Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry , 28 March 2025

Sec. Adolescent and Young Adult Psychiatry

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1525913

Emotional and cognitive responses to romantic breakups in adolescents and young adults: the role of rumination and coping mechanisms in life impact

  • 1Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy
  • 2Department of Psychology and Health Sciences, Pegaso University, Naples, Italy

Background: Romantic breakups can significantly impact the psychological well-being of young adults, affecting emotional, physical, and social domains. This study examines the roles of rumination and coping strategies in shaping adjustment to breakup-related distress, specifically focusing on Italian adolescents and young adults.

Methods: A sample of 560 participants aged 17 to 22 who had recently experienced a romantic breakup completed questionnaires assessing rumination, coping strategies, and perceived impacts on life domains such as academic performance, family relationships, physical health, and emotional well-being. Correlation, regression, and mediation analyses were conducted to explore the relationships between rumination, coping strategies, and adjustment outcomes.

Results: Rumination emerged as a significant predictor of negative outcomes in academic performance and physical health. Avoidance coping mediated the relationship between rumination and emotional well-being, suggesting that individuals who ruminate are more likely to adopt avoidance strategies, leading to greater emotional distress. Conversely, adaptive strategies like Positive Attitude and Problem Solving were associated with better adjustment, predicting improved academic performance and healthier family relationships.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of addressing rumination and avoidance coping in interventions aimed at supporting young adults post-breakup. Encouraging adaptive coping strategies, such as Positive Attitude and Problem Solving, could enhance resilience and mitigate the negative effects of relationship dissolution. This study contributes to a better understanding of coping processes in a culturally specific context, highlighting potential avenues for fostering resilience in youth facing emotional challenges.

Introduction

The dissolution of romantic relationships, particularly during late adolescence and early adulthood, has profound psychological implications that influence emotional well-being, cognitive processing, and social adaptation. This period is characterized by intense identity exploration, emotional regulation development, and increasing autonomy from parental influences (13). Unlike younger adolescents, who may rely heavily on peer relationships and exhibit heightened distress due to less mature coping mechanisms (4), young adults are in a transitional phase where romantic experiences become central to self-concept and future relational expectations (5). However, young adults also possess greater cognitive resources for adaptive coping strategies, allowing for potential growth and resilience following romantic dissolution (6). Given this duality, understanding how rumination and avoidance coping interact in young adults is crucial for developing targeted interventions that address their specific emotional regulation needs.

Despite extensive research on adolescent breakups, fewer studies have examined how coping mechanisms evolve as individuals transition from adolescence into young adulthood. This study fills this gap by investigating the role of rumination and avoidance coping in a sample of young adults (17-22 years), highlighting how this developmental period shapes post-breakup adjustment.

Romantic breakups are significant stressors that disrupt emotional well-being, cognitive processing, and social functioning. Research indicates that the way individuals regulate their emotions post-breakup plays a critical role in psychological recovery. Coping strategies, defined as the cognitive and behavioral efforts used to manage emotional stress (7), can be broadly categorized into adaptive (e.g., problem-solving, social support) and maladaptive (e.g., avoidance, disengagement) approaches. Emotion regulation, as conceptualized by Gross (8), involves the modulation of emotional experiences to influence their intensity, duration, and expression. While some coping strategies, such as positive reappraisal, can promote well-being, others, like avoidance, can prolong emotional distress.

A key factor influencing post-breakup adjustment is rumination, which involves repetitive and passive focus on distressing thoughts and emotions related to the breakup (9). Although rumination is often classified as an emotion regulation strategy, it is generally maladaptive, as it fails to resolve distress and can reinforce negative thought cycles. Importantly, research suggests that individuals who ruminate excessively are more likely to engage in avoidance coping (10), a pattern that can further hinder emotional adjustment. According to the cognitive-avoidance model, excessive rumination may lead individuals to rely on avoidance as a temporary escape from distressing emotions, delaying emotional processing and exacerbating negative psychological outcomes.

Despite the growing body of research on post-breakup adjustment, there remains a need to better understand how specific cognitive and behavioral coping mechanisms influence emotional well-being following romantic dissolution. This study aims to address this gap by examining the interplay between rumination, coping strategies, and emotional outcomes in young Italian adults.

Breakups during this stage are frequently associated with psychological distress, including heightened sadness, anxiety, and diminished self-worth (1115). Research indicates that young adults who experience relationship dissolution often engage in rumination and self-doubt, which can prolong negative emotional states and increase vulnerability to depression (12, 1619). Among these, rumination, defined as the repetitive and passive focus on negative emotions related to the breakup, has been strongly associated with prolonged emotional distress and impaired psychological adjustment (9).

Coping strategies also play a crucial role in shaping post-breakup recovery. These strategies can be broadly categorized into adaptive (e.g., problem-solving, positive reframing) and maladaptive (e.g., avoidance, emotional disengagement) responses (20). While problem-focused coping is linked to positive adjustment, avoidance strategies, such as withdrawal, denial, or distraction, may prolong emotional distress by preventing effective emotional processing (21).

Despite extensive research on the emotional consequences of breakups, less attention has been paid to the interplay between rumination and specific coping mechanisms, particularly avoidance, in shaping emotional well-being. Existing studies have largely focused on Western, individualistic contexts, whereas the influence of collectivist cultural dynamics, such as those in Italy, remains underexplored.

This study addresses these gaps by examining the role of coping strategies in moderating the effects of rumination on post-breakup adjustment. Specifically, we explore how avoidance mediates the relationship between rumination and emotional distress, offering insights into the mechanisms underlying post-breakup recovery. By focusing on an Italian adolescent and young adult sample, this study contributes a culturally specific perspective to the literature on coping and romantic dissolution.

Given the strong familial and social ties characteristic of Italian culture, breakup distress may be amplified by social expectations and familial involvement (4, 16).

Individual differences play a critical role in determining the emotional aftermath of a breakup. Attachment theory suggests that individuals with insecure attachment styles experience more intense grief and maladaptive coping behaviors, whereas those with higher self-esteem and secure attachment demonstrate greater emotional resilience and personal growth post-breakup (2, 6, 16, 22). A key factor in post-breakup distress is the extent to which self-worth is contingent on the relationship, individuals who derive their self-esteem from romantic involvement tend to experience greater emotional turmoil upon relationship dissolution (16, 23).

