Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553002

This article is part of the Research Topic Community Series In Mental-Health-Related Stigma and Discrimination: Prevention, Role, and Management Strategies, Volume III View all 19 articles

Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS-P), a Mental Health Stigma-Related Behaviour Measure

Provisionally accepted
Sima Garmehi Sima Garmehi 1Bahareh Hakimi Bahareh Hakimi 2Fateme Farhoudi Fateme Farhoudi 3*Ehsan Abedini Ehsan Abedini 2
  • 1 North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnourd, North Khorasan, Iran
  • 2 Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • 3 University of Tehran, Tehran, Tehran, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Several instruments have been developed to measure stigma associated with mental disorders. The Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS) is one of the validated questionnaires to assess the presence of stigma and discrimination against people with mental illness in the general population. It consists of eight items, divided into two subscales that measure reported and intended stigmatizing behaviours. This study aimed to translate and validate the RIBS in Persian.We translated the RIBS questionnaire from English into Persian (RIBS-P) and back-translated it into English. Thereafter, ten psychiatrists evaluated its face validity.Between 2020 and 2021, 384 Persian-speaking adults (aged 18-60) residing in various cities across Iran, with internet access, participated in the study. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to determine the construct validity. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and test-retest methods.Results: Most of the participants were 28-37 (53.9%), female (64.6%), married (51.6%), unemployed (67.7%) and educated (100%). The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the RIBS-P questionnaire was high (0.732) and The test-retest results showed no significant difference. Factor analysis was used for construct validity and resulted in the extraction of one factor, the mean, standard deviation, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the extracted factor were 3.25, 1.02 and 0.807. The items with the highest correlation with the extracted factor from the exploratory analysis were identified (>0.6). Age (P<0.0001), working status (P<0.0001), and education (P<0.0001) had a significant relationship with stigmatization behaviour.The findings indicate that the Persian version of the RIBS is valid and reliable for assessing stigmatizing behaviours among Iranians.

    Keywords: behaviour, stigma, Mental Health, Psychometric, Persian

    Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 17 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Garmehi, Hakimi, Farhoudi and Abedini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Fateme Farhoudi, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14174, Tehran, Iran

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more