AUTHOR=Klatt Maryanna , Bawa Rani , Gabram Olivia , Westrick Alexis , Blake Amanda 

TITLE=Synchronous Mindfulness in Motion Online: Strong Results, Strong Attendance at a Critical Time for Health Care Professionals (HCPs) in the COVID Era

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=12

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725810

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725810

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=<p>Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) is an organizationally-sponsored mindfulness program for employees at a large academic health center that consistently produces significant reductions in burnout and perceived stress, alongside significant increases in work engagement and resilience. This study compared outcome measures of a synchronous virtual delivery of MIM, necessitated by COVID-19, to traditional in-person delivery of MIM. Outcome measures from the virtual COVID (AU20, WI21, SP21) MIM cohorts (<italic>n</italic> = 99) were compared with the in-person Pre-COVID (SP19, AU19, WI20) MIM cohorts (<italic>n</italic> = 124). Both Pre-COVID and COVID cohorts had similar attendance rates with an average attendance of 84 and 80%, respectively. Qualitative analysis of COVID cohorts reported community support during COVID as a substantial intervention benefit, which was important at a time when isolation dominated the healthcare professional experience. Total burnout was determined by scores on the subscales of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). There were no significant differences in depersonalization (<italic>p</italic> = 0.3876) and personal accomplishment (<italic>p</italic> = 0.1519) changes between Pre-COVID and COVID cohorts, however there was a significant difference in emotional exhaustion (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0315), with COVID cohorts improving more. In both Pre, and COVID cohorts, the percentage of people meeting burnout criteria from pre to post between groups were similar, yielding a non-significant difference (<italic>p</italic> = 0.2950). The Connor Davidson Resiliency Scale (CDRS) and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) also produced no significant differences between groups (<italic>p</italic> = 0.4259, <italic>p</italic> = 0.1984, respectively). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) though yielded significant differences in reduction between groups (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0405), again with COVID cohorts showing greater improvement. Results of the first synchronous, virtually delivered MIM cohorts reflect that participants achieved very similar results and that MIM created a community in a time when it was greatly needed due to pandemic healthcare professional stress.</p>