Cognitive mechanisms also shape how individuals process and recover from breakups. Maladaptive cognitive responses, such as obsessive thoughts about an ex-partner or persistent attempts at reconciliation, can significantly hinder emotional adjustment (1, 24). Studies suggest that rumination, or repetitive negative thinking about the relationship, is linked to delayed emotional recovery and prolonged psychological distress (12, 25). In contemporary digital contexts, social media platforms have become a crucial factor in the post-breakup experience, offering both opportunities for connection and sources of distress. While social media allows individuals to maintain broader social ties, it also facilitates continued surveillance of an ex-partner, reinforcing ruminative thinking patterns and emotional distress (2628). Thus, this study does not focus solely on social media effects but rather investigates broader emotional and cognitive processes, including rumination and coping strategies. Research has shown that prolonged exposure to an ex-partner’s online presence may exacerbate sadness, fuel comparisons, and impede emotional detachment, ultimately delaying psychological recovery (29).

The developmental stage of adolescence introduces additional complexities to post-breakup emotional adjustment. Adolescents, who are still forming their coping strategies and interpersonal identities, are particularly vulnerable to relationship loss, as romantic experiences play a significant role in social belonging and emotional security (4, 30). Relationship dissolution during adolescence may lead to heightened loneliness and social isolation, both of which are associated with increased mental health risks (31, 32). Social support plays a crucial role in buffering against the emotional distress associated with romantic breakups. However, the perceived quality of support, rather than its mere availability, determines whether individuals benefit from it. Higher perceived support quality is expected to enhance adaptive coping strategies (e.g., problem-solving, positive attitude), whereas lower perceived support may contribute to maladaptive responses (e.g., avoidance, rumination). The availability of social and familial support systems influences how adolescents navigate post-breakup distress. Supportive family environments and strong peer relationships serve as protective factors that help mitigate the negative psychological effects of breakups, while emotionally distant or conflict-ridden family dynamics may contribute to worsened emotional outcomes (4).

Cultural factors further shape coping mechanisms and emotional responses to romantic breakups. In the Italian cultural context, close-knit family bonds provide strong emotional support, yet they may also intensify feelings of loss and rumination due to familial expectations and social norms. Research indicates that in collectivist-leaning cultures, where interdependence and family involvement play a central role in personal decision-making, individuals may experience greater internalized pressure following a breakup, contributing to increased emotional distress and self-doubt (4, 16). This dynamic can exacerbate rumination, particularly when young adults feel their breakup is negatively perceived by family members or when coping mechanisms are not yet fully developed (12, 25). Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing effective coping strategies and interventions to assist individuals in navigating the emotional challenges associated with breakups.

Despite extensive research on the emotional consequences of breakups, fewer studies have examined how specific coping mechanisms influence the relationship between rumination and post-breakup adjustment. This study addresses this gap by investigating whether coping strategies serve as mediators in this relationship, with a specific focus on the role of avoidance coping in exacerbating emotional distress and adaptive strategies in facilitating emotional recovery. By exploring these pathways, this study contributes to a better understanding of how cognitive and behavioral responses shape emotional well-being following romantic dissolution.

Objectives of the study

This study aims to deepen the understanding of how young Italian adults adjust to romantic breakups by examining the interplay between cognitive and behavioral responses. Specifically, the objectives are: (1) To assess the relationship between rumination and perceived impacts of a romantic breakup across key life domains, including academic performance, family relationships, physical health, and emotional well-being. By analyzing these associations, the study seeks to clarify the extent to which ruminative thought patterns contribute to prolonged emotional and physical distress post-breakup. (2) To examine how coping strategies, both adaptive and maladaptive, mediate the relationship between rumination and post-breakup adjustment, assessing their influence on emotional distress. The study focuses on how strategies like Positive Attitude, Problem Solving, and Avoidance shape individuals’ experiences following relationship dissolution, offering insights into which strategies may alleviate or exacerbate emotional difficulties. (3) To examine the role of perceived support quality in shaping young adults’ post-breakup adjustment, testing its association with both positive and negative coping mechanisms. (4) To evaluate the mediating role of Avoidance Strategies in the link between rumination and mental health outcomes. By testing this mediation, the study aims to understand whether avoidance serves as a coping mechanism that intensifies the negative impact of rumination on mental health, thus identifying potential areas for therapeutic intervention.

By exploring these objectives, this research seeks to provide insight into how young individuals process romantic losses and which factors might mitigate or exacerbate the adjustment period.

Methods

Participants

The study sample consisted of 560 Italian adolescents and young adults, aged between 17 and 22 years (M = 18.71, SD = .87), who had experienced a romantic breakup within the past two years. Participants reported their educational background, relationship history, and details of the breakup, including the duration of the relationship, time elapsed since the breakup, and whether they or their partner initiated the separation. These demographic characteristics were collected to provide context and enable stratification of responses. The sample was composed of 258 males (46%) and 302 females (54%), recruited through online and social media platforms targeting young adults. The inclusion criterion was having experienced the dissolution of a romantic relationship, regardless of the duration of the relationship or the time elapsed since the breakup. A priori power analysis was conducted using GPower (33) to ensure the study had adequate statistical power for detecting effects in multiple regression and mediation analyses. Details of the power analysis are provided in the Data Analysis section.

Procedure

Data collection was conducted over a period of four months (between March 2022 and June 2022), leveraging both online platforms and in-person recruitment to ensure a diverse and representative sample. Participants were recruited from various Italian high schools, universities, and community centers, as well as through social media channels. To participate, individuals had to meet the following criteria: aged between 17 and 22, having experienced a romantic breakup within the past two years, and providing informed consent. Upon agreeing to participate, each individual was directed to an online survey hosted on a secure platform. This platform (Questbase) was chosen for its compliance with data protection regulations, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity. Participants first read a comprehensive information sheet outlining the purpose of the study, confidentiality measures, and their right to withdraw at any time without consequence. Consent was obtained electronically, and participants confirmed their understanding and acceptance of the terms before proceeding. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Cassino and Southern Lazio approved all study protocols to ensure adherence to ethical research standards (IRB_SUSS 23: 09-02-22). The survey was designed to take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete. To reduce potential response biases, participants were assured of the anonymity of their responses and encouraged to answer as honestly as possible. After survey completion, participants had the option to provide their contact information if they wished to receive a summary of the study’s findings; however, this information was stored separately from survey data to maintain anonymity. For data quality, the survey platform incorporated features such as automatic data saving, allowing participants to complete the survey in multiple sessions if needed. Responses were screened for completeness, and only fully completed surveys were included in the final analysis.

