Lijuan Quan
Kun Zhang
Haiyan Chen*- School of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Anhui, Wuhu, China
Objective: To investigate the impact of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction among college students, focusing on the mediating role of attachment and the moderating role of social support.
Methods: A total of 1,404 college students from Wuhu, Anqing, Chaohu, Bengbu, Fuyang, and Wuhan participated in this study. Participants completed a series of self-report questionnaires, including the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short Form (CTQ-SF), the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), and the Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Scale (RRSS). Demographic variables such as grade were collected to control for potential confounding factors. Statistical analyses included correlation analyses, regression models, and moderated mediation analyses using PROCESS Macro.
Results: Childhood trauma negatively predicted romantic relationship satisfaction both directly (β = -0.06, t = -2.11, p < 0.05) and indirectly through attachment (β = -0.07, t = -2.59, p < 0.05). Social support moderated the relationship between childhood trauma and attachment, with the effect of childhood trauma on attachment strengthening as social support increased (low: t = 2.18, p = 0.03; high: t = 4.37, p < 0.001). However, social support did not significantly moderate the direct effect of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction.
Discussion: Attachment mediated the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction, while social support moderated the relationship between childhood trauma and attachment. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on improving attachment styles and strengthening social support to mitigate the negative effects of childhood trauma on romantic relationships.
1 Introduction
Humans, as social beings, have a basic need to engage in social interactions and build interpersonal relationships. Romantic relationships are an important part of individuals’ daily social networks (1). A satisfying romantic relationship can enhance trust and happiness between partners (2). However, when a relationship ends, individuals often experience significant distress (3). Romantic relationship satisfaction refers to an individual’s evaluation of their romantic (or marital) relationship and their subjective satisfaction with positive emotions such as happiness and pleasure (4). Previous research has shown that individuals with high romantic relationship satisfaction tend to have fewer depressive tendencies and experience less impact from negative life events (5, 6). Individuals with higher relationship satisfaction are more likely to maintain a long-term relationship, and this often results in a greater sense of self-worth and efficacy (7). In contrast, low satisfaction in romantic relationships may negatively impact academic performance and quality of life and is associated with an increased risk of depression (8). The age group of 18-25 is crucial for personality development in Erikson’s stages, where the main task is to develop intimacy and avoid loneliness. College students fall within this stage, making romantic relationship satisfaction especially significant for them.
Research has indicated that childhood trauma can have negative effects on individuals’ psychology, physiology, and behavior. Those who have experienced childhood trauma are more likely to evoke negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, and anger (9–11). Studies have also shown that abuse during childhood may have harmful effects on mental health that persist into adulthood (12, 13). Individuals who experienced sexual and/or physical abuse in childhood are twice as likely to develop depression and/or anxiety disorders compared to others (14). Individuals with higher levels of childhood trauma have been found to have reduced grey matter volume in areas like the hippocampus and amygdala, possibly making them more sensitive to the negative emotions of others (15). Numerous studies have shown that emotional abuse is associated with increased risk of psychological distress, such as depression and anxiety symptoms, in adolescents (16), community adults (17), and clinical samples (18). Moreover, individuals who suffer from psychological distress are more likely to experience marital problems (19) and report marital dissatisfaction (20). Childhood emotional abuse (CEM) has also been found to be linked to marital dissatisfaction (21). Various factors might contribute to this association, including expression suppression strategies that affect romantic relationship satisfaction (22). Expression suppression is an emotion regulation strategy centered on suppressing ongoing emotional expressions (23). Gottman and Levenson (24) discovered that couples who display a higher ratio of positive to negative emotional behaviors during conflict interactions tend to have higher marital satisfaction, whereas those who maintain negative emotional states are more likely to face relationship difficulties (25). Therefore, Hypothesis 1 is that childhood trauma is significantly negatively correlated with romantic relationship satisfaction.
Childhood trauma refers to experiences of abuse or neglect during childhood, including emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect (26). Psychological distress resulting from childhood trauma increases the likelihood of experiencing marital problems and reporting marital dissatisfaction. Childhood trauma makes individuals more susceptible to negative emotions such as anxiety, depression, and anger. Studies indicate that maltreatment in childhood has long-term effects on mental health, with an increased risk of psychological distress for victims of emotional abuse in adolescence, adulthood, and clinical samples. Studies have found that adults with childhood trauma histories are more likely to encounter problems in romantic relationships (27, 28). Expression suppression strategies have been shown to mediate the impact of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction (22). Thus, Hypothesis 1: Childhood trauma is significantly negatively correlated with romantic relationship satisfaction.
