AUTHOR=Liu Chuanjun , Liao Jiangqun 

TITLE=CAN Algorithm: An Individual Level Approach to Identify Consequence and Norm Sensitivities and Overall Action/Inaction Preferences in Moral Decision-Making

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=11

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547916

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547916

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=<p>Recently, a multinomial process tree model was developed to measure an agent’s consequence sensitivity, norm sensitivity, and generalized inaction/action preferences when making moral decisions (CNI model). However, the CNI model presupposed that an agent considers <italic>consequences</italic>—<italic>norms</italic>—generalized <italic>inaction</italic>/<italic>action</italic> preferences sequentially, which is untenable based on recent evidence. Besides, the CNI model generates parameters at the group level based on binary categorical data. Hence, the <italic>C</italic>/<italic>N</italic>/<italic>I</italic> parameters cannot be used for correlation analyses or other conventional research designs. To solve these limitations, we developed the CAN algorithm to compute <italic>norm</italic> and <italic>consequence</italic> sensitivities and overall <italic>action</italic>/<italic>inaction</italic> preferences algebraically in a parallel manner. We re-analyzed the raw data of the original CNI model to test the methodological predictions. Our results demonstrate that: (1) the <italic>C</italic> parameter is approximately equal between the CNI model and CAN algorithm; (2) the <italic>N</italic> parameter under the CNI model approximately equals <italic>N</italic>/(1 − <italic>C</italic>) under the CAN algorithm; (3) the <italic>I</italic> parameter and <italic>A</italic> parameter are reversed around 0.5 – the larger the <italic>I</italic> parameter, the more the generalized inaction <italic>versus</italic> action preference and the larger the <italic>A</italic> parameter, the more overall action <italic>versus</italic> inaction preference; (4) tests of differences in parameters between groups with the CNI model and CAN algorithm led to almost the same statistical conclusion; (5) parameters from the CAN algorithm can be used for correlational analyses and multiple comparisons, and this is an advantage over the parameters from the CNI model. The theoretical and methodological implications of our study were also discussed.</p>