AUTHOR=Zumeta Larraitz N. , Castro-Abril Pablo , Méndez Lander , Pizarro José J. , Włodarczyk Anna , Basabe Nekane , Navarro-Carrillo Ginés , Padoan-De Luca Sonia , da Costa Silvia , Alonso-Arbiol Itziar , Torres-Gómez Bárbara , Cakal Huseyin , Delfino Gisela , Techio Elza M. , Alzugaray Carolina , Bilbao Marian , Villagrán Loreto , López-López Wilson , Ruiz-Pérez José Ignacio , Cedeño Cynthia C. , Reyes-Valenzuela Carlos , Alfaro-Beracoechea Laura , Contreras-Ibáñez Carlos , Ibarra Manuel Leonardo , Reyes-Sosa Hiram , Cueto Rosa María , Carvalho Catarina L. , Pinto Isabel R. TITLE=Collective Effervescence, Self-Transcendence, and Gender Differences in Social Well-Being During 8 March Demonstrations JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology VOLUME=11 YEAR=2020 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607538 DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2020.607538 ISSN=1664-1078 ABSTRACT=

8 March (8M), now known as International Women’s Day, is a day for feminist claims where demonstrations are organized in over 150 countries, with the participation of millions of women all around the world. These demonstrations can be viewed as collective rituals and thus focus attention on the processes that facilitate different psychosocial effects. This work aims to explore the mechanisms (i.e., behavioral and attentional synchrony, perceived emotional synchrony, and positive and transcendent emotions) involved in participation in the demonstrations of 8 March 2020, collective and ritualized feminist actions, and their correlates associated with personal well-being (i.e., affective well-being and beliefs of personal growth) and collective well-being (i.e., social integration variables: situated identity, solidarity and fusion), collective efficacy and collective growth, and behavioral intention to support the fight for women’s rights. To this end, a cross-cultural study was conducted with the participation of 2,854 people (age 18–79; M = 30.55; SD = 11.66) from countries in Latin America (Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador) and Europe (Spain and Portugal), with a retrospective correlational cross-sectional design and a convenience sample. Participants were divided between demonstration participants (n = 1,271; 94.0% female) and non-demonstrators or followers who monitored participants through the media and social networks (n = 1,583; 75.87% female). Compared with non-demonstrators and with males, female and non-binary gender respondents had greater scores in mechanisms and criterion variables. Further random-effects model meta-analyses revealed that the perceived emotional synchrony was consistently associated with more proximal mechanisms, as well as with criterion variables. Finally, sequential moderation analyses showed that proposed mechanisms successfully mediated the effects of participation on every criterion variable. These results indicate that participation in 8M marches and demonstrations can be analyzed through the literature on collective rituals. As such, collective participation implies positive outcomes both individually and collectively, which are further reinforced through key psychological mechanisms, in line with a Durkheimian approach to collective rituals.