Attachment refers to the connections formed in childhood. Under conditions of severe childhood adversity, these behavioral patterns may lead to dysfunctional behavior and cause challenges in adult relationships (29). According to Bowlby’s attachment theory, attachment relationships formed with caregivers in early childhood serve as the foundation for an individual’s internal working model, significantly affecting their future life and the underlying model of their marital relationships. This internal working model provides an internalized sense of security, allowing individuals to regulate emotions relatively autonomously and effectively. However, internalized early traumatic experiences can shape insecure attachment patterns and hinder emotional regulation. Past research has shown that childhood trauma negatively impacts parent-child relationships and contributes to insecure attachment styles (29), affecting psychological, physiological, and behavioral development. Trauma experienced during childhood enhances sensitivity in the behavioral activation system, making individuals overly dependent on attachment figures and susceptible to attachment anxiety (30). Collins and Reed (4) extended attachment theory and found that adult attachment styles predict relationship outcomes, particularly communication quality, trust, and overall satisfaction (31). Secure attachment types tend to have more positive feelings about their relationships, better communication, and greater trust, while anxious attachment types are characterized by fears of abandonment, insecurity in relationships, and lower levels of trust and satisfaction. Research conducted by Yun Li et al. (32) also shows that attachment type influences romantic relationship satisfaction, with secure attachment being associated with greater satisfaction. This could be attributed to more positive and proactive communication with partners among securely attached individuals. Therefore, Hypothesis 2: Attachment plays a mediating role in the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction.
Perceived social support is defined as an individual’s belief or expectation that their social network, including peers, family members, and significant others, will provide support when needed (33). Social support is closely linked to an individual’s overall psychological state (34). A strong social support system contributes to more positive emotional experiences and promotes psychological well-being, while a lack of social support from family, peers, and the community can have detrimental effects on mental health. According to Herman’s theory of childhood trauma, individuals with childhood trauma often remain in a state of helplessness and find it challenging to establish trust. These feelings and behaviors may extend into adult relationships, affecting social support levels (35). Despite the association between childhood trauma and reduced social support, strong social support has been suggested as a buffer against the negative effects of childhood trauma (36, 37). The stress-buffering model indicates that victims of maltreatment, including neglect, are more likely to downplay adversities or reevaluate stressors positively if they feel supported by a partner (38). The main effects model suggests that social support positively affects individuals, regardless of stress levels. Previous studies have confirmed that perceived social support positively predicts romantic relationship satisfaction (32). Attachment theory posits that internalized early trauma experiences create insecure attachment patterns, but social support can buffer against these negative effects (39). Therefore, Hypothesis 3: Perceived social support can moderate the impact of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction and also moderate the initial pathway of attachment.
In conclusion, this study aims to explore the relationships between childhood trauma, attachment, perceived social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction among college students, shedding light on the mechanisms through which childhood trauma impacts romantic relationship satisfaction. The hypothetical model is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Moderated model.
2 Methods
2.1 Participants
This study recruited 1,404 college students from six cities in Anhui and Hubei provinces, including Wuhu, Anqing, Chaohu, Bengbu, Fuyang, and Wuhan. Participants were drawn from various universities and academic disciplines, ensuring a diverse and representative sample. The majority were first- and second-year students, with 63.5% identifying as female, 32.1% as male, and 4.5% not reporting gender. Additionally, 66% of participants came from urban areas and 34% from rural areas. The average age was 23.86 years (SD = 1.20). The sample size was determined based on statistical requirements for factor analysis and regression analysis. Following MacCallum et al. (64), we used the guideline of 5–10 participants per item for factor analysis, resulting in a required sample size of 330–660 for 66 items. Additionally, Green’s (65) recommendation of 10–20 times the number of predictors for regression analysis further informed our calculations. The final dataset of 1,404 valid responses far exceeded these requirements, ensuring robust statistical power and reliable results for subsequent analyses.
A stratified random sampling method was employed. Participants were stratified by grade and gender to ensure balanced representation across these categories. Universities were randomly selected from six cities, encompassing a range of geographic and academic diversity. This approach ensured the sample was broadly representative of the target population of college students. Data were collected through an online survey distributed via the Questionnaire Star platform (https://www.wjx.cn/). College counselors shared the survey link in class WeChat and QQ groups, and students accessed the survey using a QR code or hyperlink. Incomplete or invalid responses were excluded, resulting in a final dataset of 1,404 valid responses.
The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Anhui Normal University. All participants provided informed consent and were assured of their right to withdraw at any time. Personal data were anonymized, and all responses were kept strictly confidential, ensuring ethical compliance and privacy protection throughout the research process.