Tools

Breakup context and circumstances questionnaire

It was designed to assess the perceived impact of a romantic breakup across four key domains: academic performance, family relations, physical health, and emotional well-being. Participants rated the extent to which their breakup affected each domain using a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (no impact) to 5 (severe impact). Example items from this questionnaire include: “How did the breakup affect your ability to concentrate on academic tasks?” and “To what extent did the breakup impact your relationships with family members?”. The indices for the four domains were created based on theoretical conceptualization rather than exploratory factor analysis. Each domain was treated as a distinct subscale, and internal consistency was assessed. The BCCQ yielded a total Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84, with subscale reliabilities as follows: Academic Performance Impact: α = 0.79; Family Relations Impact: α = 0.76; Physical Health Impact: α = 0.81; Emotional Well-being Impact: α = 0.85. Inter-correlations among these domains were moderate (ranging from 0.30 to 0.55), supporting their related yet distinct nature. The BCCQ primarily captures perceived negative consequences of the breakup rather than resilience, with higher scores indicating greater disruption.

Perceived support quality

It was assessed using a 4-item scale adapted from Feeney and Collins (34), measuring participants’ satisfaction with the emotional and instrumental support received from friends, family, and peers following the breakup. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Low, 5 = Very High), with higher scores indicating a greater perception of support availability and effectiveness. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.87).

Coping orientation to problems experienced - new Italian version

To assess the coping strategies used by participants after the breakup, we administered the COPE-NVI, an Italian adaptation of the original COPE questionnaire developed by Carver et al. (20) and validated for the Italian context by Sica et al. (35). The COPE-NVI includes five dimensions: Social Support (measures the tendency to seek emotional and instrumental support from others. Example item: “I seek moral support from friends and relatives”), Avoidance Strategies (assesses behaviors aimed at evading the stressor or associated emotions. Example item: “I admit to myself that I can’t deal with it, and quit trying”), Positive Attitude (evaluates the inclination to adopt a positive outlook and reinterpret stressful events constructively. Example item: “I try to learn something good from experience”), Problem Solving (measures active efforts to address and resolve the problem causing stress. Example item: “I focus on dealing with this problem, and if necessary, I put other things aside”), and Turning to Religion (assesses the tendency to seek comfort and guidance through religious or spiritual means. Example item: “I try to find comfort in my religion”). Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = “not at all”, 4 = “very often”). This tool demonstrated within our present sample good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha values. The reliability values for the COPE-NVI dimensions in our study were as follows: Avoidance Strategies: α = 0.71; Positive Attitude: α = 0.74; Problem Solving: α = 0.79; Social Support: α = 0.91; Turning to Religion: α = 0.75.

Ruminative response scale

To measure participants’ levels of rumination, we administered the Ruminative Response Scale (36, 37). The RRS is a 22-item questionnaire assessing individuals’ tendencies to engage in ruminative thought patterns, particularly during periods of emotional distress. Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = “never”, 4 = “always”), with items exploring self-focused rumination (e.g., “You write down what you are thinking and analyze it”) and negative mood-related ruminative responses (e.g., “You think about how sad you feel”). The RRS demonstrated high reliability within this sample (Cronbach’s alpha = .95).

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS (v. 27) with an alpha level set at.05. Mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro for SPSS (38, Model 4), which allows for bootstrapped confidence intervals to estimate indirect effects. An a priori power analysis was performed using GPower (33) to determine the required sample size for detecting significant effects in regression and mediation models. Assuming a medium effect size (f² = 0.15), an alpha level of 0.05, and a desired power of 0.80, the required sample size was approximately 85 participants. With an actual sample size of 560 participants, the study was well-powered to detect even smaller effect sizes (f² as low as 0.02), enhancing the reliability of findings across both regression and mediation analyses. Initial descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were conducted to examine the relationships among rumination, coping strategies, and perceived impacts of the breakup across life domains (academic performance, family relations, physical and emotional well-being). Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive power of rumination and coping strategies on the perceived impact of the breakup. To assess whether coping strategies mediated the relationship between rumination and the perceived impact of the breakup, a mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro in SPSS (Model 4). The following statistical assumptions and preconditions were evaluated to ensure the validity of the multiple regression and mediation analyses. Scatterplots and partial regression plots were used to examine the linearity of relationships between the independent variables (rumination and coping strategies) and the outcome variables (perceived impacts on academic performance, family relations, health, and emotional well-being). The plots indicated approximately linear relationships, fulfilling the linearity assumption required for multiple regression. Normality of residuals was assessed through the Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q plots. With the larger sample size of 560, the residuals approximated a normal distribution closely, in line with the Central Limit Theorem (39). This supports the assumption of normality, even with minor deviations. The assumption of homoscedasticity was tested by examining scatterplots of residuals versus predicted values. The plots showed a relatively even spread of residuals across predicted values, suggesting that the assumption of homoscedasticity was met. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values were calculated to assess the independence of predictor variables. All VIF values were below the threshold of 5, indicating no multicollinearity issues and confirming that each predictor uniquely contributed to the models. The Durbin-Watson statistic was calculated to check for independence of residuals, yielding a value close to 2.0. This indicated that the residuals were uncorrelated, supporting the assumption of error independence. For the mediation analysis, the conditions outlined by Baron and Kenny (40) were checked. The initial regression confirmed a significant relationship between rumination (independent variable) and mental health impact (dependent variable). Rumination also showed a significant association with the mediator (Avoidance Strategies), and Avoidance Strategies were significantly related to mental health outcomes, validating the conditions required for conducting mediation analysis.

Results

Descriptive statistics

The sample consisted of 46% male and 54% female participants, with a mean age of 18.7 years (SD = 0.9), ranging from 17 to 22 years. The average duration of relationships prior to the breakup was 10.2 months (SD = 5.5), suggesting a mix of short- to mid-term relationships. On average, participants reported that their breakup occurred an average of 7.5 months prior to the study (SD = 4.2). Given the study’s focus on rumination and coping, it is important to note that prolonged emotional distress was common, with 62% of participants experiencing significant negative emotions (e.g., sadness, heartache, anger) for up to three months. Rumination, a key variable in our analysis, persisted for over six months in 12% of participants, suggesting that persistent cognitive engagement with the breakup is a frequent post-dissolution phenomenon that may influence coping strategy selection. A gender comparison indicated that women reported significantly higher levels of rumination (M = 3.5, SD = 0.7) compared to men (M = 3.0, SD = 0.6), t(558) = 4.12, p <.001. No significant gender differences emerged for avoidance strategies or social support use (p >.05).

Participants differed in their use of coping strategies, with Social Support being more frequently employed than Avoidance Strategies, F(2, 558) = 6.32, p <.01. Pairwise comparisons revealed that participants who scored higher on rumination were significantly more likely to engage in Avoidance Strategies than those with lower rumination scores, t(558) = 2.89, p <.01. These findings suggest that reliance on Avoidance may serve as a maladaptive response in individuals with higher cognitive preoccupation post-breakup. Moreover, 48% of participants responded to the breakup by seeking external distractions, 21% leaned emotionally on friends, and 11% chose to focus on sports.

