ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1534349
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Recovery College model: state of the art, current research developments and future directionsView all articles
Clustering change patterns among learners of an online Recovery College in Quebec
Provisionally accepted- 1Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
- 2Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- 3School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada
- 4School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montréal, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction. Recovery Colleges (RCs) are educational hubs offering free courses on mental health, well-being, and recovery through mutual and transformative learning. These co-learning spaces bring together individuals with diverse backgrounds-such as those with lived experience of mental illness, family members, and mental health practitioners-to co-produce knowledge on mental health topics. Studies have shown RC participation leads to improvements in several psychosocial dimensions (e.g. mental health literacy, self-, empowerment, well-being, reduced anxiety, stigma) and healthcare utilization. However, the methodological approach of averaging outcomes across all participants can mask relevant outcome trajectories, which is particularly significant given the heterogeneity of RC learners. In light of these limitations, this study aims to explore the heterogeneity of change among RC learners by identifying different trajectories of change and exploring their determinants.Methods. The study adopts a quasi-experimental longitudinal design with repeated measures, utilizing data from 353 participants recruited from a French-language RC in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at three time points: baseline (T0) prior to program participation, one-month postprogram (T1), and three to four months post-program (T2). The study uses clustering techniques to identify patterns of change across participants, focusing on key outcome measures such as well-being, anxiety, resilience, empowerment, and stigma.Results. The results identified three distinct clusters of change trajectories. The largest cluster (A) demonstrated moderate improvements in well-being, anxiety reduction, and slight increases in empowerment and resilience. Cluster B, characterized by participants with higher baseline well-being and lower stigma, showed improvements in empowerment and a slight reduction in stigma, often linked to participants with clinical backgrounds, such as healthcare practitioners. Cluster C, primarily composed of participants with clinical levels of anxiety and lower baseline empowerment, exhibited significant reductions in anxiety and increases in empowerment over time.Discussion. This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the diverse outcomes associated with RC participation and highlights the importance of tailoring RC programs to meet the heterogeneous needs of learners. It also reinforces the role of empowerment as a central mechanism of change within the RC model, suggesting that empowerment fosters not only personal growth but also improved well-being and reduced stigma.
Keywords: Recovery College1, Outcome2, cluster analysis3, empowerment4, Mental Health5 English (Canada)
Received: 25 Nov 2024; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Rapisarda, Briand, Vallée, Vachon and Lefay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Catherine Briand, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.