google Scholar

25. Najwyzsza Izba Kontroli. Informacja o wynikach kontroli. Wychowanie fizyczne i sport w szkołach publicznych i niepublicznych. Warszawa: NIK (2013).

Google Scholar

26. Gagne M, Ryan RM, Bargmann K. Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. J Appl Sport Psychol. (2003) 15:372–90. doi: 10.1080/714044203

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Vallerand RJ, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation in sport. In: Pandolf KB, editor. Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews. New York, NY: Macmillan (1987) p. 389–425. doi: 10.1249/00003677-198700150-00015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Calvo TG, Cervelló E, Jiménez R, Iglesias D, Murcia JAM. Using self-determination theory to explain sport persistence and dropout in adolescent Athletes. Span J Psychol. (2010) 13:677–84. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600002341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Moreno-Murcia JA, Huéscar E, Cervelló E. Prediction of adolescents doing physical activity after completing secondary education. Span J Psychol. (2012) 15:90–100. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37288

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Standage M, Duda JL, Ntoumanis N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. J Educ Psychol. (2003) 95:97–110. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. (1943) 50:370–96. doi: 10.1037/h0054346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am Psychol. (2000) 55:68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Crum B. How to win the battle for survival as a school subject? Reflections on justification, objectives, methods and organization of PE in schools of the 21st century. Retos. (2017) 3:238–44. Available online at: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/53496/32254

Google Scholar

34. Cañabate D, Martínez G, Rodríguez D, Colomer J. Analysing emotions and social skills in physical education. Sustainability. (2018) 10:1585. doi: 10.3390/su10051585

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Feldman SS, Elliott GR (editors.). At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1990).

Google Scholar

36. Holmbeck GN. Adolescence. In: Ramachandran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. Vol. 1. Orlando, FL: Academic Press (1994). p. 17–28.

Google Scholar

37. Lerner RM, Villarruel FA, Castellino DR. Adolescence. In: Silverman WK, Ollendick TH, editors. Developmental Issues in the Clinical Treatment of Children. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon (1999). p. 125–36.

Google Scholar

Keywords: adolescents, gender, physical education preferences, physical activity, school level

Citation: Kuśnierz C, Zmaczyńska-Witek B and Rogowska AM (2020) Preferences of Physical Education Profiles Among Polish Adolescents. Front. Public Health 8:466. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00466

Received: 02 January 2020; Accepted: 23 July 2020;
Published: 17 September 2020.

Edited by:

Allen C. Meadors, Independent Researcher, Seven Lakes, United States

Reviewed by:

Pradeep Nair, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India
Souheila AliHassan, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates

Copyright © 2020 Kuśnierz, Zmaczyńska-Witek and Rogowska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aleksandra M. Rogowska, YXJvZ293c2thJiN4MDAwNDA7dW5pLm9wb2xlLnBs

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.