Overall, 44% acknowledged that, at the time of assessment, they felt the past relationship still influenced their lives in some way, with 3% perceiving this influence as very significant. Twenty-four percent of participants believe that the past relationship negatively affects their current academic performance to a moderate degree, while 13% consider this impact to be high. For 29%, the ended relationship continues to influence their family interactions, with 6% reporting that this influence is very evident. Sixty-three percent said the breakup had significantly impacted their friendships, with 5% considering these changes very extensive. Forty-seven percent stated that the previous breakup has significantly affected their current ability to establish romantic relationships with a sense of security and peace of mind. For 15%, the previous experience heavily impacts their relational capacity. Twenty-three percent reported that the effects of the breakup also currently involve health-related aspects (e.g., body weight, sleep quality, somatization), with 9% describing these negative effects as significant. Beyond emotional and cognitive impacts, 66% of participants reported some lifestyle adjustments post-breakup, with 10% indicating substantial changes. While these shifts may reflect broader identity reevaluations following relationship dissolution, their direct influence on coping strategies remains an area for further study.

Table 1 shows the means and standard deviations for the primary variables of interest, including rumination, coping strategies as measured by the COPE-NVI subscales, and the perceived impact of the breakup on academic performance, family relations, physical health, emotional wellbeing, and perceived support quality.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for key variables.

The Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) yielded a mean score of 3.1 (SD = 0.8), indicating a moderate to high level of rumination among participants. Among coping strategies, Social Support (M = 2.9, SD = 0.7) and Positive Attitude (M = 3.0, SD = 0.6) had the highest mean scores, suggesting that participants frequently relied on these adaptive strategies. Avoidance Strategies scored lower on average (M = 2.2, SD = 0.6), reflecting less frequent use of this coping mechanism. Turning to Religion (M = 2.5, SD = 0.75) was also assessed among participants, though it was used less frequently compared to Social Support and Positive Attitude. Despite its relatively lower mean score, this coping strategy may still play a role in the emotional adjustment process for certain individuals, particularly those with strong religious beliefs. Participants rated the emotional toll of the breakup on a 5-point scale, yielding a high mean score of 4.0 (SD = 0.8). This suggests that most participants experienced the breakup as emotionally taxing, indicating significant emotional distress associated with the dissolution of their relationships. Participants also reported their satisfaction with the social support received from friends and family following the breakup on a 4-point scale, with a mean score of 3.2 (SD = 0.7). This indicates a generally positive perception of the support received, suggesting that social networks played an important role in their adjustment process post-breakup.

Correlation analysis

Table 2 presents the correlation matrix among key study variables, including rumination (Ruminative Response Scale, RRS), the COPE subscales (Social Support, Avoidance Strategies, Positive Attitude, Problem Solving, Turning to Religion), and the perceived impacts of the breakup on academic performance, family relationships, physical health, and emotional well-being, as well as perceived support quality.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Correlation matrix of key variables.

The analysis indicates that rumination is positively correlated with the impact on emotional well-being (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), physical health (r = 0.45, p < 0.01), and academic performance (r = -0.50, p < 0.01). This suggests that higher levels of rumination are associated with a more intense negative effects from the breakup in these areas. Rumination is also positively correlated with avoidance strategies (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), indicating that individuals prone to rumination are also more likely to employ avoidance strategies, potentially reflecting a cycle where rumination leads to avoidance, contributing to greater emotional difficulties.

Social support shows a significant positive correlation with positive attitude (r = 0.40, p < 0.01) and problem-solving (r = 0.35, p < 0.01), suggesting that those who seek support are also inclined to use more adaptive coping strategies. Social support is positively correlated with impact on family relations (r = -0.25, p < 0.05) and academic performance (r = -0.30, p < 0.05), indicating that individuals who seek support may experience greater resilience in these domains.

Avoidance strategies are positively correlated with impact on physical health (r = -0.40, p < 0.01) and emotional well-being (r = -0.50, p < 0.01), suggesting that avoidance coping is associated with emotional and physical difficulties post-breakup. Consistently, avoidance strategies are negatively correlated with impact on academic performance (r = -0.45, p < 0.01) and family relations (r = -0.35, p < 0.05), implying that increased reliance on avoidance may hinder adjustment in these areas.

Positive attitude shows a negative correlation with rumination (r = -0.30, p < 0.01), suggesting that a positive outlook may protect against repetitive negative thinking. Positive attitude is also positively correlated with impact on academic performance (r = 0.25, p < 0.05) and family relations (r = 0.20, p > 0.05), implying that maintaining a positive outlook may facilitate adjustment post-breakup.

Problem-solving is positively associated with social support (r = 0.35, p < 0.01) and positive attitude (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), suggesting that individuals who favor problem-solving approaches are also more likely to seek support and maintain a constructive perspective. Problem-solving is positively correlated with impact on academic performance (r = 0.20, p > 0.05) and family relations (r = 0.15, p > 0.05), indicating that those who engage in problem-solving may perceive fewer negative impacts in daily activities and relationships.

Turning to religion shows a positive correlation with avoidance strategies (r = 0.25, p < 0.05), suggesting that individuals who engage in religious coping may also be inclined toward avoidance behaviors. However, turning to religion does not show significant correlations with other coping strategies or impact areas, indicating that its role in adjustment post-breakup may be more complex and warrants further investigation.

Perceived support quality exhibits a strong positive correlation with social support (r = 0.60, p < 0.01), indicating that individuals who perceive higher quality support are more likely to seek and utilize social support resources. Perceived support quality is positively correlated with positive attitude (r = 0.45, p < 0.01) and problem-solving (r = 0.40, p < 0.01), suggesting that perceiving support as high-quality is associated with the adoption of adaptive coping strategies. Conversely, perceived support quality is negatively correlated with rumination (r = -0.35, p < 0.01) and avoidance strategies (r = -0.25, p < 0.05), implying that high-quality perceived support may mitigate maladaptive coping mechanisms.

