Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1542247

Attitudes of Vietnamese University Students on Restrictions of Rights and Compulsory Admissions in Patients with Severe Mental Illness - A Cross-Sectional Study

Provisionally accepted
Solveig Kemna Solveig Kemna 1*Van Tuan Nguyen Van Tuan Nguyen 2,3Kerem Böge Kerem Böge 1Malek Bajbouj Malek Bajbouj 1Max Bringmann Max Bringmann 1Sebastian Weyn-Banningh Sebastian Weyn-Banningh 1Luisa Marie Eilinghoff Luisa Marie Eilinghoff 1Van Phi Nguyen Van Phi Nguyen 1,2,4Laura Elisabeth Tuturea Laura Elisabeth Tuturea 1Thien Le Cong Thien Le Cong 2,3Thi Thu Ha Le Thi Thu Ha Le 2,3Tam Thi Minh Ta Tam Thi Minh Ta 1PD Dr. Eric Hahn PD Dr. Eric Hahn 1
  • 1 Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 3 National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 4 Department of Mental Health, National Geriatric Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This cross-sectional, explorative study examines university students' attitudes (n = 610) in Hanoi, Vietnam, toward the rights of psychiatric patients. Medical students responded to self-report questionnaires investigating their attitudes towards restrictions and compulsory admissions in case of severe mental illness after attending a psychiatry course. Medical students and non-medical students who did not participate in the course served as two control groups. In all groups, the majority of students opposed restricting the civil rights of psychiatric patients, but most supported compulsory admissions in certain situations. Medical students who had not attended a psychiatry course were generally more in favor of compulsory admissions compared to those who had attended a psychiatry course and non-medical students. However, when investigating attitudes on compulsory admissions in specific scenarios, students that had attended a psychiatry course were more likely to endorse compulsory admissions, except when admission was based on the patient's family request. Medical and psychiatric training seem to encourage more differentiated opinions on the use of compulsory admissions in psychiatric care. Future research, including longitudinal designs and a broader geographical scope, is needed to better understand the impact of psychiatric education in medical studies on attitudes toward mental health.

    Keywords: Medical students, Psychiatry, stigma, Restrictions, Compulsory admissions, Mental health literacy

    Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Kemna, Nguyen, Böge, Bajbouj, Bringmann, Weyn-Banningh, Eilinghoff, Nguyen, Tuturea, Le Cong, Le, Ta and Hahn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Solveig Kemna, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more