Investment in academic instruction without complementary attention to the social–emotional environment of students may lead to a failure of both. The current study evaluates a proposed mechanism for change, whereby academic achievement occurs as a result of the social–emotional learning environment impacting behavioral (discipline) outcomes.
We tested the hypothesized model during each year of a 3-year intervention to determine whether the relations among these constructs held potential as a pathway for targeted improvement.
Path analysis for each year demonstrated excellent fit [Year 1:
The consistency of these relationships supports the proposed logic model as a potential mechanism for change and has the potential to guide interventions for whole school improvement.