Gender differences emerged in the correlation analysis, particularly in relation to rumination and coping strategies. Consistent with prior research (9), gender was significantly correlated with rumination (r = 0.30, p <.01), indicating that women reported higher levels of ruminative thinking than men. Similarly, gender showed a small but significant association with avoidance strategies (r = 0.20, p <.05), suggesting that women may be slightly more inclined to engage in avoidance-based coping post-breakup. Gender also correlated positively with turning to religion (r = 0.20, p <.05) and emotional well-being impact (r = 0.25, p <.05), indicating that women were more likely to use religious coping and report a greater emotional impact of the breakup. A notable gender difference also emerged for Perceived Support Quality (r = 0.26, p <.01), with women reporting significantly higher perceived emotional and instrumental support from their social networks than men. This finding aligns with prior research suggesting that women tend to seek and receive more social support in response to stressors (41). No significant gender differences emerged for social support, problem-solving, or positive attitude (p >.05), suggesting that these adaptive strategies were used similarly across genders. These findings reinforce previous literature on gendered emotional regulation patterns, particularly the greater tendency for women to engage in ruminative processing and emotional reactivity following relationship dissolution.

These findings underscore the importance of perceived support quality in influencing coping strategies and adjustment outcomes following a breakup. Interventions aimed at enhancing the quality of perceived support may promote the use of adaptive coping mechanisms, thereby facilitating better emotional and physical well-being during the adjustment process. These results suggest that rumination and avoidance strategies are associated with greater distress, with negative impacts on emotional well-being, physical health, and academic performance. In contrast, adaptive coping strategies, such as social support, positive attitude, and problem-solving, appear to improve post-breakup adjustment and promote resilience. These findings underscore the importance of encouraging the adoption of positive coping strategies and highlight the crucial role of social support in helping young people manage the emotional challenges associated with romantic separations.

Regression analysis

A multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictive power of rumination and key coping strategies (Positive Attitude, Problem Solving, Avoidance Strategies) on the perceived impact of the breakup across various life domains, including academic performance, family relations, physical health, and emotional well-being. The selection of coping strategies was based on theoretical models of adaptive and maladaptive coping (8, 20) and prior empirical findings linking these specific strategies to post-breakup adjustment (9). Other coping mechanisms, such as social support and religious coping, were initially examined but did not show significant predictive power in exploratory analyses and were thus excluded from the final regression models. Emotional Well-Being Impact was assessed as a self-reported measure of the emotional consequences of the breakup. Higher scores indicate greater subjective distress and negative emotional adjustment. This variable was used as the dependent variable in the mediation models and regression analyses.

Results showed that rumination was a significant predictor of negative impacts on academic performance (β = .45, p <.01, R² = .22, F(3, 556) = 19.87, p <.001) and physical health (β = .48, p <.01, R² = .18, F(3, 556) = 16.42, p <.001), indicating that higher levels of rumination were associated with greater reported difficulties in these areas. Similarly, avoidance coping predicted greater emotional distress (β = .41, p <.01, R² = .24, F(3, 556) = 21.63, p <.001), while positive attitude and problem-solving were linked to improved outcomes in academic performance and family relations, respectively. These findings suggest that while rumination and avoidance coping contribute to greater psychological distress, adaptive strategies such as problem-solving and positive attitude may serve as protective factors.

On the other hand, Positive Attitude was a significant predictor of better adjustment in academic performance (β = .33, p <.05), and Problem Solving was significantly associated with better outcomes in family relations (β = .29, p <.05). These findings suggest that more adaptive coping strategies, such as maintaining a positive attitude and using problem-solving techniques, contribute to more favorable outcomes in specific areas affected by the breakup. Below is the Table 3 summarizing these regression results. These findings underscore the role of adaptive coping strategies in mitigating the negative effects of relationship dissolution and highlight areas where interventions might focus to improve young people’s resilience post-breakup.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Multiple regression analysis predicting impact of breakup across life domains.

Mediation analysis

A mediation analysis was conducted to determine whether coping strategies (specifically, Avoidance Strategies) mediated the relationship between rumination and the perceived impact of the breakup on emotional well-being. The purpose of this analysis was to understand if the tendency to ruminate led individuals to engage in avoidance coping, which, in turn, intensified emotional difficulties after the breakup. Using Avoidance Strategies as the mediator between rumination and emotional outcomes, the analysis revealed the following key results:

Direct Effect of Rumination on emotional Well-being: Rumination had a significant direct effect on emotional outcomes, indicating that higher levels of rumination were associated with more negative impact on emotional Well-being (β = .35, p <.01).

Indirect Effect through Avoidance Strategies: The indirect path, where rumination predicted Avoidance Strategies, which in turn predicted emotional impact, was also significant. The indirect effect was β = .19, p <.05, indicating a partial mediation. This suggests that while rumination has a direct and negative impact on emotional well-being, part of its effect is mediated through an increased likelihood of engaging in avoidance coping.

Total Effect: The total effect of rumination on emotional distress (considering both the direct and indirect paths) was significant (β = .54, p <.01), reinforcing that rumination is a strong predictor of emotional difficulties post-breakup, with Avoidance Strategies amplifying this relationship.

Individuals who engage in rumination are more likely to adopt avoidance coping, which compounds the negative impact on their emotional well-being. This finding highlights the importance of addressing both ruminative thinking and avoidance coping in interventions aimed at reducing distress following a breakup, as targeting these factors may mitigate their combined effect. This analysis underscores the intertwined role of cognitive and coping mechanisms in influencing post-breakup adjustment and suggests that interventions fostering healthier coping styles could lessen the emotional toll associated with relationship dissolution.

Discussion

This study provides important insights into how rumination and coping strategies influence young adults’ adaptation to romantic breakups, a significant life transition often marked by emotional distress and personal upheaval. By focusing on an Italian sample, this research also highlights cultural factors that may shape coping responses and emotional processing in the context of relationship dissolution.

The findings underscore rumination as a prominent predictor of negative adjustment outcomes. Higher levels of rumination were linked with worse outcomes in academic performance and physical health, suggesting that persistent negative thoughts following a breakup may hinder functioning in multiple areas of life. These findings are consistent with extensive literature linking rumination to heightened anxiety, depression, and impaired cognitive functioning (9, 42). By repeatedly focusing on the causes and consequences of the breakup, individuals may find it more difficult to concentrate, meet academic demands, and maintain their physical health. This cognitive drain may exacerbate feelings of loss, perpetuating a cycle of emotional turmoil and distress (4348). Consistent with prior research (9), our findings indicate that women exhibit higher rumination levels than men. This suggests that gender-specific interventions may be warranted, particularly in fostering cognitive restructuring strategies for female participants experiencing persistent negative thoughts post-breakup.

