Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Aging Psychiatry

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553697

Commentary: Dignity of Older Persons with Mental Health Conditions: Why Should Clinicians Care?

Provisionally accepted
  • The Open University of Japan, Chiba, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Banerjee et al. (1) have highlighted the importance of dignity as a central component of mental health care for the elderly. They have also emphasized the need for research addressing mental health interventions (including Dignity Therapy; DT), in the context of ageism, rights, respect, and equality. This paper builds on the work of Banerjee et al. (1) by introducing the culturally sensitive framework of flat recovery process (FRP) (2) into recovery-oriented and person-centered practices to further the dialogue regarding the necessity for service providers to consider and incorporate human dignity into the care of their clients. This paper is also an educational resource for mental health care professionals working with geriatric populations. This commentary serves as innovative material for fostering constructive discussions on human dignity through the lens of cultural diversity.An increasing proportion of the elderly experience mental illness, including chronic medical conditions, geriatric depression (3,4), anxiety (4), and poorer cognitive functioning (4, 5). Concepts such as independence, respect, autonomy, and rights are crucial for functional recovery and optimal management, most of which originate in Western paradigms (1). The need for a global paradigm of mental health care for the elderly that supports their universal human dignity is growing (1), in support of their dignity as universal dignity. Interventions such as DT, aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 (6), may address this need.The definitions of ageism are broad and cover interdependent and distinct qualities from ableism (7). Disability is cast as a diminished state of being human (8) whereas ableism is discrimination against diminished human abilities. Furthermore, as ageing is associated with a change in mental and physical abilities, the connotations of being elderly tend to be negative (9). Accordingly, this study focuses on the non-able nature of ageism and ableism.To protect universal human dignity while respecting cultural diversity, the current article introduces 34 the concept a FRP for mental disorders (2), a framework to serve an educational (1)

    Keywords: Dignity, Human Rights, the elderly, ageism, Mental Health, Recovery

    Received: 31 Dec 2024; Accepted: 18 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Muramatsu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hideki Muramatsu, The Open University of Japan, Chiba, Japan

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more