The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Psychological Therapy and Psychosomatics
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1510738
Fatigue in living kidney donors compared to a German general population sample: An exploratory study
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 2 University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 3 Clinic for Nephrology and Rheumatology, Göttingen, Germany
- 4 Clinic for Kidney and Hypertension Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 5 Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 6 The Clinic for Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine,, Hannover, Germany
Background. Clinical studies have not conclusively clarified whether fatigue scores in living kidney donors after donation are fundamentally different from general population samples. Moreover, the association between sociodemographic and donor specific factors and fatigue in donors is not well understood. To address these gaps, comprehensive subgroup comparisons are necessary to examine disparities in post-donation fatigue between donors and the general population, as well as to identify donors at risk of higher fatigue.Patients and Methods. Fatigue scores of 358 living kidney donors on average 7.67 years postdonation were compared with 1896 subjects from the German general population in five strata of age and sex. Fatigue was measured with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory . Relationships between the five MFI-20 subscales and the sociodemographic variables sex, age, education, and in the donor sample also years since donation were calculated. Additionally, the association between donor specific variables and fatigue levels were analyzed.Results. Overall, donors had lower fatigue scores than the population sample. Particularly the age group 65-74 and above reported significantly lower fatigue scores. A significant exception was found in women aged 45-54 years, where donors showed significant higher general fatigue scores than the corresponding subgroup of the general population sample. Multiple regression analyses in the general population sample revealed associations between female sex and higher age with higher values in most MFI-20 subscales, whereas subjects with higher education showed mostly lower fatigue scores. In the donor group, these associations were of little importance. Also, years since donation, partnership, and recipient group were not strongly related to fatigue. However, higher fatigue in donors was associated with more donation regret, a more negative relationship with the recipient, a more negatively perceived recipient health, less perceived family support, and more financial burden.Fatigue is less prevalent particularly in older donors and predictors of fatigue presented in the general population sample seem to have little importance in the donors. However, middle-aged female donors might be more prone to develop fatigue. This group may require more intense exploration before and after donation to detect and treat the underlying factors timely.
Keywords: Living kidney donation, Fatigue, MFI-20, Sex, age, Education, General population sample
Received: 13 Oct 2024; Accepted: 31 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Akkus, Westenberger, Einecke, Gwinner, Tegtbur, Nöhre and De Zwaan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Dilek Akkus, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, 30625, Lower Saxony, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.