Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1505345
This article is part of the Research Topic Advancing Digital Mental Health for Youth View all articles

Understanding stakeholder views of the use of digital therapeutic interventions within children and young people's mental health services

Provisionally accepted
Brioney Gee Brioney Gee 1,2*Tim Clarke Tim Clarke 1,2Jess Garner Jess Garner 3Bonnie Teague Bonnie Teague 1,2Georgianna Coote Georgianna Coote 3Aoife Dunne Aoife Dunne 1Rachel McGuire Rachel McGuire 4Andrew Laphan Andrew Laphan 1Manjul Rathee Manjul Rathee 5Jon Wilson Jon Wilson 1,2
  • 1 Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
  • 2 University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, United Kingdom
  • 3 Health Innovation East, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • 4 Other, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 5 BFB Labs, London, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Providing the growing number of children and young people seeking mental health support with timely access to care poses a significant challenge. Increased use of digital technology in the delivery of children and young people's mental health services has been proposed as a means of increasing access to treatment. Methods: We conducted three inter-related studies to provide multi-perspective insights into the use of digital therapeutic interventions within children and young people's mental health services in the UK. Study 1 used semi-structured interviews and an online survey to collect the views of digital therapeutic interventions of families who self-identified as facing additional barriers to accessing mental health support (n=13). Study 2 involved eight focus groups with children and young people's clinicians, service managers, commissioners, and policy leads (n=28), exploring participants' views and experiences of implementing and sustaining digital therapeutic interventions. Study 3 was a consensus exercise which aimed to identify actions needed to bridge the gap between the development and use of digital therapeutic interventions for children and young people's mental health through focus groups with parents/carers and professionals (n=17), and three Delphi-survey rounds. Results: Our findings revealed considerable enthusiasm for the increased use of digital mental health interventions for children and young people across stakeholder groups, but also identified key barriers to their implementation. Actions perceived to that it was agreed would facilitate more effective implementation included: a) co-producing interventions, commissioning decisions and implementation plans with children and parents/carers, b) enhancing national guidance and local leadership, c) integration of digital offers within existing clinical pathways, and d) efforts to ensure accessibility and inclusivity.

    Keywords: Mental Health, Digital health technologies, digital therapeutics, Children, Young people, implementation

    Received: 02 Oct 2024; Accepted: 14 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Gee, Clarke, Garner, Teague, Coote, Dunne, McGuire, Laphan, Rathee and Wilson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Brioney Gee, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.