2.2 Measures
2.2.1 Childhood trauma questionnaire - short form
The Chinese version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, originally compiled by Bernstein and revised by domestic scholars (40), was used to measure childhood trauma among college students. This questionnaire includes five subscales (emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect) and contains 28 questions. Responses are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “never” to “always.” Total scores range from mild to severe childhood trauma. In this study, the overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.85.
2.2.2 Adult attachment scale
The Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) was used to assess attachment, consisting of 18 items, divided into three subscales: closeness (6 items), dependence (6 items), and anxiety (6 items). Participants rate items on a five-point Likert scale (1 = “not characteristic of me” to 5 = “very characteristic of me”), with reverse scoring applied to certain items. In this study, the overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.95.
2.2.3 Perceived social support scale
The Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), developed by Blumenthal et al. in 1987 (66) and later revised by Jiang (67), was used to assess perceived social support. This scale includes 12 items measuring support from friends, family, and significant others, with responses rated on a seven-point Likert scale. The higher the total score, the greater the perceived social support. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.97.
2.2.4 Romantic relationship satisfaction scale
The Intimate Relationship Satisfaction Scale, developed by Shen Liang (2005), was used to assess romantic relationship satisfaction. The scale includes seven items rated on a five-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the relationship. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.77.
3 Results
3.1 Common method bias testing
SPSS 25.0 was used for analysis, along with the PROCESS macro developed by Andrew Hayes, to test the model. Harman’s single-factor test identified 11 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, with the first factor explaining 23.31% of the variance, which is well below the 40% threshold (41), indicating no significant common method bias.
3.2 Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis
In this study, there were 891 female participants (66.4%) and 450 male participants (33.6%). The distribution by academic year was as follows: 608 first-year students (43.3%), 726 second-year students (51.7%), 58 third-year students (4.1%), and 12 fourth-year students (0.9%). A total of 886 students (66%) were from urban areas, while 456 students (34%) were from rural areas. Among the participants, 418 (31.1%) were only children, and 928 (68.9%) were non-only children.
The results, as shown in Table 1, indicate that childhood trauma was significantly negatively correlated with romantic relationship satisfaction (r = -0.06, p < 0.05) and significantly positively correlated with attachment (r = 0.09, p < 0.01). Attachment was significantly positively correlated with social support (r = 0.17, p < 0.001) and romantic relationship satisfaction (r = 0.14, p < 0.001). Additionally, social support was significantly positively correlated with romantic relationship satisfaction (r = 0.27, p < 0.001).
Table 1. Statistics and correlation analysis results (N = 1404).
3.3 Gender differences in childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction
To explore gender differences in childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction among college students, independent sample t-tests were conducted. The results are presented in Table 2. The findings revealed significant gender differences in childhood trauma scores (t(1339) = 3.56, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 8.29), with male students scoring significantly higher than female students. Attachment also showed significant gender differences (t(1339) = 2.19, p = 0.029, Cohen’s d = 5.56), with male students reporting significantly higher attachment scores than female students. Social support displayed a significant gender difference (t(1339) = -5.64, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 12.12), with female students scoring significantly higher than male students. Finally, romantic relationship satisfaction showed significant gender differences (t(1339) = 3.14, p = 0.002, Cohen’s d = 5.17), with male students reporting significantly higher satisfaction levels than female students.
Table 2. Test of gender differences.
3.4 Grade-level differences in childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction
To investigate differences in childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction among college students across different grade levels, a one-way ANOVA was conducted. The results are presented in Table 3. The analysis revealed significant differences in childhood trauma levels across grade levels (F(3, 1400) = 3.99, p = 0.008, η² = 0.01). First-year students reported significantly higher childhood trauma scores compared to second-year students. Attachment levels also showed significant differences among grade levels (F(3, 1400) = 9.47, p < 0.001, η² = 0.02), with first-year students scoring significantly higher than second-year students. Social support demonstrated significant grade-level differences (F(3, 1400) = 2.99, p = 0.030, η² = 0.01), with first-year students reporting significantly higher scores compared to second-year students. Romantic relationship satisfaction also differed significantly by grade level (F(3, 1400) = 16.20, p < 0.001, η² = 0.04). First-year students had significantly higher satisfaction levels than second-year students, and third-year students reported significantly higher satisfaction levels than second-year students.
Table 3. Test of grade differences.
3.5 The relationship between college students’ childhood trauma experiences and romantic relationship satisfaction: a moderated mediation model test
To explore the relationships among the main continuous variables, Pearson’s coefficients were used to obtain bivariate correlations. Next, based on the results of the correlation analysis, in order to test the moderated mediation effect, the independent variable (childhood trauma), the mediating variable (attachment), the moderating variable (social support), and the dependent variable (romantic relationship satisfaction) were standardized into Z-scores. To control for potential confounding factors, demographic variables, including gender, age, only-child status, and grade level, were included as covariates in the analysis. Following the steps for testing moderated mediation effects, the PROCESS macro for SPSS, developed by Hayes, was employed. This analysis sequentially tested the roles of social support and attachment in the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction.