The study found that Avoidance Strategies partially mediated the impact of rumination on emotional well-being. This mediation suggests that rumination not only affects emotional distress directly but also increases the likelihood of engaging in avoidance behaviors, which can deepen emotional difficulties. The use of avoidance as a coping strategy has long been associated with negative mental health outcomes, as it prevents individuals from fully processing and adapting to challenging experiences (21, 49). Instead of promoting emotional recovery, avoidance may temporarily alleviate distress while ultimately intensifying unresolved emotions over time. These findings underscore the role of avoidance in prolonging post-breakup distress, particularly when combined with ruminative thought patterns.

On the other hand, Positive Attitude and Problem-Solving coping strategies were positively associated with more favorable outcomes, such as improved academic performance and healthier family relations. These results align with resilience and positive psychology frameworks, which emphasize the role of constructive coping in facilitating emotional recovery and personal growth (20, 50). A Positive Attitude may help individuals reframe the breakup as a growth opportunity, enhancing their resilience and reducing the intensity of negative emotions. Similarly, a problem-solving orientation allows individuals to confront challenges head-on, fostering healthier social interactions and improving relational outcomes within family dynamics (5153).

The current findings extend the understanding of cognitive-behavioral models of distress by illustrating how rumination and avoidance contribute to a maladaptive feedback loop. The combination of ruminative and avoidant coping may obstruct the adaptive processing of emotional experiences, leading to sustained emotional and physical health impacts (54). This research reinforces the need for integrated theoretical models that account for the interplay between cognitive and behavioral coping mechanisms, particularly in emotionally charged contexts such as romantic breakups (55, 56).

The findings suggest that cultural dynamics, particularly the strong familial ties characteristic of Italian culture, may play a role in shaping coping strategies (57, 58). However, as this study did not directly compare different cultural contexts or control for cultural variables, further research is needed to determine the extent to which these influences are distinct from broader individual differences in coping responses (34, 59, 60). While previous studies (61) have also explored mediation models in the context of rumination and coping strategies post-breakup, our study provides new insights by examining avoidance coping as a mediator between rumination and emotional well-being in young adults. In contrast to earlier work, which primarily focused on direct associations between coping mechanisms and distress, our findings underscore the indirect effects of rumination through avoidance, highlighting the complex interactions between cognitive and behavioral responses in the aftermath of relationship dissolution.

Practical implications for intervention

The study’s findings point to practical implications for mental health support aimed at young adults coping with relationship dissolution. Given the role of rumination in exacerbating emotional distress, interventions could benefit from integrating mindfulness-based techniques and cognitive-behavioral strategies to help individuals break the cycle of repetitive negative thinking (6264). Techniques such as mindfulness meditation, cognitive restructuring, and acceptance-based approaches may empower individuals to address negative thoughts without becoming absorbed in them, fostering a more balanced emotional response (65).

Addressing Avoidance Strategies in therapeutic contexts could be instrumental in promoting adaptive coping. Programs that focus on emotional processing and exposure-based interventions may help individuals engage with and process their emotions rather than deflecting them. This shift away from avoidance could facilitate emotional growth and resilience, enabling individuals to confront and adapt to their feelings of loss (66, 67).

Educational institutions, particularly universities, are well-positioned to provide resources and workshops on healthy coping strategies for relationship stress, as many young adults experience breakups during this period. Initiatives such as peer support programs, group therapy, and psychoeducational workshops could provide students with the tools needed to cope effectively, fostering both academic success and emotional well-being (5, 68). Encouraging the development of adaptive strategies like Positive Attitude and Problem Solving could also prepare young adults for other life transitions, making resilience training an invaluable component of student services.

The pervasive use of social media also complicates emotional recovery post-breakup. Adolescents often engage in online surveillance of their ex-partners, a behavior that can prolong emotional distress and hinder the adjustment process (69, 70). Such activities reinforce cycles of rumination and may amplify feelings of inadequacy, further delaying recovery (26, 29). Practical interventions should address this by promoting digital detox strategies and educating adolescents on the emotional risks associated with excessive online monitoring. Digital literacy programs could help individuals navigate social media use responsibly and reduce its emotional toll post-breakup (71, 72).

Limitations and future research directions

This study has certain limitations that warrant consideration. First, the use of a cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw conclusions about causality. Longitudinal studies would allow researchers to assess how coping strategies and mental health outcomes evolve over time, providing insight into whether certain coping patterns change or stabilize following a breakup.

While time since breakup is often associated with emotional recovery, it was not included as a predictor in the regression analyses due to its relatively uniform distribution across participants and its non-significant correlations with coping outcomes in exploratory analyses. However, future research may benefit from a longitudinal design to assess changes in emotional adaptation over time.

The sample was limited to Italian adolescents and young adults, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings to other cultural settings. Cultural expectations and norms likely shape individuals’ experiences and coping mechanisms, suggesting that these relationships might vary in different cultural contexts. Future research should aim to explore these dynamics cross-culturally to determine whether similar patterns of rumination, avoidance, and adaptive coping emerge.

Self-report data, while valuable for capturing subjective experiences, may also introduce biases such as social desirability and recall limitations. To complement self-report measures, future studies might incorporate observational or physiological assessments of coping behaviors and stress responses, which could yield a more comprehensive understanding of the coping process.

Although data on the duration of the relationship and the time elapsed since the breakup were collected and reported in the descriptive statistics, these variables were not included in the primary analysis. This represents a limitation, as both factors could significantly influence participants’ emotional responses and coping mechanisms. A further potential limitation of this study is that we did not assess whether participants had moved on to new romantic relationships or experienced additional breakups during the two-year timeframe considered. Future studies should consider incorporating these variables into the analysis to better understand their impact on post-breakup adjustment.

Conclusion

In this study, we examined the coping strategies employed by young adults following romantic breakups and their effects on various life domains. Our findings indicate that rumination is significantly associated with negative impacts on academic performance and physical health, while avoidance strategies correlate with diminished emotional well-being. Conversely, positive attitude and problem-solving approaches are linked to improved academic performance and family relations, respectively. These results underscore the importance of promoting adaptive coping mechanisms to mitigate the adverse effects of relationship dissolution among young adults. Unlike prior studies, which primarily focus on individual-level predictors, this study suggests that broader social and cultural dynamics may also play a role in shaping post-breakup adjustment. Future research should continue to explore these factors in cross-cultural contexts.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional review board of the University of Cassino. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

SM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FB: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. PD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The authors declare that financial support was received for the publication of this article, funded with the contribution of the Italian Ministry of University and Research pursuant to D.D. No. 1159 of July 23, 2023 – PROBEN Call.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Cupach WR, Spitzberg BH, Bolingbroke CM, Tellitocci BS. Persistence of attempts to reconcile a terminated romantic relationship: a partial test of relational goal pursuit theory. Communication Rep. (2011) 24:99–115. doi: 10.1080/08934215.2011.613737

