The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Addictive Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1510228
Comparative Effects of Methamphetamine, Cannabis, and Polysubstance Use on Oral Health
Provisionally accepted- 1 Seyfi Demirsoy State Hospital, Buca, İzmir, Türkiye
- 2 Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Democracy University, İzmir, İzmir, Türkiye
- 3 unaffiliated, Izmir, Türkiye
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Health Science Institute, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, Türkiye
This study aimed to compare the clinical oral health status of individuals with Methamphetamine (MA), Cannabis (THC), and Polysubstance (PS) use disorders to healthy controls, and assess the impact of substance type, usage duration, quantity, and oral health behaviors on dental health outcomes through comprehensive oral examinations. This cross-sectional clinical study. was conducted at İzmir Democracy University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Education and Research Hospital between April 2024 and August 2024. A total of 190 individuals with substance use disorders (MA, THC, and PS users) and 91 healthy controls participated. Sociodemographic data, substance use history, and oral health behaviors were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire and the Turkish version of the Hiroshima University Dental Behavior Inventory (HU-DBI). Oral health status was assessed through clinical oral examinations using the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0, applying t-tests, ANOVA, Chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation to evaluate group differences and relationships between variables. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study revealed significant differences in oral health among substance users compared to the control group. MA users had the highest DMFT scores (11.04±5.56), followed by THC users (9.49±5.87), and PS users (8.40±4.52), with the control group showing the lowest scores (6.08±4.18) (p<0.001). The study also found a moderate positive correlation between MA use and DMFT scores, indicating that longer and higher usage leads to poorer oral health, while no significant association was observed between THC use and DMFT scores. Additionally, significant disparities in education levels were observed, with substance users having lower education compared to controls (p=0.001). HU-DBI scores indicated poorer oral health behaviors in substance users, though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.053). The study reveals that all substance use groups, including MA, THC, and PS users, exhibit significantly poorer oral health outcomes, with higher DMFT scores and worse oral health behaviors compared to the control group, highlighting the critical need for comprehensive dental care interventions for individuals with substance use disorders.
Keywords: substance use disorder, Oral health behaviors, DMTF index, Cannabis, Methamphetamine
Received: 12 Oct 2024; Accepted: 09 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kılıç, Kurklu Arpacay, Gezen, Bayram and Baser. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Duygu Kurklu Arpacay, unaffiliated, Izmir, Türkiye
Onur Cagdas Gezen, unaffiliated, Izmir, Türkiye
Zehra Nur Bayram, Department of Psychiatry, Health Science Institute, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, Türkiye
Aysel Baser, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Democracy University, İzmir, 35140, İzmir, Türkiye
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.