The results, as shown in Table 4, indicated that childhood trauma significantly negatively predicted romantic relationship satisfaction (β = -0.06, t = -2.11, p < 0.05). This negative effect persisted even when the mediator (attachment) was included in the model (β = -0.07, t = -2.59, p < 0.05). Childhood trauma significantly predicted attachment (β = 0.09, t = 3.20, p < 0.001), and attachment significantly predicted romantic relationship satisfaction (β = 0.14, t = 5.05, p < 0.001).
Table 4. Test of mediating effect of attachment.
A moderated mediation analysis was conducted using PROCESS Model 8 developed by Hayes. The results, as shown in Table 5, revealed that when social support was included in the model, childhood trauma positively predicted attachment (β = 0.15, t = 4.43, p < 0.001), and social support positively predicted attachment (β = 0.15, t = 5.45, p < 0.001). The interaction term between childhood trauma and social support also significantly predicted attachment (β = 0.09, t = 3.18, p < 0.001). However, social support did not moderate the direct effect of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction.
Table 5. Test of moderated mediation effect.
The results from Table 6 indicate that a suppression effect was observed in the mediation analysis. The direct effect of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction was significant (β = -0.07, 95% CI = [-0.13, -0.02]), while the indirect effect through attachment was also significant (β = 0.01, 95% CI = [0.01, 0.02]). The total effect was estimated at β = -0.06, with the direct effect accounting for 116.67% and the indirect effect contributing 16.67%.
Table 6. Mediation effect analysis.
To further examine whether social support significantly moderated the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction, simple slope analysis was conducted by categorizing social support into high and low groups (one standard deviation above and below the mean, respectively). As shown in Figure 2, when social support was low (one standard deviation below the mean), childhood trauma significantly predicted attachment (simple slope = 0.06, t = 2.18, p = 0.03). Similarly, when social support was high (one standard deviation above the mean), childhood trauma also significantly predicted attachment (simple slope = 0.23, t = 4.37, p < 0.001). These results suggest that the positive predictive effect of childhood trauma on attachment becomes stronger as the level of social support increases.
Figure 2. Moderated mediation.
4 Discussion
This study demonstrates that childhood trauma negatively predicts romantic relationship satisfaction both directly and indirectly through attachment. Social support moderates the relationship between childhood trauma and attachment, but it does not moderate the direct effect of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction. These findings highlight the mediating role of attachment and the moderating role of social support in the context of childhood trauma and romantic relationships.
4.1 The relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction
This study examined the relationships among childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction. After controlling for grade, it was found that childhood trauma negatively predicted romantic relationship satisfaction, which is consistent with previous research. Cohen et al. (42) found that childhood trauma weakens an individual’s ability to establish and maintain intimate relationships with others. Ji et al. (43, 44) indicated that childhood trauma significantly positively predicts fear of intimacy. According to Bowen’s family systems theory, the original family can shape an individual’s perception of intimate relationships, with motivations behind people’s behaviors rooted in interactions and experiences gained within the family during their upbringing (45). Therefore, trauma suffered during childhood, such as physical neglect or emotional neglect, can lead to low levels of self-differentiation, greatly affecting the individual’s behavior in future intimate relationships and increasing the likelihood of problematic intimate relationships. Additionally, social learning theory suggests that behaviors are acquired by observing others, so individuals who have experienced childhood trauma are also likely to treat their partners with violence, neglect, or indifference, thereby damaging the intimacy of the relationship (46, 47).
4.2 The mediating role of attachment
This study also found that attachment partially mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction. Childhood trauma not only directly predicts romantic relationship satisfaction but also indirectly predicts college students’ romantic relationship satisfaction through attachment, which aligns with our hypothesis. According to the internal working model of attachment, the attachment relationship formed between a child and their caregiver in early childhood influences their subsequent life and serves as the fundamental working model in future intimate relationships. Increasing evidence shows that adverse childhood experiences disrupt a child’s sense of security, which is the foundation for the development of the attachment working model (48, 49). Studies have confirmed that attachment is closely related to early experiences, with negative early life experiences linked to the development of insecure attachment (50, 51). Attachment plays a crucial role in intimate relationships—it can be understood as a complex pattern of interpersonal interactions related to security, emotional regulation, coping with stress, and pain. Individuals with secure attachment exhibit more positive psychological behaviors and have higher romantic relationship satisfaction compared to those with insecure attachment (52). Previous studies have also confirmed that attachment directly predicts romantic relationship satisfaction among college students (32, 53).
