Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Psychopathology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490196
This article is part of the Research Topic Translational research advancements utilizing the Iowa Gambling Task in preclinical and clinical studies: 30 years of the IGT View all 3 articles

Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies

Provisionally accepted
Frida A. Lindberg Frida A. Lindberg 1Christakis Kagios Christakis Kagios 2Nikita Tjernström Nikita Tjernström 3Erika Roman Erika Roman 1*
  • 1 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 2 Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 3 Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Decision-making requires individuals to perceive probabilities and risks associated with different options. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a widely used instrument that assesses decision-making under uncertainty and risk by varying monetary reinforcer/loss contingencies. The rat gambling task (rGT), based on the IGT, is a preclinical test using varying number of palatable reinforcers as wins and different duration of timeouts as punishment, mimicking losses. The rGT requires extensive operant training prior to the free choice sessions. The aim of the present study was to investigate if task acquisition and number of training days affected subsequent individual differences in decision-making strategies in the rGT, and if behavioral profiles impacted on task learning.Training time and performance of 70 male Lister Hooded rats from previously published studies were herein used to investigate whether learning time affected later decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Behavioral profiles generated from a subset of animals were used to study the impact of underlying behavior on learning time.Results: There were differences in training days between fast, intermediate and slow learners. However, time required to acquire the rGT did not affect subsequent decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Finally, learning time was independent of underlying behavioral profiles.In conclusion, neither decision-making strategies in the rGT nor behavioral profiles were correlated or differed between animals with different learning speed. This suggests that the large variation in training time between animals is unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies during free choice rGT. Such information is valuable for researchers using the rGT.

    Keywords: behavioral profile, impulsivity, Iowa Gambling Task, Learning speed, Multivariate concentric square field, Personality, risk taking behavioral profile, Risk taking

    Received: 02 Sep 2024; Accepted: 08 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Lindberg, Kagios, Tjernström and Roman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Erika Roman, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 751 24, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.