
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CASE REPORT article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Neurostimulation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1568895
This article is part of the Research Topic Underlying Neural Mechanisms of Non-invasion Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies Volume II View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has been shown to reduce symptoms related to psychosis, especially positive symptoms such as auditory hallucinations (AH). However, there are time and transportation burdens that fall on patients since typical tES treatments are performed over 5 days in-clinic and consist of twice daily tES sessions. Evidence suggests that accelerated protocols (repeated number of tES sessions over fewer days) may have similar efficacy as traditional 5-day tES protocols. Moreover, few investigations have sought to target novel brain regions linked to AH, such as those identified by advanced neuroimaging studies that identify causal neural substrates that manifest AH. Here, we report on a 62-year-old woman with persistent treatment-resistant AH. We performed two tES treatment protocols (a 5-day traditional protocol and a 2-day accelerated protocol) targeting a brain region that has been causally linked to the manifestation of AH, the right superior temporal sulcus (rSTS). Both traditional and accelerated protocols resulted in a decrease in AH and distinct electroencephalogram (EEG) changes that tracked with symptom changes.
Keywords: lesion network mapping, superior temporal sulcus, auditory hallucinations, treatment resistance, EEG, Transcranial electric current stimulation
Received: 30 Jan 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Raymond, Trotti and Lizano. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Paulo Lizano, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.