4.3 The moderating role of social support
This study also found that social support moderates the predictive effect of childhood trauma on attachment, and the positive predictive effect of childhood trauma on attachment strengthens as social support increases. Herman’s childhood trauma theory suggests that individuals with childhood trauma are prone to developing negative self-concepts, which can lead to negative emotions and a state of helplessness, making it difficult for them to establish trust with others. These feelings and behaviors may persist into adulthood, affecting social support levels. Close social relationships and secure attachment are believed to have stress-relieving functions, providing a sense of safety and promoting psychological well-being (54, 55). Conversely, insecure attachment may lead to poorer psychological well-being. Although childhood trauma is related to lower social support, good social support is a mechanism that can buffer the negative effects of childhood trauma. Studies have shown that social support can offset the harmful consequences of abuse (56). For example, studies on school-age children and adolescents have found that abused individuals with high social support are less likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety (57) or engage in risky or violent behaviors (58–60). Good social support plays an intervening role in mitigating the negative effects of early life stress, brings positive psychological factors, and may reduce the occurrence of early life stress (61, 62). It is noteworthy that the results of this study indicate that social support does not significantly moderate the direct relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction, possibly because social support alone may not be sufficient to overcome the harmful effects of abuse (63).
4.4 Implications and limitations
This study provides valuable insights into the relationships between childhood trauma, attachment, social support, and romantic relationship satisfaction, offering new perspectives for both theoretical understanding and practical applications. It reveals that childhood trauma negatively predicts romantic relationship satisfaction both directly and indirectly through attachment. Moreover, social support moderates the relationship between childhood trauma and attachment, though it does not directly moderate the influence of childhood trauma on romantic relationship satisfaction. These findings contribute to our theoretical understanding of how early trauma impacts romantic relationships in adulthood.
Beyond its theoretical contributions, the findings have important practical implications for supporting university students. Emotional distress stemming from childhood trauma and toxic relationships can affect not only students’ personal lives but also their academic performance and social relationships. Students with unresolved emotional issues or insecure attachment may face challenges with concentration, motivation, and time management, which could hinder academic achievement. Furthermore, difficulties in romantic relationships may spill over into broader social contexts, negatively impacting peer interactions and participation in group activities.
University counselors and mental health services are uniquely equipped to address these challenges by offering targeted support programs. Counselors can assist students in recognizing the signs of unhealthy relationships and developing effective strategies to manage emotional difficulties. Interventions such as emotional education, establishing emotional boundaries, and preventive programs could help mitigate the psychological impact of trauma and promote mental well-being. Additionally, incorporating social support initiatives into counseling services could strengthen students’ resilience, enhancing both their academic performance and social experiences.
While this study provides significant theoretical and empirical insights, it has certain limitations. First, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causal relationships between the variables. Although significant correlations were observed among childhood trauma, attachment, and romantic relationship satisfaction, the causal direction remains uncertain. Future research could benefit from employing longitudinal designs to better understand the temporal dynamics and causal pathways of these relationships.
Second, this study primarily focused on the overall dimensions of each questionnaire. The attachment questionnaire used in this research includes three distinct dimensions: secure, anxious, and avoidant attachment. Prior studies indicate that individuals with different attachment styles exhibit varying behaviors and emotional responses in intimate relationships. Therefore, future research could delve into the specific roles of these attachment dimensions in shaping romantic relationship satisfaction and related psychological outcomes.
Additionally, the study did not address the trajectory of unsatisfactory relationships, particularly how they might progress to consensual breakups or escalate into violent or aggressive separations. This is a critical area for understanding the influence of early trauma on romantic dissatisfaction. Relationship satisfaction often declines in a nonlinear manner, marked by conflicts, emotional dysregulation, and communication breakdowns, which may be exacerbated by early trauma. Understanding these hidden dynamics is essential for uncovering how relationship dissatisfaction evolves and intensifies.
Future research should investigate how childhood trauma, particularly in both men and women, impacts romantic relationship satisfaction and may lead to more severe outcomes such as violent breakups. Areas of focus could include emotional regulation, attachment patterns, and conflict resolution strategies as mediators that exacerbate relational dissatisfaction. These insights could inform interventions designed to address relationship distress stemming from trauma and foster healthier relational dynamics.
Furthermore, future studies should aim to refine the concepts of “unsatisfactory relationship” and “satisfactory relationship” to better capture their dynamic complexities. This includes exploring underlying factors such as conflict, emotional dysregulation, and aggression, which may contribute to satisfaction or dissatisfaction levels. A more nuanced understanding of these terms could help uncover the intricate realities within romantic relationships, providing a stronger foundation for targeted interventions and support programs.