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Norona JC, Scharf M, Welsh DP, Shulman S. Predicting post-breakup distress and growth in emerging adulthood: the roles of relationship satisfaction and emotion regulation. J Adolescence. (2018) 63:191–3. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.01.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect. (2007) 1:68–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chen P, Harris K. Association of positive family relationships with mental health trajectories from adolescence to midlife. JAMA Pediatr. (2019) 173:e193336. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Acolin J, Cadigan JM, Fleming CB, Rhew IC, Lee CM. Trajectory of depressive symptoms in the context of romantic relationship breakup: characterizing the “natural course“ of response and recovery in young adults. Emerging Adulthood. (2023) 11:1211–22. doi: 10.1177/21676968231184922

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Waller K, MacDonald T. Trait self-esteem moderates the effect of initiator status on emotional and cognitive responses to romantic relationship dissolution. J Pers. (2010) 78:1271–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00650.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company (1984).

Google Scholar

8. Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Rev Gen Psychol (1998) 2(3):271–99. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspect psychol Sci. (2008) 3:400–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Borkovec TD, Alcaine OM, Behar E. “Avoidance theory of worry and generalized anxiety disorder”. In: Heimberg RG, Turk CL, Mennin DS, editors. Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice. Guilford Press (2004). p. 77–108.

Google Scholar

11. Mason A, Law R, Bryan A, Portley R, Sbarra D. Facing a breakup: electromyographic responses moderate self-concept recovery following a romantic separation. Pers Relat. (2011) 19:551–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01378.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Saffrey C, Ehrenberg M. When thinking hurts: attachment, rumination, and postrelationship adjustment. Pers Relat. (2007) 14:351–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00160.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Sbarra D, Emery R. The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Pers Relat. (2005) 12:213–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00112.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Armeli S, Hamilton HR, Hammen C, Tennen H. Romantic relationship status, stress, and maturing out of problematic drinking. Psychol Addictive Behav. (2022) 36:44–53. doi: 10.1037/adb0000698

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Davis D, Shaver PR, Vernon ML. Physical, emotional, and behavioral reactions to breaking up: the roles of gender, age, emotional involvement, and attachment style. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. (2003) 29:871–84. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029007006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Park L, Sanchez D, Brynildsen K. Maladaptive responses to relationship dissolution: the role of relationship contingent self-worth. J Appl Soc Psychol. (2011) 41:1749–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00769.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Diotaiuti P, Valente G, Mancone S, Girelli L, Cavicchiolo E, Chirico A. Validation study of the Italian brief version of the multidimensional jealousy scale: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender, and convergent validity. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:1013584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013584

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Diotaiuti P, Valente G, Mancone S, Grambone A, Chirico A. Metric goodness and measurement invariance of the italian brief version of interpersonal reactivity index: A study with young adults. Front Psychol (2021) 12:773363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Diotaiuti P, Valente G, Mancone S, Grambone A, Chirico A, Lucidi F. The use of the decision regret scale in non-clinical contexts. Front Psychol (2022) 13:945669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945669

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1989) 56:267–83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2010) 30:217–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Heshmati R, Zemestani M, Vujanovic A. Associations of childhood maltreatment and attachment styles with romantic breakup grief severity: the role of emotional suppression. J Interpersonal Violence. (2021) 37:NP11883–NP11904. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997438

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Park Y, Impett E, Spielmann S, Joel S, MacDonald G. Lack of intimacy prospectively predicts breakup. Soc psychol Pers Sci. (2020) 12:442–51. doi: 10.1177/1948550620929499

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Perilloux C, Buss D. Breaking up romantic relationships: costs experienced and coping strategies deployed. Evolutionary Psychol. (2008) 6(1):164–81. doi: 10.1177/147470490800600119

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ceglarek P, Darbes L, Stephenson R, Bauermeister J. Breakup-related appraisals and the psychological well-being of young adult gay and bisexual men. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. (2017) 21:256–74. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2017.1293579

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Fox J, Tokunaga R. Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: attachment, dependence, distress, and post-dissolution online surveillance via social networking sites. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Networking. (2015) 18:491–8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Petruccelli F, Diotaiuti P, Verrastro V, Petruccelli I, Federico R, Martinotti G, et al. Affective dependence and aggression: An exploratory study. BioMed Res Int. (2014) 2014:805469. doi: 10.1155/2014/805469

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tong ST. Facebook use during relationship termination: uncertainty reduction and surveillance. Cyberpsychology Behavior Soc Networking. (2013) 16:788–93. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Marshall TC. Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology Behavior Soc Networking. (2012) 15:521–6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Magson N, Freeman J, Rapee R, Richardson C, Oar E, Fardouly J. Risk and protective factors for prospective changes in adolescent mental health during the covid-19 pandemic. J Youth Adolescence. (2020) 50:44–57. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Anasuyari NKY, Latifah M, Yuliati LN. Adolescents’ mental health during the covid-19 pandemic: do loneliness, family, and online friends matter? Humanitas. (2023) 20(1):53–68. doi: 10.26555/humanitas.v20i1.32

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sulistiowati NMD, Keliat BA, Ismail RI, Besral B, Triana IKDL. The effectiveness of mental health nursing promotive and preventive model on protective factors, risk factors and adolescents’ mental health. La Pediatria Med e chirurgica. (2023) 45(s1). doi: 10.4081/pmc.2023.317

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. (2009) 41:1149–60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Feeney BC, Collins NL. A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. (2015) 19:113–47. doi: 10.1177/1088868314544222

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Sica C, Magni C, Ghisi M, Altoè G, Sighinolfi C, Chiri LR, et al. Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI): uno strumento per la misura degli stili di coping. Psicoterapia cognitiva e comportamentale. (2008) 14:27.

Google Scholar

36. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1991) 61:115–21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.115

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Palmieri A, Gasparre A, Lanciano T. Le risposte ruminative: Un contributo alla validazione italiana della Ruminative Response Scale (RRS) di Nolen-Hoeksema e Morrow. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia. (2007) 34:101–12.

Google Scholar

38. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press (2018).

Google Scholar

39. Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical inference. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA, USA: Duxbury Press (2002).

