AUTHOR=Hauschild Sophie , Dragovic Drago , Kasper Lea , Sobanski Esther , Taubner Svenja 

TITLE=Patient characteristics of completion and dropout of mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with conduct disorder

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=15

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390169

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390169

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=<sec id="sec1"><title>Introduction</title><p>Conduct disorder (CD) is a severe mental disorder in youth. Yet, providing psychological interventions for adolescents with CD is challenging. This patient group is often characterized by risk factors for therapy dropout such as, e.g., CD symptoms and being in middle adolescence. On the other hand, little is known about characteristics of adolescents with CD who complete treatment. To gain more insight into what might become a successful therapy with adolescents with CD, this study explores baseline characteristics and drop-out occurrence in patients with CD referred to mentalization-based treatment for adolescents with CD (MBT-CD). More specifically, this study aims at identifying clusters of adolescent patients based on age, CD symptom severity and personality pathology at the beginning of treatment which may have come along with a higher or lower dropout occurrence.</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>Methods</title><p>Following implications of an elbow plot, a 3-means cluster-analysis was conducted on self-report baseline data of <italic>N</italic> = 32 adolescents with CD (<italic>n</italic> = 11 dropouts, <italic>n</italic> = 21 completers) who participated in a feasibility study on MBT-CD. Additionally, in an exploratory stepwise logistic regression, variables were explored as potential predictors of dropout.</p></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>Results</title><p>Cluster 1 consisted of <italic>n</italic> = 14 adolescents, of whom <italic>n</italic> = 8 (57%) dropped out. Cluster 2 consisted of <italic>n</italic> = 5 adolescents of whom 1 (20%) dropped out. Cluster 3 consisted of <italic>N</italic> = 13 adolescents, of whom only <italic>n</italic> = 2 (15%) dropped out. Cluster 2 showed descriptively the highest CD symptom severity. While adolescents in Clusters 1 and 3 showed in part similarities in CD symptom severity, personality pathology was descriptively markedly higher in Cluster 1. In the stepwise logistic regression, only intimacy personality pathology was identified as potential predictor for dropout.</p></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>Discussion</title><p>This study’s exploratory findings point to different types of adolescents with CD coming along with different chances for therapists to conduct a (successful) psychotherapy. Herein, low personality functioning in the intimacy domain, rather than CD symptoms as aggressiveness, may play a crucial role. While findings are limited by the small sample size, they may be able to shed increasing light on conducting (successful) psychotherapy with a scarcely researched patient group.</p></sec>