5 Conclusion
(1) Childhood trauma in college students is significantly positively correlated with attachment and significantly negatively correlated with romantic relationship satisfaction. Attachment is significantly positively correlated with both social support and romantic relationship satisfaction, and social support is significantly positively correlated with attachment and romantic relationship satisfaction.
(2) Childhood trauma affects romantic relationship satisfaction through the indirect effect of attachment.
(3) Social support can moderate the relationship between childhood trauma and attachment. The higher the level of social support, the stronger the predictive effect of childhood trauma on attachment.
(4) Future research should investigate how childhood trauma impacts romantic relationship satisfaction and its potential to result in severe outcomes, such as violent breakups. These insights could lay the groundwork for interventions targeting relationship distress, fostering healthier relational dynamics. Additionally, future interventions should consider the broader effects of toxic relationships, addressing not only emotional well-being but also academic performance and social interactions, to promote more positive outcomes for university students.
Data availability statement
Requests to access these datasets should be directed to bGlqdWFucUBhaG51LmVkdS5jbg==.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Normal University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Participants provided written informed consent for participation in this study.
Author contributions
LQ: Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KZ: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. HC: Data curation, Supervision, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Anhui Office of Philosophy and Social Science (Grant No. AHSKY2020D119).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1519699/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Zhan S, Shrestha S, Zhong N. Romantic relationship satisfaction and phubbing: The role of loneliness and empathy. Front Psychol. (2022) 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967339
2. Robles TF, Slatcher RB, Trombello JM, McGinn MM. Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. psychol Bull. (2014) 140:140. doi: 10.1037/a0031859
3. Tashiro T, Frazier P. I’ll never be in a relationship like that again”: Personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Pers Relat. (2003) 10:113–28. doi: 10.1111/pere.2003.10.issue-1
4. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1990) 58:644. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
5. Cairo Notari S, Notari L, Favez N, Delaloye JF, Ghisletta P. The protective effect of a satisfying romantic relationship on women’s body image after breast cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-oncology. (2017) 26:836–42. doi: 10.1002/pon.v26.6
6. Rohmann E, Führer A, Bierhoff HW. Relationship satisfaction across European cultures: The role of love styles. Cross-Cultural Res. (2016) 50:178–211. doi: 10.1177/1069397116630950
7. Weiser DA, Weigel DJ. Self-efficacy in romantic relationships: direct and indirect effects on relationship maintenance and satisfaction. Pers Individ Dif. (2016) 89:152–6.
8. Wang X, Xie X, Wang Y, Wang P, Lei L. Partner phubbing and depression among married chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Pers Individ Dif (2017) 110:12–7.
9. Gardner MJ, Thomas HJ, Erskine H, DePrince AP. The association between five forms of child maltreatment and depressive and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Child Abuse Negl. (2019) 96:104082. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104082
10. Huang YL, Fonagy P, Feigenbaum J, Montague PR, Nolte T, London. Multidirectional pathways between attachment, mentalizing, and posttraumatic stress symptomatology in the context of childhood trauma. Psychopathology (2020) 53:1:48–58.
11. Rachel Y, Halligan SL, Grossman R. Childhood trauma and risk for PTSD: Relationship to intergenerational effects of trauma, parental PTSD, and cortisol excretion. Stress and the brain, Routledge (2013). p. 177–97.
12. Mc Laughlin K, Green J, Gruber M, Sampson N, Zaslavsky A, Kessler R. Childhood adversities and first onset of psychiatric disorders in a national sample of adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2012) 69 :1151–60. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2277
13. McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Hill ED, Petukhova M, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in a national sample of adolescents. J.Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. (2013) 52 :815–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.05.011
14. Gardner MJ, Thomas HJ, Erskine HE. The association between five forms of child maltreatment and depressive and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse Negl. (2019) 96:104082. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104082
15. Mao Y. The impact of childhood trauma on depressive symptoms and its neural mechanisms. China: Southwest University (2021).
