AUTHOR=Aiello Edoardo Nicolò , Carelli Laura , Solca Federica , Torre Silvia , Ferrucci Roberta , Priori Alberto , Verde Federico , Silani Vincenzo , Ticozzi Nicola , Poletti Barbara TITLE=Validity and diagnostics of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology VOLUME=Volume 13 - 2022 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1031841 DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1031841 ISSN=1664-1078 ABSTRACT=Background. The present study aimed at exploring the construct validity and diagnostic properties of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Materials. N=61 consecutive patients and N=50 healthy controls (HCs) were administered the 36-item RMET. Additionally, patients underwent a comprehensive assessment of social cognition via the Story-Based Empathy Task (SET), which encompasses three subtests targeting Causal Inference, Emotion Attribution (SET-EA) and Intention Attribution (SET-IA), as well as global cognitive (Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen) and behavioural screening (Frontal Behavioural Inventory; Dimensional Apathy Scale; Beck Depression Inventory; State- and Trait-Anxiety Inventory-Y). Construct validity of the RMET was tested by regressing it within a stepwise model that encompassed as predictors the abovementioned cognitive and behavioural measures, covarying for demographic and motor confounders. Receiver-operating characteristics analyses allowed to explore intrinsic and post-test properties of the RMET both in discriminating patients from HCs and in identifying patients with a defective SET-EA performance. Results. The RMET was solely predicted by the SET-EA (p=.003) and SET-IA (p=.005). RMET scores showed high accuracy both in discriminating patients from HCs (AUC=.81), and in identifying patients with a defective SET-EA score (AUC=.82), with adequate-to-optimal both intrinsic and post-test properties. Discussion. The RMET is a convergently and divergently valid measure of affective social cognition in non-demented ALS patients, also featured by optimal intrinsic and post-test diagnostic properties in both case-control and case-findings scenarios.