
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1552233
This article is part of the Research Topic Empowering Early Career Researchers in Psychiatry: Advancing Autism Research View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is associated with atypical neural dynamics, affecting spatial navigation and information integration. EEG microstates and functional connectivity (FC) are useful tools for investigating these differences. This study examines alterations in EEG microstates and theta-band FC during map-reading tasks in children with ASD (n = 12) compared to typically developing (TD) peers (n = 12), aiming to uncover neural mechanisms underlying spatial processing deficits in ASD.Methods: EEG data were collected from children with ASD (n = 12) and TD controls (n = 12) aged 6-10 years during a map-reading task. Microstate analysis quantified the temporal dynamics of four canonical microstates (A, B, C, and D). Theta-band (4-8 Hz) FC was analyzed to assess interregional neural communication during the task. Statistical tests identified group differences in microstate metrics and FC patterns.Results: Children with ASD showed significant differences in EEG microstate dynamics compared to TD controls. The ASD group showed reduced occurrence, but longer duration and greater coverage in microstate A, indicating abnormal temporal and spatial brain activity. For microstate B, the ASD group displayed shorter durations and lower coverage, suggesting impairments in cognitive control. In microstate C, the ASD group exhibited reduced duration, coverage, and steady-state distribution, pointing to disruptions in spatial attention. Conversely, microstate D showed increased occurrence and greater coverage in the ASD group, reflecting atypical spatial attention allocation. Theta-band FC analysis revealed significantly reduced connectivity in key brain networks involved in spatial navigation, particularly between fronto-parietal and occipito-temporal regions. This suggests disrupted integration of spatial and cognitive processes in children with ASD.Discussion: The alterations in EEG microstate patterns and theta-band FC highlight differences in the neural mechanisms underlying spatial navigation and cognitive integration in ASD. These findings suggest that microstate and FC analyses could serve as biomarkers for understanding visual spatial navigation in ASD, related to perceptual abnormalities. This research provides a basis for individualized rehabilitation plans for children with ASD, using qEEG biomarkers to guide neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Future studies should investigate longitudinal changes and intervention effects on these neural dynamics.
Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Microstates, functional connectivity, Cognition, navigation
Received: 27 Dec 2024; Accepted: 12 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wang and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chong Lu, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.