The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1527182
This article is part of the Research Topic World Mental Health Day: Mental Health in the Workplace View all articles
Occupational Violence toward Mental Health Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Study
Provisionally accepted- 1 Direction of Epidmiological and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
- 2 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- 3 National Autonomous University of Mexico, México City, México, Mexico
- 4 Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico
- 5 Columbia College, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States
- 6 American University of Beirut, Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- 7 Mental Health Clinic No. 1, Moscow, Russia
Introduction: According to pre-COVID-19 pandemic studies, occupational violence (OV) toward mental healthcare professionals (MHCPs) is a common phenomenon with important consequences in their own mental health. This study sought to assess the prevalence of different types and sources of OV toward MHCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic, analyze the risk for OV conferred by relevant factors, and compare the emotional distress reported by MHCPs with and without OV. Methods: It is an international cross-sectional Internet-based study completed by 3,325 MHCPs having provided direct clinical services during the COVID-19 pandemic. 13.11% experienced OV. Results: The most frequent type/source of OV was psychological violence inside the workplace (59.6% of those who reported OV). Risk factors for any type/source of OV being younger, working in emergency services, treating COVID-19 patients, and living in a lower to upper middle-income country. Emotional distress was higher in those who had experienced OV. Risk factors for emotional distress among those reporting OV included being younger and having experienced physical violence outside the workplace. Discussion: Approximately one in ten MHCP experienced OV during the COVID-19 pandemic. This figure is consistent with the range of OV against MHCPs reported prior to the pandemic and indicates that efforts are needed to prevent and manage OV and its negative emotional 2 consequences among MHCP, particularly in aforementioned high-risk groups during health emergencies, and addressing both proxy and distal environmental factors related to OV toward MHCPs. * p <.05, ** p <.01, *** p <.001; a 94.4% were psychiatrists (n=1,609); b Categories with over 1% of the sample: Psychology= 1,193 (35.9%), Counseling= 92 (2.8%), Occupational Therapy= 91 (2.7%), Social-Work= 80 (2.4%), Nursing= 63 (1.9%); c Rates per 100,000 population; d Value index could vary from 0 to 100 (with 100 being the strictest).
Keywords: Zagorodnoye shosse, 2, 117152, Moscow, Russian Federation occupational violence1, Distress2, mental health professionals3, Risk Factors4
Received: 13 Nov 2024; Accepted: 19 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Robles, Kogan, Medina Mora, García-Pacheco, Rebello, Khoury, Kulygina and Reed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Rebeca Robles, Direction of Epidmiological and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz (INPRFM), Mexico City, 14370, Mexico City, Mexico
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.