16. Paul E, Eckenrode J. Childhood psychological maltreatment subtypes and adolescent depressive symptoms. Child Abuse Negl. (2015) 47:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.018
17. Dias A, Sales L, Hessen DJ, Kleber RJ. Child maltreatment and psychological symptoms in a Portuguese adult community sample: the harmful effects of emotional abuse. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. (2015) 24:767–78. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0621-0
18. Huh HJ, Kim KH, Lee H-K, Chae J-H. The relationship between childhood trauma and the severity of adulthood depression and anxiety symptoms in a clinical sample: The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies. J Affect Disord. (2017) 213:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.009
19. Renshaw KD, Rodebaugh TL, Rodrigues CS. Psychological and marital distress in spouses of Vietnam veterans: Importance of spouses’ perceptions. J Anxiety Disord. (2010) 24:743–50. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.007
20. Frye-Cox NE, Hesse CR. Alexithymia and marital quality: The mediating roles of loneliness and intimate communication. J Family Psychol. (2013) 27:203. doi: 10.1037/a0031961
21. DiLillo D, Peugh J, Walsh K, Panuzio J, Trask E, Evans S. Child maltreatment history among newlywed couples: a longitudinal study of marital outcomes and mediating pathways. J Consulting Clin Psychol. (2009) 77:680. doi: 10.1037/a0015708
22. Dan Y. The impact of childhood trauma on satisfaction in intimate relationships: Moderated mediation effect. Sichuan Normal University (2022). doi: 10.27347/d.cnki.gssdu.2022.000661
23. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2003) 85:348. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
24. Gottman JM, Levenson RW. Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1992) 63:221. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.221
25. Greene SM, Anderson ER. Observed negativity in large family systems: Incidents and reactions. J Family Psychol. (1999) 13:372. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.13.3.372
26. Larkin W, Read J. Childhood trauma and psychosis: Evidence, pathways, and implications. J Postgraduate Med. (2008) 54:287. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.41437
27. Dilillo D, Lewis T, Loreto-Colgan AD. Child maltreatment history and subsequent romantic relationships. J Aggression Maltreatment Trauma. (2007) 15:19–36. doi: 10.1300/J146v15n01_02
28. Riggs SA. Childhood emotional abuse and the attachment system across the life cycle: what theory and research tell us. J Aggression Maltreatment Trauma. (2010) 19:5–51. doi: 10.1080/10926770903475968
29. Raby KL, Labella MH, Martin J, Carlson EA, Roisman GI. Childhood abuse and neglect and insecure attachment states of mind in adulthood: Prospective, longitudinal evidence from a high-risk sample. Dev Psychopathol. (2017) 29:347–63. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000037
30. Huh HJ, Jeong BR, Hwang JH, Chae JH. High behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system sensitivity, childhood emotional neglect and their interaction as possible related factors for adult attachment style in depression. Psychiatry Invest (2020) 17:2.
31. Wallace JL, Vaux A. Social support network orientation: The role of adult attachment style. J Soc Clin Psychol. (1993) 12:354–65. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1993.12.3.354
32. Li Y, Zhang J, Hu Z, Zhou S. The effect of adult attachment on relationship satisfaction among college students: The mediating role of perceived social support and self-esteem. psychol Res. (2019) 12:570–6.
33. Barrera M. Models of social support and life stress: beyond the buffering hypothesis. Life events psychol functioning: Theor methodological Issues. (1988), 211–36.
34. Liu X, Huang X. Social support and its mechanisms of impact on mental health. psychol Res. (2010) 1):7.
35. Angelakis I, Gooding P. Associations of anxiety and depression with suicide experiences in individuals with and without childhood trauma: The role of social support. Psychiatry Res. (2022) 309:114424. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114424
36. Appleyard K, Yang C, Runyan DK. Delineating the maladaptive pathways of child maltreatment: A mediated moderation analysis of the roles of self–perception and social support. Dev. Psychopathol. (2010) 22:337–52. doi: 10.1017/S095457941000009X
37. Gayer-Anderson C, Fisher HL, Fearon P, Hutchinson G, Morgan K, Dazzan P, et al. Gender differences in the association between childhood physical and sexual abuse, social support and psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2015) 50:1489–500. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1058-6
38. Herta F, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Beate D, Heinrichs M. Psychobiology of social support: The social dimension of stress buffering. Restorative Neurol Neurosci. (2014) 1):149–62. doi: 10.3233/RNN-139008
39. Hinde RA. John bowlby, attachment and loss. I. Attachment. In: (1969), 63s. Animal behaviour. Hogarth Press, London (1969). p. (4).
40. Wen-Qing F, Yao S-Q. Initial reliability and validity of childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ-SF) applied in chinese college students. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2005) 01:40–2.
