data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Psychology of Aging
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540493
This article is part of the Research Topic Cognitive Aging and Decision-Making: Evaluating Real-World Measures View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Though often not routinely assessed in older adults, declines in decision-making (DM) abilities are often observed in aging and may lead to adverse outcomes in multiple aspects of daily functioning. The Advancing Reliable Measurement in Cognitive Aging and Decision-making Ability (ARMCADA) research initiative seeks to address these issues. This scoping review investigates the current published literature on existing DM measures in aging samples, with emphasis on the domain of functional outcomes, defined as skills or behaviors related to one's ability to live independently. Methods: We identified studies published between 2018-2023 using key words related to DM abilities and functional outcomes in aging populations through multiple databases. The scoping review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework. Titles and abstracts were first reviewed by two reviewers, full texts were then screened, and data were extracted from included articles.The scoping review identified 16,278 articles across domains with adults aged 45 and older. After screening and extraction, 705 total articles were included; 301 were related to functional outcomes and, from these, 231 distinct measures were identified. Mode of administration of most measures were self-administered with supervision, followed by examiner-administered, and most were conducted with clinical samples (e.g., MCI/AD, chronic health conditions, and Parkinson's disease, or clinical samples and a control group). Discussion: The goal of the current scoping review is to provide a comprehensive examination of the current DM measures in older adults; this article focuses on the domain of functional outcomes. This scoping review guides a project to create and validate measures that can efficiently assess DM abilities in older adults across the cognitive aging spectrum.
Keywords: Activities of Daily Living, Daily functioning, decision-making, Aging, cognitive impairment
Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 26 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Karpouzian-Rogers, Dworak, Bucko, Ho, Ece, Mather, Novack, Pila, Hosseinian, Hall, Mkhize, Bassard, Gershon and Weintraub. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tatiana Karpouzian-Rogers, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, 60611, Illinois, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.