Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Autism

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1531694

Distinct features of EEG microstates in autism spectrum disorder revealed by meta-analysis: the contribution of individual age to heterogeneity across studies

Provisionally accepted
Wei Ran Wei Ran 1,2,3*Wang Yonglu Wang Yonglu 1Fang Hui Fang Hui 1Guan Luyang Guan Luyang 1Gao Jianxing Gao Jianxing 1Xu Xinyue Xu Xinyue 1Jin Hua Jin Hua 2,3*Ke Xiaoyan Ke Xiaoyan 1*
  • 1 The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2 The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
  • 3 Suzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Suzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background and Purpose: Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstates, as quasi-stable scalp EEG spatial patterns, are characterized by their high temporal resolution, making them a potentially powerful approach for studying the function of large-scale brain networks. A substantial body of research has demonstrated that abnormalities in the function or structure of large-scale brain networks are closely related to many characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Investigating the EEG microstate features of individuals with autism can help reveal the nature of autism. To date, numerous studies have observed unique resting-state microstate patterns in individuals with autism. However, the results of these studies have not been consistent. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the differences in microstate parameters between ASD and non-autistic groups through meta-analysis and to explore the sources of research heterogeneity.Method: This meta-analysis was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42024599897) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies in English comparing EEG microstate patterns between ASD and Non-autistic groups were retrieved by database search to October 20, 2024. The meta-analysis was then conducted using RevMan5.2. Pooled results are expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). Heterogeneity (I²) and publication bias were assessed using Stata15.0.Result: Seven studies enrolling 194 ASD individuals were included, four deemed high quality and three moderate quality according to bias risk assessment. Microstate B duration and coverage were significantly greater in the pooled ASD group (duration SMD=0.83, 95%CI: 0.17-1.5; coverage SMD=0.54, 95%CI: 0.18-0.90), but heterogeneity could not be excluded. Microstate C occurrence frequency was also in the ASD group (SMD= -0.61, 95%CI: -1.08 to -0.15), and heterogeneity was significant. Sensitivity analysis revealed that only the group difference in microstate B coverage was robust. Subgroup analysis suggested that age was the main source of heterogeneity in microstate B and C coverage. Results were not affected by publication bias according to Egger's test.Future studies on the EEG microstate characteristics of ASD must control for age as an important cofounding variable.

    Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, age-dependence, EEG microstate, Meta-analysis, EEG

    Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ran, Yonglu, Hui, Luyang, Jianxing, Xinyue, Hua and Xiaoyan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Wei Ran, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
    Jin Hua, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
    Ke Xiaoyan, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more