41. Zhou H, Long L. Statistical test and control methods for common method bias. Adv Psychol Sci. (2004) 12:942–2.
42. Cohen E, Dekel R, Solomon Z, Lavie T. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and fear of intimacy among treated and non-treated survivors who were children during the holocaust. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. (2003) 38:611–7. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0681-9
43. Ji Y, Liu X, Ma Y, Shao S. The relationship between fear of intimacy and childhood abuse among college students. Chin J Ment Health. (2014) 28:4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2014.02.007
44. Ji Y, Zhao B, Ma Y. The mediating role of inferiority in the relationship between fear of intimacy and childhood trauma among college students. Chin J Ment Health. (2015) 06):457–62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2015.06.011
45. Kerr ME, Bowen M. Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York (Norton). (1988).
46. Xu X, Hu Z. Psychosocial mediators between childhood trauma and adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: A review. Chin J Ment Health. (2022) 12):1079–83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2022.12.016
47. Yilamujiang A, Xu Z, Huang J, Zhou X. The relationship between childhood trauma experiences and complex post-traumatic stress symptoms among college students: The role of interpersonal trust and rumination. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2023) 01):235–40. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2023.01.045
48. Miller G, Brody E, Gene H, Chen E. Childhood close family relationships and health. Am Psychol. (2017) 72:555–66. doi: 10.1037/amp0000067
49. Yumbul C, Cavusoglu S, Geyimci B. The effect of childhood trauma on adult attachment styles, infidelity tendency, romantic jealousy and self-esteem. Proc - Soc Behav Sciences 5. (2010), 1741–5. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.357
50. Szepsenwol O, Simpson JA. Attachment within life history theory: an evolutionary perspective on individual differences in attachment. Curr Opin Psychol. (2018) 25:65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.005
51. Hu Y, Hu Y. An exploration of the entry points for psychological intervention of left-behind children: Implications of attachment theory for the education of left-behind children. Educ Teach Forum. (2012) 29):131–3.
52. He H. A study on the relationship between adult and childhood attachment types and marital quality. China: Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2007).
53. Li L, He T, Gao M. The effect of doll play therapy on adult attachment and self-differentiation in college students with childhood trauma experiences. Chin J Clin Psychol. (2022) 01):187–90. doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2022.01.038
54. Ein–Dor T, Mikulincer M, Doron G, Shaver P. The attachment paradox: How can so many of us (the insecure ones) have no adaptive advantages? Perspectives on Psychological Science. A J Assoc Psychol Sci. (2010) 5:123–41. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362349
55. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Bar–On N, Ein–Dor T. The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2010) 98:450–68. doi: 10.1037/a0017366
56. Egeland B, Jacobvitz D, Sroufe LA. Breaking the cycle of abuse. Child Dev. (1988) 59:1080–8. doi: 10.2307/1130274
57. Ezzell CE, Swenson CC, Brondino MJ. The relationship of social support to physically abused children’s adjustment. Child Abuse Negl. (2000) 24:641–51. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00123-X
58. Maschi T. Trauma and violent delinquent behavior among males: The moderating role of social support. Stress Trauma Crisis. (2006) 9:45–72. doi: 10.1080/15434610500506233
59. Taussig HN. Risk behaviors in maltreated youth placed in foster care: A longitudinal study of protective and vulnerability factors. Child Abuse Negl. (2002) 26:1179–99. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00391-5
60. Liu W, Wan Y, Tao F, Hao J. The mediating role of social support in the relationship between childhood abuse and non-suicidal self-injury behavior in adolescents. Chin Ment Health J. (2017) 03):230–4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2017.03.010
61. Negriff S, Cederbaum JA, Lee DS. Does social support mediate the association between maltreatment experiences and depressive symptoms in adolescence. Child Maltreat. (2019) 24:203–12. doi: 10.1177/1077559518814680
62. Negriff S, James A, Trickett PK. Characteristics of the social support networks of maltreated youth: Exploring the effects of maltreatment experience and foster placement. Soc Dev. (2015) 24:483–500. doi: 10.1111/sode.2015.24.issue-3
63. Thompson RA, Goodvin R. Social support and developmental psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, editor. Developmental psychopathology: Volume three: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (2015), 1–37.
64. MacCallum R. C., Widaman K. F., Zhang S., Hong S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 4(1), 84–99.
65. Green B. S. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivar Behav Res. 26(3), 499–510.
66. Blumenthal J. A., Burg M. M., Barefoot J., Williams R. B., Haney T., Zimet, G. (1987). Social support, Type A behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med. 49(4), 331–40.
Keywords: childhood trauma, romantic relationship satisfaction, attachment, social support, college students
Citation: Quan L, Zhang K and Chen H (2025) The relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction: the role of attachment and social support. Front. Psychiatry 15:1519699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1519699
Received: 30 October 2024; Accepted: 10 December 2024;
Published: 22 January 2025.
Edited by:
Soumitra Das, Western Health, AustraliaReviewed by:
Massimo Casacchia, University of L’Aquila, ItalyBarikar C Malathesh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, India
Copyright © 2025 Quan, Zhang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lijuan Quan, bGlqdWFucUBhaG51LmVkdS5jbg==; Haiyan Chen, aHljaGVuQGFobnUuZWR1LmNu