CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1452206

The effectiveness of online Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) 2.0 Group Protocol (EMDR 2.0 GP) on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders Symptoms, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Individuals Who Have Experienced a Traffic Accident: A Randomized-Controlled Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Gelisim University, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 2Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Ankara, Türkiye
  • 3Independent researcher, İstanbul, Türkiye
  • 4Independent researcher, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
  • 5Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 6Institute for Behavioral Studies, Istanbul, Türkiye

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

EMDR 2.0, an innovative approach rooted in the conventional Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), has garnered attention due to its promising outcomes. The application of EMDR, whether it is EMDR or EMDR 2.0 protocol, in a group format, especially for conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, will provide significant opportunities in terms of economic feasibility and accessibility, ultimately leading to widespread use. Building on the established effectiveness of EMDR 2.0 in individual applications, this study examines its impact in group settings. This protocol is designed to provide a structured framework for implementing EMDR 2.0 within group contexts, paving the way for a nuanced understanding of its potential benefits in collective therapeutic settings. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the online EMDR 2.0 Group Protocol(EMDR 2.0 GP) versus Improving MentalHealth Training for Primary Care Residents(mhGAP) on individuals with a history of traffic accidents in a controlled way. In this randomized-controlled study sample includes volunteers who were involved in traffic accidents and were given the randomized online EMDR 2.0 GP and mhGAP Stress management module. The participants were given a sociodemographic data form, Depression-Anxiety-Stress 21 scale (DASS-21) and Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). Participants were evaluated with measurements before, after and "one month after the application. The mean age of the participants was 34.80(8.10) years and 88.0%(n=22) were female. The change in DASS-21 Anxiety(η²=0.136), Stress(η²=0.140), IES-R Avoidance(η²=0.134), Hyperarousal(η²=0.0148), Total(η²=0.223) scores of online EMDR 2.0 GP was determined to be statistically significant compared to the mhGAP group. However, no statistically significant difference was observed in DASS-21 Depression(η²=0.017), IES-R Intrusion(η²=0.094), scores between the two groups. The RCT of online EMDR 2.0 GP indicated that this newly developed protocol, when applied to groups, may be effective in reducing anxiety, stress, and traumatic symptoms among a non-clinical sample.

Keywords: Anxiety, Depression, EMDR, EMDR 2.0, EMDR 2.0 Group Protocol, online emdr, Online EMDR 2.0, stress

Received: 20 Jun 2024; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yasar, Gündoğmuş, Kubilay, Alban Tunca, Uygun, Zat Çiftçi and Kavakçı. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Alisan Burak Yasar, Gelisim University, Istanbul, Türkiye
İbrahim Gündoğmuş, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, 06170, Ankara, Türkiye

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more