AUTHOR=Haffey Sean C. , Hopman Wilma M. , Leveridge Michael J. 

TITLE=Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=8

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00300

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2020.00300

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objective:</bold> Physician-rating websites have exploded in popularity in recent years. Consequently, these sites have garnered attention from researchers interested in factors influencing patient satisfaction. A doctor's earnings might reflect practice patterns that could influence their patients' perceptions. We sought to explore any association between physicians' earnings and their online ratings.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> The names and billings of 500 physicians from British Columbia, Canada were randomly extracted from the 2016-17 <italic>BC Blue Book</italic> and matched to their profiles on <italic>RateMDs.com</italic>. Physicians' earnings were compared to their global ratings and to their Staff, Punctuality, Helpfulness, and Knowledge scores. Earnings and ratings were also compared between men and women, as well as between family medicine, surgical, and internal medicine and subspecialties cohorts.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> We found no significant correlation between physicians' earnings and their global online ratings (<italic>p</italic> = 0.304). Weak negative correlations existed between earnings and Staff and Helpfulness ratings (Spearman's rho = −0.055, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001; rho = −0.033, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.028). Online ratings were largely favorable (mean MD rating of 3.85/5. Male physicians earned significantly more than their female colleagues ($371,734.85 and $261,590.82, respectively; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), but no significant difference existed between men and women with regards to online ratings (mean 3.87 and 3.81, respectively, <italic>p</italic> = 0.191). Surgical and Family Medicine specialties showed a negative correlation between income and ratings; no relationship was seen in the internal medicine and subspecialties cohort.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> No meaningful association was found between physicians' earnings and their online ratings, although there is an impact of specialty grouping. Patients tend to review doctors favorably online; these data add to the discussion of whether male and female doctors are differentially rated. Trends toward increased transparency in health care systems may help to elucidate how doctors' earnings influence patients' perception of and satisfaction with the care they receive.</p>