Google Scholar

40. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1986) 51:1173–82. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS. Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (2002) 6(1):2–30. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lyubomirsky S, Tucker KL, Caldwell ND, Berg K. Why ruminators are poor problem solvers: Clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2003) 85:75–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.75

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. McLaughlin KA, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination as a transdiagnostic factor in depression and anxiety. Behav Res Ther. (2011) 49:186–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Keng SL, Smoski MJ, Robins CJ. Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clin Psychol Rev. (2011) 31:1041–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2005) 1:293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.032505.060115

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cogn Ther Res. (2003) 27:247–59. doi: 10.1023/A:1023910315561

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Diotaiuti P, Valente G, Mancone S, Bellizzi F. A mediating model of emotional balance and procrastination on academic performance. Front Psychol (2021) 12:665196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665196

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Diotaiuti P, Girelli L, Mancone S, Valente G, Bellizzi F, Misiti F, et al. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance across gender of the italian version of the tempest self-regulation questionnaire for eating adapted for young adults. Front Psychol (2022) 13:941784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941784

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Holahan CJ, Moos RH, Holahan CK, Brennan PL, Schutte KK. Stress generation, avoidance coping, and depressive symptoms: A 10-year model. J Consult Clin Psychol (2005) 73(4):658–66. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2004) 86:320–33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Van der Watt AS, Roos A, Du Plessis S, Bui E, Lesch E, Seedat S. An attachment theory approach to reframing romantic relationship breakups in university students: A narrative review of attachment, neural circuitry, and posttraumatic stress symptoms. J Couple Relationship Ther. (2022) 21:129–50. doi: 10.1080/15332691.2021.1996531

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Machia LV, Ogolsky BG. The reasons people think about staying and leaving their romantic relationships: A mixed-method analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. (2021) 47:1279–93. doi: 10.1177/0146167220966781

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Brody N, LeFebvre L, Blackburn K. Holding on and letting go: Memory, nostalgia, and effects of virtual possession management practices on post-breakup adjustment. J Soc Pers Relat. (2020) 37:2229–49. doi: 10.1177/0265407520921469

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Akbari M, Kim JJ, Seydavi M, Enright RD, Mohammadkhani S. Neglected side of romantic relationships among college students: Breakup initiators are at risk for depression. Family Relations. (2022) 71:1698–712. doi: 10.1111/fare.12676

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Pancani L, Aureli N, Riva P. Relationship dissolution strategies: Comparing the psychological consequences of ghosting, orbiting, and rejection. Cyberpsychology: J Psychosocial Res Cyberspace. (2022) 16(2):9. doi: 10.5817/CP2022-2-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Slotter EB, Ward DE. Finding the silver lining: The relative roles of redemptive narratives and cognitive reappraisal in individuals’ emotional distress after the end of a romantic relationship. J Soc Pers Relat. (2015) 32:737–56. doi: 10.1177/0265407514546978

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Giunta LD, Esposito G, Lansford JE. COVID-19 impact on parental emotion socialization and youth socioemotional adjustment in Italy. J Res Adolescence. (2021) 31:595–607. doi: 10.1111/jora.12669

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. González MR, Dumka LE, Millsap RE. Alternate approaches to coping in Latinx adolescents from immigrant families. J Adolesc Res. (2020) 37:353–77. doi: 10.1177/0743558420914083

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Washburn-Busk M, Vennum A, McAllister P, Busk P. Navigating “Breakup remorse”: Implications for disrupting the On-Again/Off-Again cycles in young adult dating relationships. J Marital Family Ther. (2020) 46:413–30. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Moller NP, Fouladi RT, McCarthy CJ, Hatch KD. Relationship of attachment and social support to college students' adjustment following a relationship breakup. J Couns Dev. (2003) 81:354–69. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00262.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Tan X, An Y, Chen C. Avoidant coping as mediator of the relationship between rumination and mental health among family caregivers of Chinese breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. (2022) 31:e13523. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13523

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zeifman RJ, Boritz T, Barnhart R, Labrish C, McMain S. The independent roles of mindfulness and distress tolerance in treatment outcomes in dialectical behavior therapy skills training. Pers Disord. (2020) 11:181–90. doi: 10.1037/per0000368

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ma Y, Fang S. Adolescents’ mindfulness and psychological distress: the mediating role of emotion regulation. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Ma Y, She Z, Siu AFY, Zeng X, Liu X. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions on psychological distress and the mediating role of emotion regulation. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:2090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Cozzolino M, Celia G. The psychosocial genomics paradigm of hypnosis and mind–body integrated psychotherapy: Experimental evidence. Am J Clin Hypn. (2021) 64(2):123–38. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2021.1947767

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Melsom L, Ulvenes P, Solbakken OA, Curran PJ, Wampold BE. Emotional clarity and tolerance of emotional distress as mechanisms of change in short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for chronic depression. J Consulting Clin Psychol. (2022) 90:289–302. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000728

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Artiran M, Şimşek Ö.F, Turner MJ. Mediational role of rumination and reflection on irrational beliefs and distress. Behav Cogn Psychother. (2019) 47:659–71. doi: 10.1017/s1352465819000031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Richard J, Rebinsky R, Suresh R, Kubic S, Carter A, Cunningham JE, et al. Scoping review to evaluate the effects of peer support on the mental health of young adults. BMJ Open. (2022) 12:e061336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061336

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Arikewuyo AO, Efe-Özad B, Dambo TH, Abdulbaqi SS, Arikewuyo HO. An examination of how multiple use of social media platforms influence romantic relationships. J Public Affairs. (2020) 21(3):e2240. doi: 10.1002/pa.2240

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Fox J, Anderegg C. Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on facebook. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Networking. (2014) 17:685–91. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Brewer G, Abell L. Machiavellianism and romantic relationship dissolution. Pers Individ Dif. (2017) 106:226–30. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Palacio-González A, Clark DA, O’Sullivan LF. Cognitive processing in the aftermath of relationship dissolution: associations with concurrent and prospective distress and posttraumatic growth. Stress Health. (2016) 33:540–8. doi: 10.1002/smi.2738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: romantic breakup, young adults, rumination, coping strategies, emotional well-being, avoidance coping, resilience, Italian adolescents

Citation: Mancone S, Celia G, Bellizzi F, Zanon A and Diotaiuti P (2025) Emotional and cognitive responses to romantic breakups in adolescents and young adults: the role of rumination and coping mechanisms in life impact. Front. Psychiatry 16:1525913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1525913

Received: 10 November 2024; Accepted: 07 March 2025;
Published: 28 March 2025.

Edited by:

Peng Wu, Hubei University, China

Reviewed by:

Meenakshi Shukla, Allahabad University, India
Wojciech Podsiadłowski, University of Warsaw, Poland

Copyright © 2025 Mancone, Celia, Bellizzi, Zanon and Diotaiuti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Stefania Mancone, cy5tYW5jb25lQHVuaWNhcy5pdA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more