AUTHOR=Bourlier Maxime , Jacquet Baptiste , Lassiter Daniel , Baratgin Jean 

TITLE=Coherence, not conditional meaning, accounts for the relevance effect

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=14

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150550

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150550

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=<p>Missing-link conditionals like “If bats have wings, Paris is in France” are generally felt to be unacceptable even though both clauses are true. According to the <italic>Hypothetical Inferential Theory</italic>, this is explained by a conventional requirement of an inferential connection between conditional clauses. Bayesian theorists have denied the need for such a requirement, appealing instead to a requirement of discourse coherence that extends to all ways of connecting clauses. Our experiment compared conditionals (“<italic>If A, C</italic>”), conjunctions (“<italic>A and C</italic>”), and bare juxtapositions (“<italic>A. C</italic>.”). With one systematic exception that is predicted by prior work in coherence theory, the presence or absence of an inferential link affected conditionals and other statement types in the same way. This is as expected according to the Bayesian approach together with a general theory of discourse coherence.</p>